Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY 65<br />
to exert greater influence within the ITU to pressure member states in the<br />
South to open their markets to foreign firms (Lee 1996: 176). The growing<br />
influence of corporate actors in multilateral policy-making bodies like<br />
the ITU corresponded with a renewed focus <strong>and</strong> concern about telecommunications<br />
disparity in the South, an issue that became paramount in<br />
development circles in the mid-1980s.<br />
Although the ITU had officially recognized the ‘special character’ of<br />
telecommunications as a ‘medium of economic <strong>and</strong> social development’<br />
as early as the 1950s (O’Siorchu et al. 2002: 40), it was only in the 1980s<br />
that the ITU along with the World Bank <strong>and</strong> the IMF began to promote<br />
the ‘Missing Link’ between economic development <strong>and</strong> ‘telecommunications<br />
penetration’. The 1984 publication of the ITU-sponsored influential<br />
Maitl<strong>and</strong> Commission Report condemned the extreme inequalities<br />
of telephone access between rich <strong>and</strong> poor nations. Although the report<br />
drew global attention to the relatively novel issue of information disparity,<br />
its recommendations pressed for the need to reform inefficient national<br />
public monopolies <strong>and</strong> promote the transfer of technologies from advanced<br />
to developing nations. The ITU report argued that investment in<br />
telecommunications should no longer be seen as a luxury service for corporate<br />
<strong>and</strong> national elites, but rather as an essential service that directly<br />
leads to economic growth. Reflecting the new technologically driven consensus<br />
in policy circles, the report overemphasized the causality between<br />
‘telephone penetration’ <strong>and</strong> economic growth (Samarajiva <strong>and</strong> Shields<br />
1990). <strong>Policy</strong> experts in the ITU <strong>and</strong> the World Bank claimed that investment<br />
in the newest telecommunications technologies would allow<br />
developing countries to actually ‘leapfrog’ over stages of development<br />
(Wellenius <strong>and</strong> Stern 1994).<br />
The first phase of reforms in the South consisted of the liberalization<br />
of the equipment market but, by 1986, discussions within the Uruguay<br />
Round of the GATT introduced the economically more significant area<br />
of trade in telecommunications services. US-based transnational firms<br />
ranging from credit card companies to telecommunication, media <strong>and</strong><br />
computer service providers had been lobbying the US government for<br />
over a decade to include services along with manufactured goods in the<br />
purview of the GATT. This would mean that member states would agree<br />
to reduce <strong>and</strong> eventually eliminate tariffs <strong>and</strong> trade barriers in the area of<br />
services – including telecommunications services. An initial overwhelming<br />
comparative advantage held by Northern industries in the area of<br />
services prompted eight years of opposition <strong>and</strong> negotiation between<br />
‘developing’ economies such as India <strong>and</strong> Brazil against the US <strong>and</strong> its<br />
Western European <strong>and</strong> East Asian allies. Ultimately, opposition gave way<br />
to agreement, as developed countries conceded to open their markets to