11.11.2014 Views

Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad

Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad

Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY 65<br />

to exert greater influence within the ITU to pressure member states in the<br />

South to open their markets to foreign firms (Lee 1996: 176). The growing<br />

influence of corporate actors in multilateral policy-making bodies like<br />

the ITU corresponded with a renewed focus <strong>and</strong> concern about telecommunications<br />

disparity in the South, an issue that became paramount in<br />

development circles in the mid-1980s.<br />

Although the ITU had officially recognized the ‘special character’ of<br />

telecommunications as a ‘medium of economic <strong>and</strong> social development’<br />

as early as the 1950s (O’Siorchu et al. 2002: 40), it was only in the 1980s<br />

that the ITU along with the World Bank <strong>and</strong> the IMF began to promote<br />

the ‘Missing Link’ between economic development <strong>and</strong> ‘telecommunications<br />

penetration’. The 1984 publication of the ITU-sponsored influential<br />

Maitl<strong>and</strong> Commission Report condemned the extreme inequalities<br />

of telephone access between rich <strong>and</strong> poor nations. Although the report<br />

drew global attention to the relatively novel issue of information disparity,<br />

its recommendations pressed for the need to reform inefficient national<br />

public monopolies <strong>and</strong> promote the transfer of technologies from advanced<br />

to developing nations. The ITU report argued that investment in<br />

telecommunications should no longer be seen as a luxury service for corporate<br />

<strong>and</strong> national elites, but rather as an essential service that directly<br />

leads to economic growth. Reflecting the new technologically driven consensus<br />

in policy circles, the report overemphasized the causality between<br />

‘telephone penetration’ <strong>and</strong> economic growth (Samarajiva <strong>and</strong> Shields<br />

1990). <strong>Policy</strong> experts in the ITU <strong>and</strong> the World Bank claimed that investment<br />

in the newest telecommunications technologies would allow<br />

developing countries to actually ‘leapfrog’ over stages of development<br />

(Wellenius <strong>and</strong> Stern 1994).<br />

The first phase of reforms in the South consisted of the liberalization<br />

of the equipment market but, by 1986, discussions within the Uruguay<br />

Round of the GATT introduced the economically more significant area<br />

of trade in telecommunications services. US-based transnational firms<br />

ranging from credit card companies to telecommunication, media <strong>and</strong><br />

computer service providers had been lobbying the US government for<br />

over a decade to include services along with manufactured goods in the<br />

purview of the GATT. This would mean that member states would agree<br />

to reduce <strong>and</strong> eventually eliminate tariffs <strong>and</strong> trade barriers in the area of<br />

services – including telecommunications services. An initial overwhelming<br />

comparative advantage held by Northern industries in the area of<br />

services prompted eight years of opposition <strong>and</strong> negotiation between<br />

‘developing’ economies such as India <strong>and</strong> Brazil against the US <strong>and</strong> its<br />

Western European <strong>and</strong> East Asian allies. Ultimately, opposition gave way<br />

to agreement, as developed countries conceded to open their markets to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!