10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusions in RD&D 2001 and its review<br />

SKI points out the importance of the influence of saline groundwater on the hydraulic properties<br />

of the backfill. Future changes in the salinity of the groundwater must also be taken into<br />

account, see also Kasam’s viewpoints in section 18.2.21.<br />

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

In principle, the backfill works in the same way as the buffer, see section 17.2.15. Saline<br />

groundwater will, however, have a greater relative influence on the physical properties of<br />

the backfill, since the density of the montmorillonite fraction is lower in the backfill. Current<br />

compaction technology for backfill materials in a deposition tunnel does not provide sufficiently<br />

high montmorillonite density to meet the safety margins under sea water conditions.<br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

See section 17.2.15. For backfill materials, the development work will be focused on emplacement<br />

technique to increase the montmorillonite density, see section 18.1.6, and testing of<br />

different clay materials.<br />

18.2.14 Ion exchange/sorption<br />

Ion exchange from sodium to calcium leads to similar effects as high salinity in the groundwater<br />

(see section 17.2.16) in a backfill material with a low content of swelling clay, i.e. the pore<br />

geometry in the backfill material is altered and the backfill risks losing its swelling and sealing<br />

properties.<br />

Conclusions in RD&D 2001 and its review<br />

SKI maintains that <strong>SKB</strong> should evaluate what saline groundwaters mean for the repository.<br />

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

See section 17.2.16.<br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

See section 17.2.16.<br />

18.2.15 Montmorillonite transformation<br />

What is said about montmorillonite transformation in the buffer is largely applicable to the<br />

backfill as well, see section 17.2.17. The boundary conditions exhibit certain differences,<br />

however. The temperature in the backfill is lower and less iron is available, which would lead to<br />

slower transformation. On the other hand, the density may be lower and the quantity of cement<br />

may be higher, which could lead to more rapid transformation.<br />

Conclusions in RD&D 2001 and its review<br />

In Kasam’s opinion, <strong>SKB</strong> should set a limit on how much potassium the crushed rock may<br />

contain.<br />

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

See section 17.2.17.<br />

RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong> 237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!