poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering
poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering poster - International Conference of Agricultural Engineering
location of the study, López-Urrea et al. (2006) indicated that FAO56 P-M equation is the most accurate method to estimate ETo in semiarids conditions. For these reasons, this equation has been chosen to calibrate the Hargreaves equation. This paper aims to calibrate the Hargreaves equation for estimating ETo, comparing it with daily average estimations obtained through the FAO56 P-M equation in a zone of the Southeast of Spain. 2. Materials and Methods Weather data sets were obtained from agrometeorological stations in the provinces of Murcia and Albacete (Spain). These stations are integrated in the irrigation advisory service in the Spanish autonomous regions of Murcia and Castilla-La Mancha. Data were daily registered during period 2005-2009. From these climatic data, and by using the Penman-Monteith FAO56 equation, ETo was calculated (Allen et al., 1998). The used Penman Monteith equation is the next: ET 0 900 0,408· ∆(Rn − G) + γ u2(e = T + 273 ∆ + γ(1+ 0.34·u ) Where: ET o = reference evapotranspiration (mm·day -1 ) Rn = crop surface net radiation (MJ·m -2 day -1 ) Ra = extraterrestrial radiation (mm·day -1 ) G = soil heat flux (MJ·m -2 día -1 ) T = average air temperature at 2 m height (ºC) u2 = wind speed at 2 m height (m·s -1 ) e s = saturated vapor pressure (kPa) e a = real vapor pressure (kPa) e s - e a = vapor pressure deficit (kPa) ∆ = slope of the vapor pressure curve (kPa·ºC -1 ) γ = psicrometric constant (kPa·ºC -1 ). 2 s − e a ) Moreover, and by using the same climatic data, estimations of ETo values by means of Hargreaves equation were obtained (Hargreaves and Samani, 1985). ET 0.5 0 = 0.0135·(t ave + 17.78)·R 0·KT·(t max − tmin) ET o = referente evapotranspiration (mm·day -1 ) t ave = daily average temperature (ºC) R o = extraterrestrial radiation (MJ·m -2 day -1 ) KT = coefficient (0.162 for inner regions and 0.19 for coastal regions) In order to transform MJ·m -2 day -1 to mm·day -1 , the value has to be multiplied by 0.408. Several comparisons were obtained through the simple linear regression analysis technique and a set of statistics. These statistics are: Root mean square error (RMSE): ⎡ ⎢ RMSE = ⎢ ⎢ ⎢⎣ n ∑ i= 1 2 ⎤ (yi − xi) ⎥ ⎥ n0 ⎥ ⎥⎦ 0,5
Relative error (RE): Index of agreement (IA): IA = 1− n RMSE RE = ·100 y ∑ i= 1 ∑ i= 1 i n (x − y ) ((x − x) + (y Where: x i = ET o Hargreaves (ET o H) value for the i day. y i = ET o Penman Monteith (ET o PM) value for the i day. n = number of data. x = average ET o H value. y = average ET o PM value. i i i 2 − y)) Relation between ET o PM and ET o H values for the studied period has been graphically represented, and regression lines for every station have been calculated. 3. Results In this study, data from two specific agrometeorological stations were analysed, concretely from the 2.5 (Villena, Alicante) and 3.4 (Yecla, Murcia) stations. In Fig. 1 a linear regression between the ETo values estimated by Hargreaves and the values calculated by using FAO56 P-M equation is presented for every station. In 3.4 station (Fig. 1, left), the daily values obtained by Hargreaves neither overestimate nor underestimate the values calculated by FAO56 P-M equation, with a RMSE of 0.67 mm day-1, a RE near 20 % and a IA value of 0.97. Otherwise, in 2.5 station (Fig. 1, right), Hargreaves has a good fit with values between 0.5 and 4.5 mm day-1, but over these values the ETo calculated by FAO56 P-M equation is lightly underestimated (6%). 2 ETo Hargreaves (1985) (mm day -1 ) 12 10 8 y = 0.99x + 0.03 R 2 = 0.90 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 ETo Hargreaves (1985) (mm day -1 ) 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 y = 0.86x + 0.31 R 2 = 0.91 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 ET o Penman-Monteith FAO56 (mm day -1 ) ETo Penman.Monteith FAO56 (mm day -1 ) ETo PM 1:1 Regression ETo PM 1:1 Regression FIGURE 1. Daily ETo comparison between FAO56 P-M and Hargreaves equations during the studied period (2005-2009) in two stations: 3.4 (Yecla) station (left) and 2.5 (Villena) station (right). TABLE 1. Evaluation of Hargreaves equation to estimate daily ETo comparing with FAO56 Penman- Monteith equation for two different locations. N Xi yi yi/xi A B R 2 RMSE ER IA Station (mm day -1 ) (mm day -1 ) (%) (mm day -1 ) (mm day -1 ) (%) ET o (Har.)=A+B*ET o (P-M FAO56) Yecla (Murcia) 1816 3,41 3,40 100 0,03 0,99 0,90 0,67 19,61 0,97 Villena (Alicante) 1825 3,67 3,46 94 0,31 0,86 0,91 0,70 18,96 0,97 Results indicate that Hargreaves equation is precise for daily estimations in this zone. It is not necessary to previously calibrate data. The rest of stations present a similar performance with some exceptions.
- Page 75 and 76: mobilizing assimilated exerted by c
- Page 77 and 78: This method consists of covering th
- Page 79 and 80: uncovered ones, that mixed the wate
- Page 81 and 82: coliforms and E-coli that might hav
- Page 83 and 84: WATER TREATMENT BY COAGULATION WITH
- Page 85 and 86: in a grinder and passed through a 0
- Page 87 and 88: 3.2. Determination of the required
- Page 89 and 90: ANALYSIS OF LEVELS OF LAND DEGRADAT
- Page 91 and 92: This methodology consists of a sequ
- Page 93 and 94: FIGURE 5. A - Area of exploitation
- Page 95 and 96: Water technology improvements and t
- Page 97 and 98: The Multiattribute Utility Theory (
- Page 99 and 100: higher demand than those of scenari
- Page 101 and 102: YIELD AND BEAN SIZE OF COFFEA ARABI
- Page 103 and 104: uniformity of flowering. The irriga
- Page 105 and 106: Table 3 - Analysis of variance for
- Page 107 and 108: SUGARCANE FERTIRRIGATED WITH MINERA
- Page 109 and 110: 3. Results and Discussion The value
- Page 111 and 112: espectively, compared to that obser
- Page 113 and 114: Optimal Reservoir Operation Model w
- Page 115 and 116: all periods are computed using Eq.
- Page 117 and 118: (a) Calibration (b) Verification Fi
- Page 119 and 120: Characteristics of Heavy Metal Cont
- Page 121 and 122: 2. Materials and Method 2.1. Study
- Page 123 and 124: TABLE 2: Devices for collecting of
- Page 125: Calibration of Hargreaves Equation
- Page 129 and 130: Stochastic modelling of Contaminant
- Page 131 and 132: widely used for various fields such
- Page 133 and 134: show that Extvalue and Logistic dis
- Page 135 and 136: Efficiency of water and energy use
- Page 137 and 138: Pressure: it was obtained by means
- Page 139 and 140: them cover similar percentages. Dur
- Page 141 and 142: Relationship among compaction, mois
- Page 143 and 144: Cylindrical containers (191mm diame
- Page 145 and 146: Figure 9 High compaction. Bulk dens
- Page 147 and 148: Simulation of water flow with root
- Page 149 and 150: water contents were almost greater
- Page 151 and 152: Operation and Energy Optimization M
- Page 153 and 154: Urmia Salt Lake Urmia FIGURE 1: Gha
- Page 155 and 156: changes have been done in system. F
- Page 157 and 158: Application of Surface Cover and So
- Page 159 and 160: significantly lower than those from
- Page 161 and 162: Choi, J. D., (1997). Effect of Rura
- Page 163 and 164: 1.1. Scope and aim The growth of th
- Page 165 and 166: Therefore, the remaining works are
- Page 167 and 168: network makes such volumes unaccept
- Page 169 and 170: Reclaimed wastewater reuse has been
- Page 171 and 172: Fig. 2 shows the monitoring results
- Page 173 and 174: 3. Conclusions Reclaimed wastewater
- Page 175 and 176: Q P Ia 2 P Ia S for P≥Ia Q 0
location <strong>of</strong> the study, López-Urrea et al. (2006) indicated that FAO56 P-M equation is the<br />
most accurate method to estimate ETo in semiarids conditions. For these reasons, this<br />
equation has been chosen to calibrate the Hargreaves equation.<br />
This paper aims to calibrate the Hargreaves equation for estimating ETo, comparing it with<br />
daily average estimations obtained through the FAO56 P-M equation in a zone <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Southeast <strong>of</strong> Spain.<br />
2. Materials and Methods<br />
Weather data sets were obtained from agrometeorological stations in the provinces <strong>of</strong> Murcia<br />
and Albacete (Spain). These stations are integrated in the irrigation advisory service in the<br />
Spanish autonomous regions <strong>of</strong> Murcia and Castilla-La Mancha. Data were daily registered<br />
during period 2005-2009.<br />
From these climatic data, and by using the Penman-Monteith FAO56 equation, ETo was<br />
calculated (Allen et al., 1998). The used Penman Monteith equation is the next:<br />
ET<br />
0<br />
900<br />
0,408· ∆(Rn<br />
− G) + γ u2(e<br />
=<br />
T + 273<br />
∆ + γ(1+<br />
0.34·u )<br />
Where:<br />
ET o = reference evapotranspiration (mm·day -1 )<br />
Rn = crop surface net radiation (MJ·m -2 day -1 )<br />
Ra = extraterrestrial radiation (mm·day -1 )<br />
G = soil heat flux (MJ·m -2 día -1 )<br />
T = average air temperature at 2 m height (ºC)<br />
u2 = wind speed at 2 m height (m·s -1 )<br />
e s = saturated vapor pressure (kPa)<br />
e a = real vapor pressure (kPa)<br />
e s - e a = vapor pressure deficit (kPa)<br />
∆ = slope <strong>of</strong> the vapor pressure curve (kPa·ºC -1 )<br />
γ = psicrometric constant (kPa·ºC -1 ).<br />
2<br />
s<br />
− e<br />
a<br />
)<br />
Moreover, and by using the same climatic data, estimations <strong>of</strong> ETo values by means <strong>of</strong><br />
Hargreaves equation were obtained (Hargreaves and Samani, 1985).<br />
ET<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
= 0.0135·(t<br />
ave<br />
+ 17.78)·R<br />
0·KT·(t<br />
max<br />
− tmin)<br />
ET o = referente evapotranspiration (mm·day -1 )<br />
t ave = daily average temperature (ºC)<br />
R o = extraterrestrial radiation (MJ·m -2 day -1 )<br />
KT = coefficient (0.162 for inner regions and 0.19 for coastal regions)<br />
In order to transform MJ·m -2 day -1 to mm·day -1 , the value has to be multiplied by 0.408.<br />
Several comparisons were obtained through the simple linear regression analysis technique<br />
and a set <strong>of</strong> statistics. These statistics are:<br />
Root mean square error (RMSE):<br />
⎡<br />
⎢<br />
RMSE = ⎢<br />
⎢<br />
⎢⎣<br />
n<br />
∑<br />
i=<br />
1<br />
2 ⎤<br />
(yi<br />
− xi)<br />
⎥<br />
⎥<br />
n0<br />
⎥<br />
⎥⎦<br />
0,5