Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Media Policy and Globalization - Blogs Unpad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
98 MEDIA POLICY AND GLOBALIZATION<br />
British governments assigned the role of scrutiny <strong>and</strong> policy proposal<br />
making to a number of independent committees. From Sykes (1923) to<br />
Beveridge (1951) <strong>and</strong> from Pilkington (1962) to the Peacock Committee<br />
(1986) <strong>and</strong> to the Communications Act of 2003, British governments<br />
have sought to define the ‘problem’ within specific discursive frameworks<br />
that reflect the ideological dispositions of the dominant groups of British<br />
society. Therefore the definition of public service broadcasting in Britain<br />
as a ‘national service’ was represented by the Sykes Committee in a period<br />
when the politics of the country was geared towards democratic representation<br />
<strong>and</strong> universal suffrage. The beginnings <strong>and</strong> development of a<br />
welfare state in the country were also created under conditions friendlier<br />
to broadcasting decentralization (proposed by the Ullswater Committee<br />
in 1936) than the totalitarian regimes of Germany <strong>and</strong> Italy that sought<br />
to exercise absolute control over broadcasts.<br />
The fall of British colonial rule gave an impetus to reassessment of the<br />
role of the BBC. Compounded by the beginnings of the cold war era <strong>and</strong><br />
the intensification of a capitalist economy, the conservative government<br />
supported the establishment of commercial broadcasting (1954), withdrawing<br />
its support for a PSB monopoly <strong>and</strong> introducing an immature<br />
television programming to the competition environment of the market.<br />
A series of government interventions since the 1950s has extended the<br />
liberalization of the media market in Great Britain <strong>and</strong>, with every step,<br />
the ‘issue’ of the BBC is addressed anew. This sustained state hostility has<br />
not managed to marginalize the corporation, as it evolved <strong>and</strong> maintained<br />
its position as the most successful public service broadcaster in the world<br />
<strong>and</strong> has increased its revenue <strong>and</strong> strengthened its position in international<br />
communication systems. The added risks caused by deregulation<br />
of both the market <strong>and</strong> the use of new technological possibilities <strong>and</strong> in<br />
particular the digitization of communications were pointed out in the<br />
early days of television digitization in Britain (Chalaby <strong>and</strong> Segell 1999).<br />
Largely owing to its commercial ventures, the BBC succeeded in reorganizing<br />
its structure <strong>and</strong> priorities <strong>and</strong> is currently offering a number<br />
of digital services alongside private entertainment or highly specialized<br />
channels. The other European broadcasters, however, often struggle with<br />
decreased audience shares <strong>and</strong> little development-oriented policy.<br />
Protecting one’s own: cultural expression <strong>and</strong> policy hegemonies<br />
Broadcasting policy has impacted upon European market integration like<br />
few other policy areas in the EU. It has created a market for private<br />
European media conglomerates <strong>and</strong> has allowed cross-ownership <strong>and</strong><br />
increased ownership concentration despite strong objections from the