poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering
poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering
Develop A Simple Economical Evaporation Pan Mohamed A. Rashad 1 , and El-Sayed E. Omran 2 * 1 Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Egypt. 2 Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Egypt. * Corresponding author. E-mail: ee.omran@gmail.com - e.omran@scuegypt.edu.eg Abstrat The objective of the current study was “to develop a Simple Economical Evaporation Pan (SEEP)”. The pan made using inexpensive materials which are simple, low cost, and can easily be placed in several locations of an irrigated field. Four different pans sized very small (16cm), small (32cm), medium (40cm) were compared to the standard large (57cm) pan. The pan consists of a galvanized washtub with standard brass toilet bowl floats. Twelve pans (3 replicates for 4 diamter) were evaluated and tested to determine if the pans of the same size responded similarly to each other, and how the variation was different between pan sizes. For the test, 432 different readings were available over a period of time. The results show that pan size 57 cm was the nearest from the standard class (A) in evaporation rate. But that not mean it is the best one. The final decision for the best pan is based on the economical and many other factors. The medium pan (M= Ф 40) did not respond exactly the same as the larger pan (L= Ф 57). However, the small pan (S= Ф 32) responded in a similar manner to the medium pan (M= Ф 40) when compared to the large (L= Ф 57) pan. The very small pan (VS= Ф 16) representing the evaporation that occurs from the large pan. Overall based on this study, the very small sized pan (VS= Ф 16) offers a potentially less expensive alternative to irrigation scheduling. The advantages of economical evaporation pan are facial in measurement and in transportation and lower in cost of installation which make it easy for farmers to have evaporation pan and calculate water requirement for all plant. Key words: Economical Pan, Evaporation, Irrigation Scheduling. 1. Introduction The current available methods for measuring rates of evaporation are limited. Unfortunately, the three accurate direct methods of measurement available, i.e. weighing lysimeters, Bowen ratio and eddy flux instrumentation, are unsuitable for monitoring evaporation as a routine direct measurement at meteorological enclosures (Strangeways, 2001). Field devices that integrate environmental effects and measure evaporation can be used to schedule irrigation. These devices respond to water removal and water addition, like rainfall or irrigation. Crop water use is commonly predicted using weather data to estimate reference evapotrationspiration (ET 0 ). Evapotranspiration is not easy to measure. Specific devices and accurate measurements of various physical parameters or the soil water balance in lysimeters are required to determine evapotranspiration. The methods are often expensive, demanding in terms of accuracy of measurement and can only be fully exploited by well-trained research personnel. Although the methods are inappropriate for routine measurements, they remain important for the evaluation of ET estimates obtained by more indirect methods. The only two practical methods suitable for routine use in meteorological station networks are measurements using evaporimeters and calculations based on other meteorological measurements. The second is the approach, introduced by Penman in 1948 to estimate open water evaporation (Penman, 1948) and extended by Monteith in 1965 to directly estimate evaporation from vegetation covered surfaces (Monteith, 1965) which is now the method recommended by the FAO to calculate reference crop evapotranspiration (Allen et al., 1998). However, to apply the Penman–Monteith equation to natural vegetation or agricultural crop
surfaces requires information on their surface resistance to water loss. The use of the Penman–Monteith equation in irrigation practice requires empirical coefficients to modify in general to reduce but sometimes to increase the estimates of reference crop evapotranspiration. It is of course the need for such empirical crop coefficients that is the major criticism of the use of evaporimeters. One meteorologically based device used for irrigation management is the evaporimeter, which can be any evaporation measuring device such as an atmometer (Broner and Law, 1991) or evaporation pan, whose data can be related to crop water use by applying crop coefficients as are used to modify evapotranspiration models. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) has recommended that the evaporation pan be adopted as the standard instrument for crop water use determination. The best known of the pans are the "Class A" evaporation pan and the "Sunken Colorado Pan". The pan has proved its practical value and has been used successfully to estimate reference evapotranspiration by observing the evaporation loss from a water surface and applying empirical coefficients to relate pan evaporation to ET O (Stanhill, 2002, Thomas, et al., 2002). The problems involved in the use of Class A pan as expensive and not easy movable were recognized. According to our knowledge, no reports are available on using the economical and flexible evaporation pan. The objective of this study is to develope a simple economical evapotranspiration pan. The aim is to assess the feasibility of and also to provide guidelines for setup and use of the evaporation pan for irrigation 2. Materials and Methods Experiments were conducted at the soil and water department’s farm, Faculty of agriculture, Suez Canal University. The main aim of this research is to propose evaporation pan and calculate its K pan and compare it with the K pan of evaporation pan class A. 2.1. Pan Development Stages Four galvanized steel pans with 16, 30, 39, and 57 cm diameter and 30 cm height were built-in. The pans were from available materials in the market and at affordable prices. The pan constructed with mesh covers and install unit to determine the increase and the decrease in the water level (figure 1). 2.2. Field Experimental setup The first field experiment was conducted from 15/04/2011 to 05/05/2011 and the second experiment was conducted from 7/6/2011 to 21/6/2011. In order to calibrate the different pans and determine k pan compared to k pan of the evaporation class A pan (120 cm diameter and 25 cm height) at the same condition, the following steps are considered (Figure 1). First, three of the pans were distributed and put on wood base exept for the fourth size (16) which is installed vertically at a djustable height of 150 cm above the soil. After that the horizontal of pans was adjust by using water leveling apparatus to ensure the accuracy of prototype obtained. Second, every three pans of the same type were distributed in one place to standardize the conditions applicable to them. Third, the evaporation class A pan was Put with different pans to compare it with the different pans. Finally, wind speed was measured by Anemomete (accuracy 0.1 km /hr) for used in equations to calculate the K pan . Also, the temperature and humidity were measured by digital temperature and humidity device at the time of sunrise and noon. The water level reading in pans was started in same time from first day until last day.
- Page 263 and 264: TABLE 5 Correlation analysis of wat
- Page 265 and 266: turbulent flow energy produced by w
- Page 267 and 268: The numerical model was validated a
- Page 269 and 270: 4. Conclusion FIGURE 6: The shape o
- Page 271 and 272: 2.1 Case study The Zayandeh-Rud bas
- Page 273 and 274: economic factors. In this is a very
- Page 275 and 276: FIGURE 1. Location of the Wuliangsu
- Page 277 and 278: WT( o C) (a) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5
- Page 279 and 280: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h) (i)
- Page 281 and 282: • The effectiveness of the crop c
- Page 283 and 284: As evidenced by Rana et al. (2005),
- Page 285 and 286: 1.20 1.20 2010 2011 0.90 0.90 K c 0
- Page 287 and 288: elationships. There is forest area,
- Page 289 and 290: B = ( c − a) A − ( c − d) c
- Page 291 and 292: References Choi, W.-J., Lee, S.-M.,
- Page 293 and 294: of faecal bacteria (Kummerer, 2004;
- Page 295 and 296: FIGURE 1 - Project tasks and links
- Page 297 and 298: Oliveira, A.B. & Henriques, M. (201
- Page 299 and 300: 1 Introduction To irrigate is to su
- Page 301 and 302: the inverter that provides a refere
- Page 303 and 304: OLIVEIRA FILHO, D. ; SAMPAIO, R. P.
- Page 305 and 306: 1.1 Description of the Study Area T
- Page 307 and 308: Refrences: Bruce J.P. (1994). Natur
- Page 309 and 310: RE because it has the advantages ov
- Page 311 and 312: with L 1 2 com obs J ( k ) = ∑{ f
- Page 313: Relative hydraulic conductivity r 1
- Page 317 and 318: climate. Therefore a special coeffi
- Page 319 and 320: FIGURE 2: The relation between K pa
- Page 321 and 322: Coagulation using Moringa oleifera
- Page 323 and 324: After the assembly of the experimen
- Page 325 and 326: For the positive control test, the
- Page 327 and 328: MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL OF PRINCIP
- Page 329 and 330: The multiple regression equations w
- Page 331 and 332: Table 3 - Regression models that be
- Page 333 and 334: Is Imaging Analysis Quantifying the
- Page 335 and 336: of the computer. All additional ima
- Page 337 and 338: The final enhanced images were segm
- Page 339 and 340: image analysis is well suited and f
- Page 341 and 342: EVALUATION OF CROP CANOPY EFFECT ON
- Page 343 and 344: ∂e ∂e ∂e + u + v ∂t ∂x
- Page 345 and 346: 4. Results and discussion 4.1. Spat
- Page 347 and 348: Benchmarking of Irrigated Agricultu
- Page 349 and 350: Indicators can be thought of as sta
- Page 351 and 352: total area is about 13,700 km2. The
surfaces requires information on their surface resistance to water loss. The use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Penman–Monteith equation in irrigation practice requires empirical coefficients to modify in<br />
general to reduce but sometimes to increase the estimates <strong>of</strong> reference crop<br />
evapotranspiration. It is <strong>of</strong> course the need for such empirical crop coefficients that is the major<br />
criticism <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> evaporimeters.<br />
One meteorologically based device used for irrigation management is the evaporimeter, which<br />
can be any evaporation measuring device such as an atmometer (Broner and Law, 1991) or<br />
evaporation pan, whose data can be related to crop water use by applying crop coefficients as<br />
are used to modify evapotranspiration models. The World Meteorological Organization (WMO)<br />
has recommended that the evaporation pan be adopted as the standard instrument for crop<br />
water use determination. The best known <strong>of</strong> the pans are the "Class A" evaporation pan and<br />
the "Sunken Colorado Pan". The pan has proved its practical value and has been used<br />
successfully to estimate reference evapotranspiration by observing the evaporation loss from a<br />
water surface and applying empirical coefficients to relate pan evaporation to ET O (Stanhill,<br />
2002, Thomas, et al., 2002). The problems involved in the use <strong>of</strong> Class A pan as expensive<br />
and not easy movable were recognized.<br />
According to our knowledge, no reports are available on using the economical and flexible<br />
evaporation pan. The objective <strong>of</strong> this study is to develope a simple economical<br />
evapotranspiration pan. The aim is to assess the feasibility <strong>of</strong> and also to provide guidelines for<br />
setup and use <strong>of</strong> the evaporation pan for irrigation<br />
2. Materials and Methods<br />
Experiments were conducted at the soil and water department’s farm, Faculty <strong>of</strong> agriculture,<br />
Suez Canal University. The main aim <strong>of</strong> this research is to propose evaporation pan and<br />
calculate its K pan and compare it with the K pan <strong>of</strong> evaporation pan class A.<br />
2.1. Pan Development Stages<br />
Four galvanized steel pans with 16, 30, 39, and 57 cm diameter and 30 cm height were built-in.<br />
The pans were from available materials in the market and at affordable prices. The pan<br />
constructed with mesh covers and install unit to determine the increase and the decrease in the<br />
water level (figure 1).<br />
2.2. Field Experimental setup<br />
The first field experiment was conducted from 15/04/2011 to 05/05/2011 and the second<br />
experiment was conducted from 7/6/2011 to 21/6/2011. In order to calibrate the different pans<br />
and determine k pan compared to k pan <strong>of</strong> the evaporation class A pan (120 cm diameter and 25<br />
cm height) at the same condition, the following steps are considered (Figure 1). First, three <strong>of</strong><br />
the pans were distributed and put on wood base exept for the fourth size (16) which is installed<br />
vertically at a djustable height <strong>of</strong> 150 cm above the soil. After that the horizontal <strong>of</strong> pans was<br />
adjust by using water leveling apparatus to ensure the accuracy <strong>of</strong> prototype obtained. Second,<br />
every three pans <strong>of</strong> the same type were distributed in one place to standardize the conditions<br />
applicable to them. Third, the evaporation class A pan was Put with different pans to compare it<br />
with the different pans. Finally, wind speed was measured by Anemomete (accuracy 0.1 km<br />
/hr) for used in equations to calculate the K pan . Also, the temperature and humidity were<br />
measured by digital temperature and humidity device at the time <strong>of</strong> sunrise and noon. The<br />
water level reading in pans was started in same time from first day until last day.