10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A2.3 System design<br />

A2.3.1 Fundamental requirements, design premises<br />

At a general level, the premises for designing and engineering the management system for<br />

spent nuclear fuel are derived from Swedish laws and regulations, other requirements on safety,<br />

and <strong>SKB</strong>’s own and other parties’ requirements on technical feasibility and efficiency. These<br />

requirements are as a rule generally formulated and not directly applicable to optimization or<br />

more concrete design work. They therefore have to be translated into performance requirements<br />

on the system or its parts.<br />

Performance requirements mainly apply to safety and radiation protection, other environmental<br />

protection, construction and operation, and aspects that derive from international agreements.<br />

The design and execution of the facilities must be shown to fulfil all of these requirements under<br />

the design-basis stresses and loads. These stresses and loads are determined by analyzing the<br />

situations and processes that occur or might occur during construction and operation, and in the<br />

case of the deep repository after closure as well. They include e.g. static loads, deformations and<br />

movements, corrosion, etc.<br />

The work sequence in the waste programme, with regular accountings in the form of RD&D<br />

programmes and safety assessments, has entailed a gradual development of the system, accompanied<br />

by regular cross-checking with the requirements. In 2002, <strong>SKB</strong> submitted a status report<br />

on the work of preparing design premises, see Chapters 5 and 11 with references. The report<br />

covers the entire deep repository system and its parts, and also includes the sequence of derivations<br />

that has been gone through to arrive at a useful design basis from general requirements.<br />

The degree of precision and quantification provided by the report for the parameters, loads etc<br />

that govern design and execution corresponds to the status of the work at the time of the report.<br />

A2.3.2 System analysis and optimization<br />

The overall strategy for designing and optimizing a repository system according to the KBS-3<br />

concept has been presented in many contexts, most recently in RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> 2001.<br />

The principle is to gradually work out, in defined steps, an increasingly detailed design of the<br />

facilities, requisite infrastructure and technical supply systems. Execution of construction and<br />

operation are more precisely defined in the same way. As the design becomes increasingly<br />

detailed, decisions are made which narrow down the range of options, first for general system<br />

selection, then for technical solutions for facilities and subsystems, and finally for the details.<br />

This mode of working has been successfully applied in many industrial projects, including SFR,<br />

Clab and the NPPs.<br />

Decisions and choices during the course of the process are made systematically by producing<br />

possible alternatives and evaluating them against established requirements or other criteria with<br />

regard to:<br />

• Post-closure safety and performance.<br />

• Safety during construction and operation.<br />

• Environment.<br />

• Feasibility and efficiency.<br />

• Resource needs.<br />

Final choices of system and technology solutions will be made as late as possible to in order<br />

to take full advantage of technical advances and, in some cases, site-specific data as well.<br />

However, the decisions must not be delayed so much that the development of other parts of<br />

the system is held back or otherwise impaired by unclear premises. Striking a balance between<br />

the advantages of retaining freedom of choice on the one hand and the need to drive the design<br />

process towards the final goal at a reasonable pace on the other hand is a central consideration<br />

in <strong>SKB</strong>’s strategic planning.<br />

RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong> 369

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!