09.11.2014 Views

Pelvic Fractures and the Unstable Patient

Pelvic Fractures and the Unstable Patient

Pelvic Fractures and the Unstable Patient

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Pelvic</strong> <strong>Fractures</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Unstable</strong> <strong>Patient</strong><br />

Adam M. Shiroff, M.D.<br />

Assistant Professor of Surgery<br />

Section of Trauma <strong>and</strong> Surgical Critical Care<br />

UMDNJ-RWJUH


Outline<br />

• History<br />

•Anatomy<br />

• Biomechanics<br />

• Classification<br />

• Diagnosis of fracture/bleeding<br />

• Polytrauma<br />

• <strong>Unstable</strong> patients<br />

• Algorithm


Scope of <strong>the</strong> Problem<br />

• <strong>Pelvic</strong> fractures continue to be a source of<br />

major morbidity <strong>and</strong> mortality<br />

• Mortality from pelvic fractures:<br />

Any: 5-10%<br />

Hemodynamically unstable: 40-60%<br />

Open fractures: up to 70%


History<br />

• 1901 Booth, P.L. Lancet<br />

NORTH LONSDALE HOSPITAL, BARROW-IN-<br />

FURNESS. A CASE OF FRACTURE OF THE<br />

PELVIS WITH INJURY TO THE BLADDER AND<br />

PELVIC VESSELS<br />

• 1964 Seavers, R. Surgery<br />

Hypogastric artery ligation for uncontrollable<br />

hemorrhage in acute pelvic trauma.


History<br />

• 1970 Hawkins, L. Journal of Trauma<br />

Laparotomy at <strong>the</strong> time of pelvic fracture.<br />

• 1972 Margolies, M.N. NEJM<br />

Arteriography in <strong>the</strong> management of<br />

hemorrhage from pelvic fractures.


History<br />

• 1973 Ring, E.J. Radiology<br />

Arteriographic management of hemorrhage<br />

following pelvic fracture<br />

• 9 pts, autologous clotted blood<br />

• “hemostasis was produced”


Anatomy<br />

• 2 innominate bones (arise from embryonic<br />

pubis, ilium <strong>and</strong> ischium) <strong>and</strong> sacrum<br />

• No inherent stability


Ligamentous Anatomy<br />

• Posteriorly: anterior <strong>and</strong> posterior SI<br />

ligaments<br />

• Anteriorly: pubic symphysis (weakest link)<br />

• Inferiorly: sacrospinus <strong>and</strong> sacrotuberous


Vascular Anatomy<br />

• Large blood vessels<br />

• Veins more posterior, closer to bone<br />

• Iliac arteries directly over SI joint


Neuroanatomy


<strong>Pelvic</strong> Volume


Biomechanics of Fracture<br />

• Vectors of force:<br />

Lateral compression: ped struck at 90°<br />

Anterior-posterior: MCC/Crush injury<br />

Vertical sheer: fall from height


Lateral Compression<br />

• Acute shortening in<br />

diameter across pelvis<br />

• Ligaments often intact,<br />

not “open”<br />

• Vascular injury less<br />

likely<br />

• Ex-fix no good/ T-<br />

POD not helpful


• Force via iliac spine,<br />

femurs or straddle<br />

injuries<br />

• Diameter widens,<br />

opens pelvis<br />

• High risk of vascular<br />

injury<br />

• Highest energy =<br />

posterior SI ligament<br />

disruption<br />

Anterior-Posterior


• Usually a fall from<br />

height l<strong>and</strong>ing on<br />

extended extremity<br />

• Disruption of all<br />

ligaments of<br />

hemipelvis<br />

• Mechanically unstable<br />

• Not as bad from<br />

vascular injury<br />

st<strong>and</strong>point<br />

Vertical Sheer


Classification


Diagnosis of Fracture<br />

• Strong suspicion based on mechanism<br />

• Any high energy blunt trauma should be<br />

suspected to have pelvic injury<br />

• Physical exam for stability to be done once<br />

• Perineum, rectal, vaginal exam important<br />

• AP pelvis film?


Team Pryor (a few)


Diagnosis of Fracture<br />

• Salvino 1992 Journal of Trauma<br />

779 awake <strong>and</strong> alert blunt trauma pts, all got<br />

AP pelvis<br />

743 negative physical exams, <strong>and</strong> no<br />

complaints of pelvic/hip pain<br />

0.4% rate of missed pelvic fractures<br />

3 simple anterior rami fractures requiring no<br />

intervention<br />

• AP pelvic film not necessary in <strong>the</strong> reliable,<br />

examinable patient


Diagnosis of Fracture<br />

• CT scanning is routine<br />

• Excellent for occult fracture identification<br />

• Adds information about injury magnitude<br />

• Posterior elements better visualized<br />

• Define instability<br />

• Help operative planning, especially with 3D<br />

reconstruction


Diagnosing Bleeding<br />

• Vascular injury <strong>and</strong> fracture sites<br />

• Can be a life-threatening problem<br />

• Postmortem angio study Huittinen 1973:<br />

Mostly venous bleeding (veins/bone)<br />

One or more sites of arterial bleeding in<br />

those who died of pelvic hemorrhage<br />

Putting bone back toge<strong>the</strong>r good


Diagnosing Bleeding<br />

• With known fractures, bleeding is diagnosis of<br />

exclusion<br />

• Most hemorrhage stops (venous/tamponade)<br />

• Arterial bleeding<br />

• Signs of ongoing bleeding:<br />

Non-responders<br />

Transient responders<br />

Return of hypotension = >70% arterial bleeding<br />

on angio (Miller, 2003)


Markers for pelvic hemorrhage<br />

• Plain films<br />

• Fracture pattern <strong>and</strong> displacement at that<br />

single point in time<br />

• No idea of displacement at time of injury<br />

• Clues to major ligamentous disruption =<br />

arterial bleeding<br />

• Sarin 2005: nei<strong>the</strong>r fracture pattern or class<br />

was predictive of need for angio<br />

embolization


Markers for pelvic hemorrhage<br />

• Plain films PLUS:<br />

• Blackmore 2006: Anatomy/<br />

physiology:<br />

Pubic symphysis diastasis > 1cm,<br />

Obturator ring fxr displaced > 1cm<br />

HCT130<br />

• All four: 66% major arterial injury<br />

• Two of four: 46%


Markers for pelvic hemorrhage<br />

• CT Scan with contrast<br />

• Excellent for fracture, hematoma, blush<br />

• Brown (LAC) 2005: Hematoma predicts of<br />

positive angiogram?<br />

37 patients with CT <strong>and</strong> Angiogram<br />

Significant hematoma (> 2 x 3cm): 73%<br />

Smaller hematoma: 67%<br />

Blush: 83%<br />

No blush: 71%<br />

• Need physiologic information


Initial Management<br />

• ABC’s<br />

• Adjuncts to survey:<br />

CXR<br />

AP Pelvis<br />

FAST<br />

compressive device?<br />

• Anticipate blood requirements:<br />

Huge potential space<br />

Signs of shock on admission: > 5 units over<br />

24 hrs<br />

20% of those will need > 15 units<br />

(Klein, 1992)


Polytrauma<br />

• <strong>Pelvic</strong> fractures<br />

commonly associated<br />

with o<strong>the</strong>r significant<br />

injuries: 89% (Parreira,<br />

2000)<br />

CHI- 37%<br />

Abdomen- 42%<br />

Chest- 25%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Fractures</strong>- 48%


Polytrauma<br />

• Rapidly assess severity of o<strong>the</strong>r injuries:<br />

Serial exams/Hgb not indicated<br />

CXR<br />

FAST- requires approx. 200ml of fluid,<br />

operator dependent<br />

DPL/DPA- supraumbilical, up to 30% false<br />

positive rate<br />

CT scan


The <strong>Unstable</strong> <strong>Patient</strong><br />

• Difficult dilemma<br />

• Multiple potential sources<br />

• Rapid assessment of<br />

hemorrahge is key<br />

Hx/Inspection/Exam<br />

CXR<br />

FAST/DPL(A)


The <strong>Unstable</strong> <strong>Patient</strong><br />

• Not on <strong>the</strong> street<br />

• Abdomen <strong>and</strong> Chest “cleared”<br />

• Pelvis as compelling source<br />

• 3 ways to bleed<br />

Bone<br />

Artery<br />

Vein


The <strong>Unstable</strong> <strong>Patient</strong><br />

• <strong>Pelvic</strong> stabilization<br />

Helps with <strong>the</strong> bone<br />

/venous bleeding<br />

Creates tamponade<br />

• Angiography with<br />

embolization<br />

Solves <strong>the</strong> artery<br />

problem


The <strong>Unstable</strong> <strong>Patient</strong><br />

• Expect competing priorities<br />

Neurosurgery<br />

Orthopedic surgery<br />

Cardiothoracic surgery<br />

Vascular surgery


What can be done?<br />

•MAST<br />

• Compression devices<br />

• External fixation<br />

• C-clamp<br />

• Angiography/Embolization<br />

•OR?


MAST<br />

• Military antishock trousers<br />

• Advocated in 1970-80’s<br />

• Induce pelvic tamponade <strong>and</strong> increase<br />

venous return<br />

• Also, lower extremity ischemia/reperfusion,<br />

compartment syndrome, <strong>and</strong> skin necrosis<br />

• Largely discontinued


Compressive Devices<br />

• Adjunct to primary/secondary survey<br />

• Bed sheet or T-POD<br />

• Consider placing during roll<br />

• Provides external compression <strong>and</strong> “closes” <strong>the</strong><br />

open pelvis- use when pelvic volume is exp<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

• Decreases pelvic volume<br />

• DeAngelis (2007): Cadaveric study, T-POD<br />

significantly improved diastasis reduction vs bed<br />

sheet.


Compressive Devices<br />

• Placement:<br />

Centered over greater trochanters, not <strong>the</strong> iliac<br />

wings<br />

Binder can be cut for access to groin vessels/<br />

won’t hinder laparotomy<br />

• Place before moving patient to ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

stretcher/OR table/IR suite<br />

• Reduce disruption of clot or secondary damage<br />

from <strong>the</strong> movement of bony fragments


Compressive Devices<br />

• Lee C. (2007) EMJ:<br />

Prehospital Care<br />

Do not log roll<br />

Do not examine by<br />

palpation or springing<br />

“If <strong>the</strong>re is any<br />

suspicion of fracture,<br />

immobilize <strong>the</strong> pelvis<br />

using an external<br />

compression splint.”


Emergent External Fixation<br />

• Was mainstay of treatment for 30 years<br />

• Can be done in <strong>the</strong> ED<br />

• Reduces pelvic geometry (small), reduces fracture<br />

fragment bleeding <strong>and</strong> may “stabilize <strong>the</strong> clot”<br />

• Currently more common in Europe<br />

• Largely replaced by binders in <strong>the</strong> U.S.<br />

Noninvasive<br />

Minimal resources<br />

No posterior stabilization


External Fixation


C-clamp<br />

• Form of external fixation<br />

• Can be placed without floro<br />

• Can provide posterior support depending on<br />

placement<br />

• Doesn’t limit access to abdomen or<br />

perineum<br />

• Not applicable in iliac fractures<br />

• Requires experienced orthopedic surgeon


Angiography <strong>and</strong> Embolization<br />

• Started in early 70’s<br />

• Clotted blood metal coils <strong>and</strong> gelatin<br />

sponges<br />

• <strong>Fractures</strong> who need embolization:


Angiography <strong>and</strong> Embolization<br />

• Agolini 1997: significantly greater survival<br />

with angio in less that 3 hrs<br />

• Balogh 2002: improved mortality with<br />

angio within 90 min<br />

• 24 hour angiography on emergency basis is<br />

desirable


Angiography <strong>and</strong> Embolization<br />

• Selective embolization appropriate for<br />

hemodynamically stable patients<br />

• HD instability consider non-selective tx<br />

Intermittent bleeding- hypotension<br />

Vasospasm<br />

Changing coagulation profile<br />

Collaterals<br />

Time<br />

B/L internal iliac embo in <strong>the</strong> dying pt


Angiography <strong>and</strong> Embolization<br />

• Problems:<br />

• Issues with arterial access (body habitus,<br />

hypotension, injury to groin etc…)<br />

• Stick site complications<br />

• Radiation / Contrast exposure<br />

• High pressure injection<br />

• Recurrent bleeding


Angiography <strong>and</strong> Embolization<br />

• Problems continued…<br />

• CT needed/preferred prior to embolization,<br />

not <strong>the</strong> place for unstable pts<br />

• Time to embolization: 50 min to 5.5 hrs<br />

• Many success rates based on angio not<br />

vitals<br />

• Tissue ischemia <strong>and</strong> necrosis<br />

7% gluteal necrosis with B/L embo


A difficult situation…<br />

• Unresponsive at <strong>the</strong> scene intubated<br />

• Hypotension getting volume<br />

Responds to IVF, blood started<br />

• CXR OK<br />

• Open book pelvic fracture<br />

T-POD<br />

• FAST negative<br />

• Run to CT scan to triage cranium


Don’t be scared


Suddenly <strong>the</strong> patient is in <strong>the</strong> OR<br />

• Head being shaved<br />

• Recurrent hypotension, pelvic bleeding<br />

• Laparotomy?<br />

Don’t believe <strong>the</strong> negative CT/ negative<br />

FAST combo<br />

Negative laparotomies bad<br />

• <strong>Pelvic</strong> packing<br />

How?


<strong>Pelvic</strong> Packing<br />

• Historically: Open exploration <strong>and</strong> ligation<br />

Difficult access, wide collateralization<br />

Bloody fatal mess<br />

70’s-80’s: <strong>Pelvic</strong> should never be opened for<br />

bleeding fractures<br />

• Shouldn’t delay hemostasis waiting for IR<br />

Damage control<br />

Laparotomy <strong>and</strong> PACKING<br />

• Ertel, 2001: 20 pts<br />

Laparotomy <strong>and</strong> packing after c-clamp<br />

5 had intraabdominal injuries<br />

4 deaths from hemorrhagic shock, 1 from sepsis


Pre-peritoneal Packing<br />

• Direct packing of retroperitoneum<br />

• Keeps you of out <strong>the</strong> abdomen<br />

• Faster (20min), easier, less invasive than<br />

open packing<br />

• How is it done?


Technique<br />

• Low midline incision (6-8cm long) or Pfannenstiel<br />

• Open linea alba, stay out of <strong>the</strong> peritoneum<br />

• Hematoma has generally done <strong>the</strong> dissection for<br />

you<br />

• Bluntly sweep peritoneum from inner symphysis<br />

pubis <strong>and</strong> laterally<br />

• Place 3 (maybe more) laps on each side<br />

• CLOSE THE FASCIA, clip <strong>the</strong> skin<br />

• Planned removal/repacking 24-48 hours later


Pre-peritoneal Packing<br />

• Totterman (2007): 18 pts<br />

• 72% survival at 30 days<br />

• Significant rise in BP after packing<br />

• All went to angio<br />

80% positive angio post op


Pre-peritoneal Packing<br />

• Cothren (2007): 28 pts, HD unstable (bp


Pre-peritoneal packing<br />

• Problems:<br />

• Invasive (whatever)<br />

• Increase ACS<br />

• Ineffective for large arterial bleeding<br />

• Need re-operation<br />

• Risk of infection


Putting it all toge<strong>the</strong>r…<br />

• Hemodynamically unstable patients with<br />

pelvic fractures are “hard”<br />

• Need immediate <strong>and</strong> precise identification<br />

of cause of HD instability<br />

• Currently not possible with trauma bay<br />

imaging<br />

• Must remain flexible


Negative<br />

FAST Exam<br />

Positive<br />

Angio<br />

NO<br />

Responder<br />

YES<br />

OR: laparotomy<br />

<strong>and</strong> pack pelvis<br />

Pan CT<br />

SICU<br />

OR: PPP,<br />

address o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

injuries<br />

Pan CT scan<br />

Blush<br />

<strong>Pelvic</strong> injury<br />

only<br />

No<br />

Blush<br />

Angio<br />

SICU<br />

±Pan CT<br />

<strong>Pelvic</strong> injury +<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r life/limb<br />

Threatening injuries<br />

Angio<br />

SICU


“You can only do what you can do, <strong>and</strong> you<br />

can’t do what you can’t do.”<br />

J.P.


Questions…

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!