atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention - Continuing Medical ...

atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention - Continuing Medical ... atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention - Continuing Medical ...

cmemeeting.org
from cmemeeting.org More from this publisher
09.11.2014 Views

Essentials in Primary Care Conference Wednesday, July 31, 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines Assess Thromboembolic Risk (CHADS 2 ) CHADS 2 = 0 CHADS 2 = 1 CHADS 2 = 2 Increasing stroke risk No antithrombotic ASA OAC* OAC* OAC No additional risk factors for stroke Either female sex or vascular disease Age 65 yrs Age > or 65 yrs combination or combination female female sex sex + vascular and vascular disease disease *ASA is a reasonable alternative for some as indicated by risk/benefit When OAC therapy is indicated, most patients receive: • Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban (after Health Canada approval) • In preference to warfarin • Conditional Recommendation, High-Quality Evidence Skanes AC, et al. Can J Cardiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;28(2):125-36.. Take-home Teaching Points: • Most patients with CHADS 2 > 2 will derive net benefit from anticoagulation, regardless of ‘bleeding score’ • For patients with CHADS 2 = 0 or 1 Consider calculating CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score If CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is 1 or higher, anticoagulate but…. Weigh absolute benefit of AC against best estimate of bleeding risk • Antiplatelet therapy (e.g. ASA and/or clopidogrel) is much less effective than anticoagulation (and not significantly safer!) Jan Basile, MD Atrial Fibrillation & Stroke Prevention

Essentials in Primary Care Conference Wednesday, July 31, 2013 Take Home Teaching Points • Stroke risk reduction with warfarin is substantial (±66%) • Risk of ICH with warfarin is low (

Essentials in Primary Care Conference<br />

Wednesday, July 31, 2013<br />

Canadian Cardiovascular Society<br />

Guidelines<br />

Assess Thromboembolic Risk<br />

(CHADS 2 )<br />

CHADS 2 = 0<br />

CHADS 2 = 1<br />

CHADS 2 = 2<br />

Increasing <strong>stroke</strong> risk<br />

No antithrombotic<br />

ASA<br />

OAC*<br />

OAC*<br />

OAC<br />

No<br />

additional<br />

risk factors<br />

for <strong>stroke</strong><br />

Either<br />

female sex<br />

or<br />

vascular<br />

disease<br />

Age 65 yrs<br />

Age > or 65 yrs<br />

combination<br />

or<br />

combination<br />

female<br />

female sex<br />

sex<br />

+ vascular <strong>and</strong><br />

vascular disease<br />

disease<br />

*ASA is a<br />

reasonable<br />

alternative<br />

for some as<br />

indicated by<br />

risk/benefit<br />

When OAC therapy is<br />

indicated, most patients<br />

receive:<br />

• Dabigatran, rivaroxaban,<br />

or apixaban (after Health<br />

Canada approval)<br />

• In preference to warfarin<br />

• Conditional Recommendation,<br />

High-Quality Evidence<br />

Skanes AC, et al. Can J Cardiol. 2012 Mar-Apr;28(2):125-36..<br />

Take-home Teaching Points:<br />

• Most patients with CHADS 2 > 2 will derive net benefit<br />

from anticoagulation, regardless of ‘bleeding score’<br />

• For patients with CHADS 2 = 0 or 1<br />

Consider calculating CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score<br />

If CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score is 1 or higher, anticoagulate<br />

but….<br />

Weigh absolute benefit of AC against best estimate<br />

of bleeding risk<br />

• Antiplatelet therapy (e.g. ASA <strong>and</strong>/or clopidogrel) is<br />

much less effective than anticoagulation (<strong>and</strong> not<br />

significantly safer!)<br />

Jan Basile, MD<br />

Atrial Fibrillation & Stroke Prevention

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!