Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BROADCASTING POLICY 99<br />
European Parliament <strong>and</strong> critics. Broadcasting in general has defined the<br />
EU as a single market contributing to the biggest <strong>and</strong> most impressive<br />
experiment in territorial economic integration in the region. The Television<br />
Without Frontiers Directive (TVWF) introduced in 1989, amended<br />
in 1997 <strong>and</strong> currently under revision still remains the definitive document<br />
of broadcasting policy (EP <strong>and</strong> Council 1987; Council 1989) because it<br />
sets out the general principles that rule transborder media services market<br />
today, with a particular emphasis on the unrestricted movement of media<br />
content. Broadcasting policy <strong>and</strong> in particular the audiovisual arm of<br />
the industry became the means that tested the functionality of the single<br />
market, but also boosted its operation. It has been the ultimate test for<br />
the circulation <strong>and</strong> market validity of products that cannot be understood<br />
in physical terms, such as cars, oranges <strong>and</strong> coffee makers that are easier<br />
to circulate. The exceptional thing about ‘symbolic’ products, or in other<br />
words ‘cultural’ products, is that in most cases they can be reproduced,<br />
distributed <strong>and</strong> broadcast for an almost unlimited number of times. Apart<br />
from taste, which changes with time, very little else can affect negatively<br />
the profit-making ability of these products. The powerful commercial<br />
arm of the film industry repackages products that have lost their novelty<br />
<strong>and</strong> reintroduces them in a variety of ways that help maintain their<br />
market value, in forms such as special ‘seasons’ dedicated to Hollywood<br />
stars, according to genre, or releasing different versions of perceived ‘cult’<br />
films (the ‘director’s cut’ are some of the best examples). The audiovisual<br />
sector, currently boosted by the increasing prominence of the electronic<br />
sector <strong>and</strong> e-commerce, is in a unique position to reproduce goods at<br />
minimal cost, which is not the case with other products, such as the automotive<br />
industry. Digitization <strong>and</strong> the expansion to the ‘virtual’ realm,<br />
where storage <strong>and</strong> connection to receivers <strong>and</strong> therefore customers, are<br />
theoretically at least infinite, <strong>and</strong> provide content providers <strong>and</strong> media<br />
owners with the conditions to move in (almost) unlimited market spaces.<br />
For that of course access to nationally controlled markets is necessary.<br />
Sometimes referred to as ‘cultural goods’ <strong>and</strong> more often defined as<br />
‘services’, broadcasting content became the object of liberalization in<br />
European societies <strong>and</strong> markets in the last two decades of the twentieth<br />
century. At an EU level, a battalion of neoliberalists working together<br />
with the telecommunications companies put forward reports <strong>and</strong> policy<br />
proposals for the full liberalization of telecommunications <strong>and</strong> broadcasting<br />
as the drivers for economic progress. Under this light, the TVWF<br />
directive became a major document of mainly competition policy, which<br />
treats content as a ‘service’ partly because juristically the EU’s competencies<br />
did not exp<strong>and</strong> to non-economic sectors. Additionally, the dominance<br />
of market-driven objectives are partly due to the fact that the interests