10.11.2014 Views

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

RD&D-Programme 2004 - SKB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

simulating the repository environment in the laboratory. Oxygen is present in the air around<br />

us, but in the anoxic experiments the partial pressure of oxygen must be virtually zero. This is<br />

difficult to achieve in practice. Traces of oxygen tend to diffuse in due to the big difference in<br />

partial pressure outside and inside the experiment. Despite flushing with inert gas or the use of<br />

glove boxes filled with inert gas, the conditions in the experiments tend to be more oxidizing<br />

than in the repository.<br />

In order to be able to distinguish the effect of radiolytic oxidation caused by radiation in the<br />

experiments with spent fuel, it is necessary to reduce the influence of oxygen contamination.<br />

Only then is it possible to observe the influence of different reducing components. The results<br />

of experiments involving dissolution of a fuel rod in an argon atmosphere are reported in /15-6/.<br />

The use of metal tubes, glass-metal welds and better seals in the measurement system reduced<br />

the inward diffusion of contaminating oxygen. It could then be observed how radiolysis alone<br />

contributes to an oxidative dissolution of the fuel. After 280 days, two small metal foils of iron<br />

and copper were added to simulate the influence of the canister’s different materials. The fission<br />

products caesium, molybdenum and strontium continued to leach out (Figure 15-2), while the<br />

concentrations of uranium, neptunium and technetium fell. This shows that despite the strong<br />

radiation, the contact with iron creates reducing conditions.<br />

Two other ways of avoiding contamination with atmospheric oxygen have also been tried:<br />

use of an oxygen trap and inert gas under high pressure /15-7/. In the first case, an oxygen<br />

trap with saturated iron(II) carbonate solution was placed in the same closed inert-gas-flushed<br />

space as the test vessel /15-8/. In the second case, a sturdy and well-sealed pressure vessel was<br />

used, where any leakage can easily be checked via changes in the pressure. No leakage may be<br />

tolerated, since tests have shown that even if inert gas flows out of the vessel it is possible for<br />

oxygen to diffuse in upstream /15-9/.<br />

The term “reducing conditions” should not be used indiscriminately for all experiments with<br />

hydrogen-saturated solutions. For even though the hydrogen is potentially highly reducing, it<br />

is also kinetically inert at normal temperatures. This, along with the importance of the negative<br />

redox potentials measured in hydrogen solutions, is discussed in /15-9/.<br />

30<br />

6x10 —6<br />

Sr-90<br />

Tc-99<br />

25<br />

Cs-137<br />

Mo-100<br />

Concentration, ppb<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

U-238<br />

U-238<br />

4x10 —6<br />

(U)<br />

mol/L<br />

2x10 —6<br />

5<br />

Addition of iron<br />

and copper foil<br />

0<br />

0 100 200 300 400 500<br />

Leaching time, days<br />

0<br />

Figure 15-2. Measured concentrations of 238 U and the fission products 137 Cs, 90 Sr, 99 Tc and 100 Mo<br />

as a function of leaching time. The concentrations of 238 U are shown on the right-hand axis in<br />

mol/l. The vertical dashed line shows the time for introduction of iron and copper electrodes<br />

(each with a surface area of about 30 mm 2 ).<br />

172 RD&D-<strong>Programme</strong> <strong>2004</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!