10.11.2014 Views

poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the soil mechanical resistance to penetration, with these variables applying it to a horticultural soil in the<br />

Mediterranean area.<br />

Several laboratory and field studies have been linked empirically, adjusting multiple SR regression<br />

functions (Busscher, 1990, da Silva et al. 1994 and 1997, Smith et al. 1997) to texture, porosity (Ф), organic<br />

matter content (Spivey et al., 1986), water content (θ) (Ayers and Perumperal, 1982, Busscher et al, 1997<br />

and Lehrsch et al, 1982), bulk density (Db) (Taylor and Gardner, 1963, Camp and Lund, 1968; Mirreh and<br />

Ketcheson, 1972) and matric potential (ψ) and calcium carbonate content (Poch and Verplancke, 1997).<br />

(Busscher, 1990) used up to ten different adjustments to estimate SR as a dependant variable <strong>of</strong> matric<br />

potential and bulk density. Sample soils sieved to 2 mm, with textures ranging from sandy to sandy loam.<br />

The function that best fit had the following structure: SR = a (ψ b ) • (D b ) c where ψ is the absolute magnitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> the matric potential, and a, b, c are constant adjustments.<br />

Da Silva and Kay (1997) also, obtained a fit function for SR based on the volumetric water content θ (SR<br />

= c θ d • (D b ) e ) from samples with clay contents between 6% and 37% and organic matter between 9 and 39<br />

g / kg. Coefficients d and e depend on the content <strong>of</strong> clay and organic matter in soil sampled. They<br />

concluded that compaction has a greater impact on SR than it will on bulk density levels.<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this study is the indirect evaluation <strong>of</strong> SR as a determinant <strong>of</strong> root growth and crop<br />

development (Campbell et al., 1988, Cassel and Nelson, 1979; Grecu et al. 1988; Perumperal, 1987, Sojka<br />

et al., 1991) and movement <strong>of</strong> water and air (Rivas et al., 1998).<br />

2. Materials and methods<br />

2.1 Soil studied<br />

The study was carried out from soil samples collected in a horticultural farm in Eastern Spain (Liria,<br />

Valencia), altitude 190 m. In this farm, a sprinkler with fixed installation is used as an irrigation system and<br />

cropping intensity allows two annual crops in rotation with conventional tilled practices. There is a high level<br />

<strong>of</strong> mechanization in agricultural tasks, in addition to the presence <strong>of</strong> large harvesters and crop transport<br />

vehicles which have been stood for the last 20 years. This area has a semiarid Mediterranean climate type<br />

with dry summers and rainy autumns and winters. The annual rainfall historical average is <strong>of</strong> 398 mm with a<br />

evapotranspiration potential <strong>of</strong> 1091 mm (Montheih Pennman), rain incidence is higher in autumn season.<br />

The soil is characterized as silty loam Haplic Calcisol (Word Reference Base, FAO 2003) with high<br />

calcium carbonate content. The organic matter content is low and decreases with depth (Table 1).<br />

Table 1. Soil properties (mean values <strong>of</strong> eight samples)<br />

Particle size distribution:<br />

Sand (50 -2000 μm), % 53.34<br />

Silt (2-50 μm), % 24.71<br />

Clay (< 2 μm), % 21.94<br />

Chemical properties:<br />

Organic carbon content, g kg -1 8.13<br />

CaCO3 , g kg -1 615.8<br />

pH (water, 1:2.5) 8.4<br />

Electrical Conductivity ( 1:5) (mmhos cm -1 ) 0.2<br />

2.2 Samples preparation<br />

Ten samples (15 kg/each) were taken from random locations in the farm by digging to a depth <strong>of</strong> 30 cm<br />

and mixing the extracted material. Samples collected from the field were taken to the laboratory. Coarse<br />

elements such as stones or crop residues were manually separated from soil. The remaining material was<br />

sieved with a 4 mm mesh to obtain a fine working soil for laboratory. Soil was dried in an oven at 105°C<br />

until a moisture value near zero (Figure 1). Subsequently it was wetted up to a 15% <strong>of</strong> RH. This RH value<br />

showed in a previous experience that achieves good levels <strong>of</strong> compaction. Wetting was conducting on dry<br />

soil by using a spray. In order to get a uniform distribution <strong>of</strong> moisture, soil was spread in thin layers over<br />

large trays. To warrant control weights <strong>of</strong> soil and water inputs a high precision digital scale was used<br />

(Figure 2). The uniform water distribution process is completed by gentle stirring with a spatula (Figure 3).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!