11.11.2014 Views

Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad

Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad

Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE HISTORY OF GLOBAL COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA POLICY 25<br />

Developmentalism, Fordism <strong>and</strong> the shadow of the Cold War<br />

The eras of the Pax Britannica, the Pax Americana, or the Pax Soveitica –<br />

the era of states inclined to prophetic visions of their own gr<strong>and</strong>eur<br />

<strong>and</strong> the unshakeable affirmation of their superiority – gave rise to the<br />

tendency to look at the world from the point from which power radiated<br />

outwards. The East–West confrontation has left its imprint in the<br />

form of a bipolar division of the planet that fuelled the imaginary with<br />

a metaphysical contest between the forces off good <strong>and</strong> evil – at least<br />

until the day when the bloc conception crumbled along with regimes<br />

thought eternal <strong>and</strong> omnipotent. And yet the Manichean vision of the<br />

planet has not vanished from mentalities. The Cold War had scarcely<br />

been buried when a regional war broke out, <strong>and</strong> this religious conception<br />

of gr<strong>and</strong> international oppositions made a spectacular resurgence.<br />

The havoc it has wrought is visible even among the most enlightened<br />

intellectuals. (Mattelart 2002: 242)<br />

In an exhaustive historiography, Arm<strong>and</strong> Mattelart writes of the enduring<br />

legacy of military <strong>and</strong> economic power in shaping the role of modern<br />

media <strong>and</strong> information systems. These arguments remain resonant<br />

today as new foreign <strong>and</strong> civil wars are rationalized as an ‘exceptional’<br />

response to terrorism, whether in Iraq, Afghanistan, or at ‘home’ in the<br />

West (Agamben 2004). Mattelart cautions against the ‘fading memory’<br />

of past internationalization, the way in which conservatives <strong>and</strong> liberals<br />

alike assume that today’s multipolar <strong>and</strong> networked world marks a<br />

distinct rupture from previous modes of governance <strong>and</strong> technological<br />

order (Friedman 2005; Ohmae 1999). In this tradition, we trace how the<br />

bipolar ideological division of the world as defined through the Cold War<br />

remains central to the current definition of ‘free’ media <strong>and</strong> information<br />

flow. We also consider how the brutal encounter <strong>and</strong> legacy of colonialism<br />

continues to shape the problems <strong>and</strong> solutions in the field of global<br />

media <strong>and</strong> communication policy.<br />

We start with the end of the Second World War, when multilateral<br />

governance was codified with the founding of the United Nations (UN).<br />

The UN charter provided for the establishment of specialized bodies<br />

like the United Nations Education, Scientific <strong>and</strong> Cultural Organization<br />

(UNESCO) which has dealt explicitly in regulating international communications<br />

<strong>and</strong> media industries, as well as the World Bank <strong>and</strong> International<br />

Monetary Fund (IMF) <strong>and</strong> the General Agreement on Trade <strong>and</strong><br />

Tariffs (GATT), which would eventually play a prominent role in these areas.<br />

Although multilateral governance of communication industries has<br />

a longer history – for instance, the International Telecommunications

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!