10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

Existing fractures that intersect deposition holes can be activated and sheared by a earthquake.<br />

The effect of such a rock shear has been investigated in a project that includes both laboratory<br />

tests and finite element calculations. /17-11, 17-12/.<br />

The buffer material in a deposition hole acts as a cushion between the canister and the rock,<br />

which reduces the effect of a rock shear substantially. The lower the density the softer the buffer<br />

and the less the effect on the canister. However, at the high densities proposed for the buffer in a<br />

deep repository, its stiffness is rather high. Stiffness is also a function of the rate of shear, which<br />

means that the canister can be damaged at very high shear rates.<br />

In order to investigate the stiffness and shear strength of the buffer material, a number of<br />

laboratory test series have been performed with shearing of water-saturated bentonite samples<br />

at different densities and shear rates. Based on these tests, a material model of the buffer that<br />

takes into account density and shear rate has been formulated. Tests have been carried out with<br />

shear rates of up to 6 m/s.<br />

The rock shear has been modelled and calculated with the finite element code Abaqus. A threedimensional<br />

finite element mesh that models the buffer and the canister has been created and<br />

a number of calculations that simulate different rock shears have been performed, see section<br />

16.2.4. Figure 17-2 shows examples of calculation results.<br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

There may be reason to further verify the modelled effect of a rock shear. The need for<br />

additional tests and possibilities for conducting such tests are being considered.<br />

Plastic strain<br />

+1.000e—01<br />

+9.000e—02<br />

+8.000e—02<br />

+7.000e—02<br />

+6.000e—02<br />

+5.000e—02<br />

+4.000e—02<br />

+3.000e—02<br />

+2.000e—02<br />

+1.000e—02<br />

+0.000e+00<br />

Average stress (kPa)<br />

+4.416e+04<br />

+4.000e+04<br />

+3.600e+04<br />

+3.200e+04<br />

+2.800e+04<br />

+2.400e+04<br />

+2.000e+04<br />

+1.600e+04<br />

+1.200e+04<br />

+8.000e+03<br />

+4.000e+03<br />

+0.000e+00<br />

Figure 17-2. Examples of results from a calculation with 20 cm eccentric rock shear (density at<br />

water saturation 2,000 kg/m 3 and shear rate 1 m/s). Deformed structure (upper left), plastic strain<br />

in the cast iron insert (upper right), plastic strain in the buffer (lower left) and average stress<br />

(kPa) in the buffer (lower right).<br />

210 RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!