10.11.2014 Views

Ministerial responsibility: reality or myth? - Australasian Study of ...

Ministerial responsibility: reality or myth? - Australasian Study of ...

Ministerial responsibility: reality or myth? - Australasian Study of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

people about the policies they are enacting. They are also responsible f<strong>or</strong><br />

ensuring that Departmental failures <strong>or</strong> mistakes are rectified. As mentioned<br />

previously, in modern Parliaments there are many checks and balances on<br />

Ministers that are m<strong>or</strong>e effective in procuring good government than the<br />

resignation <strong>of</strong> a Minister. With rigid party systems, the current f<strong>or</strong>ms <strong>of</strong><br />

parliament in Australia, ministerial resignation f<strong>or</strong> departmental faults would<br />

be an ineffective tool to achieve the goal <strong>of</strong> an open and accountable<br />

Government.<br />

Modern parliament and departments make the notion that Ministers ought to<br />

resign f<strong>or</strong> departmental err<strong>or</strong>s untenable. In conclusion, modern day<br />

parliaments have wide scrutiny mechanisms in place to examine the<br />

executive and the Government.<br />

However, the role <strong>of</strong> <strong>Ministerial</strong> Advis<strong>or</strong>s and the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> scrutiny<br />

<strong>of</strong> their actions is perhaps a topic suitable f<strong>or</strong> further examination.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!