10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

These phenomena have been studied both in basic laboratory tests and in model tests on<br />

different scales. The former were done either with constant flow rate or constant water pressure<br />

in drilled holes with a diameter of 2–4 millimetres through 5–10 centimetre long bentonite<br />

pellets. The results showed that only very low water flow rates or very low water pressures<br />

could be stopped by the bentonite. Since these tests can be regarded as conservative extremes,<br />

model tests were performed, first on a scale of 1:10 and then on full scale. The result of the<br />

model tests on a scale of 1:10, where the gap at the top of the simulated distance block was<br />

four millimetres, was that a pressure increase rate of about 200 kPa/h was the upper limit below<br />

which piping did not occur, but also that the water fill-up rate was an important parameter.<br />

When the test was scaled up to full scale, however, the upper limit was only 5 kPa/h, since the<br />

gap there was four centimetres. At the same time, the leakage rate during fill-up was very great.<br />

In other words, the requirements cannot be met without an engineering solution, and a collar<br />

was applied to the “rock” in the most recent test. The collar was attached to the “rock” and its<br />

annular disc was made so big that it closed off the gap between the “rock” and the spacer block<br />

and extended another five centimetres into the spacer block. This arrangement could cope with<br />

50 kPa/h up to a pressure of 2 MPa without piping occurring and without any leakage occurring<br />

before fill-up was finished.<br />

The conclusion is thus that a gap on the order of several centimetres between the roof and the<br />

distance block cannot handle the base scenario without an engineering solution, but also that it<br />

should be fully possible to either devise solutions that meet the requirements or to make spacer<br />

blocks with smaller gaps against the rock (for example, wedge-shaped three-piece blocks).<br />

Independent tests have been conducted within the Colloid Project, as well as field tests at Äspö.<br />

The results clearly show that spontaneous dispersal of montmorillonite from a bentonite buffer<br />

does not occur if the calcium concentration in the groundwater exceeds 1 mM. The results<br />

complement and confirm previous investigations both qualitatively and quantitatively /17-19/.<br />

The problem of spontaneous release of montmorillonite is thereby probably reduced to the<br />

concentration of divalent ions in the groundwater.<br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

The tests with piping and erosion for KBS-3H will continue both on a small scale and on full<br />

scale to gain a better understanding of these processes. If it proves difficult to guarantee that<br />

piping will not occur, a series of erosion tests must be done for the purpose of being able to<br />

estimate the quantity of eroding bentonite in different situations.<br />

Quantitative modelling of a possible removal of montmorillonite colloids from the buffer is<br />

planned.<br />

17.2.20 Radiation-induced montmorillonite transformation<br />

Montmorillonite in the buffer can be broken down by gamma radiation. The result is a decrease<br />

in the montmorillonite concentration. Experiments have shown that the accumulated radiation<br />

dose to which the bentonite will be exposed in a deep repository does not cause any measurable<br />

changes in the montmorillonite concentration.<br />

17.2.21 Radiolysis of pore water<br />

Gamma radiation that penetrates through the canister can decompose pore water by radiolysis,<br />

forming OH radicals, hydrogen, oxygen and several other components. The oxygen is consumed<br />

rapidly by oxidation processes which affect the redox potential, while the hydrogen is transported<br />

away. The canister’s wall thickness is, however, sufficient so that the effect of gamma<br />

radiolysis on the outside is negligible, see section 17.1.4.<br />

222 RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!