10.11.2014 Views

poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

annual rainfall is 1,382 mm and the rainy season is concentrated between October and<br />

March (1,048 mm), representing 75.8% <strong>of</strong> the total annual rainfall. The driest period occurs<br />

between June and September (SENTELHAS et al., 2009).<br />

The sewage originated from installations <strong>of</strong> FEAGRI/UNICAMP (bathrooms, laboratories and<br />

kitchen) present characteristics <strong>of</strong> domestic effluents. In the sewage treatment plant (STP)<br />

there is a box for the separation <strong>of</strong> the coarse material which is conducted to the Partitioned<br />

Anaerobic Reactor (PAR) and afterwards to the Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands<br />

(SFCW), with average dimensions <strong>of</strong> 3,17mx1,68mx0,53m, and useful volume <strong>of</strong><br />

approximately 1.150 liter for each CW. The substratum used was gravel <strong>of</strong> size 1 and<br />

ornamental plants Heliconia psittacorum (CW1) and Cyperus altenifolius (CW2). The<br />

plantation <strong>of</strong> the macrophytes was in December 2008. The monitoring <strong>of</strong> water quality was<br />

done in two periods: before pruning (BP) at the beginning <strong>of</strong> May till Mid-August 2009, when<br />

pruning occurred, totaling 8 days monitoring. The sampling <strong>of</strong> affluent and effluents was<br />

done on an hourly scale (from 09:00 till 18:00 h, every hour). The flow was regulated<br />

manually, from the ball valves, in the morning before the first sampling. The flow<br />

measurements were performed by the volumetric method (direct measurement) (CALIJURI<br />

et al., 2009). The water collection for the analysis was made just after the flow<br />

measurements, being one affluent sample to the CWs and a sample for each effluent <strong>of</strong><br />

CWs. The analysis <strong>of</strong> water quality parameters was done in a specialized lab, according to<br />

the methodology <strong>of</strong> Standard Methods (APHA, 1998).<br />

The calculus for the amount <strong>of</strong> variables was made by the multiplication <strong>of</strong> the concentration<br />

from each input and output variable by the effluent flow <strong>of</strong> input and output referring to each<br />

day. The efficiency <strong>of</strong> daily retention for the amount <strong>of</strong> each variable was obtained by the<br />

difference between the daily amount <strong>of</strong> input and the daily amount <strong>of</strong> expected output divided<br />

by the daily amount <strong>of</strong> input, times 100.<br />

The variables analyzed for the water quality were: Ammonia nitrogen (NH³ + ), Nitrate (NO -3 )<br />

and Total Phosphorus (TP).<br />

3. Results and discussion<br />

The characterization <strong>of</strong> the PAR effluent can be observed at Table 1. The average values<br />

were obtained from the hourly collected samples, afterwards integrated in the daily scale,<br />

corresponding to the sampling days during the period monitored.<br />

Table 1. Average values and standard deviation <strong>of</strong> the principal characteristic <strong>of</strong> the effluent<br />

after anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), and affluent <strong>of</strong> the CW.<br />

Sewage pH EC DO water temp NH³ + NO -3 TP<br />

effluent 7.9 ± 0.2 966.6 ± 151.0 2.06 ± 2.1 22.5 ± 1.8 41.0 ± 15.8 1.7 ± 0.4 3.4 ± 0.7<br />

PAR<br />

pH Hydrogen potential; EC Electrical Conductivity (µS.cm -1 ); DO Concentration <strong>of</strong> dissolved oxygen (mg.L -1 );<br />

Water temperature (ºC); NH³ + ammonia nitrogen (mg.L -1 ); NO -3 nitrate (mg.L -1 ); TP total phosphorus (mg.L -1 ).<br />

Table 2 shows the minimum and maximum affluent concentrations during the total period<br />

under study. The affluent concentration <strong>of</strong> NH 3+ varied from 24.8 to 76.9 mg.L -1 . Authors like<br />

CALIJURI et al. (2009) and SOUSA et al. (2000) worked with domestic sewage and affluent<br />

averages <strong>of</strong> 43 mg.L -1 and 43.9 mg.L -1 , respectively. As for NO -3 the variation was <strong>of</strong> 1.1 to<br />

3.0 mg.L -1 , MAZZOLA (2003) worked with domestic sewage and affluent concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

NO -3 which varied from 0.4 to 1.3 mg.L -1 . The affluent concentration for TP during the period<br />

studied varied from 2.2 a 5.2 mg.L -1 . WU et al. (2010) and ZHANG et al. (2007) worked with<br />

domestic sewage and an average affluent concentration <strong>of</strong> TP 4.1 and 4.4 mg.L -1 ,<br />

respectively. SILVA and ROSTON (2010) report an average affluent concentration <strong>of</strong> 5.1<br />

mg.L -1 in wash water at the milking parlor. The results found corroborate with the above<br />

mentioned authors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!