poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

cigr.ageng2012.org
from cigr.ageng2012.org More from this publisher
10.11.2014 Views

z 5 cm -10 cm -20 cm 5 4 3 Pressure head Volumetric water content m 0.0 -0.4 -0.8 -1.2 -1.6 0.25 0.15 -10cm -20cm -30cm -30 cm 2 1 Tensiometer Soil moisture probe Thermometer FIGURE 1: Schematic illustration of observation and computation Soil temperature 0.05 o C 20 10 0 11/26 11/27 11/28 11/29 11/30 12/1 12/2 Time in day FIGURE 2: Observed data Eq.(10), respectively. Additionally, the saturated water content θ s is defined as the value of θ in case that ψ is equal to zero while the residual water content θ r as the minimum value in observed data of θ. Thus, θ s and θ r are determined to be 0.30 and 0.05 from all observed data series including them shown in Fig.2, respectively. As the reference soil temperature, the average value of observed data is adopted which equals to 12.4 degrees Celsius. Conclusively, a best fitting curve for θ −ψ relation at the reference soil temperature is obtained with the value of α and n vg being 28.9 m -1 and 1.43, respectively. 4.3 Identification of RHC Firstly, the number of identified unknown parameters is determined. Since the optimal number of parameters is approximately from seven to nine according to Bitterlich et al. (2004) and Iden and Durner (2007), the number of unknown parameters is set to be 10 in this study. Secondly, the manner of division on the definition domain (effective saturation domain) is determined. The function shape of RHC generally has steeper gradient near the saturated zone. In the context of accuracy, the range with steeper gradient should be divided into finer subdomain. Therefore the effective saturation range from 0.8 to 1.0 where RHC function rapidly changes is partitioned into sub-range in the manner of geometric series. Eventually, RHC function is identified as shown in Fig.3 after the saturated hydraulic conductivity at the reference temperature is determined to be 5.18×10 -5 m/s through laboratory experiment. 4.4 Reproducibility of Calibrated Forward Simulation Model The validity of the inverse modeling proposed is assessed in terms of reproducibility for the time-series observed data by calibrated forward simulation model through comparing the observed and computed values. The result of reproducibility for water movement is shown in Fig.4. In the lower half of Fig.4, the absolute errors |ψ obs -ψ com | are also shown to demonstrate the time-varying difference in solution reproducibility. From the results, it is found that water movement is reproduced with high accuracy. 5. Conclusion An inverse modeling in variably saturated and non-isothermal subsurface water flow is developed. To consider the water movement depending on the soil temperature, a couple of the mixed form RE with heat conduction equation is employed as the governing equation.

Relative hydraulic conductivity r 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 r 0.0 0.2 0.6 1.0 Effective saturation FIGURE 3: Identified RHC e Pressure head (m) Fitting error (m) 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 0.16 0.08 0.0 11/26 11/27 11/28 11/29 11/30 12/1 12/2 Time in day FIGURE 4: Reproducibility of forward solution for water movement RHC function is represented using a free-form approach and determined by solving IP with the simulation-optimization technique after SWRC which can be determined through experiments with relative ease is given in advance. The validity of the inverse modeling proposed is confirmed from the practical application with in-situ soil near the surface soil. obs com Reference list Bitterlich, S., Durner, W., Iden, S.C., & Knabner, P. (2004). Inverse estimation of the unsaturated soil hydraulic properties from column outflow experiments using free-form parameterizations. Vadose Zone J., 3, 971-981. Chung, S.O., & Horton, R. (1987). Soil heat and water flow with a partial surface mulch. Water Resour. Res., 23(12), 2175-2186. Hillel, D. (1998). Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press, (Chapter 8). Huyakorn, P.S. & Pinder, G.F. (1983). Computational Methods in Subsurface Flow. Academic Press. Iden, S.C., & Durner, W. (2007). Free-form estimation of the unsaturated soil hydraulic properties by inverse modeling using global optimization. Water Resour. Res., 43, W07451, doi:10.1029/2006WR 005845. Iden, S.C., & Durner, W. (2008). Free-form estimation of soil hydraulic properties using Wind's method. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 59, 1228-1240. Izumi, T., Takeuchi, J. Kawachi, T., Unami, K., & Maeda, S. (2008). An inverse method to estimate soil hydraulic properties in saturated-unsaturated groundwater flow. J. of Rainwater Catchment Systems, 13(2), 23-28. Izumi, T., Takeuchi, J. Kawachi, T., & Fujihara, M. (2009). An inverse method to estimate unsaturated hydraulic conductivity in seepage flow in non-isothermal soil. Trans. of The Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering, 264, 35-42. Izumi, T., Takeuchi, J. Kawachi, T., & Fujihara, M. (2011). Inverse modeling of massconservative numerical model for variably saturated seepage flow. J. of Rainwater Catchment Systems, 17(2), 11-16. Mualem, Y. (1976). A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res., 12(3), 513-522. Seki, K. (2007). SWRC fit - a nonlinear fitting program with a water retention curve for soils having unimodal and bimodal pore structure. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 4, 407- 437. Sun, N.Z. (1994). Inverse Problems in Groundwater Modeling. Kluwer Academic Publishers, (Chapter 4). van Genuchten, M.Th. (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892-898.

z<br />

5 cm<br />

-10 cm<br />

-20 cm<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

Pressure<br />

head<br />

Volumetric<br />

water content<br />

m<br />

0.0<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.8<br />

-1.2<br />

-1.6<br />

0.25<br />

0.15<br />

-10cm -20cm -30cm<br />

-30 cm<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Tensiometer<br />

Soil moisture<br />

probe<br />

Thermometer<br />

FIGURE 1: Schematic illustration <strong>of</strong> observation<br />

and computation<br />

Soil<br />

temperature<br />

0.05<br />

o<br />

C<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

11/26 11/27 11/28 11/29 11/30 12/1 12/2<br />

Time in day<br />

FIGURE 2: Observed data<br />

Eq.(10), respectively. Additionally, the saturated water content θ s is defined as the value <strong>of</strong> θ<br />

in case that ψ is equal to zero while the residual water content θ r as the minimum value in<br />

observed data <strong>of</strong> θ. Thus, θ s and θ r are determined to be 0.30 and 0.05 from all observed<br />

data series including them shown in Fig.2, respectively. As the reference soil temperature,<br />

the average value <strong>of</strong> observed data is adopted which equals to 12.4 degrees Celsius.<br />

Conclusively, a best fitting curve for θ −ψ relation at the reference soil temperature is<br />

obtained with the value <strong>of</strong> α and n vg being 28.9 m -1 and 1.43, respectively.<br />

4.3 Identification <strong>of</strong> RHC<br />

Firstly, the number <strong>of</strong> identified unknown parameters is determined. Since the optimal<br />

number <strong>of</strong> parameters is approximately from seven to nine according to Bitterlich et al.<br />

(2004) and Iden and Durner (2007), the number <strong>of</strong> unknown parameters is set to be 10 in<br />

this study.<br />

Secondly, the manner <strong>of</strong> division on the definition domain (effective saturation domain) is<br />

determined. The function shape <strong>of</strong> RHC generally has steeper gradient near the saturated<br />

zone. In the context <strong>of</strong> accuracy, the range with steeper gradient should be divided into finer<br />

subdomain. Therefore the effective saturation range from 0.8 to 1.0 where RHC function<br />

rapidly changes is partitioned into sub-range in the manner <strong>of</strong> geometric series.<br />

Eventually, RHC function is identified as shown in Fig.3 after the saturated hydraulic<br />

conductivity at the reference temperature is determined to be 5.18×10 -5 m/s through<br />

laboratory experiment.<br />

4.4 Reproducibility <strong>of</strong> Calibrated Forward Simulation Model<br />

The validity <strong>of</strong> the inverse modeling proposed is assessed in terms <strong>of</strong> reproducibility for the<br />

time-series observed data by calibrated forward simulation model through comparing the<br />

observed and computed values. The result <strong>of</strong> reproducibility for water movement is shown in<br />

Fig.4. In the lower half <strong>of</strong> Fig.4, the absolute errors |ψ obs -ψ com | are also shown to demonstrate<br />

the time-varying difference in solution reproducibility. From the results, it is found that water<br />

movement is reproduced with high accuracy.<br />

5. Conclusion<br />

An inverse modeling in variably saturated and non-isothermal subsurface water flow is<br />

developed. To consider the water movement depending on the soil temperature, a couple <strong>of</strong><br />

the mixed form RE with heat conduction equation is employed as the governing equation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!