10.11.2014 Views

Shah-Bano-eng

Shah-Bano-eng

Shah-Bano-eng

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Shah</strong> <strong>Bano</strong>, MW Act, and Mataa<br />

stated in Hedaya and by Baillie and quoted above by us on the<br />

reasoning that their Lordships “do not care to speculate on the mode<br />

in which the text quoted from the Koran, which is to be found in Sura<br />

II, verse 240, is to be reconciled with the law as laid down in the<br />

Hedaya and by the author of the passage quoted from Baillie’s<br />

Imameea. But it would be wrong for the Court on a point of this kind<br />

to attempt to put their own construction on the Koran in opposition<br />

to the express ruling of commentators of such great antiquity and<br />

high authority.”<br />

14. This dictum of the Privy Council quoted above pronounced<br />

about one hundred years ago in 1897 AD cannot be followed on three<br />

grounds.<br />

15. Firstly, the learned Judges in the Privy Council were non-<br />

Muslims and they were anxious to decide such issues in accordance<br />

with the laws as propounded by the Muslim jurists rather than<br />

independently, disregarding the Muslim jurists.<br />

16. Secondly, Article 8(1A) of the Constitution of Bangladesh,<br />

contained in Part II under the heading “Fundamental Principles of<br />

State Policy”, states that absolute trust and faith in the Almighty Allah<br />

shall be basis of all actions. It indicates that Quranic injunctions shall<br />

have to be followed strictly and without any deviation.<br />

17. Thirdly, Quran urges:<br />

Those to whom we have sent the Book study it as it should be studied;<br />

they are the ones that believe therein. (Second Sura Baqara, verse 121.)<br />

This verse directs continuous study of the Quran which is in<br />

conformity with the dynamic, progressive and universal character of<br />

Islam.<br />

18. We now like to quote an observation from a decision of the<br />

Lahore High Court reported in PLD 1960 Lahore 1142 (Mst. Rashida<br />

Begum v. <strong>Shah</strong>an Din & others) in support of our above views as<br />

hereunder:<br />

22<br />

Thus it is quite clear that reading and under-standing the Quran is not the<br />

privilege or the right of one individual or two. It is revealed in easy and<br />

understandable language so that all Muslims if they try may be able to<br />

understand and act upon it. It is thus a privilege granted to every Muslim<br />

which cannot be taken away from him by anybody, however highly<br />

placed or learned he may be, to read and interpret the Quran. In<br />

understanding the Quran one can derive valuable assistance from the<br />

commentaries written by different learned people of yore, but then that<br />

is all. Those commentaries cannot be said to be the last word on the<br />

subject. Reading and understanding the Quran implies the interpretation<br />

of it and the interpretation in its turn includes the application of it which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!