10.11.2014 Views

Bondarenko Dmitri M. Homoarchy

Bondarenko Dmitri M. Homoarchy

Bondarenko Dmitri M. Homoarchy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

81<br />

heroes and location of Ekpo represent a traditional source of<br />

opposition. Where all paths to prestige and political<br />

power converge in the capital, Ekpo emphasizes the ritual<br />

importance of the village.<br />

In the meantime, although only the cases of those accused in doing<br />

harm to the whole country and especially to the Oba and his relatives were<br />

investigated at the central, all-Benin court, the Oba was recognized as not<br />

merely the supreme judge but also the only legitimate lawgiver. This was so<br />

not only due to his recognition by the subjects as their master in the sense<br />

described in section 3 of chapter 3, but first and foremost because the Binis saw<br />

the laws as not really “given” by the Oba but rather as his authoritative<br />

translations to them of the ancestors’ behests, uncorrupted even slightly due to<br />

the sovereign’s maximal spiritual proximity to the true lawgivers in the Binis’<br />

minds – the ancestors. However, though for the Binis the ancestors were the<br />

ultimate source of laws, in reality the regulations were rooted in community<br />

norms and traditions. Due to this new laws met no insurmountable barriers on<br />

their way from the Oba’s palace to communalists’ houses.<br />

In the period under immediate consideration in this work the country<br />

consisted not only of chiefdoms, autonomous local communities and –<br />

seldom – equal in rights unions of communities (Egharevba 1952: 26; 1965:<br />

12) as before but also of the units of a new type, in which both the<br />

strengthening of the central authority compared to the Ogiso time and its still<br />

ambiguous position in the Benin multipolity revealed themselves. This new<br />

institution was a group of communities under the leadership of a paramount<br />

chief, like chiefdoms, but the genesis of that socio-political unit was completely<br />

different. Such units started to appear from the reign of the first Oba in the<br />

result of the supreme ruler’s grants of communities to all-Benin chiefs and<br />

royal relatives (Egharevba 1956: 31; Bradbury 1957: 33; 1973: 177). The<br />

territorial expansion and titled chiefs’ involvement in politically and financially<br />

profitable relations with Europeans contributed much to the “pseudochiefdoms”<br />

appearance in later historical periods (Ryder 1969). The titled chiefs were<br />

those who exercised the supreme power over communities and chiefdoms<br />

through the community and chiefdom heads in the name of the Oba. While<br />

chiefdom heads were more powerful farther from the capital their estates were<br />

due to their personal enterprise, the Oba himself granted pseudochiefdom heads<br />

more prerogatives more distant from Benin City the territory lay (Bradbury<br />

1973: 150; Imoagene 1990: 28). The pseudochiefdom heads were to<br />

compensate, “voluntarily” or “in the performance of the duty”, the central<br />

power’s insufficient strength in the country’s outskirts. Such units’ number<br />

especially increased in the time of Benin’s active expansion (mid-15 th – early<br />

17 th centuries).<br />

It goes without saying that this system had nothing essential in common<br />

with the feudal one, being realized in a society to which private landownership

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!