10.11.2014 Views

poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. Data and Methods<br />

2.1. Methods<br />

Irrigation vulnerability is determined by a quantitative balance between crop water<br />

consumption and water resource availability. A vulnerability assessment model was<br />

developed using two modules: simulation <strong>of</strong> water requirements in paddy fields and<br />

calculation <strong>of</strong> hydrologically effective run<strong>of</strong>f. All processes were designed to be conducted<br />

over a grid in order to make the process extendable to global scale-application, as<br />

vulnerability does not need to be assessed only at country or regional levels such as<br />

administrative or watershed boundaries (Naudé et al., 2011).<br />

2.1.1. Simple water balance model<br />

A simple water balance equation was formulated to simulate daily water balance at a location<br />

(Eq. 1). The daily water requirement and ponding depth was simulated successively using<br />

daily climate data and recommended water management practices.<br />

PD(t) = PD(t-1) + PR(t) – AET(t) – DP (1)<br />

where PD is ponding depth (mm) with an upper limit <strong>of</strong> 80 mm and the negative values <strong>of</strong> PD<br />

trigger water deficit (WD), PR is the precipitation (mm/day) just in case <strong>of</strong> more than 5.0<br />

mm/day, AET is actual crop evapotranspiration (mm/day) calculated by multiplying the<br />

Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration by the 10-day crop coefficient (Table 1), DP<br />

is a deep percolation <strong>of</strong> 4.0 mm/day (Lee, 1988), and t is time.<br />

Irrigation requirements (IR) cannot be greater than the desired ponding depth by growth<br />

stages (Table 2). Effective rainfall (ER) is the amount <strong>of</strong> rainfall below the upper limit <strong>of</strong><br />

ponding depth.<br />

TABLE 1: Crop coefficients for use with the Penman-Monteith equation (Yoo et al., 2008)<br />

Days after<br />

transplanting<br />

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120<br />

Crop coefficients 0.78 0.97 1.07 1.16 1.28 1.45 1.50 1.58 1.46 1.45 1.25 1.01<br />

TABLE 2: Desired ponding depth by growth stages in paddy fields (Jang et al., 2004)<br />

Days since transplanting 10 40 60 90 130<br />

Growth stage On transplanting Tillering Elongation Heading Ripening<br />

Ponding depth 0.78 0.97 1.07 1.16 1.28<br />

2.1.2. Cell-based simple run<strong>of</strong>f model<br />

Input parameters for the model were limited by a lack <strong>of</strong> quality data. Therefore, this study<br />

examined a simplified run<strong>of</strong>f model using a curve number (CN) method at a cell unit.<br />

2.1.3. Vulnerability indices<br />

Vulnerability is a broad measure which is open to interpretation, and there are several<br />

approaches to its measurement (Jun et al., 2011). Expression <strong>of</strong> vulnerability is complicated<br />

by everything from the quality <strong>of</strong> the available data, to the selection and creation <strong>of</strong> indicators,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!