10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

17.1.3 Pore geometry<br />

Conclusions in RD&D 2001 and its review<br />

In SR 97, it was assumed that the buffer had a dry density of 1,590 ± 30 kg/m 3 . This gives a<br />

porosity of 41 percent. No questions for further research were identified in SR 97 or its review.<br />

In RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> 2001, it is pointed out that other clays than MX-80 could also satisfy the<br />

conductivity requirements that are made on the buffer. A choice of another clay might lead to the<br />

choice of another density and porosity.<br />

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

No new knowledge has been forthcoming.<br />

<strong>Programme</strong><br />

The very low hydraulic conductivity of the buffer, despite the fact that its porosity is over<br />

40 percent, suggests that the distribution of the pore volume is of crucial importance for the<br />

properties of the bentonite. Different qualitative and quantitative descriptions of pore structure<br />

– and how it affects properties such as diffusion, conductivity and swelling pressure – are found<br />

in the literature. <strong>SKB</strong> therefore intends to start a study aimed at quantifying pore structures in<br />

potential bentonite materials under different physical and chemical conditions.<br />

17.1.4 Radiation intensity<br />

The initial dose rate on the canister surface was calculated in SR 97 to be 100–500 mGy/h, and<br />

on the outside of the buffer about 2 mGy/h. The calculations are based on the same assumptions<br />

as the material in section 17.2.2.<br />

17.1.5 Temperature<br />

Buffer and backfill are at ambient temperature at deposition. This varies with repository site<br />

and disposal depth and is approximately 10–15°C. The temperature is dependent to some extent<br />

on the handling sequence, where the buffer blocks have been stored, heat from the deposition<br />

machine, etc. An uncertainty of around 5°C is reasonable.<br />

Determination of the initial buffer temperature is of trivial importance, in contrast to the heat<br />

transport in the buffer after deposition, see section 17.2.12.<br />

17.1.6 Montmorillonite content<br />

Conclusions in RD&D 2001 and its review<br />

The commercial bentonites that are of interest as buffer materials have a given composition.<br />

The montmorillonite content is normally over 80 percent. The delivered product will be qualitytested<br />

before being taken to the repository.<br />

Newfound knowledge since RD&D 2001<br />

New methods for determining the mineral distribution in buffer materials have been used<br />

and developed. Among other things, the important material parameter cation exchange<br />

capacity (CEC) has been determined by means of a simpler and more reliable method /17-2/.<br />

Furthermore, a new analysis method (Rietveld technique) for quantification of minerals from<br />

X-ray diffractograms has been used. Detailed determinations of the mineralogy of MX-80<br />

material have been performed within the Lot project, for reference material and for exposed<br />

material. Other bentonite materials have been studied in the project “Alternative buffer<br />

materials”, see section 17.1.2. New determinations of the montmorillonite content of MX-80<br />

RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong> 197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!