Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
164 MEDIA POLICY AND GLOBALIZATION<br />
Feminist economists such as Swasti Mitter <strong>and</strong> Celia Ng have conducted<br />
extensive empirical research on employment in ICT-based industries in<br />
the South to argue for greater state intervention to improve the ‘quality<br />
<strong>and</strong> quantity’ of jobs for women workers fostering sustainable as opposed<br />
to export-led development. 15<br />
Deliberation through difference: lessons for transnational public<br />
interest advocates<br />
Feminist advocacy within the WSIS process shows the ways in which<br />
redistributive claims over appropriate technology <strong>and</strong> basic ICT access<br />
are deeply entangled in claims for recognition marked by gender, class,<br />
race <strong>and</strong> nationality, among other differences. We have argued that two<br />
decades of debates over representation within transnational civil society<br />
have given advocates for gender justice a wider perspective on how to<br />
challenge the Eurocentric claims of human rights without ab<strong>and</strong>oning<br />
an emancipatory vision of social justice. The notion that both states <strong>and</strong><br />
corporations need to be held accountable to universal principles of social<br />
justice is an indisputably positive outcome of the ‘MacBride legacy’. We<br />
have argued that building on this legacy, we must recognize the need for<br />
a normative framework of social justice that incorporates recognition,<br />
redistribution <strong>and</strong> representation as linking issues of ‘development’ with<br />
concerns about individual <strong>and</strong> community ‘rights’.<br />
If we consider the issue of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs), for instance,<br />
we can see how expansive redistributive claims coupled with claims<br />
for recognition based on community rights can successfully challenge IS<br />
discourse <strong>and</strong> practice. Relevant to this discussion is the fact that civil<br />
society organizations have worked with state actors, specifically states<br />
where there are vibrant social movements engaged in policy-making<br />
more broadly – in this case Argentina, Brazil, India <strong>and</strong> South Africa,<br />
among others. Since the 1986 signing of the controversial TRIPS Agreement<br />
in the GATT strongly advocated by the US <strong>and</strong> its Northern allies,<br />
Southern nation-states have formed alliances among themselves <strong>and</strong> also<br />
with civil society organizations to oppose the implementation of freetrade<br />
norms, especially in the area of agricultural seeds <strong>and</strong> medicine.<br />
Northern nations <strong>and</strong> TNCs have meanwhile pushed for patenting of<br />
plants <strong>and</strong> other living organisms against arguments for community use<br />
of resources <strong>and</strong> the need for affordable transfer of technologies to promote<br />
economic <strong>and</strong> technological development (Shashikanth 2005). The<br />
battle over TRIPs has taken place at the WTO <strong>and</strong> more recently at<br />
WIPO, where Argentina, Bolivia <strong>and</strong> Brazil were successful in 2004 of<br />
convincing the general assembly to adopt a resolution that established a