atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention - Continuing Medical ...

atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention - Continuing Medical ... atrial fibrillation and stroke prevention - Continuing Medical ...

cmemeeting.org
from cmemeeting.org More from this publisher
09.11.2014 Views

Essentials in Primary Care Conference Wednesday, July 31, 2013 Contrasting the 3 New Oral Agents • Apixaban prevents about 3 more strokes per 1000 patients per year than warfarin. Plus it leads to 10 FEWER bleeds and 4 FEWER deaths. • Rivaroxaban doesn’t prevent more strokes than warfarin...and has a similar risk of bleeding. But it’s the only new agent given just ONCE daily. • Dabigatran prevents about 5 more strokes per 1000 patients per year than warfarin...with a similar overall bleeding risk. Dabigatran is also the only new agent that reduces ISCHEMIC strokes compared to warfarin...in addition to HEMORRHAGIC strokes. Pharmacists/Physicians Letter Feb 2013. Optimal Candidates for Warfarin Patients who: • Have (borderline) renal insufficiency • Are taking stable dose of warfarin and do not find INR testing burdensome • Have access to self-testing machine or other reliable means of regular INR monitoring • Are concerned about the lack of an evidencebased reversal strategy • Has issues with out-of-pocket expense Jan Basile, MD Atrial Fibrillation & Stroke Prevention

Essentials in Primary Care Conference Wednesday, July 31, 2013 Optimal Candidates for New Oral Antithrombotic Drugs Patients who: • Find INR testing burdensome • Despite adherence to provider recommendations, have low INR ‘time-inrange’ (TTR) • Can afford (or arrange to get) the new drugs • Have normal and stable renal function AF Rx as Per CHADS 2 Score: AT8 (2008) vs AT9 (2012) CHADS 2 0 Rx Recommendation AT8 (2008) AT9 (2012) ASA No Rx (2B) 1 >2 Warfarin or ASA Warfarin Oral Anticoagulant (1B) Oral Anticoagulant (1A) You JJ, et al. CHEST 2012;141(2)(Suppl):e531S-e575S Jan Basile, MD Atrial Fibrillation & Stroke Prevention

Essentials in Primary Care Conference<br />

Wednesday, July 31, 2013<br />

Optimal C<strong>and</strong>idates for New<br />

Oral Antithrombotic Drugs<br />

Patients who:<br />

• Find INR testing burdensome<br />

• Despite adherence to provider<br />

recommendations, have low INR ‘time-inrange’<br />

(TTR)<br />

• Can afford (or arrange to get) the new drugs<br />

• Have normal <strong>and</strong> stable renal function<br />

AF Rx as Per CHADS 2 Score:<br />

AT8 (2008) vs AT9 (2012)<br />

CHADS 2<br />

0<br />

Rx Recommendation<br />

AT8 (2008) AT9 (2012)<br />

ASA<br />

No Rx (2B)<br />

1<br />

>2<br />

Warfarin or ASA<br />

Warfarin<br />

Oral Anticoagulant<br />

(1B)<br />

Oral Anticoagulant<br />

(1A)<br />

You JJ, et al. CHEST 2012;141(2)(Suppl):e531S-e575S<br />

Jan Basile, MD<br />

Atrial Fibrillation & Stroke Prevention

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!