atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention - Continuing Medical ...

atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention - Continuing Medical ... atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention - Continuing Medical ...

cmemeeting.org
from cmemeeting.org More from this publisher
09.11.2014 Views

Essentials in Primary Care Conference Wednesday, July 31, 2013 Questions to answer • Would this patient benefit more from rate control or rhythm control with acute cardioversion or medical (anti-arrhythmic) conversion?-AFFIRM, AF-CHF • What is the target heart rate in a patient with asx or minimally symptomatic AF-(lenient vs strict rate control)?-RACE II AFFIRM Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management Primary Endpoint: All-Cause Mortality Mortality (%) Time (Y) 25 20 15 10 5 0 p = 0.08 •4080 pts, • mean age 70 yrs • 40% female •paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation •All treated with coumadin Rhythm Rate Rhythm-guideline based anti-arrythmia Rx Rate-80 at rest,110 with exercise 0 1 2 3 4 5 Rate N 2027 1925 1825 1328 774 236 Rhythm N 2033 1932 1807 1316 780 255 AFFIRM Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1825-33 Jan Basile, MD Atrial Fibrillation & Stroke Prevention

Essentials in Primary Care Conference Wednesday, July 31, 2013 The Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure (AF-CHF) [EF < 35%, clinical HF] Trial: Results (n=1376;1 endpoint=time to death from CV causes Rhythm Control Rate Control p-value Cardiovascular Mortality 26.7 % 25.2 % NS Total Mortality 31.8 % 32.9 % NS Stroke 2.6 % 3.6 % NS Hospitalization 46 % 39 % 0.001 Worsening CHF 27.6 % 30.8 % NS Roy et al. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2667-2677. RAte Control Efficacy in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation II (RACE II) • Since rate control is as good as rhythm control, then let’s test 311 patients randomized to lenient (resting HR < 110 BPM) vs 303 strict rate control (resting HR < 80 BPM, with exercise < 110 BPM) • Mean follow-up 2 years, max 3 years • BB alone (45%), CCB alone (6%), digoxin alone (6%), BB + dig (17%), BB + dilt/verap (3%), sotalol (5%), amiod (1.3%) Van Gelder IC, et al. RACE II trial. NEJM 2010;362:1363-73. Jan Basile, MD Atrial Fibrillation & Stroke Prevention

Essentials in Primary Care Conference<br />

Wednesday, July 31, 2013<br />

Questions to answer<br />

• Would this patient benefit more<br />

from rate control or rhythm<br />

control with acute cardioversion<br />

or medical (anti-arrhythmic)<br />

conversion?-AFFIRM, AF-CHF<br />

• What is the target heart rate in a<br />

patient with asx or minimally<br />

symptomatic AF-(lenient vs strict<br />

rate control)?-RACE II<br />

AFFIRM<br />

Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation<br />

of Rhythm Management<br />

Primary Endpoint: All-Cause Mortality<br />

Mortality (%)<br />

Time (Y)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

p = 0.08<br />

•4080 pts,<br />

• mean age 70 yrs<br />

• 40% female<br />

•paroxysmal or persistent <strong>atrial</strong> <strong>fibrillation</strong><br />

•All treated with coumadin<br />

Rhythm<br />

Rate<br />

Rhythm-guideline based anti-arrythmia Rx<br />

Rate-80 at rest,110 with exercise<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Rate N 2027 1925 1825 1328 774 236<br />

Rhythm N 2033 1932 1807 1316 780 255<br />

AFFIRM Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1825-33<br />

Jan Basile, MD<br />

Atrial Fibrillation & Stroke Prevention

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!