Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4 Governing the backbone of<br />
cultures: broadcasting policy<br />
A whole generation of urban young people now in their 20s grew up<br />
with only a vague memory of a media system that consists of two or,<br />
at a maximum, three television channels. In Europe, children born in<br />
the 1980s have reached young adulthood with MTV <strong>and</strong> to a significant<br />
extent have learned about human relationships – <strong>and</strong> fashion – through<br />
Friends, Frasier, Big Brother <strong>and</strong> Sex <strong>and</strong> the City. The idea alone that<br />
their media lives could be limited to wildlife <strong>and</strong> historical documentaries<br />
seems absurd. The very thought that they – or more possibly their<br />
parents, since they still live at home – have to pay monthly fees to receive<br />
channels they do not watch is illogical. The suggestion that, not so long<br />
ago, there used to be a state monopoly over television seems archaic at<br />
best. Often, in the classroom it is difficult to generate support for Public<br />
Service Broadcasting (PSB) among students, who although they may<br />
know to appreciate that private television is largely about Hollywood <strong>and</strong><br />
imitations thereof, do not necessarily have PSB on their agenda of glamorous<br />
entertainment. In the United States, where the project of public<br />
service television seems to be financially suspended in a vegetative state,<br />
because of the firm h<strong>and</strong> of commercial broadcasting, the whole concept<br />
of non-commercial broadcasting has been pushed to the margins of<br />
public discussion. This is not to say that Americans or young Europeans<br />
are oblivious to the politics of commercialization of the media. However,<br />
in the eyes of Hollywood-raised audiences, non-commercial media<br />
have not managed to escape the dry language of their past, the same way<br />
that criticism of the big bully – Capitalism – has not escaped its association<br />
with colourless <strong>and</strong> monotonous left-wing politics that have ceased<br />
to inspire <strong>and</strong> excite young blood. Whether the above described images<br />
correspond to reality or stereotypes is possibly relevant to the ways<br />
in which the questions about public service broadcasting <strong>and</strong> publicly<br />
owned media in general have been framed. Is Gramsci’s analysis of hegemony<br />
in maintaining the domination of capital pointing to a haunting<br />
85