Pelvic Fractures and the Unstable Patient
Pelvic Fractures and the Unstable Patient
Pelvic Fractures and the Unstable Patient
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Pelvic</strong> <strong>Fractures</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Unstable</strong> <strong>Patient</strong><br />
Adam M. Shiroff, M.D.<br />
Assistant Professor of Surgery<br />
Section of Trauma <strong>and</strong> Surgical Critical Care<br />
UMDNJ-RWJUH
Outline<br />
• History<br />
•Anatomy<br />
• Biomechanics<br />
• Classification<br />
• Diagnosis of fracture/bleeding<br />
• Polytrauma<br />
• <strong>Unstable</strong> patients<br />
• Algorithm
Scope of <strong>the</strong> Problem<br />
• <strong>Pelvic</strong> fractures continue to be a source of<br />
major morbidity <strong>and</strong> mortality<br />
• Mortality from pelvic fractures:<br />
Any: 5-10%<br />
Hemodynamically unstable: 40-60%<br />
Open fractures: up to 70%
History<br />
• 1901 Booth, P.L. Lancet<br />
NORTH LONSDALE HOSPITAL, BARROW-IN-<br />
FURNESS. A CASE OF FRACTURE OF THE<br />
PELVIS WITH INJURY TO THE BLADDER AND<br />
PELVIC VESSELS<br />
• 1964 Seavers, R. Surgery<br />
Hypogastric artery ligation for uncontrollable<br />
hemorrhage in acute pelvic trauma.
History<br />
• 1970 Hawkins, L. Journal of Trauma<br />
Laparotomy at <strong>the</strong> time of pelvic fracture.<br />
• 1972 Margolies, M.N. NEJM<br />
Arteriography in <strong>the</strong> management of<br />
hemorrhage from pelvic fractures.
History<br />
• 1973 Ring, E.J. Radiology<br />
Arteriographic management of hemorrhage<br />
following pelvic fracture<br />
• 9 pts, autologous clotted blood<br />
• “hemostasis was produced”
Anatomy<br />
• 2 innominate bones (arise from embryonic<br />
pubis, ilium <strong>and</strong> ischium) <strong>and</strong> sacrum<br />
• No inherent stability
Ligamentous Anatomy<br />
• Posteriorly: anterior <strong>and</strong> posterior SI<br />
ligaments<br />
• Anteriorly: pubic symphysis (weakest link)<br />
• Inferiorly: sacrospinus <strong>and</strong> sacrotuberous
Vascular Anatomy<br />
• Large blood vessels<br />
• Veins more posterior, closer to bone<br />
• Iliac arteries directly over SI joint
Neuroanatomy
<strong>Pelvic</strong> Volume
Biomechanics of Fracture<br />
• Vectors of force:<br />
Lateral compression: ped struck at 90°<br />
Anterior-posterior: MCC/Crush injury<br />
Vertical sheer: fall from height
Lateral Compression<br />
• Acute shortening in<br />
diameter across pelvis<br />
• Ligaments often intact,<br />
not “open”<br />
• Vascular injury less<br />
likely<br />
• Ex-fix no good/ T-<br />
POD not helpful
• Force via iliac spine,<br />
femurs or straddle<br />
injuries<br />
• Diameter widens,<br />
opens pelvis<br />
• High risk of vascular<br />
injury<br />
• Highest energy =<br />
posterior SI ligament<br />
disruption<br />
Anterior-Posterior
• Usually a fall from<br />
height l<strong>and</strong>ing on<br />
extended extremity<br />
• Disruption of all<br />
ligaments of<br />
hemipelvis<br />
• Mechanically unstable<br />
• Not as bad from<br />
vascular injury<br />
st<strong>and</strong>point<br />
Vertical Sheer
Classification
Diagnosis of Fracture<br />
• Strong suspicion based on mechanism<br />
• Any high energy blunt trauma should be<br />
suspected to have pelvic injury<br />
• Physical exam for stability to be done once<br />
• Perineum, rectal, vaginal exam important<br />
• AP pelvis film?
Team Pryor (a few)
Diagnosis of Fracture<br />
• Salvino 1992 Journal of Trauma<br />
779 awake <strong>and</strong> alert blunt trauma pts, all got<br />
AP pelvis<br />
743 negative physical exams, <strong>and</strong> no<br />
complaints of pelvic/hip pain<br />
0.4% rate of missed pelvic fractures<br />
3 simple anterior rami fractures requiring no<br />
intervention<br />
• AP pelvic film not necessary in <strong>the</strong> reliable,<br />
examinable patient
Diagnosis of Fracture<br />
• CT scanning is routine<br />
• Excellent for occult fracture identification<br />
• Adds information about injury magnitude<br />
• Posterior elements better visualized<br />
• Define instability<br />
• Help operative planning, especially with 3D<br />
reconstruction
Diagnosing Bleeding<br />
• Vascular injury <strong>and</strong> fracture sites<br />
• Can be a life-threatening problem<br />
• Postmortem angio study Huittinen 1973:<br />
Mostly venous bleeding (veins/bone)<br />
One or more sites of arterial bleeding in<br />
those who died of pelvic hemorrhage<br />
Putting bone back toge<strong>the</strong>r good
Diagnosing Bleeding<br />
• With known fractures, bleeding is diagnosis of<br />
exclusion<br />
• Most hemorrhage stops (venous/tamponade)<br />
• Arterial bleeding<br />
• Signs of ongoing bleeding:<br />
Non-responders<br />
Transient responders<br />
Return of hypotension = >70% arterial bleeding<br />
on angio (Miller, 2003)
Markers for pelvic hemorrhage<br />
• Plain films<br />
• Fracture pattern <strong>and</strong> displacement at that<br />
single point in time<br />
• No idea of displacement at time of injury<br />
• Clues to major ligamentous disruption =<br />
arterial bleeding<br />
• Sarin 2005: nei<strong>the</strong>r fracture pattern or class<br />
was predictive of need for angio<br />
embolization
Markers for pelvic hemorrhage<br />
• Plain films PLUS:<br />
• Blackmore 2006: Anatomy/<br />
physiology:<br />
Pubic symphysis diastasis > 1cm,<br />
Obturator ring fxr displaced > 1cm<br />
HCT130<br />
• All four: 66% major arterial injury<br />
• Two of four: 46%
Markers for pelvic hemorrhage<br />
• CT Scan with contrast<br />
• Excellent for fracture, hematoma, blush<br />
• Brown (LAC) 2005: Hematoma predicts of<br />
positive angiogram?<br />
37 patients with CT <strong>and</strong> Angiogram<br />
Significant hematoma (> 2 x 3cm): 73%<br />
Smaller hematoma: 67%<br />
Blush: 83%<br />
No blush: 71%<br />
• Need physiologic information
Initial Management<br />
• ABC’s<br />
• Adjuncts to survey:<br />
CXR<br />
AP Pelvis<br />
FAST<br />
compressive device?<br />
• Anticipate blood requirements:<br />
Huge potential space<br />
Signs of shock on admission: > 5 units over<br />
24 hrs<br />
20% of those will need > 15 units<br />
(Klein, 1992)
Polytrauma<br />
• <strong>Pelvic</strong> fractures<br />
commonly associated<br />
with o<strong>the</strong>r significant<br />
injuries: 89% (Parreira,<br />
2000)<br />
CHI- 37%<br />
Abdomen- 42%<br />
Chest- 25%<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Fractures</strong>- 48%
Polytrauma<br />
• Rapidly assess severity of o<strong>the</strong>r injuries:<br />
Serial exams/Hgb not indicated<br />
CXR<br />
FAST- requires approx. 200ml of fluid,<br />
operator dependent<br />
DPL/DPA- supraumbilical, up to 30% false<br />
positive rate<br />
CT scan
The <strong>Unstable</strong> <strong>Patient</strong><br />
• Difficult dilemma<br />
• Multiple potential sources<br />
• Rapid assessment of<br />
hemorrahge is key<br />
Hx/Inspection/Exam<br />
CXR<br />
FAST/DPL(A)
The <strong>Unstable</strong> <strong>Patient</strong><br />
• Not on <strong>the</strong> street<br />
• Abdomen <strong>and</strong> Chest “cleared”<br />
• Pelvis as compelling source<br />
• 3 ways to bleed<br />
Bone<br />
Artery<br />
Vein
The <strong>Unstable</strong> <strong>Patient</strong><br />
• <strong>Pelvic</strong> stabilization<br />
Helps with <strong>the</strong> bone<br />
/venous bleeding<br />
Creates tamponade<br />
• Angiography with<br />
embolization<br />
Solves <strong>the</strong> artery<br />
problem
The <strong>Unstable</strong> <strong>Patient</strong><br />
• Expect competing priorities<br />
Neurosurgery<br />
Orthopedic surgery<br />
Cardiothoracic surgery<br />
Vascular surgery
What can be done?<br />
•MAST<br />
• Compression devices<br />
• External fixation<br />
• C-clamp<br />
• Angiography/Embolization<br />
•OR?
MAST<br />
• Military antishock trousers<br />
• Advocated in 1970-80’s<br />
• Induce pelvic tamponade <strong>and</strong> increase<br />
venous return<br />
• Also, lower extremity ischemia/reperfusion,<br />
compartment syndrome, <strong>and</strong> skin necrosis<br />
• Largely discontinued
Compressive Devices<br />
• Adjunct to primary/secondary survey<br />
• Bed sheet or T-POD<br />
• Consider placing during roll<br />
• Provides external compression <strong>and</strong> “closes” <strong>the</strong><br />
open pelvis- use when pelvic volume is exp<strong>and</strong>ed<br />
• Decreases pelvic volume<br />
• DeAngelis (2007): Cadaveric study, T-POD<br />
significantly improved diastasis reduction vs bed<br />
sheet.
Compressive Devices<br />
• Placement:<br />
Centered over greater trochanters, not <strong>the</strong> iliac<br />
wings<br />
Binder can be cut for access to groin vessels/<br />
won’t hinder laparotomy<br />
• Place before moving patient to ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
stretcher/OR table/IR suite<br />
• Reduce disruption of clot or secondary damage<br />
from <strong>the</strong> movement of bony fragments
Compressive Devices<br />
• Lee C. (2007) EMJ:<br />
Prehospital Care<br />
Do not log roll<br />
Do not examine by<br />
palpation or springing<br />
“If <strong>the</strong>re is any<br />
suspicion of fracture,<br />
immobilize <strong>the</strong> pelvis<br />
using an external<br />
compression splint.”
Emergent External Fixation<br />
• Was mainstay of treatment for 30 years<br />
• Can be done in <strong>the</strong> ED<br />
• Reduces pelvic geometry (small), reduces fracture<br />
fragment bleeding <strong>and</strong> may “stabilize <strong>the</strong> clot”<br />
• Currently more common in Europe<br />
• Largely replaced by binders in <strong>the</strong> U.S.<br />
Noninvasive<br />
Minimal resources<br />
No posterior stabilization
External Fixation
C-clamp<br />
• Form of external fixation<br />
• Can be placed without floro<br />
• Can provide posterior support depending on<br />
placement<br />
• Doesn’t limit access to abdomen or<br />
perineum<br />
• Not applicable in iliac fractures<br />
• Requires experienced orthopedic surgeon
Angiography <strong>and</strong> Embolization<br />
• Started in early 70’s<br />
• Clotted blood metal coils <strong>and</strong> gelatin<br />
sponges<br />
• <strong>Fractures</strong> who need embolization:
Angiography <strong>and</strong> Embolization<br />
• Agolini 1997: significantly greater survival<br />
with angio in less that 3 hrs<br />
• Balogh 2002: improved mortality with<br />
angio within 90 min<br />
• 24 hour angiography on emergency basis is<br />
desirable
Angiography <strong>and</strong> Embolization<br />
• Selective embolization appropriate for<br />
hemodynamically stable patients<br />
• HD instability consider non-selective tx<br />
Intermittent bleeding- hypotension<br />
Vasospasm<br />
Changing coagulation profile<br />
Collaterals<br />
Time<br />
B/L internal iliac embo in <strong>the</strong> dying pt
Angiography <strong>and</strong> Embolization<br />
• Problems:<br />
• Issues with arterial access (body habitus,<br />
hypotension, injury to groin etc…)<br />
• Stick site complications<br />
• Radiation / Contrast exposure<br />
• High pressure injection<br />
• Recurrent bleeding
Angiography <strong>and</strong> Embolization<br />
• Problems continued…<br />
• CT needed/preferred prior to embolization,<br />
not <strong>the</strong> place for unstable pts<br />
• Time to embolization: 50 min to 5.5 hrs<br />
• Many success rates based on angio not<br />
vitals<br />
• Tissue ischemia <strong>and</strong> necrosis<br />
7% gluteal necrosis with B/L embo
A difficult situation…<br />
• Unresponsive at <strong>the</strong> scene intubated<br />
• Hypotension getting volume<br />
Responds to IVF, blood started<br />
• CXR OK<br />
• Open book pelvic fracture<br />
T-POD<br />
• FAST negative<br />
• Run to CT scan to triage cranium
Don’t be scared
Suddenly <strong>the</strong> patient is in <strong>the</strong> OR<br />
• Head being shaved<br />
• Recurrent hypotension, pelvic bleeding<br />
• Laparotomy?<br />
Don’t believe <strong>the</strong> negative CT/ negative<br />
FAST combo<br />
Negative laparotomies bad<br />
• <strong>Pelvic</strong> packing<br />
How?
<strong>Pelvic</strong> Packing<br />
• Historically: Open exploration <strong>and</strong> ligation<br />
Difficult access, wide collateralization<br />
Bloody fatal mess<br />
70’s-80’s: <strong>Pelvic</strong> should never be opened for<br />
bleeding fractures<br />
• Shouldn’t delay hemostasis waiting for IR<br />
Damage control<br />
Laparotomy <strong>and</strong> PACKING<br />
• Ertel, 2001: 20 pts<br />
Laparotomy <strong>and</strong> packing after c-clamp<br />
5 had intraabdominal injuries<br />
4 deaths from hemorrhagic shock, 1 from sepsis
Pre-peritoneal Packing<br />
• Direct packing of retroperitoneum<br />
• Keeps you of out <strong>the</strong> abdomen<br />
• Faster (20min), easier, less invasive than<br />
open packing<br />
• How is it done?
Technique<br />
• Low midline incision (6-8cm long) or Pfannenstiel<br />
• Open linea alba, stay out of <strong>the</strong> peritoneum<br />
• Hematoma has generally done <strong>the</strong> dissection for<br />
you<br />
• Bluntly sweep peritoneum from inner symphysis<br />
pubis <strong>and</strong> laterally<br />
• Place 3 (maybe more) laps on each side<br />
• CLOSE THE FASCIA, clip <strong>the</strong> skin<br />
• Planned removal/repacking 24-48 hours later
Pre-peritoneal Packing<br />
• Totterman (2007): 18 pts<br />
• 72% survival at 30 days<br />
• Significant rise in BP after packing<br />
• All went to angio<br />
80% positive angio post op
Pre-peritoneal Packing<br />
• Cothren (2007): 28 pts, HD unstable (bp
Pre-peritoneal packing<br />
• Problems:<br />
• Invasive (whatever)<br />
• Increase ACS<br />
• Ineffective for large arterial bleeding<br />
• Need re-operation<br />
• Risk of infection
Putting it all toge<strong>the</strong>r…<br />
• Hemodynamically unstable patients with<br />
pelvic fractures are “hard”<br />
• Need immediate <strong>and</strong> precise identification<br />
of cause of HD instability<br />
• Currently not possible with trauma bay<br />
imaging<br />
• Must remain flexible
Negative<br />
FAST Exam<br />
Positive<br />
Angio<br />
NO<br />
Responder<br />
YES<br />
OR: laparotomy<br />
<strong>and</strong> pack pelvis<br />
Pan CT<br />
SICU<br />
OR: PPP,<br />
address o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
injuries<br />
Pan CT scan<br />
Blush<br />
<strong>Pelvic</strong> injury<br />
only<br />
No<br />
Blush<br />
Angio<br />
SICU<br />
±Pan CT<br />
<strong>Pelvic</strong> injury +<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r life/limb<br />
Threatening injuries<br />
Angio<br />
SICU
“You can only do what you can do, <strong>and</strong> you<br />
can’t do what you can’t do.”<br />
J.P.
Questions…