Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE INFORMATION SOCIETY 115<br />
good jobs for the American people <strong>and</strong> economic growth for the nation.<br />
As importantly, the NII can transform the lives of the American<br />
people – ameliorating the constraints of geography, disability, <strong>and</strong> economic<br />
status – giving all Americans a fair opportunity to go as far as<br />
their talents <strong>and</strong> ambitions will take them. (NII 1993)<br />
[The European Parliament] considers that the new information<br />
technologies may create even greater regional <strong>and</strong> social disparities<br />
in the European Union than at present <strong>and</strong> considers that in order to<br />
obviate this risk, the use of information highways should focus on correcting<br />
existing imbalances <strong>and</strong> discrepancies between regions of the<br />
European Union in terms of economic <strong>and</strong> social development, <strong>and</strong><br />
social <strong>and</strong> regional problems ...(European Parliament 1998 para. 23)<br />
Transforming digital information into economic <strong>and</strong> social value is the<br />
basis of the new economy, creating new industries, changing others<br />
<strong>and</strong> profoundly affecting citizens’ lives. (Commission of the European<br />
Communities 2000a: 4)<br />
Proactive policies are needed to respond to the fundamental changes<br />
in technology. Digital convergence requires policy convergence <strong>and</strong><br />
a willingness to adapt regulatory frameworks where needed so they<br />
are consistent with the emerging digital economy. (Commission of<br />
the European Communities 2005b: 3)<br />
These quotes capture the spirit (<strong>and</strong> time) of the ‘new’ informational<br />
age <strong>and</strong> exemplify the directions of national <strong>and</strong> supranational policy<br />
in Europe <strong>and</strong> the USA. Quite significant in their positioning, the declarations<br />
made in Gore’s National Information Infrastructure (NII) <strong>and</strong><br />
the European Commission’s two major policy documents eEurope: an Information<br />
Society for All (2000a) <strong>and</strong> the ‘mature’ IS plan for i2010 – a<br />
European Information Society for Growth <strong>and</strong> Employment (2005b) convey<br />
the expectations of policy-makers <strong>and</strong> in general the rhetoric of a new<br />
<strong>and</strong> therefore promising era for revived economies <strong>and</strong> an end to poverty.<br />
They also clearly convey an almost dogmatic definition of policy which<br />
adheres to technological determinism <strong>and</strong> the ‘free’ market. Among these<br />
celebratory intents, the voice of the European Parliament emerges as an<br />
unannounced visitor, the voice of caution <strong>and</strong> urgency pointing to the<br />
vast gap between fairy tales <strong>and</strong> reality. One of the interesting traits of<br />
the development of IS policies is that the boundaries between ‘national’<br />
<strong>and</strong> ‘global’ policy, ‘Fordist’ <strong>and</strong> ‘post-Fordist’ modes of production, conventional<br />
<strong>and</strong> ‘new’ media are continuously shifting – they coexist <strong>and</strong>