11.11.2014 Views

Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government

Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government

Yap Summit Community Sector - Yap State Government

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2012<br />

YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Second Economic and<br />

Social <strong>Summit</strong><br />

YAP STATE<br />

[INFORMAL & TRADITIONAL<br />

SECTOR]<br />

This Dossier provides data and inputs for reflection on the working topics assigned to the Informal &<br />

Traditional <strong>Sector</strong> Standing Committee of the Second Economic and Social <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Summit</strong>.<br />

1 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

CONTENTS<br />

CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2<br />

Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................. 3<br />

INTRODUCTION TO THE STANDING COMMITTEES ........................................................................................................ 4<br />

METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................. 5<br />

INFORMAL & TRADITIONAL SECTOR: Topics & Goals -suggested - ............................................................................... 6<br />

Strategic Development Plan (2004-2023) ................................................................................................................. 6<br />

SUBSISTENCE ACTIVITIES & PRIVATE SECTOR ........................................................................................................... 7<br />

Point of Reflection ................................................................................................................................................ 7<br />

Inputs on Private <strong>Sector</strong> ........................................................................................................................................ 7<br />

Inputs on Agriculture and Fisheries .................................................................................................................... 26<br />

CONSUMERS’ CHOICES ............................................................................................................................................ 43<br />

Input .................................................................................................................................................................... 43<br />

WELFARE & ENVIRONMENT .................................................................................................................................... 45<br />

Inputs .................................................................................................................................................................. 45<br />

2 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Table of Figures<br />

Figure 1. Economic Triopod ........................................................................................................................................... 4<br />

Figure 2 Private <strong>Sector</strong> & MDG 1 ................................................................................................................................. 10<br />

Figure 3 Labor Force 2010 & Private <strong>Sector</strong> ................................................................................................................ 11<br />

Figure 4 Labor Force 2010 & Gender & Private <strong>Sector</strong> ................................................................................................ 13<br />

Figure 5 Employment by Industry & Private <strong>Sector</strong>..................................................................................................... 14<br />

Figure 6 Employment by Industry & Gender & Private <strong>Sector</strong> .................................................................................... 17<br />

Figure 7 Class of Workers & Private <strong>Sector</strong> ................................................................................................................. 18<br />

Figure 8 Class of Workers & Gender & Private <strong>Sector</strong> ................................................................................................. 20<br />

Figure 9 <strong>Yap</strong>-NES Priority Policy & Projects Matrix ..................................................................................................... 26<br />

Figure 10 Extent of Agriculture Activities FY95-FY10 .................................................................................................. 29<br />

Figure 11 Employment by Industry & Agriculture ....................................................................................................... 30<br />

Figure 12 Crop Production ........................................................................................................................................... 32<br />

Figure 14 Break down of Fish Consumption and Sales ................................................................................................ 38<br />

Figure 13 Extent of Fisheries Activities FY95-FY10 ...................................................................................................... 38<br />

Figure 15 Employment by Industry & Fisheries ........................................................................................................... 39<br />

Figure 16 Marine Harvesting & Fisheries ..................................................................................................................... 41<br />

Figure 17 Imports of Food FY2000-FY2010 .................................................................................................................. 43<br />

Figure 18 The Role of Consumers Choices in the Economy ......................................................................................... 44<br />

Figure 19 Environment & MDG 7 ................................................................................................................................ 51<br />

Figure 20 Population 2010 ........................................................................................................................................... 53<br />

Figure 21 Population Growth Rate 1980-2010 ............................................................................................................ 54<br />

Figure 22 Unemployment Rate 2010 ........................................................................................................................... 54<br />

Figure 23 Gender & MDG 3 ......................................................................................................................................... 60<br />

Figure 24 Disability by Age & Gender # 9 .................................................................................................................... 65<br />

3 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

INTRODUCTION TO THE STANDING COMMITTEES<br />

The economy of the <strong>State</strong> of <strong>Yap</strong> can be looked at from the tripod of three main areas that influence the macro<br />

economy, and that are fed by the activities developed in the productive sectors of the economy such as<br />

agriculture, fisheries, tourism, etc. The three core areas referred to are Public <strong>Sector</strong>, Private <strong>Sector</strong>, and Informal<br />

and Traditional Economy.<br />

Figure 1. Economic Triopod<br />

Hence three Standing Committees were created: Public <strong>Sector</strong>, Private <strong>Sector</strong>, and Informal & Traditional<br />

Economy.<br />

The three Committees will be working both separately and interacting with each other according to the topic<br />

under discussion.<br />

4 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

The Standing Committees will articulate their work on each assigned topic as follows.<br />

a. Mapping the problem<br />

1. The Problem affects <strong>Yap</strong> from having different angles:<br />

• Local<br />

• Regional<br />

• Global<br />

2. Are the initial problems identified the most critical to be addressed? Not surface<br />

problem, but underlying causes.<br />

3. Determine the relationship between different contributing factors to focus on the Local<br />

level.<br />

b. Clarifying Expectations<br />

1. WHAT parts of the problem can be controlled/affected at Local level: What can <strong>Yap</strong> do?<br />

2. WHO can act on the problem at <strong>State</strong> Level? WHO are the ACTORS?<br />

c. Results Setting<br />

1. WHAT are achievable goals under the full control of the <strong>State</strong>? Determining short, mid<br />

and long term interventions that may be necessary for a sustainable solution.`<br />

2. HOW budget and human resources influence the process? How can Budget, Human<br />

Resources and the projects’ implementation be monitored? [CAPACITY]<br />

d. Recommendations Draft<br />

1. Defining WHO/which Departments/Organizations should consider this issue in their<br />

planning and monitoring. Identifying the partnership that may be necessary to<br />

effectively address the problem.<br />

2. Defining WHAT are the goals.<br />

3. Defining HOW budget and human resources should be planned to overcome the<br />

problem. Identifying resources and sources that may be required to deal with the<br />

problem. Addressing the roles that different stakeholders may need to play in solving<br />

the problem.<br />

4. Defining HOW can they be monitored.<br />

5 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

INFORMAL & TRADITIONAL SECTOR: Topics & Goals -suggested -<br />

Topics: Subsistence Activities & Private <strong>Sector</strong>; Consumers’ Choices; Welfare & Environment.<br />

Goals: Linking subsistence activities and private sector, and bringing traditional activities into the formal economy;<br />

Strengthening the informal economy addressing people’s consumption habits towards local products; Developing<br />

recommendations for traditional and alternative welfare and environment solutions.<br />

Strategic Development Plan (2004-2023)<br />

The policy document that currently addresses the <strong>Yap</strong>ese social, economic and environmental strategy is the<br />

Strategic Development Plan (SDP) 2004-2023. The plan was drafted at the national level in 2003 and it has not<br />

been tailored so far to the specific <strong>Yap</strong>ese reality. The SDP defines four main development objectives. The first<br />

stresses the importance of achieving “Stability and Security” to maintain macroeconomic stability.<br />

Macroeconomic stability is indispensable given the progressively increasing cuts in the Compact funding towards<br />

the end of the Compact itself. The second objective advocates for the creation of an “Improved Enabling<br />

Environment for Economic Growth” where through institutional capacity an environment able to support “open,<br />

outward-oriented and private sector led development” should be created. The third objective aims at supporting<br />

an “Improved Education and Health Status”, providing basic Health and Education services. Finally, the fourth<br />

objective focuses on creating “Assured Self-Reliance and Sustainability” through the establishment of a trust fund<br />

aiming at replacing in the long term the annually appropriated transfers from the U.S..<br />

These four objectives shape the framework within which the different sectors of the <strong>Yap</strong>ese Social and Economic<br />

system are planned. The sectors as defined in the SDP are framed by sub-Goals inspired by the four main<br />

objectives described.<br />

The SDP does not directly include activities related to the Energy <strong>Sector</strong>, as well as initiatives undertaken by Public<br />

Works & Transportation (PW&T). However, the Energy Policy to be adopted at the nation level in the upcoming<br />

future and the logic under which PW&T operates explicitly respond to the needs expressed by the four main SDP<br />

objectives. PW&T and YSPSC should be highly involved in relation to the SDP Goals related to Environment and<br />

Public <strong>Sector</strong> Management.<br />

6 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

SUBSISTENCE ACTIVITIES & PRIVATE SECTOR<br />

Enhancing the Positive Impact Subsistence Activities<br />

Subsistence activities are the reason why from Compact I to Compact II, despite the great extent of the cuts in<br />

financial aid, the <strong>State</strong> did not undergo a major recession.<br />

→ The Committee will explore the potential of traditional and subsistence activities, and how to link it to<br />

private and public sector, revitalizing its role as “comparative advantage” of the <strong>State</strong>. The Committee will<br />

also discuss how to address the impact of climate change on local practices.<br />

Point of Reflection<br />

• Gender, Small Business and Collateral<br />

o<br />

Women are more than 50% of Market Oriented Home Production<br />

Inputs on Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

SDP Private <strong>Sector</strong> Goals<br />

Departments Interviewed: YCC (all), PW&T (all)<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong> # 1: Create a sound economic policy making environment, in full consultation with the private<br />

sector, to support export-oriented, private sector-led growth.<br />

policy making environment, in full consultation with the private sector: achieved;<br />

support export-oriented: strong impediments;<br />

private sector led growth: no elements to value it.<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There is the perception that a policy making environment in full consultation with the private sector<br />

exists. The <strong>Yap</strong> Chamber of Commerce (YCC) well represents the existing link between the two sectors.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• In order to target the private sector properly, first of all a definition of what private sector comprehends<br />

should be given. Agriculture fisheries, tourism can and should all follow under the definition of private<br />

sector. In fact, in the case of <strong>Yap</strong> purchasing chains are almost absent as the producer and the seller very<br />

often coincide. Therefore framing private sector as retailing does not apply.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• A definition of the very peculiar characteristics that the private sector may have in <strong>Yap</strong> should be given to<br />

avoid pursuing Goals set for other private sector realities. As mentioned in the critical aspects towards the<br />

7 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

achievement of the Goal, the almost complete absence of purchasing chains in the local market should be<br />

taken into account preventing the setting of unrealistic targets and Goals.<br />

• For the private sector highlighting links between sectors is particularly important in terms both of<br />

comparative advantages and multiplier effects.<br />

• The domains within the private sector that have been identified as having more economic potential are<br />

the followings: tourism, fisheries, and the IT sector. Export oriented activities have been considered a<br />

realistic solution only applied to fisheries (25% of the world's tuna resources are located within the FSM<br />

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ, and <strong>Yap</strong> has the main water extension in the FSM). IT initiatives have the<br />

advantage of overcoming logistics and transportation costs that are the first impediment for<br />

internationally traded economic activities in <strong>Yap</strong>. However, further research should be undertaken in<br />

terms of costs and logistic aspects related to the continuous upgrades in IT technology in relation to costs<br />

of transportation and second hand markets to absorb outdate IT resources.<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong> # 2: Improve the competitiveness of the factors of production to promote private sector<br />

development.<br />

strong impediments<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Land tenure is perceived as the major impediment to the development of private sector<br />

entrepreneurship. The impediment has been identified as affecting mainly women entrepreneurship as<br />

they cannot use land as collateral not having direct ownership rights.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• A strong emphasis has been placed on the potential of an IT sector development on island.<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong> # 3: Improve the environment for FDI and expand entrepreneurial and business development<br />

support services.<br />

strong impediments<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Lack of local skills is perceived as an impediment to the attraction of FDI. This may lead to the import of<br />

foreign workers in relation to FDI, jeopardizing the potential benefits of FDI in <strong>Yap</strong>, as local employment<br />

trends and the economy won’t fully benefit from foreign investments.<br />

• Lack of local skills has been associated with the rate of failures of <strong>Yap</strong>ese students under scholarship.<br />

[Secretariat Note: The actual causes of failure of <strong>Yap</strong>ese students should be further explored, and other<br />

sources of capacity building should be object of additional research. E.g. voluntarism as knowledge<br />

8 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

sharing and capacity building, foreign workers obligations to train local personnel to be effectively<br />

monitored, motivational workshops to promote a client oriented culture for the tourism industry, etc.]<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• No specific recommendations were suggested. [Secretariat Note: Geopolitical inputs, potential,<br />

implications and risks of FDIs attraction should be further explored.]<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong> # 4: Reduce the direct role of the <strong>Government</strong> in the economy.<br />

not understood<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Although there are pilot projects that tried to transfer the management of activities into the hands of<br />

private actors, these initiatives never moved to the next level ensuring private sector autonomy and a<br />

leading role in the economy.<br />

• The critical aspects related to enhancing the role of the private sector in the economy are seen as linked<br />

to the lack of skills and local capacity (Private <strong>Sector</strong> Goal #3).<br />

• Historically the <strong>Government</strong> is perceived as having more authority than the private sector. This affects<br />

both entrepreneurial projects, the ability/trust to tackle potential difficulties encountered in running<br />

private business or applying for SMEs funding.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The concept of Public-Private partnerships should be further explored, and it is perceived as the “way<br />

out” a dependency of the <strong>Yap</strong>ese economy on the Public <strong>Sector</strong>.<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong> # 5: Provide efficient and cost-effective economic infrastructure to support competitive private<br />

sector development.<br />

being achieved<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Education, telecommunication and transportation infrastructures are perceived as gradually improving.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Good management has been identified as the main critical obstacle to a cost-effective economic<br />

infrastructure development.<br />

9 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• No specific recommendations were made. [Secretariat Note: It is highly recommended to undergo further<br />

research to identify the nodes that impede a cost effective use of local resources, grants and loans<br />

dedicated to infrastructures. A closer look at IPIC is also recommended.]<br />

Related MDGs<br />

MDG 1. Poverty, Hardship, Hunger<br />

Target 1-B. Employment<br />

GDP per person employed<br />

- wage sector<br />

-salary sector<br />

GDP per person employed (growth rate)<br />

Population employed (wage and salary sector)<br />

Person 15+ years of age in labor force (%)<br />

- Total/Male/Female<br />

Labor force in wage and salary jobs (%)<br />

- Total/Male/Female<br />

Labor force unemployed (%)<br />

- Total/Male/Female<br />

Working poor (households in lowest 30% expenditure<br />

with one or more workers)<br />

FY95<br />

FY08<br />

FY95<br />

FY08<br />

YAP<br />

$ 13,927<br />

$ 14,936<br />

YAP 0.5%<br />

[FSM]<br />

[$ 13,069]<br />

[$ 13,939]<br />

[FSM<br />

0.4%]<br />

2008 YAP 21.2% [FSM<br />

2000 YAP<br />

69/70/68<br />

2000 % YAP<br />

44/57/31<br />

2000 YAP<br />

4/6/3%<br />

[FSM]<br />

[59/67/50<br />

[FSM] %]<br />

[37/44/39<br />

[FSM]<br />

[22/21/24<br />

%]<br />

2005 YAP 66.9% [FSM<br />

77.9%]<br />

Figure 2 Private <strong>Sector</strong> & MDG 1<br />

Source: Millennium Development Goals & The Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Status Report 2010<br />

Census Information Relevant to the <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Labor Force<br />

Status<br />

FSM<br />

<strong>Yap</strong><br />

Persons 15+<br />

years<br />

66,163 7,693<br />

In labor force 35,276 5,046<br />

Percent 53.3 65.6<br />

Employed 31,791 4,869<br />

Formal work 15,134 2,465<br />

10 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Labor Force<br />

Status<br />

FSM<br />

<strong>Yap</strong><br />

Home<br />

production<br />

16,657 2,404<br />

Subsistence 8,562 1,807<br />

Market oriented 8,095 597<br />

Unemployed 3,485 177<br />

Percent of labor<br />

force<br />

Not in labor<br />

force<br />

Could have<br />

taken job<br />

Not available<br />

for work<br />

9.9 3.5<br />

30,887 2,647<br />

2,638 134<br />

28,249 2,513<br />

Figure 3 Labor Force 2010 & Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Gender & Labor<br />

Force Status<br />

FSM<br />

<strong>Yap</strong><br />

Females 15+ years 32,762 3,956<br />

In labor force 14,679 2,545<br />

Percent 44.8 64.3<br />

Employed 13,143 2,477<br />

Formal work 5,568 976<br />

Home production 7,575 1,501<br />

Subsistence 4,394 1,164<br />

Market 3,181 337<br />

11 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Gender & Labor<br />

Force Status<br />

FSM<br />

<strong>Yap</strong><br />

oriented<br />

Unemployed 1,536 68<br />

Percent of labor<br />

force<br />

10.5 2.7<br />

Not in labor force 18,083 1,411<br />

Could have taken<br />

job<br />

Not available for<br />

work<br />

With own children<br />

under 6 yrs<br />

1,167 53<br />

16,916 1,358<br />

7,569 838<br />

In labor force 3,803 604<br />

With own children<br />

6-17 yrs only<br />

4,679 688<br />

in labor force 2,673 535<br />

Subsistence Activity FSM <strong>Yap</strong><br />

Total subsistence<br />

persons 15+<br />

20,540 3,444<br />

For sale 793 31<br />

Own consumption 10,980 2,582<br />

Both 8,767 831<br />

Subsistence Activity<br />

& Gender<br />

FSM<br />

<strong>Yap</strong><br />

Total subsistence<br />

females 15+<br />

8,949 1,939<br />

For sale 399 21<br />

12 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Gender & Labor<br />

Force Status<br />

FSM<br />

<strong>Yap</strong><br />

Own consumption 5,298 1,502<br />

Both 3,252 416<br />

Figure 4 Labor Force 2010 & Gender & Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Industry FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

Current formal<br />

workplace<br />

persons 15+<br />

Agriculture,<br />

hunting, &<br />

forestry<br />

15,134 2,465<br />

218 4 0.16<br />

Fishing 529 15 0.61<br />

Manufacturing 219 29 1.18<br />

Electricity, gas<br />

and water<br />

supply<br />

304 92 3.73<br />

Construction 1,167 183 7.42<br />

Wholesale &<br />

retail trade,<br />

repair of motor<br />

vehicles or<br />

motorcycles &<br />

personal or<br />

household<br />

goods<br />

Hotels and<br />

restaurants<br />

2,650 385 15.62<br />

778 168 6.82<br />

13 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Industry FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

Transportation,<br />

storage and<br />

communication<br />

Financial<br />

intermediation<br />

Real estate,<br />

renting and<br />

business<br />

activities<br />

Other<br />

community,<br />

social &<br />

personal<br />

service<br />

activities<br />

Private<br />

households<br />

with employed<br />

persons<br />

819 116 4.71<br />

219 39 1.58<br />

286 70 2.84<br />

432 68 2.76<br />

321 42 1.70<br />

Figure 5 Employment by Industry & Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Industry &<br />

Gender<br />

Male, Current<br />

formal<br />

workplace 15+<br />

Agriculture,<br />

hunting, &<br />

forestry<br />

FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

9,566 1,489<br />

154 3 0.20<br />

Fishing 485 12 0.81<br />

14 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Industry &<br />

Gender<br />

FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

Manufacturing 124 16 1.07<br />

Electricity, gas<br />

and water<br />

supply<br />

271 81 5.44<br />

Construction 1,124 180 12.09<br />

Wholesale &<br />

retail trade,<br />

repair of motor<br />

vehicles or<br />

motorcycles &<br />

personal or<br />

household<br />

goods<br />

Hotels and<br />

restaurants<br />

Transportation,<br />

storage and<br />

communication<br />

Financial<br />

intermediation<br />

Real estate,<br />

renting and<br />

business<br />

activities<br />

Other<br />

community,<br />

social &<br />

personal<br />

service<br />

activities<br />

Private<br />

households<br />

with employed<br />

1,356 182 12.22<br />

374 85 5.71<br />

650 80 5.37<br />

71 7 0.47<br />

190 41 2.75<br />

267 43 2.89<br />

94 20 1.34<br />

15 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Industry &<br />

Gender<br />

FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

persons<br />

Female, Current<br />

formal<br />

workplace 15+<br />

Agriculture,<br />

hunting, &<br />

forestry<br />

5,568 976<br />

64 1 0.10<br />

Fishing 44 3 0.31<br />

Manufacturing 95 13 1.33<br />

Electricity, gas<br />

and water<br />

supply<br />

33 11 1.13<br />

Construction 43 3 0.31<br />

Wholesale &<br />

retail trade,<br />

repair of motor<br />

vehicles or<br />

motorcycles &<br />

personal or<br />

household<br />

goods<br />

Hotels and<br />

restaurants<br />

Transportation,<br />

storage and<br />

communication<br />

Financial<br />

intermediation<br />

Real estate,<br />

renting and<br />

business<br />

1,294 203 20.80<br />

404 83 8.50<br />

169 36 3.69<br />

148 32 3.28<br />

96 29 2.97<br />

16 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Industry &<br />

Gender<br />

FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

activities<br />

Other<br />

community,<br />

social &<br />

personal<br />

service<br />

activities<br />

Private<br />

households<br />

with employed<br />

persons<br />

165 25 2.56<br />

227 22 2.25<br />

Figure 6 Employment by Industry & Gender & Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Class<br />

Worker<br />

of<br />

FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

Current<br />

formal<br />

workforce<br />

persons 15+<br />

Private for<br />

profit<br />

company<br />

Private nonprofit<br />

company<br />

Self<br />

employed<br />

Formal<br />

<strong>Sector</strong> Sub-<br />

Total<br />

15,134 2,465<br />

5,742 875 35.50<br />

745 142 5.76<br />

440 51 2.07<br />

6,927 1,068 43<br />

17 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Class<br />

Worker<br />

Unpaid<br />

family<br />

worker<br />

of<br />

FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

49 3 0.12<br />

Home<br />

production<br />

activities for<br />

own<br />

use/sale<br />

285 12 0.49<br />

334 15 1<br />

TOTAL 7,261 1,083 44<br />

Figure 7 Class of Workers & Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Gender<br />

Class<br />

Worker<br />

&<br />

of<br />

FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

Male, Current<br />

formal<br />

workforce 15+<br />

9,566 1,489<br />

Private<br />

profit<br />

company<br />

for<br />

3,653 528 35.46<br />

Informal<br />

<strong>Sector</strong> Sub-<br />

Total<br />

Private nonprofit<br />

company<br />

Self<br />

employed<br />

Male, Formal<br />

<strong>Sector</strong> Sub-<br />

426 71 4.77<br />

242 29 1.95<br />

4,321 628 42<br />

18 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Gender<br />

Class<br />

Worker<br />

Total<br />

&<br />

of<br />

FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

Unpaid family<br />

worker<br />

Home<br />

production<br />

activities for<br />

own use/sale<br />

22 2 0.13<br />

163 3 0.20<br />

Male,<br />

Informal<br />

<strong>Sector</strong><br />

Total<br />

185 5 0.33<br />

Male, TOTAL 4,506 633 42.33<br />

Female,<br />

Current<br />

formal<br />

workforce 15+<br />

yrs<br />

5,568 976<br />

Private<br />

profit<br />

company<br />

for<br />

2,089 347 35.55<br />

Sub-<br />

Private nonprofit<br />

company<br />

Self<br />

employed<br />

Female,<br />

Formal <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Sub-Total<br />

Unpaid family<br />

worker<br />

319 71 7.27<br />

198 22 2.25<br />

2,606 440 45.07<br />

27 1 0.10<br />

19 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Gender<br />

Class<br />

Worker<br />

&<br />

of<br />

FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong><br />

%<br />

Home<br />

production<br />

activities for<br />

own use/sale<br />

Female,<br />

Informal<br />

<strong>Sector</strong> Sub-<br />

Total<br />

Female,<br />

TOTAL<br />

122 9 0.92<br />

149 10 1.02<br />

2,755 450 46.09<br />

Figure 8 Class of Workers & Gender & Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Links with other sectors<br />

Existing<br />

Critical links between private sector entrepreneurship and gender related organizations/initiatives.<br />

Private sector as defined by other sectors/domains: agriculture, fisheries, tourism.<br />

Suggested<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong> – DOE – COM – Vocational Training Institutions/initiatives.<br />

Strengthen explicit links with agriculture, fisheries, tourism.<br />

Private sector and IT technology/business. [Secretariat Note: explore the following: “The National Department of<br />

Education has contracted the FSM College of Micronesia to assist in the development of Information and<br />

Communications Technology (ICT) standards for students, teachers and administrators. These standards will guide<br />

the integration of ICT in future years. Training and purchase plans will be developed based on the standards.”<br />

Source: FSM: Comments from the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia on the Five Year Review of the Amended Compact of Free<br />

Association (2011), pp. 23. Explore also: E-Commerce Micronesia, Made-in-Micronesia, and Micronesia Saves.<br />

Endorsed the establishment and alignment of the e-commerce initiative supporting the RWDC's entrepreneurial<br />

priority area. This includes positioning a product signature identity "Made-in-Micronesia" strategy. This<br />

endorsement extended to the corresponding recommendation to establish a similar strategy entitled „Micronesia<br />

Saves‟, which supports the RWDC's computer and financial literacy strategy. Explore also: “Tonga Declaration”, a<br />

“Framework for Action on ICT for Development in the Pacific”, assignment of the lead coordination role of the<br />

Secretariat of the Pacific <strong>Community</strong> (SPC), and the establishment of regional initiatives including the Pacific<br />

20 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Computer Emergency Response Team (PacCERT), Pacific ICT Regulatory Resource Center (PIRRC), and ICT Capacity<br />

Building for Pacific ACP Countries (ICB4PAC).]<br />

The <strong>Sector</strong> through existing reviews and/or policies<br />

U.S. Department of Interior: Report to Congress on the First 5years Review of the Compact of free Association<br />

with the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010)<br />

pp. 15. “The value of private sector production, excluding households, … it averaged 26.8 percent in 1995-2008.”<br />

pp. 16. “According to the IMF, the FSM was ranked 126 th in the world in the most recent Doing Business Report<br />

from the World Bank. This ranking, the IMF notes, was not only lower than the previous one, but also the lowest<br />

among the Pacific Island countries.”<br />

pp. 18. “This unavoidable reduction in Compact grant and public spending translates to jobs and income, which<br />

have so far not been replaced by gains in private sector outputs and jobs.”<br />

pp. 18. BUSINESS AND TAXES: “the call for growth in business and, therefore, the tax base more urgent.”<br />

pp. 18. PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE: “one way to increase economic output quickly is to expand public infrastructure<br />

that would add to the productive capacity of the economy in the longer term and create jobs in the near term.”<br />

pp. 18. INFRASTRUCTURE – TOURISM: “ Infrastructure such as improvements in roads and port and airport<br />

facilities may particularly be helpful to tourism, which despite slow growth in recent years holds some potential …<br />

specialty groups such as divers, the so called eco-tourists and regional and world explorers of the oceans.”<br />

FSM: Comments from the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia on the Five Year Review of the Amended Compact of<br />

Free Association (2011)<br />

pp. 47. “private sector output has declined by 1.9% across the FSM from FY04 to FY08 … <strong>Yap</strong> a significant decrease.<br />

This lackluster performance is attributable to a number of factors including delays in the implementation of<br />

infrastructure projects, the erosion of household spending power, the continued weakness of exports, the<br />

worldwide economic slowdown, the slumping of the nation’s tourism industry, the impacts of the global financial<br />

markets crisis, the slowing of remittances from overseas workers and the shift in productive factors based on<br />

consumption-induced price shifts.”<br />

pp. 47. TAX REFORM: “The major components of the proposed reform include:<br />

• Modernization and strengthening of Tax Administration through a unified Revenue Authority Act (URA);<br />

• Elimination of the Gross Receipts Tax (GRT) and the Wage and Salary Tax and replacement by a 25%Net<br />

Profits Tax (NPT);<br />

• Introduction of a 10% value-added tax (VAT) to replace current national customs duties and state sales<br />

taxes, as well as state ability to impose an exercise tax. “<br />

pp. 48. “Institutional structures are the investment, employment, fiscal, monetary and external policies that<br />

contribute to the nature of the private sector climate. The World Bank identifies each of these policy areas as<br />

contributing to the “Ease of Doing Business” (EDB) index in a particular country. The FSM debuted on the World<br />

Bank’s EDB index in 2009 as the 125 Th most business friendly country of the 183 countries tracked … Overall the<br />

21 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

FSM lags well behind its sister states in terms of the EDB index [Palau 92 nd ; RMI 93 rd ] and has failed to show any<br />

substantial improvement over Amended Compact period. The impetus to make these changes lies largely with the<br />

political leadership in the FSM, and is a priority as discussed in the recommendations section.”<br />

pp. 49. MEASURING PRIVATE SECTOR AS PERCENTAGE OF GDP: FY04-FY08. “ Private sector output, as a<br />

percentage of the GDP, has been stagnant across the FSM during the entire period of the Amended Compact … <strong>Yap</strong><br />

a significant decrease.”<br />

pp. 51. LACK OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMIES OF SCALE: it has been highlighted as being the main impediment<br />

to the development of a strong private sector, together with the fact that private sector grants finance for the<br />

51% consumption (wages and salaries) [Working Group Note: exploring cooperative options to overcome<br />

technological and scale gaps, while considering consumers choices towards local productions to at least maximize<br />

the high share of private sector grants that covers consumption through wages and salaries].<br />

pp. 51. “<strong>Government</strong> can support private sector development by providing appropriate institutional and physical<br />

infrastructure, or direct support.”<br />

pp. 52. “Reliable and sufficient transportation, energy and communication networks are fundamental for an active<br />

private sector … The FSM thus proposes that economic infrastructure projects be treated with the same priority as<br />

social infrastructure … One of the most pressing needs of the private sector is reliable and cost-effective<br />

transportation of goods. The current commercial providers are unable or unwilling to provide routine or costeffective<br />

cargo services and current production volumes leave the existing private sector with limited negotiating<br />

leverage for bulk shipment rates.” [Working Group Note: Regarding cargo’s supply chains the efficiency of the<br />

schedule should be further analyzed to estimate the most cost effective way to manage transportation of goods<br />

into <strong>Yap</strong>.]<br />

pp. 53. INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT FUND (IDF) by the U.S. <strong>Government</strong> is seen as crucial to the private sector<br />

development.<br />

<strong>Yap</strong>: work in progress towards a local perspective<br />

The <strong>Yap</strong>ese recommendations towards strengthening the Private <strong>Sector</strong> were formulated in occasion of the<br />

National Economic Symposium (NES) in 2011. They were summarized in the following “<strong>Yap</strong>-NES Priority Policy &<br />

Projects Matrix”.<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Critical Areas<br />

Institutional<br />

Reform<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Requirement<br />

Investment<br />

Opportunities<br />

I. ACCESSIBILITY TO CAPITAL & LENDING<br />

1. Banking &<br />

Lending<br />

Practices<br />

Research<br />

existing laws,<br />

regulations and<br />

practices to<br />

ease lending<br />

and expand<br />

Not Required.<br />

Increased number<br />

of business ventures<br />

in new tradable<br />

industries, joint<br />

ventures,<br />

22 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Critical Areas<br />

Institutional<br />

Reform<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Requirement<br />

Investment<br />

Opportunities<br />

the private<br />

sector.<br />

employment, etc.<br />

2. Taxation &<br />

Incentives<br />

Research<br />

existing laws<br />

and regulations<br />

including VAT<br />

to provide<br />

incentives for<br />

private sector<br />

capital<br />

formation and<br />

expansion.<br />

Not Required.<br />

Increased capital<br />

formation and<br />

expansion through<br />

capital gains, R&D<br />

and other activities<br />

in support of<br />

business growth.<br />

3. Foreign<br />

Investment<br />

Research<br />

existing laws<br />

and regulations<br />

to attract<br />

appropriate<br />

foreign<br />

investment.<br />

Creation of<br />

new<br />

infrastructures<br />

for tradable<br />

industries<br />

through<br />

foreign<br />

investments.<br />

Creation of joint<br />

ventures for small<br />

and large scale<br />

industries for export<br />

markets.<br />

II. DOMESTIC & FOREIGN MARKETS ACCESSIBILITY<br />

1. Marketing<br />

Feasibility<br />

Study Program<br />

Policy<br />

endorsement<br />

with<br />

appropriate<br />

representation<br />

from Gov't and<br />

the Private<br />

<strong>Sector</strong>.<br />

Not Required.<br />

Creation of tradable<br />

industries through<br />

selection and<br />

formulation of<br />

appropriate<br />

technologies and<br />

export markets.<br />

2. Public<br />

Market-Place<br />

Designation of<br />

vacant lot<br />

across from<br />

YCA.<br />

A&E Required<br />

for<br />

Construction.<br />

A marketplace for<br />

buying & selling of<br />

Local Produce and<br />

Crafts & Arts<br />

products.<br />

3. Access to Mandate Establish Improved marketing<br />

23 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Critical Areas<br />

Institutional<br />

Reform<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Requirement<br />

Investment<br />

Opportunities<br />

Foreign<br />

Investors<br />

Department of<br />

Foreign Affairs<br />

to coordinate<br />

marketing of<br />

<strong>Yap</strong>/FSM<br />

products.<br />

outlets in US<br />

Mainland &<br />

neighboring<br />

countries to<br />

showcase <strong>Yap</strong><br />

and FSM<br />

products.<br />

of <strong>Yap</strong>/FSM<br />

products.<br />

III. TRADE & INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT & EXPANSION<br />

1. Product<br />

Processing<br />

Plant(s)<br />

Product<br />

Certification &<br />

Quality Control<br />

Measures.<br />

A&E Required<br />

for<br />

Construction.<br />

Small Scale:<br />

Agriculture Produce;<br />

Pelagic & Reef Fish<br />

Processing.<br />

2. Fishing<br />

Industry<br />

Review existing<br />

laws and<br />

regulations for<br />

YFA to market<br />

fish and other<br />

marine species<br />

and for MRMD<br />

to regulate<br />

sustainable use<br />

and<br />

production.<br />

Purchase<br />

additional<br />

Purse Seiners,<br />

long-liners and<br />

in-shore fishing<br />

vessels, etc..<br />

NORMA to scale<br />

back on licensing of<br />

foreign fishing<br />

vessels; increase<br />

volume of<br />

processed exports<br />

to markets in Guam,<br />

Japan, Mainland<br />

China, Taiwan & US<br />

markets.<br />

3.<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Industry<br />

Research laws<br />

on creation of<br />

a zone for tax<br />

free products<br />

into US<br />

Mainland and<br />

China<br />

Mainland<br />

markets<br />

A&E Required<br />

for Free Trade<br />

Zone<br />

Construction if<br />

FSM is eligible.<br />

On<br />

construction of<br />

appropriate<br />

facilities for<br />

manufacturing<br />

goods.<br />

Tradable Industries<br />

can be created for<br />

niche markets in the<br />

US Mainland and<br />

China. Ex; Value-<br />

Added industries<br />

from Trochus,<br />

Coconut/Copra,<br />

product<br />

components, etc<br />

4. Trademark & Review FSM Not Required. Secured marketing<br />

24 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Critical Areas<br />

Institutional<br />

Reform<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Requirement<br />

Investment<br />

Opportunities<br />

Copy Right<br />

laws on<br />

creation of<br />

trademarks<br />

and patents.<br />

& protection of<br />

<strong>Yap</strong>/FSM products<br />

through patents and<br />

Intellectual Property<br />

Rights, etc..<br />

5. Inter/Intra-<br />

Island<br />

Transportation<br />

Review exiting<br />

FSM laws on<br />

inter and intraisland<br />

commerce for<br />

improvement.<br />

Inter/Intra-<br />

Island viable<br />

marine and air<br />

transport<br />

vessel(s).<br />

Established marine<br />

and air trade routes<br />

for intra-island<br />

commerce. Secure<br />

more frequent air<br />

transport with air<br />

carriers/Continental<br />

, etc for cargo and<br />

passengers.<br />

6.<br />

Communicatio<br />

n &<br />

Information<br />

Technology<br />

Review exiting<br />

FSM laws on<br />

communicatio<br />

n commerce<br />

and<br />

capabilities for<br />

improvements.<br />

FSM Telecom<br />

to review and<br />

upgrade where<br />

needed its<br />

communicatio<br />

n hardware to<br />

meet demand<br />

for on-line or<br />

e-commerce.<br />

Improved<br />

accessibility to<br />

international<br />

businesses for<br />

marketing of local<br />

arts and crafts,<br />

marine and<br />

agriculture<br />

products.<br />

IV. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT<br />

1. Vocational<br />

Education<br />

Manpower and<br />

Employment<br />

Survey in<br />

progress.<br />

Not Required.<br />

Manpower &<br />

Employment needs<br />

for construction,<br />

hospitality<br />

industries and other<br />

tradable skills.<br />

2. Academic<br />

Education<br />

Manpower and<br />

Employment<br />

Survey in<br />

progress.<br />

Not Required.<br />

Manpower &<br />

Employment needs<br />

in management,<br />

business, education,<br />

etc..<br />

25 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Critical Areas<br />

Institutional<br />

Reform<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Requirement<br />

Investment<br />

Opportunities<br />

3. Professional<br />

& Specialized<br />

Education<br />

Manpower and<br />

Employment<br />

Survey in<br />

progress.<br />

Not Required.<br />

Manpower &<br />

Employment needs<br />

for engineers,<br />

medical services,<br />

biology, physics,<br />

etc..<br />

V. PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP<br />

1. <strong>Yap</strong> Chamber<br />

of Commerce -<br />

Business<br />

Forum-<br />

Relations<br />

Policy<br />

endorsement<br />

of a pro-active<br />

entity to liaise<br />

and coordinate<br />

programs and<br />

projects<br />

between the<br />

Gov't and the<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong>.<br />

Not Required.<br />

Improved<br />

coordination of<br />

priority projects and<br />

programs between<br />

the Gov't and the<br />

Private <strong>Sector</strong>.<br />

Figure 9 <strong>Yap</strong>-NES Priority Policy & Projects Matrix<br />

Inputs on Agriculture and Fisheries<br />

SDP Agriculture Goals<br />

Departments Interviewed: YINS (all), DAF (all)<br />

Agriculture # 1: A well resourced and properly focused agriculture sector operating within a stable and<br />

consistent policy framework.<br />

strong impediments<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The Agriculture <strong>Sector</strong> has clear and focused Goals such as the formulation and implementation of the<br />

Consumption Survey. This is internally perceived as a point of strength, despite the declared lack of<br />

resources limited the implementation of those Goals.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

26 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

• The Agriculture <strong>Sector</strong> perceives itself as not being supported. The sector perceives itself as not being a<br />

priority in budget terms.<br />

• There is no explicit Agriculture Policy established by the local <strong>Government</strong>. [Secretariat Note: The effects<br />

of the yet to be approved National Agriculture Policy still have to be produced, however there is a need of<br />

a more specific and rooted local planning.]<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• A cooperative of farmers should be created.<br />

• The sector perceives as a necessity looking at extra source of funding to complement the perceived lack of<br />

budget support. Being Food Security a recognized priority by International Banks and Organizations, the<br />

possibility of applying for food security funds was highlighted as recommendable by the sector’s internal<br />

stakeholders.<br />

• The budget allocated for agriculture should reflect the +6% suggested in the SDP.<br />

• Agriculture should be recognized as a priority towards self-reliance.<br />

Agriculture # 2: Increase production of traditional farming systems for home nutritional and traditional needs<br />

and cash incomes.<br />

strong impediments/no elements to value it<br />

Positive aspect towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Subsistence farming presently plays a major role in the local communities<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There are no data to measure the extent of the consumption of traditional farming product, and their<br />

percentage of the total food consumption within the state. This is an impediment in identifying why and<br />

under which circumstances (price, cooking time, values, etc.) people consume locally produced food or<br />

imported products.<br />

• The long lasting debate on how to foster the economic potential of an increasing of the production of<br />

local food faces the dilemma on whether the focus should be on the demand or on the supply side.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• A consumption survey has been recommended to determine the level of consumption of local versus<br />

imported food.<br />

27 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

• The importance of rethinking prices of local products in their relation to imported food has been<br />

highlighted.<br />

• The creation of a cooperative was recommended to help controlling and matching local products price<br />

needs.<br />

Agriculture # 3: Increased volumes of saleable surpluses to be marketed by the private sector into local and<br />

regional markets.<br />

strong impediments<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Although informally, small entrepreneurs are already involved in the production of agricultural products<br />

for sale (e.g. tuba, bettlenuts, coconut oil, etc.).<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• In targeting the local market, the dilemma is on whether the focus should be on supporting demand or<br />

supply.<br />

• There is a lack of data on agricultural production, both in terms of locally consumed products, and in<br />

relation to small amounts of food informally sent abroad without being recorded.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• As for Goal #2, rethink pricing of locally produced products is necessary, to readdress consumers’ choices<br />

and of purchasing imported food. Experimentations have been done in terms of subsidies to support local<br />

production, but were unsuccessful. .<br />

• As for Goal #2, the creation of a cooperative was recommended to help controlling and matching local<br />

products price needs.<br />

• Export solutions and new products should be explored. Bettlenuts and bananas were identified as the<br />

only two sustainable products with value added potential, and with low long term sustainability risk.<br />

• Meat slaughtering should be for local market not for export as there are too many requirements and costs<br />

to export meat products. A decline in imports will be a great achievement per se.<br />

• The potential of new and faster recipes to be made with local products should be explored. The creation<br />

of new local recipes may also support the branding of local products as “niche products”, which may<br />

support their exports.<br />

28 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Agriculture # 4: Promote environmentally sound and sustainable production.<br />

being achieved/strong impediments<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There is already an established network of cooperation over environmental sustainability of agricultural<br />

production. [Refer to the Existing Links Session of the Agriculture <strong>Sector</strong> for further details].<br />

• Samples of good practices towards the achievement of the Goal are the defeated pesticides’ abuse, and<br />

an SPC project that targeted invasive species.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The Goal is being achieved in practice; however there is a perceived lack of <strong>Government</strong>’s attention and<br />

institutional capacity.<br />

• Environmentally and sustainable production issues tend to be discontinuous as they are subjected to<br />

extra budgetary funding.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• It was recommended that DAF continues to work together with EPA to promote further environmental<br />

awareness in agricultural development.<br />

Agriculture Data<br />

12.00<br />

10.00<br />

8.00<br />

6.00<br />

4.00<br />

2.00<br />

0.00<br />

25.00%<br />

20.00%<br />

15.00%<br />

10.00%<br />

5.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

Agriculture, Hunting and Forestry<br />

Percentage Change<br />

Linear (Agriculture, Hunting and Forestry)<br />

Figure 10 Extent of Agriculture Activities FY95-FY10<br />

DATA Source: DOI and Pacific Island Training Initiative, “Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Fiscal Year 2010 Economic<br />

Review”, available online via www.pitiviti.org .<br />

29 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Census Information Relevant to the <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Industry FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

Current formal workplace persons<br />

15+<br />

Agriculture, hunting, &<br />

forestry<br />

15,134 2,465<br />

218 4 0.16<br />

Industry & Gender FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

Male, Current formal workplace<br />

15+<br />

Agriculture, hunting, &<br />

forestry<br />

Female, Current formal workplace<br />

15+<br />

Agriculture, hunting, &<br />

forestry<br />

9,566 1,489<br />

154 3 0.20<br />

5,568 976<br />

64 1 0.10<br />

Figure 11 Employment by Industry & Agriculture<br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Crops Total <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

SAKAU<br />

Total 4,105 3<br />

Consume 1,582 2 66.67<br />

Sell 231 -<br />

Both 2,292 1 33.33<br />

COCONUT<br />

30 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Crops Total <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

Total 15,068 2,093<br />

Consume 11,948 1,756 83.9<br />

Sell 177 7 0.33<br />

Both 2,943 330 15.77<br />

BANANA<br />

Total 15,437 2,140<br />

Consume 12,267 1,952 91.21<br />

Sell 170 9 0.42<br />

Both 3,000 179 8.36<br />

CITRUS<br />

Total 7,642 923<br />

Consume 6,257 827 89.60<br />

Sell 107 1 0.11<br />

Both 1,278 95 10.29<br />

BREAD FRUIT<br />

Total 14,629 1,841<br />

Consume 12,277 1,736 94.30<br />

Sell 113 - -<br />

Both 2,239 105 5.70<br />

TARO<br />

31 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Crops Total <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

Total 12,879 2,052<br />

Consume 10,655 1,907 92.93<br />

Sell 137 4 0.19<br />

Both 2,087 141 6.87<br />

YAM<br />

Total 7,075 1,405<br />

Consume 5,934 1,296 92.24<br />

Sell 105 2 0.14<br />

Both 1,036 107 7.62<br />

BETELNUT<br />

Total 8,906 1,935<br />

Consume 5,264 1,227 63.41<br />

Sell 479 14 0.72<br />

Both 3,163 694 35.87<br />

VEGETABLE<br />

Total 5,921 1,557<br />

Consume 4,703 1,463 93.96<br />

Sell 89 9 0.58<br />

Both 1,129 85 5.46<br />

Figure 12 Crop Production<br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Links with other sectors<br />

32 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Existing<br />

Link between the DAF and EPA.<br />

Suggested<br />

Link between agriculture and private sector targeting mainly the local market, and possibly promoting export of<br />

agricultural products.<br />

Link between private sector small entrepreneurs and local communities [possibly through a cooperative] to<br />

promote, and possibly enhance, subsistence farming selling surpluses in the local market.<br />

The <strong>Sector</strong> through existing reviews and/or policies<br />

U.S. Department of Interior: Report to Congress on the First 5years Review of the Compact of free Association<br />

with the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010)<br />

pp. 50 Agriculture is not comprehended in the <strong>Sector</strong>s that have “<strong>Sector</strong> Grant” dedicated to them. Many activities<br />

are funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and other agencies outside the main Compact umbrella.<br />

The Compact <strong>Sector</strong> Grants however support Environmental projects on issues supporting the achievement of Goal<br />

4 of the SDP: “Promote environmentally sound and sustainable production”. More specifically, “Environment<br />

sector grants support <strong>Government</strong> efforts to protect the country’s land and marine environment and to conserve<br />

and achieve the sustainable use of natural resources. Allowable activities include the ongoing development,<br />

adoption and enforcement of policies, laws and regulations; the reduction and prevention of environmental<br />

pollution and degradation; the protection of biological diversity; the establishment of conservation areas;<br />

environmental infrastructure planning, design construction and operation; interaction and cooperation with<br />

nongovernmental organizations; the promotion of increased environmental awareness; and , the promotion of<br />

increased citizen involvement in conservation.”<br />

FSM: Comments from the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia on the Five Year Review of the Amended Compact of<br />

Free Association (2011)<br />

The Comments from the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia on the Five Year Review of the Amended Compact of Free<br />

Association do not include an overview of the Agriculture <strong>Sector</strong>. The Policy Proposal of the Agriculture National<br />

Policy, designed based on the SDP structure, will be taken into consideration during the formulation of the final<br />

policy recommendations. [Working Group Note: Members of the Task Force participated into the meetings with<br />

national <strong>Government</strong> officials related to the mentioned Agriculture Policy Plan.]<br />

<strong>Yap</strong>: work in progress towards a local perspective<br />

<strong>Yap</strong> has currently no specific agricultural policy, and has not so far planned agriculture related activities using the<br />

SDP as a point of reference. The impact of the national Agriculture Policy designed on the SDP structure, and<br />

currently subjected to approval at the national level is currently unknown. Independently from the outcome of<br />

national decisions over the new Agriculture Policy there is a perceived need to translate macro objectives as stated<br />

in the national policy documents into a realistic and locally tailored policy, allowing in this way the agriculture<br />

sector to gain institutional, political and budgetary support.<br />

[Secretariat Note: It would be useful to conduct a survey on the consumption of local food. The survey will be<br />

relevant to address the definition and thresholds of poverty in <strong>Yap</strong>, and the role played by subsistence agriculture<br />

in mitigating poverty. Additionally the consumption of local food should be considered for the GDP calculation is to<br />

33 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

track the impact that local food. The survey will finally help to highlight whether and which kind of import<br />

substitution practices may be suitable in <strong>Yap</strong>.]<br />

Inputs for reflection<br />

• Not a budget priority: lack of government support despite being the biggest share of the GDP and +6%<br />

recommended in the SDP<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Lack of explicit Agriculture Policy at <strong>State</strong> Level<br />

SDP experience shows that tailoring at local level is fundamental for ownership, and hence<br />

efficiency: critical approach to cuts and growth<br />

• Major role to play in addressing local demand and consumption (food security and dependency): reexploring<br />

critically cooperative options<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Need to collect data on reasons and extent of consumption of local and imported food<br />

Agriculture as part of Private <strong>Sector</strong> Development & Informal Economy Potential<br />

Weather Index Insurance to Incorporate Informal Economy & Support <strong>Government</strong>-citizens<br />

relations<br />

Tailoring retail of local products to the local context: bringing the cooperative to the villages<br />

instead of centralizing it<br />

• Addressing Exports aims and concerns:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Strengthening and branding locally to substitute imports first<br />

Focusing on export of niche products in phase two: overcoming the limits of lack of economies of<br />

scale with feasible solutions to address transportation constraints, high quality and high<br />

revenues per unit (e.g. slaughtering malfunction)<br />

• Networks and crosscutting approach to planning (FIRST) and funds hunting: DAF – EPA –<br />

NGO/Individuals – COM – R&D (Researchers Coordinator) + DOE (sustainability)<br />

SDP Fisheries Goals<br />

Departments Interviewed: MRMD (all), YFA (all)<br />

Fisheries # 1: Stakeholders and personnel contributing to fisheries and marine resource management and<br />

development are suitably trained and skilled to effectively participate in sectoral activities.<br />

strong impediments<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Personnel resources are perceived as limited but sufficient to promote successfully agency programs.<br />

• Agencies have access and are collaborating with third party specialists and consultants.<br />

34 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Achieving an effective use of limited personnel to coordinate programs and achieve tasks is considered a<br />

major challenge.<br />

• Achieving an effective use of limited funding and budget is another major challenge.<br />

• The lack of coordination and planning between agencies represents an additional constraint.<br />

• The lack of knowledge transfer to local staff by international experts minimizes the effectiveness of<br />

consultancy expenditures.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Capacity building and training have been highly recommended. There is a perceived need to define and<br />

follow Action Plans, as well as to consider change management operations.<br />

• More personnel and funding is perceived as a necessity.<br />

Fisheries # 2: Inshore and Coastal marine resources are monitored and managed in a consultative and<br />

participatory manner that respects traditional practice, utilizes established scientific methodology, sustains<br />

biodiversity and resource abundance.<br />

being achieved<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The presence of many Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) sites around <strong>Yap</strong> was highlighted as a positive<br />

factor.<br />

• Many programs and public awareness activities targeting the Goal were estimated being successfully<br />

implemented. The locally tailored approach used to monitor biodiversity that involved significantly the<br />

communities was considered a positive asset.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The lack of continuous monitoring activities and data collection was identified as a constraint. The<br />

monitoring of biodiversity should be undertaken on a yearly basis to be effective.<br />

• Achieving an effective use of limited personnel to coordinate programs and achieve tasks is considered a<br />

major challenge.<br />

• Achieving an effective use of limited funding and budget is another major challenge. The lack of<br />

coordination and planning between agencies represents an additional constraint.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• More personnel and funding are perceived as a necessity.<br />

• YFA should contribute/be able to contribute to the monitoring of biodiversity and its extent.<br />

35 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

• More communication between MRMD and YFA has been recommended.<br />

Fisheries # 3: Inshore and Coastal marine resources are effectively exploited to meet subsistence and artisanal<br />

needs and optimized stakeholder social and economic benefits within sustainable parameters.<br />

achieved<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The presence of many Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) sites around <strong>Yap</strong> was highlighted as a positive<br />

factor.<br />

• There is a perceived significant presence of market opportunities to sell costal marine resources.<br />

• There is evidence of public awareness of the economic potential of an effective use of costal marine<br />

resources.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The lack of continuous monitoring activities and data collection was identified as a constraint.<br />

• Achieving an effective use of limited personnel to coordinate programs and achieve tasks is considered a<br />

major challenge.<br />

• Achieving an effective use of limited funding and budget is another major challenge. The lack of<br />

coordination and planning between agencies represents an additional constraint.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• More personnel and funding is perceived as a necessity.<br />

• No other significant recommendations were made.<br />

Fisheries # 4: Oceanic resources are monitored and managed with best practice methodology to ensure harvest<br />

levels remain within sustainable parameters.<br />

strong impediments<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There is evidence of community involvement in the monitoring and management of oceanic resources.<br />

The presence of many Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) sites around <strong>Yap</strong> was highlighted as a positive<br />

factor.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The lack of coordination between sectors represents a major constraint.<br />

• The lack of continuous monitoring activities and data collection was identified as a constraint.<br />

36 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

• The lack of funding and personnel was highlighted as the main challenge towards the achievement of the<br />

Goal.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• More personnel and funding is perceived as a necessity.<br />

• No other significant recommendations were made.<br />

Fisheries # 5: Oceanic resources are exploited in a manner that assures optimum economic benefit to FSM.<br />

strong impediments<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There is the perception that there is no monitoring of the oceanic resources exploited.<br />

• There is the perception that there are currently no data on the economic benefits derived from the<br />

exploitation of oceanic resources.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There is the perception that enhancing the coordination between different sectors involved will support<br />

the achievement of the Goal. [Working Group Note: Refer to the suggested links between sectors<br />

section.]<br />

• The establishment of a fishing cooperative for the local exploitation of oceanic resources was suggested.<br />

More specifically the fish harvested in oceanic waters was suggested to be shipped directly to Palau or<br />

Guam and returning to <strong>Yap</strong> only at the end of the sale.<br />

• The Ngulu Island has been recommended as a suitable spot for aquaculture.<br />

• Setting up an efficient system of monitoring and data collection was highly recommended.<br />

37 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Fisheries Data<br />

9.00<br />

8.00<br />

7.00<br />

6.00<br />

5.00<br />

4.00<br />

3.00<br />

2.00<br />

1.00<br />

18.00%<br />

16.00%<br />

14.00%<br />

12.00%<br />

10.00%<br />

8.00%<br />

6.00%<br />

4.00%<br />

2.00%<br />

Fisheries<br />

Percentage Change<br />

Linear (Fisheries)<br />

0.00<br />

FY1995 FY1996 FY1997 FY1998 FY1999 FY2000 FY2001 FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010<br />

0.00%<br />

Figure 13 Extent of Fisheries Activities FY95-FY10<br />

DATA Source: DOI and Pacific Island Training Initiative, “Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Fiscal Year 2010 Economic<br />

Review”, available online via www.pitiviti.org .<br />

Tuna, Reef Fish, Sea Cucumber Trochus, Lobster, Crab,<br />

Clam<br />

Consume Average 86.85%<br />

Sell Average 2.39%<br />

Both Average 8.62%<br />

Figure 14 Break down of Fish Consumption and Sales<br />

38 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Census Information Relevant to the <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Industry FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

Current formal workplace persons<br />

15+<br />

15,134 2,465<br />

Fishing 529 15 0.61<br />

Industry & Gender FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

Male, Current formal workplace<br />

15+<br />

9,566 1,489<br />

Fishing 485 12 0.81<br />

Female, Current formal workplace<br />

15+<br />

5,568 976<br />

Fishing 44 3 0.31<br />

Figure 15 Employment by Industry & Fisheries<br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Marine Life Total <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

TUNA<br />

Total 5,347 963<br />

Consume 3,379 904 93.87<br />

Sell 95 3 0.31<br />

Both 1,873 56 5.82<br />

REEF FISH<br />

Total 10,770 1,720<br />

Consume 7,343 1,569 91.22<br />

Sell 162 4 0.23<br />

39 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Marine Life Total <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

Both 3,265 147 8.55<br />

SEA CUCUMBER<br />

Total 4,971 37<br />

Consume 3,477 29 78.38<br />

Sell 282 6 16.22<br />

Both 1,212 2 5.41<br />

TROCHUS<br />

Total 3,663 400<br />

Consume 2,157 223 55.75<br />

Sell 134 23 5.75<br />

Both 1,372 154 38.50<br />

LOBSTER<br />

Total 5,642 1,102<br />

Consume 4,260 1,047 95.01<br />

Sell 89 3 0.27<br />

Both 1,293 52 4.72<br />

CRAB<br />

Total 8,517 1,883<br />

Consume 6,965 1,840 97.72<br />

Sell 96 3 0.16<br />

Both 1,456 40 2.12<br />

40 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Marine Life Total <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

CLAM<br />

Total 6,499 1,254<br />

Consume 5,283 1,229 98.01<br />

Sell 82 3 0.24<br />

Both 1,134 22 1.75<br />

Figure 16 Marine Harvesting & Fisheries<br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Links with other sectors<br />

Existing<br />

Link between MRMD and YFA.<br />

Suggested<br />

Link between Marine Resource, YFA, Public Safety, OPB, and DY&CA.<br />

The <strong>Sector</strong> through existing reviews and/or policies<br />

U.S. Department of Interior: Report to Congress on the First 5years Review of the Compact of free Association<br />

with the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010)<br />

N/A<br />

FSM: Comments from the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia on the Five Year Review of the Amended Compact of<br />

Free Association (2011)<br />

pp. 58. “The primary source of local revenue at the national level remains through the sale of tuna fishing licenses<br />

and the foreign fleets in FSM waters are growing per the pecuniary prerogatives of a developing nation. Ecological<br />

pressures therefore are on upswing.”<br />

<strong>Yap</strong>: work in progress towards a local perspective<br />

As recalled in the Private <strong>Sector</strong> Session, during the National Economic Symposium (NES) held in 2011, few<br />

recommendations were given to define a <strong>Yap</strong>ese vision on the local Fisheries <strong>Sector</strong>. These included reviewing<br />

existing laws and regulations for YFA to market fish and other marine species, and for MRMD to regulate<br />

sustainable use and production. Infrastructural improvements such as purchasing additional purse seiners, longliners<br />

and in-shore fishing vessels were perceived as needed. Additionally the further investment<br />

recommendations were identified during the NES: scaling back NORMA’s licensing of foreign fishing vessels;<br />

41 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

increasing volume of processed exports should try to access markets in Guam, Japan, Mainland China, Taiwan and<br />

US markets.<br />

Furthermore hypothesis of reducing transportation costs of exporting fish to Guam and Palau are being developed<br />

at YFA by a JICA volunteer, and should be further explored.<br />

Inputs for reflection<br />

• Not a budget priority<br />

• Lack of monitoring and data (climate change impact)<br />

• Poor Planning: Lack of Policy/Action Plans Framework at <strong>State</strong> and Agency<br />

o<br />

Ownership & efficiency: critical approach to cuts and growth<br />

• Major role to play in addressing local demand and consumption (food security and dependency)<br />

• Good Practices with MPAs and <strong>Community</strong> Involvement<br />

• Addressing Exports aims and concerns:<br />

• Transportation routs (JICA) & National-<strong>State</strong> relations<br />

• Networks and crosscutting approach to planning (FIRST) and funds hunting: YFA – MRMD – EPA –<br />

NGO/Individuals – COM – R&D (Researchers Coordinator) + DOE (sustainability)<br />

Fisheries additional Info to consider<br />

Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency (FFA) http://www.ffa.int/<br />

Regulatory Framework: “The Vessel Day Scheme (VDS) is a scheme where vessel owners can purchase and trade<br />

days fishing at sea in places subject to the Parties to the Nauru Agreement (PNA).The purpose of the VDS is to<br />

constrain and reduce catches of target tuna species, and increase the rate of return from fishing activities through<br />

access fees paid by Distant Water Fishing Nations (DWFNs).”<br />

The Regional Tuna Management and Development Strategy (RTMADS) 2009:<br />

http://www.ffa.int/system/files/Regional%20Tuna%20Management%20and%20Development%20Strategy.pdf<br />

“The FFA member waters are the most productive in the WCPO (Figures 4). Total production in FFA waters in 2009<br />

was a record 1.1 million Mt, up 4% on 2008 and accounting for 57% total catch in WCPO. Over the period 1997-<br />

2009, the catch from FFA waters ranged between 0.5 and 1.1 million Mt, with the last four years showing<br />

increasing trends consistently above the 1.0 million Mt mark.” Source: SPC-OFP, August 2010.<br />

“Some interesting statistics were brought up by the debate teams. All teams stressed that 25% of the world's tuna<br />

resources are located within the FSM Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The Pohnpei team, when arguing in favor of<br />

limiting access of the EEZ to foreign fishing companies, stated that currently these companies make $144 million<br />

per year from fishing in the EEZ, whereas local FSM fishing companies make an average of $1.6 million per year.<br />

The Kosrae team, also when arguing for the proposition, revealed that the FSM imports $2.5 million of canned<br />

tuna per year and proposed cutting down on such imports.” Source: http://www.fsmgov.org/press/pr071310.htm.<br />

42 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

CONSUMERS’ CHOICES<br />

Unsustainable Consumers’ Choices<br />

The Consumer Price Index -CPI- that shows how people decide and chose to spend their money responding to price<br />

changes, highlights that the two main areas of households’ expenditure are food and fuel. Food in this case is<br />

imported food (soft drinks, tuna cans, spam cans etc.), and this consumers’ choice is harming the local economy,<br />

despite the fact that <strong>Yap</strong> has all the resources to substitute the imported food with local food.<br />

→ The Committee will discuss how to strengthen the informal economy addressing people’s consumption<br />

habits towards local products and promoting innovative agriculture practices (i.e. CRI). It will also try to<br />

identify potential links between traditional practices, health and education.<br />

Input<br />

→ Good Practice currently in place to be monitored and possibly expanded: Local Food Promotion<br />

Project by the Tobacco and Diabetes Coalition<br />

Figure 17 Imports of Food FY2000-FY2010<br />

DATA Source: DOI and Pacific Island Training Initiative, “Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Fiscal Year 2010<br />

Economic Review”, available online via www.pitiviti.org .<br />

43 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Figure 18 The Role of Consumers Choices in the Economy<br />

As Cameron (1991) highlighted in a FAO study on Food Security in the FSM, “an imported food item is<br />

qualitatively essential if it contains a nutritional component that cannot be obtained within the local<br />

environment at any price … [or] prices are too high … to afford”.<br />

Food security is another lens through which the contradiction of “self-reliance” in <strong>Yap</strong> can be examined. In the<br />

Report to the US Congress on the “First 5 years Review of the Compact of Free Association with the Federated<br />

<strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010)” the US Department of Interior defines as “economically self-sufficient” an economy<br />

that “produces goods and services in sufficient quantities to meet the demands of the population.” What is not<br />

clear in this definition is whether the “goods” mentioned are “essential goods” as highlighted by Cameroon (1991)<br />

or goods pushed into the local economy by a “Cargo Cult”. In fact, there is no poverty in <strong>Yap</strong>, if poverty is defined<br />

as insufficient access to food. In <strong>Yap</strong> the “severity of poverty” target that measures the first Millennium<br />

Development Goal (MDG) defining Poverty, Hardship and Hunger is only 1.7 (Millennium Development Goals &<br />

The Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Status Report 2010). What is curious is that despite the fact that subsistence<br />

agriculture is practiced by every family on the island the food poverty line for <strong>Yap</strong> is set at 6,394 USD per day<br />

(Millennium Development Goals & The Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Status Report 2010). It is therefore<br />

reasonable to suggest that the food poverty line as set actually includes imported food that was defined through<br />

the “Cargo Cult” as “essential”, despite the complete availability of nutritional goods on the island. In this respect it<br />

is worth highlighting how the high “vulnerability” of Small Island <strong>State</strong>s is due to, within other factors, a high<br />

“dependence on strategic imports” (Briguglio, 1995). What should be taken under consideration is the extended<br />

definition of “strategic imports” that aid dynamics constructed over time. Food and beverages represent the best<br />

sample in this respect, and they are within the highest components of household expenditures according to the<br />

Consumer Price Index (CPI). In fact in 2010, of the total basket of items attributed to <strong>Yap</strong>ese households that was<br />

weighted as being 18.5% of the total FSM purchases (100%), food was set as being 4.8%, beverages 1.9%, and<br />

apart from fuel which was weighted 0.8%, all the other commodities were below 0.3% (FSM SBOC, 2011). Soft<br />

drinks, alcohol and tuna cans are within the main items imported and sold by local retail businesses (DOI and<br />

Pacific Island Training Initiative, 2010). All of these items have local substitutes, namely coconut water, tuba and<br />

fresh tuna. Not only do all these items have a local substitute, but each family has access to these products<br />

through land, which makes them affordable to anyone in economic terms, while equivalent imported items<br />

undermine the extent of the impact on the local economy of retail businesses: if the items sold would be local<br />

products, the impact of the retail business on the <strong>Yap</strong>ese economy would be greater.<br />

44 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

WELFARE & ENVIRONMENT<br />

Anticipating Upcoming Challenges & Preventing Disruptive Impacts<br />

Extended family erosion and migration trends, as well as environmental challenges will soon have a stronger<br />

impact on the Islands.<br />

Inputs<br />

→ The Committee will discuss the potential of the role of community volunteerism in the effective<br />

implementation of environmental initiatives (i.e. waste management, recycling, etc.). It will also discuss<br />

alternative welfare solutions (i.e. elderly care) acknowledging social changes and suggesting culturally<br />

appropriate initiatives.<br />

SDP Environment Goals<br />

Departments Interviewed: YSPC (#3); APA (all); MRMD (#1, #2, #4, #5, #6, #7, #9), YINS (#1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8,<br />

#9)<br />

Environment # 1: Mainstream environmental considerations, including climate change, into national policy and<br />

planning as well as in all economic development activities.<br />

being achieved/ strong impediments<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There is an increased awareness of climate change threats and of the need to formulate policies dealing<br />

with climate change issues and the conservation of the environment as a whole.<br />

• Environment risk mitigation is seen as established and operating well.<br />

• There is the perception that adequate advocacy efforts are in place.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Presently advocacy attention seems to have geared mainly towards climate change, not targeting the<br />

environment as a whole.<br />

• There is no perception of a policy plan for climate change yet, and also uncertainties on which<br />

environmental considerations to mainstream.<br />

• Funding and personnel are often perceived as the key factor that impedes the implementation of plans.<br />

• Perceived lack of a continuous monitoring system, and of technical skills necessary for a proper evaluation<br />

of complex projects (e.g. solar panels).<br />

• Perceived lack of a of long term project sustainability.<br />

• Perceived lack of distribution of information and sharing of policies amongst stakeholders.<br />

45 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

• Stakeholders’ involvement is perceived as insufficient and not comprehensive of all the relevant factors<br />

involved and/or needed (involving external stakeholders is often perceived as problematic due to budget<br />

timelines).<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Climate change as an issue as well as overall environmental considerations need to and should be<br />

strengthened.<br />

• Baselines need to be identified.<br />

• Establish a policy plan: identify and prioritize environmental considerations to be made.<br />

• Improve implementation and monitoring of projects.<br />

• Improve stakeholders’ involvement and communication.<br />

• Improve awareness of the importance of mangroves in environmental preservation and disaster<br />

preparedness.<br />

Environment # 2: Improve and Enhance the Human Environment (Improve waste management (reduce, recycle,<br />

reuse) and pollution control.<br />

being achieved<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Recycling is already a reality targeting the majority of non-biodegradable wastes such as bottles and cans.<br />

• Collecting and cleaning up activities were successfully organized in the past, revealing community<br />

cohesion, and the potential of volunteerism towards a collective environmental education (Joint clean-up<br />

efforts between EPA and MRMD).<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Irregularities in activities relating to waste management and pollution control were highlighted as core<br />

impediments.<br />

• There are no dedicated personnel or agency to coordinate and implement activities with solid waste<br />

management in the <strong>State</strong> with planning, monitoring, and limited activities conducted as practicable by a<br />

number of entities. However, a <strong>State</strong> Solid Waste Management Strategy (SSWMS) is being developed,<br />

aimed to guide and direct needed actions, responsible entities, and resources for implementation and<br />

improvement.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• No specific recommendations were made in relation to the Goal. Volunteerism as techniques of waste<br />

management should be further explored.<br />

46 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

• Finalization, endorsement, and implementation of the SSWMS will improve overall waste management<br />

activities, coordination, and pollution control related to waste management in the <strong>State</strong>.<br />

Environment # 3: Reduce energy use and convert to renewable energy sources / Minimize emission of<br />

greenhouse gases.<br />

strong impediments/being achieved<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There are good practices targeting the Goal, such as the action plans on renewable energies developed by<br />

YSPSC for the electrification of the Neighboring Islands through solar panel systems.<br />

• Projects targeting the Goal are well documented through summaries and other technical reports.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Funding sources and other management mechanisms are perceived as a strong impediment towards the<br />

achievement of the Goal.<br />

• Maintenance seems to be a core constraint.<br />

• Managing legal compliance, policy Goals and financial resources is perceived as a major challenge, mainly<br />

due to the misalignment and lack of coordination between the formers.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Improving the flow of information between different <strong>Government</strong> entities.<br />

• Further research relating to renewable energy is perceived as needed. [Working Group Note: The ongoing<br />

Energy Audit and the drafting of National Energy Plan may support the process.]<br />

• Maintenance should be considered a priority and included from the real beginning of the project’s<br />

implementation into the project strategy and budget.<br />

Environment # 4: Enhance the benefits of sustainable use of the FSM’s genetic resources and ensure benefits<br />

derived are fairly shared amongst stakeholders.<br />

being achieved/strong impediments/not understood<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Policies and legal documents being drafted at the National level to protect local genetic resources from<br />

external exploitation.<br />

• There is a perceived excellent information sharing and collaboration on the status of coral reefs among<br />

the four states.<br />

• Agreements and contracts with foreign bio-prospectors, mainly Japanese, to test genetic resources.<br />

47 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Outdated marine resources inventory.<br />

• Lack of trained locals/personnel: the perception is that capacity building at present has not been tackled<br />

as a priority.<br />

• The risk of exploitation by foreigners of local genetic resources is not perceived as a major risk in <strong>Yap</strong>.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Need to update inventory of marine resources.<br />

• Expanding the data collection has been highly recommended.<br />

• Conduct capacity building workshops for local individuals is seen as fundamental to ensure the continuity<br />

of the formers, and hence to support a proper management of local genetic resources. In this respect,<br />

foreign experts coming to work in the <strong>State</strong> should be responsible for the training of local staff. The<br />

results of the training should be effectively monitored.<br />

• Awareness should be raised to frame genetic resources as an environmental and financial asset that<br />

needs to be protected.<br />

Environment # 5: Manage and Protect the Nation's Natural Environment/Protect, conserve, and sustainably<br />

manage a full and functional representation of the FSM's marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems.<br />

being achieved/strong impediments<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Micronesia Challenge, DAF, MRMD, and other entities are ensuring the management and protection of<br />

the state’s marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems.<br />

• Establishments of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs).<br />

• Environmental advocacy and education is been promoted through newsletters distributed by MRMD to<br />

the schools.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Limited efforts relating to terrestrial ecosystem’s management and protection.<br />

• Limited personnel.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Collaboration of Environment Agencies with DOE to promote environmental education, as the distribution<br />

of newsletters to the schools is currently done informally targeting individual teachers who may or may<br />

not use them in class.<br />

• Improve public awareness.<br />

48 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

• Develop an implementation and monitoring plan.<br />

• Tailor advocacy and education initiatives at the communities’ level; develop municipal plans to have<br />

people participating in their community in the planning, implementation, and monitoring phases of the<br />

projects.<br />

Environment # 6: Improve environmental awareness and education and increase involvement of citizenry of the<br />

FSM in conserving their country's natural resources.<br />

achieved/being achieved<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Micronesia Challenge, agriculture and fisheries, and other entities are overseeing the achievement of this<br />

Goal.<br />

• Newsletters distributed by MRMD are promoting awareness through distribution in the education system<br />

to raise environmental awareness. [Working group Note: Informal distribution, not through DOE, hence<br />

not formally introduced into school’s curricula.]<br />

• There are projects targeting the transmission of local knowledge related to the usage of local techniques<br />

and traditional materials. A sample of a good practice was indicated to be an assembling fish nets<br />

workshop.<br />

• Annual observance of Earth day, Environment Week, Tree Planting Day, etc.<br />

• Cooperation with Queens University’s through the Geographic Information Science (GIS) project.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There is a history of academic research on the island; however there is the perception that foreign<br />

academicians did not support knowledge sharing processes.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The network of universities to be invited on the island should be expanded.<br />

• To better manage relationship with universities, <strong>Yap</strong>-Cap or R&D have been indicated as a suitable<br />

intermediaries to ensure that during future cooperation with academic institutions local capacity will be<br />

built through direct training and knowledge sharing.<br />

• Organizing a tropical ecology course first taught by foreign teachers, and later on by <strong>Yap</strong>ese properly<br />

trained during the first phase : linking past traditions and new technologies, and mixing foreign capacity<br />

and local teachers, have been indicated as the most suitable solutions to promote local capacity and<br />

awareness.<br />

49 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Environment # 7: Establish effective bio-security (border control, quarantine and eradication) programs to<br />

effectively protect the FSM's biodiversity from impacts of alien invasive species.<br />

achieved/being achieved<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• An Office of Quarantine is in place and implements effective bio-security programs.<br />

• An invasive species task force was established including other agencies DAF, MRMD, and EPA.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Limited funding and personnel are perceived as the core critical factor.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Increasing the number of the agencies and departments involved in the eradication of invasive species<br />

was highly recommended.<br />

Environment # 8: Create sustainable financing mechanisms for environmental and sustainable resource<br />

initiatives (FSMES, NBSAP).<br />

strong impediments/being achieved<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There are public fora and action plans that target the Goal: FSM Environmental <strong>Summit</strong>, National<br />

Biodiversity Strategic Action Plan (national level), <strong>Yap</strong> Biodiversity Strategic Action Plan (state level).<br />

• The Micronesia Conservation Trust (MCT) is successfully acting as NGOs funding collector and resources<br />

allocator supporting small local NGOs.<br />

• Establishment and support for effective management of several MPAs and locally managed marine areas<br />

(LMMAs) have been led and provided by <strong>Yap</strong>CAP and the MRMD.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The minimal level of direct participation/assistance to individual/households due to the lack of skills to<br />

access financial mechanisms has been highlighted as a critical factor.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• There is the need to map through a comprehensive picture of all the initiatives that target and fund<br />

environmental issues.<br />

• <strong>Yap</strong>-Cap can play a very positive role helping communities to draft small grant proposals at the<br />

community level.<br />

50 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Environment # 9: Enhance and Employ In-Country Technical Capacity to Support Environmental Programs.<br />

being achieved/strong impediments<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The Geographic Information Science (GIS) Summer Program of Queens College, South Carolina, is<br />

supporting the mapping of local resources. There is the perception that good technical capacity already<br />

exists.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Although there are people trained in environment related fields, there are limited job opportunities in this<br />

area.<br />

• Qualified/trained locals are migrating overseas seeking better employment opportunities.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Establishing networks of cooperation with other universities through OPB and R&D.<br />

• There is a perceived need for continuous improvement in capacity building and technical support.<br />

• Local job opportunities in environment related fields should be created.<br />

Related MDGs<br />

MDG 7. Environmental Sustainability<br />

Target 7-A. Integrate the principles of sustainable development into policies and programs;<br />

reverse the loss of envoronmental resources<br />

Land area covered by forests %<br />

Water resources utilization (<strong>Yap</strong> proper)<br />

- Normal conditions<br />

- Drought conditions<br />

2006-7 YAP 72% [FSM 89%]<br />

YAP<br />

37%<br />

58%<br />

[FSM]<br />

[23%]<br />

[37%]<br />

Target 7-B. Reduce biodiversity loss and by 2010, achieve a significant reversal of loss<br />

Area in protection status<br />

- Marine/Terrestrial<br />

2010 YAP<br />

10% / 0%<br />

[FSM ]<br />

[6% / 15%]<br />

Target 7-C. Have the proportion of the population without sustainable access to improved<br />

water sanitation<br />

Access to improved drinking water<br />

Access to improved sanitation<br />

Households with toilets facilities<br />

2005 YAP 61% [FSM 57%]<br />

2005 YAP 24% [FSM 25%]<br />

2005 YAP 59% [FSM 73%]<br />

Target 7-D. By 2020 to have achieved significant improvement in the lives of urban slum<br />

dwellers<br />

Households with security tenure<br />

Figure 19 Environment & MDG 7<br />

2000 YAP 98% [FSM 94%]<br />

51 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Source: Millennium Development Goals & The Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Status Report 2010<br />

Links of Environment and Welfare with other sectors<br />

Existing<br />

MRMD and teachers (informal link); DAF-EPA- MRMD (invasive species); YINS-EPA-MRMD (quarantine); MCT<br />

[Working Group Note: MCT resources deployment to other departments should be subjected to further analysis]-<br />

<strong>Yap</strong>-Cap -Micronesia Challenge.<br />

Suggested `<br />

MRMD-DOE (newsletter); Environment –Tourism-Communities (e.g. eco-tourism); YINS-OPB-R&D-COM-DAF-<br />

MRMD-YFA-Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth-Communities-Foreign Universities (capacity building).<br />

[Secretariat Note: the link between COM Land Grant and DAF community based agriculture practices should be<br />

explored.]<br />

The <strong>Sector</strong> through existing reviews and/or policies<br />

U.S. Department of Interior: Report to Congress on the First 5years Review of the Compact of free Association<br />

with the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010)<br />

N/A<br />

FSM: Comments from the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia on the Five Year Review of the Amended Compact of<br />

Free Association (2011)<br />

pp. 59. “Recognizing this lack of prior funding, as well as the fact that many planned outcomes have yet to be<br />

achieved, the Office of Environment and Emergency management developed, in 2009, a 5-year Environment<br />

<strong>Sector</strong> Plan. This plan lays out distinct priorities and indicators for the environment sector as well as the programs<br />

that need to be funded in order to achieve these Goals.” [Working Group Note: explore its effective<br />

implementation.] .<br />

pp. 59. “Unfortunately, incomplete, inconsistent and non-standardized indicator reporting precludes any<br />

systematic presentation or analysis of the environment sector. Projects have not historically been planned for, or<br />

renewed, on a long-term basis and as such there are no consistent indicators of performance, or means by which<br />

to assess improvement or digression … <strong>Yap</strong> had no measures for which year on year comparison is available.”<br />

pp. 60. Despite the fact that under the Compact Environment shifted from being a crosscutting issue to become a<br />

self-standing sector, “Environment sector expenditures are clearly only a small fraction of Compact expenditures,<br />

averaging 3.5% of compact expenditures from FY04-FY08. Additionally, there has been a steady decline in spending<br />

on the environment sector from 4.2% of Compact expenditures in FY04 to 2.6% in FY08. The lack of measurable<br />

environmental indicators, much less progress in those indicators, can largely be attributed to relative dearth of<br />

environment sector funding which precludes sustained environmental projects.”<br />

pp. 61. Figure 9.3: <strong>Yap</strong> has the lowest salaries and wages percentages of the Environmental <strong>Sector</strong> Expenditures.<br />

pp. 62. “The environment sector grant is an important addition to the Amended Compact and the FSM believes<br />

that through proper vision and planning it can achieve the expectations set forth during negotiations.”<br />

52 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

<strong>Yap</strong>: work in progress towards a local perspective<br />

[Secretariat Note: the value of ecological resources should be monitored together with the possibility to develop<br />

projects that link past traditions and new technologies.]<br />

Population Data<br />

Gender FSM <strong>Yap</strong><br />

Total 102,843 11,377<br />

Male 52,193 5,635<br />

Female 50,650 5,742<br />

Age FSM <strong>Yap</strong><br />

1-14 36,680 3,684<br />

15-59 60,574 6,872<br />

60-64 2,299 326<br />

65+ 3,317 495<br />

Gender & Age FSM <strong>Yap</strong><br />

Male, 1-14 18,792 1,898<br />

Male, 15-59 30,876 3,364<br />

Male, 60-64 1,172 180<br />

Male, 65+ 1,380 193<br />

Female, 1-14 17,888 1,786<br />

Female, 15-59 29,698 3,508<br />

Female, 60-64 1,127 146<br />

Female, 65+ 1,937 302<br />

Figure 20 Population 2010<br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

53 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Population Annual Growth rate (%)<br />

1980 1989 1994 2000 2010 1980-<br />

1989-<br />

1994-<br />

2000-<br />

1989<br />

1994<br />

00<br />

2010<br />

<strong>Yap</strong> 8,100 10,365 11,178 11,241 11,376 2.7 1.5 0.1 0.1<br />

FSM 73,159 95,740 105,506 107,008 102,624 3.0 1.9 0.3 -0.4<br />

Figure 21 Population Growth Rate 1980-2010<br />

Source: U.S. Dept. of Interior (2009); FSM SBOC (2011)<br />

Unemployment (2010) Total Percent of potential labor force<br />

<strong>Yap</strong> 177 2%<br />

FSM 3,485 5%<br />

Figure 22 Unemployment Rate 2010<br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Key issues:<br />

• To understand main population and migration trends.<br />

• To address population trends and economic consequences in the working population versus dependent<br />

population ratio (e.g. age, subsistence activities, etc.).<br />

• To address gender in economic terms.<br />

• “The FSM is a rare case of an economy where total employment in 2008 is lower than it was in 1995<br />

while population has increased”. Source: U.S. Department of Interior: Report to Congress on the First 5years<br />

Review of the Compact of free Association with the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010), pp.17.<br />

• "As some critics of American policies in the Pacific point out, as long the United <strong>State</strong>s provides a<br />

guaranteed source of income as well as a place to migrate to the FSM's economy does not have to<br />

become any more dynamic than it already is”. Source: U.S. Department of Interior: Report to Congress on the<br />

First 5years Review of the Compact of free Association with the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010), pp.16.<br />

54 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

SDP Gender Goals<br />

Departments Interviewed: DY&CA (all); YWA (all)<br />

Gender # 1: Enhance and promote the cultural, economic, legal, political and social development of women and<br />

children throughout their life cycles.<br />

being achieved/strong impediments<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• YWA & WIO are promoting women economic, legal and political participation of women, mainly in terms<br />

of networking and initiatives (e.g. Food Security Day).<br />

• The promotion of communication within women circles is improving.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Lack of funding and volunteerism seem not to be any more a resource, as people’s attitude towards<br />

volunteer initiatives changed. Please refer to the recommendations paragraph to follow up on the<br />

challenges and potential of volunteerism.<br />

• There are advocacy initiatives in place, however tangible projects are lacking.<br />

• Girls and young women are being targeted, while elderly women tend to be neglected.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The cultural participation is a controversial aspect of the Goal, as the inclusion of <strong>Yap</strong>ese women in the<br />

cultural development is perceived in different ways by different groups of women. [Working Group Note:<br />

This aspect should be further explored and understood by breaking down the reasons brought in by<br />

different sides: those that feel discrimination and those that do not perceive social structures in this way.]<br />

• More awareness raising and advocacy should be supported to promote traditional values that are getting<br />

lost. Mainly in relation to volunteer activities, there is a need to rediscover a traditional commitment<br />

towards <strong>Yap</strong> as a whole. An analysis of the impact of FEMA aid impact and usage after Typhoon Sudal has<br />

been strongly recommended to rediscover individual, family, and community values that can be<br />

promoted by women circles. [Working Group Note: the potential of men’s groups should also be<br />

explored, as gender is about gender roles, and their interaction, it is not only about empowering women.]<br />

Gender # 2: Enhance the Leadership Capacity and Roles of Women.<br />

being achieved/not understood<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• A successful project sample is the <strong>Yap</strong> Women Association Building.<br />

55 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The Goal is being achieved very slowly, as traditionally women are strong in their leadership, but in the<br />

new <strong>Government</strong> structure the relations were substantially complicated. It is perceived as arguable<br />

whether this Goal applies to the <strong>Yap</strong>ese reality, as there are women in public positions, including<br />

leadership positions in the <strong>Government</strong>. Additionally many <strong>Yap</strong>ese women believe that there should be a<br />

meritocracy system in place, and that horizontal positive discrimination should not be the way through<br />

which women get into leadership positions.<br />

• Many women do actually have both training and background to be in key leadership roles. The critical<br />

aspect is that they actually do not get the jobs. Although the cause may be attributed to the gender<br />

hierarchies in terms of ownership of businesses, mainly in the private sector, the lack of use of gained<br />

training and education by women do represent an economic loss, an a manpower disempowerment.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Further analysis should be done regarding the <strong>Yap</strong>ese relevance of the Goal, and its different perception<br />

by different women and stakeholders.<br />

Gender # 3: Mainstream Gender Issues into Decision- Making, Policies and Strategic Development Plans.<br />

being achieved/strong impediments<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Gender is starting to be targeted explicitly in policies that involve the youth.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• It is extremely difficult to tackle gender related issues, as gender is not openly mainstreamed, despite the<br />

fact that gender issues are silently what drive many decision making processes.<br />

• The definition and perception of priority related to gender issues is substantially different at a National<br />

level and at a <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> level: while women in the other states seem to support positive discrimination<br />

initiatives to insure women representations in the public arena, a consistent part of <strong>Yap</strong>ese women<br />

supports meritocracy instead, opposing policies promoting positive discrimination.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• A <strong>Yap</strong>ese debate on how and in which domain gender issues should be mainstreamed should be<br />

undertaken.<br />

Gender # 4: Maximize Women’s Contribution to and Participation in Democratic and Development Processes by<br />

Creating Opportunities for women’s Active Involvement.<br />

being achieved/no elements to value it<br />

56 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The Goal may not apply to the <strong>Yap</strong>ese reality as there are no social movements tackling democracy, de<br />

facto or attempted.<br />

• The confusion around the different roles and mission of YWA and WIO is impeding any potential action to<br />

be taken towards maximizing women’s contribution to and participation in democratic and development<br />

processes by creating opportunities for women’s active involvement.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• More communication and advocacy initiatives should give visibility to both YWA and WIO and their<br />

potential role in promoting a more active women’s role in tackling social problems.<br />

Gender # 5: Strengthen the Institutional Capacity of the Women’s Programs in FSM.<br />

being achieved<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Through YWA institutional capacity is being promoted. A good sample is represented by the <strong>Yap</strong> Women<br />

Association Building, and the role it may play to support several social problems such as elderly care,<br />

domestic violence, etc.<br />

• WIO, once separated from YWA, may have the potential to complement YWA activities sponsoring and<br />

supporting training initiatives.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Addressing explicitly gender issues and advocating for women empowerment may raise resistance<br />

conflicting with a traditional division of roles.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Further research should be undertaken in terms of defining what is changing over time naturally in terms<br />

of women’s gain of institutional capacity, and what needs actually to be supported through specific<br />

initiatives.<br />

Gender # 6: Strengthen the institutional capacity, effectiveness and impact of Youth Organizations.<br />

being achieved<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Since 2009 Youth Organizations are consistently emerging. Starting from the First Youth <strong>Summit</strong> in 2009,<br />

the youth became more aware of its role into political and social dynamics. In 2010 another Youth <strong>Summit</strong><br />

57 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

was held and Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth was established. Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth represents the first time that the youth tided<br />

together under one organization.<br />

• Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth is getting involved in several initiatives contributing to tackle a wide range of problems. A<br />

significant sample in this respect is represented by Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth involvement with the Fire Division for<br />

training and fire prevention activities (Wild Land Fire Initiative).<br />

• The <strong>Government</strong> is perceived as very supportive of Youth Organizations, although it is still exercising a<br />

strong control over their activities.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• No critical aspects were highlighted.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The links suggested in the “Links with over sectors” section should be further explored to promote a more<br />

effective social action and cohesion to tackle existing and emerging social problems.<br />

• Training may be needed to introduce networking and cooperative skills between the different<br />

stakeholders involved in Gender activities understood as the relation between horizontal categories such<br />

as, for example, women and youth.<br />

Gender # 7: Strengthen Youth Development through Social, Economic and Political Participation.<br />

being achieved<br />

[Same arguments as for Goal #6]<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Since 2009 Youth Organizations are consistently emerging. Starting from the First Youth <strong>Summit</strong> in 2009,<br />

the youth became more aware of its role into political and social dynamics. In 2010 another Youth <strong>Summit</strong><br />

was held and Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth was established. Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth represents the first time that the youth tided<br />

together under one organization.<br />

• Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth is getting involved in several initiatives contributing to tackle a wide range of problems. A<br />

significant sample in this respect is represented by Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth involvement with the Fire Division for<br />

training and fire prevention activities (Wild Land Fire Initiative).<br />

• The <strong>Government</strong> is perceived as very supportive of Youth Organizations, although it is still exercising a<br />

strong control over their activities.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• No critical aspects were highlighted.<br />

58 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The links suggested in the “Links with over sectors” section should be further explored to promote a more<br />

effective social action and cohesion to tackle existing and emerging social problems.<br />

• Training may be needed to introduce networking and cooperative skills between the different<br />

stakeholders involved in Gender activities understood as relation between horizontal categories such as,<br />

for example, women and youth.<br />

Gender # 8: Establish social protection and social welfare services for seniors.<br />

strong impediments/not understood<br />

Positive aspects towards the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The <strong>Yap</strong> Women Association Building may have a strong potential in tackling the lack of elderly welfare<br />

care services, and other social problems, in a context of erosion of the extent of the support of the<br />

extended family.<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• My Care does not include a specific plan that addresses elderly needs.<br />

• The sense of family responsibility in relation to elderly care may be challenged by the changes in the<br />

broader social and <strong>State</strong> context where migration, economic constraints and changes in working needs<br />

and schedules may not insure complete coverage of elderly needs based on the support of a modified<br />

family extension and structure.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Further analysis through focus groups to identify the economic extent of the changes in the extended<br />

family structure may help to identify the most suitable way to support families’ needs related to welfare<br />

services for seniors.<br />

• Pensions and Retirement plans have not yet being considered in the analysis of seniors’ services.<br />

[Working Group Note: Further investigation in this respect is needed to provide accurate<br />

recommendations.]<br />

Gender # 9: Address the special economic, political and social needs of disabled persons and persons with special<br />

needs.<br />

strong impediments<br />

Critical aspects were highlighted that may affect the final achievement of the Goal:<br />

• Disability, as seniors’ care, is traditionally handled as a family responsibility. However the changes in the<br />

broader social and <strong>State</strong> context of migration, economic constraints and changes in working needs and<br />

59 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

schedules may not insure complete coverage of persons with disability needs based on the support of a<br />

modified family extension and structure. Additionally inclusive initiatives supporting social integration of<br />

people with special needs cannot always being tackled with family resources.<br />

Recommendations were made to support the achievement of the Goal:<br />

• The links suggested in the “Links with over sectors” section should be further explored to promote a more<br />

effective inclusiveness and economic resources to support people with special needs and their families.<br />

Related MDGs<br />

MDG 3. Promote gender equality and empower women<br />

Target 3-A. Equality in education<br />

Ratio of girls to boys primary eductaion<br />

SY08-09 YAP 0.90 [FSM 0.96]<br />

Ratio of girls to boys secondary eductaion<br />

SY08-09 YAP 0.83 [FSM 1.02]<br />

Ratio of girls to boys enrolled in COM<br />

SY08-09 YAP 1.20 [FSM 1.14]<br />

Ratio women to men in wage employment<br />

2000 YAP 0.70 [FSM 0.49]<br />

Ratio women to men earnings<br />

2000 YAP n/a [FSM 0.87]<br />

Legislative seats held by women<br />

2007 YAP 0.0 [FSM 0.0]<br />

legislative compliance with CEDAW<br />

- Full/partial/out of compliance<br />

2004 YAP<br />

26/14/60%<br />

[FSM]<br />

[27/16/57%]<br />

Figure 23 Gender & MDG 3<br />

Source: Millennium Development Goals & The Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia, Status Report 2010<br />

Census Information Relevant to the <strong>Sector</strong><br />

Disability by age FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

Persons under 20 years 48,672 4,862<br />

SEEING, EVEN WITH GLASSES<br />

Some difficulty 376 47 0.97<br />

A lot of difficulty 79 10 0.21<br />

Cannot do at all 57 2 0.04<br />

60 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Disability by age FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

HEARING, EVEN WITH HEARING<br />

AID<br />

Some difficulty 537 68 1.40<br />

A lot of difficulty 154 11 0.23<br />

Cannot do at all 65 4 0.08<br />

WALKING, CLIMBING STEPS, OR<br />

USE OF ARMS<br />

Some difficulty 432 36 0.74<br />

A lot of difficulty 163 14 0.29<br />

Cannot do at all 147 15 0.31<br />

REMEMBERING OR<br />

CONCENTRATING<br />

Some difficulty 562 74 1.52<br />

A lot of difficulty 207 27 0.56<br />

Cannot do at all 155 14 0.29<br />

OTHERS<br />

Some difficulty 123 6 0.12<br />

A lot of difficulty 69 4 0.08<br />

Cannot do at all 78 2 0.04<br />

Persons 20 to 39 years 29,539 3,083<br />

SEEING, EVEN WITH GLASSES<br />

61 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Disability by age FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

Some difficulty 497 82 2.66<br />

A lot of difficulty 77 11 0.36<br />

Cannot do at all 22 - -<br />

HEARING, EVEN WITH HEARING<br />

AID<br />

Some difficulty 410 45 1.46<br />

A lot of difficulty 95 11 0.36<br />

Cannot do at all 36 5 0.16<br />

WALKING, CLIMBING STEPS, OR<br />

USE OF ARMS<br />

Some difficulty 430 44 1.43<br />

A lot of difficulty 118 9 0.29<br />

Cannot do at all 47 9 0.29<br />

REMEMBERING OR<br />

CONCENTRATING<br />

Some difficulty 505 71 2.30<br />

A lot of difficulty 148 20 0.65<br />

Cannot do at all 45 3 0.10<br />

OTHERS<br />

Some difficulty 81 2 0.06<br />

A lot of difficulty 65 7 0.23<br />

62 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Disability by age FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

Cannot do at all 36 1 0.03<br />

Persons 40 to 59 years 19,016 2,611<br />

SEEING, EVEN WITH GLASSES<br />

Some difficulty 2,853 605 23.17<br />

A lot of difficulty 314 36 1.38<br />

Cannot do at all 37 2 0.08<br />

HEARING, EVEN WITH HEARING<br />

AID<br />

Some difficulty 886 157 6.01<br />

A lot of difficulty 123 15 0.57<br />

Cannot do at all 33 5 0.19<br />

WALKING, CLIMBING STEPS, OR<br />

USE OF ARMS<br />

Some difficulty 1,634 260 9.96<br />

A lot of difficulty 368 45 1.72<br />

Cannot do at all 85 10 0.38<br />

REMEMBERING OR<br />

CONCENTRATING<br />

Some difficulty 1,171 190 7.28<br />

A lot of difficulty 231 32 1.23<br />

Cannot do at all 38 2 0.08<br />

63 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Disability by age FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

OTHERS<br />

Some difficulty 211 10 0.38<br />

A lot of difficulty 57 11 0.42<br />

Cannot do at all 19 -<br />

Persons 60 years and over 5,616 821<br />

SEEING, EVEN WITH GLASSES<br />

Some difficulty 1,784 337 41.05<br />

A lot of difficulty 518 94 11.45<br />

Cannot do at all 86 17 2.07<br />

HEARING, EVEN WITH HEARING<br />

AID<br />

Some difficulty 1,016 190 23.14<br />

A lot of difficulty 367 62 7.55<br />

Cannot do at all 52 8 0.97<br />

WALKING, CLIMBING STEPS, OR<br />

USE OF ARMS<br />

Some difficulty 1,309 271 33.01<br />

A lot of difficulty 684 109 13.28<br />

Cannot do at all 267 50 6.09<br />

64 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

Disability by age FSM <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>Yap</strong> %<br />

REMEMBERING OR<br />

CONCENTRATING<br />

Some difficulty 1,064 201 24.48<br />

A lot of difficulty 449 84 10.23<br />

Cannot do at all 78 10 1.22<br />

OTHERS<br />

Some difficulty 147 11 1.34<br />

A lot of difficulty 72 6 0.73<br />

Cannot do at all 22 7 0.85<br />

Figure 24 Disability by Age & Gender # 9<br />

Source: <strong>Yap</strong> <strong>State</strong> Census 2010<br />

Links with other sectors<br />

Existing<br />

[Working Group Note: the relation between DY&CA and YWA/WIO should be further explored.]<br />

Suggested<br />

YWA/WIO and Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth in relation to Youth’s support of gender related initiatives for community cohesion<br />

and eventually volunteerism (involving both men and women, not only targeting women empowerment).<br />

DOE-DHS-DY&CA-Our <strong>Yap</strong> Youth over disability issues. More specifically sport and disability, and peer to peer<br />

support for disabled youth should be explored.<br />

The <strong>Sector</strong> through existing reviews and/or policies<br />

U.S. Department of Interior: Report to Congress on the First 5years Review of the Compact of free Association<br />

with the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia (2010)<br />

N/A<br />

65 | P a g e


YAP STATE GOVERNMENT<br />

FSM: Comments from the Federated <strong>State</strong>s of Micronesia on the Five Year Review of the Amended Compact of<br />

Free Association (2011)<br />

N/A<br />

<strong>Yap</strong>: work in progress towards a local perspective<br />

N/A<br />

YWA/WIO additional info to consider<br />

YWA as NGO was established in 1953 to target <strong>Yap</strong> women. In 1974 the first renegotiation took place extending<br />

YWA mandate to both <strong>Yap</strong> proper and Outer Islands women, as well as women of any other ethnicity living in <strong>Yap</strong>.<br />

When the FSM joined the UN in 1991, a Women Interest Office (WIO) was created in each of the FSM <strong>State</strong>s as a<br />

Public Office to be financed with local revenues resources. Today YWA and WIO operate as one entity also from an<br />

administrative point of view. Within the end on 2012 the two entities should be split to regain their different roles<br />

although they share complementary mission statements. More specifically WIO is concerned with how policies<br />

introduced at a <strong>State</strong> level affect women interests. WIO also actively contributes to bills proposals that support<br />

women’s interests by the <strong>Government</strong>. In this respect WIO acts as a support entity for women association. YWA on<br />

the other hand is an NGO supported by Japanese, Chinese, U.S., Australian and New Zealand funds in addition to<br />

other local fund raising campaigns that include Day Care and other events. YWA has as mission promoting the<br />

empowerment of women in the <strong>State</strong>, and covering this role participated into the First Economic and Social<br />

<strong>Summit</strong>, although Gender wasn’t framed as a topic/sector per se at that time. The reason behind the “no-need” of<br />

explicitly addressing gender issues during the First Economic and Social <strong>Summit</strong> was attributed to the fact that the<br />

division of gender roles in <strong>Yap</strong> did not exclude women, but regulated their influence in the public sphere through<br />

non public fora of discussion. Additionally, in more than one occasion <strong>Yap</strong>ese women opposed positive<br />

discrimination policies aiming at “insuring” a given number of women positions under the belief that meritocracy,<br />

and not positive discrimination throughout horizontal societal categories, should be the mean for any given role.<br />

66 | P a g e

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!