download the PDF here - Amphibian Specialist Group
download the PDF here - Amphibian Specialist Group
download the PDF here - Amphibian Specialist Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
AFDM) and we hypo<strong>the</strong>size that centrolenid<br />
tadpoles may play a role in stimulating<br />
growth of stream fungal communities at<br />
local scales However, leaf mass loss and<br />
temperature-corrected leaf decomposition<br />
rates in control treatments were almost<br />
identical in our stream with frogs (41.01%<br />
AFDM lost, k degree day<br />
= - 0.028 d -1 ) and<br />
<strong>the</strong> frogless stream (41.81% AFDM lost,<br />
k degree day<br />
= - 0.027 d -1 ) and between control<br />
and tadpole exclusion treatments within<br />
each stream. Likewise, <strong>the</strong>re were<br />
no significant differences in leaf pack<br />
bacterial biomass, microbial respiration<br />
rates, or macroinvertebrate abundance<br />
between treatments or streams.<br />
Invertebrate community composition<br />
on leaf packs was similar between<br />
treatments (SIMI = 0.97) and streams<br />
(SIMI = 0.95) and was dominated by<br />
larval Chironomidae, Simuliidae (Diptera),<br />
and larval Anchytarsus spp. (Coleoptera).<br />
Can amphibians take <strong>the</strong> heat?<br />
Vulnerability to climate warming in<br />
subtropical and temperate larval<br />
amphibian communities<br />
By Helder Duarte, Miguel Tejedo, Marco<br />
Katzenberger, Federico Marangoni, Diego Baldo,<br />
Juan Francisco Beltrán, Dardo Andrea Martí,<br />
Alex Richter-Boix, & Alejandro González-Voyer<br />
Predicting <strong>the</strong> biodiversity impacts of<br />
global warming implies that we know<br />
w<strong>here</strong> and with what magnitude <strong>the</strong>se<br />
impacts will be encountered. <strong>Amphibian</strong>s are<br />
currently <strong>the</strong> most threatened vertebrates,<br />
mainly due to habitat loss and to emerging<br />
infectious diseases. Global warming may<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r exacerbate <strong>the</strong>ir decline in <strong>the</strong><br />
near future, although <strong>the</strong> impact might<br />
vary geographically. We predicted that<br />
subtropical amphibians should be relatively<br />
susceptible to warming-induced extinctions<br />
because <strong>the</strong>ir upper critical <strong>the</strong>rmal limits<br />
(CTmax) might be only slightly higher than<br />
maximum pond temperatures (Tmax). We<br />
tested this prediction by measuring CTmax<br />
and Tmax for 47 larval amphibian species<br />
from two <strong>the</strong>rmally distinct subtropical<br />
communities (<strong>the</strong> warm community of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Gran Chaco and <strong>the</strong> cool community<br />
of Atlantic Forest, nor<strong>the</strong>rn Argentina),<br />
as well as from one European temperate<br />
community. Upper <strong>the</strong>rmal tolerances<br />
of tadpoles were positively correlated<br />
(controlling for phylogeny) with maximum<br />
pond temperatures, although <strong>the</strong> slope was<br />
steeper in subtropical than in temperate<br />
species. CTmax values were lowest in<br />
temperate species and highest in <strong>the</strong><br />
subtropical warm community, which<br />
paradoxically, had very low warming<br />
tolerance (CTmax– Tmax) and <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
may be prone to future local extinction<br />
from acute <strong>the</strong>rmal stress if rising pond<br />
Tmax soon exceeds <strong>the</strong>ir CTmax. Canopyprotected<br />
subtropical cool species have<br />
larger warming tolerance and thus should<br />
be less impacted by peak temperatures.<br />
Temperate species are relatively secure<br />
to warming impacts, except for late<br />
breeders with low <strong>the</strong>rmal tolerance,<br />
which may be exposed to physiological<br />
<strong>the</strong>rmal stress in <strong>the</strong> coming years.<br />
Full article: Duarte, H., Tejedo,<br />
M., Katzenberger, M., Marangoni,<br />
F., Baldo, D., Beltrán, J.F., Martí,<br />
D.A., Richter-Boix, A., Gonzalez-<br />
Voyer, A. (2011) Can amphibians<br />
take <strong>the</strong> heat? Vulnerability to<br />
climate warming in subtropical<br />
and temperate larval amphibian<br />
communities. Global Change<br />
Biology (2011), doi: 10.1111/j.1365-<br />
2486.2011.02518.x<br />
Glass frogs eggs, ready to hatch, overhanging stream<br />
in El Cope, Panama. Photo: Scott Connelly<br />
In contrast to <strong>the</strong> dramatic effects of grazing<br />
tadpoles on algal communities reported in<br />
our previous studies, tadpoles had largely<br />
insignificant effects on decomposition.<br />
While centrolenid tadpoles were common in<br />
<strong>the</strong> stream with frogs, patchy distributions<br />
in both experimental and natural leaf packs<br />
suggest that <strong>the</strong>ir effects on detrital dynamics<br />
and microbes are likely more localized<br />
than those of grazing tadpoles on algae.<br />
Full article: Connelly, S. et al. Do<br />
tadpoles affect leaf decomposition<br />
in Neotropical streams? (2011)<br />
Freshwater Biology 56, 1863–1875<br />
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02626.x<br />
Warming Tolerance (WT, WT = CTmax-Tmax) for different amphibian larvae communities. The average for each<br />
species is represented by <strong>the</strong> middle line of boxplots, box height indicates upper and lower CI 95%. Dashed and<br />
dotted lines indicate <strong>the</strong> average WT and 95 % confidence intervals, respectively, for <strong>the</strong> overall community.<br />
Species codes appear ordered phylogenetically within community. Subtropical warm: Ebi: Elachistocleis bicolor;<br />
Dmu: Dermatonotus muelleri; Psa: Phyllomedusa sauvagii; Sna: Scinax nasicus; Sac: Scinax acuminatus;<br />
Hra: Hypsiboas raniceps; Tve: Trachycephalus venulosus; Ppl: Pseudis platensis; Pli: Pseudis limellum; Pal:<br />
Physalaemus albonotatus; Lpo: Leptodactylus podicipinus; Lla: Leptodactylus latinasus; Lbu: Leptodactylus<br />
bufonius; Lll: Lepidobatrachus llanensis; Ccr: Ceratophrys cranwelli; Rsc: Rhinella schneideri. Subtropical cool:<br />
Pte: Phyllomedusa tetraploidea; Sfu: Scinax fuscovarius; Hcu: Hypsiboas curupi; Dmi: Dendropsophus minutus;<br />
Llt: Leptodactylus latrans; Lma: Limnomedusa macroglossa; Csc: Crossodactylus schmidti; Mkr: Melanophryniscus<br />
krauczuki; Mde: Melanophryniscus devincenzii; Raz: Rhinella azarai; Ror: Rhinella ornata. Temperate: Ssa:<br />
Salamandra salamandra; Pwa: Pleurodeles waltl; Tpy: Triturus pygmaeus; Tcr: Triturus cristatus; Lbo: Lissotriton<br />
boscai; Rib: Rana iberica; Rte: Rana temporaria; Rar: Rana arvalis; Ple: Pelophylax lessonae; Ppe: Pelophylax<br />
perezi; Hme: Hyla meridionalis; Har: Hyla arborea; Eca: Epidalea calamita; Bbu: Bufo bufo; Pib: Pelodytes ibericus;<br />
Pcu: Pelobates cultripes; Dga: Discoglossus galganoi; Amu: Alytes muletensis; Adi: Alytes dickhilleni; Aci: Alytes<br />
cisternasii.<br />
44 | FrogLog Vol. 98 | September 2011