08.11.2014 Views

sakaisettlersocr

sakaisettlersocr

sakaisettlersocr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The authorities did not move to "restore order,"<br />

incidentally, until after Afrikan World War I vets broke<br />

into the 8th Illinois Infantry Armory, and armed<br />

themselves with rifles to take care of the white mobs. (45)<br />

This was the vigorous "warm-up" for the steel<br />

strike. It was not surprising that the Afrikan exile communities<br />

were less than enthusiastic about supporting the<br />

strike of the same people who had spent the past two years<br />

attacking them. Given the history of the A.F.L. it was<br />

possible that an outright triumph of the A.F.L. unions<br />

might have meant renewed efforts to drive Afrikan labor<br />

out of the mills altogether. It was typical settleristic thinking<br />

to make Afrikans responsible for the failure of a white<br />

strike, which was never theirs in the first place.<br />

Both the strike leadership and the bourgeoisie<br />

cleverly promoted this hatred, encouraging the European<br />

immigrant and "native-born" settler alike to turn all their<br />

anger and bitterness onto the Afrikan nation. Perhaps the<br />

most interesting role was played by William Z. Foster, the<br />

chief leader of the strike. He was one of the leading<br />

"socialist" trade-unionists of the period, and in 1920<br />

would become a leader in the new Communist Party USA.<br />

From then on until his death he would be a leadinn - figure -<br />

of settler "communism." Even today young recruits in the<br />

CPUSA and Mao Zedong Thought organizations are<br />

often told to "study" Foster's writings in order to learn<br />

about labor organizing.<br />

No longer was it just a question of some Afrikans<br />

not following the orders of the white labor. Now Foster<br />

was openly saying that the entire Afrikan "race" was the<br />

enemy. Could the imperialists have asked for more, than<br />

to have the leading "communist" trade-union leader help<br />

them whip up the oppressor nation masses to repress the<br />

Afrikan nation?<br />

The Cossacks were the hated and feared special<br />

military of the Russian Czar, used in bloody repressions<br />

against the people. Only the most twisted, Klan-like mentality<br />

would have so explicitly compared the oppressed<br />

Afrikan nation to those infamous oppressors. And was<br />

this message not an incitement to mob terror and<br />

genocide? For the poor immigrants from Eastern Europe<br />

(much of which was under the lash of Czarist tyranny) to<br />

kill a Cossack was an act of justice, of retribution. The<br />

threat was easy to read.<br />

In case Afrikans didn't get Foster's threat (which<br />

was also being delivered in the streets, as we know), Foster<br />

made it even more plain. He said that if Afrikans failed to<br />

obey the decisions of settler labor: "It would make our industrial<br />

disputes take on more and more the character of<br />

race wars, a consummation that would be hinhlv iniurious<br />

William Z. Foster had, as the saying goes, "pulled<br />

defeat out of the jaws of victory." Foster based the strike<br />

on the A.F.L. unions, despite their proven record of<br />

treachery and hostility towards the proletarian masses.<br />

That alone guaranteed defeat. He encouraged white<br />

supremacist feeling and thus united the honest elements<br />

with the most reactionary. Despite the great popular support<br />

for a nation-wide strike and the angry sentiments of<br />

the most exploited steelworkers, Foster and the other<br />

A.F.L. leaders so sabotaged the strike that it went down to<br />

defeat. The one "smart" thing he did was to cover up his<br />

opportunistic policies by following the capitalists in using<br />

Afrikans as the scapegoats.<br />

In his 1920 history of the strike, Foster (the supposed<br />

"communist") repeated the lie that Afrikan workers<br />

had "lined up with the bosses. " In fact, Foster even said<br />

that in resolving the differences between Euro-Amerikan<br />

and Afrikan labor "The negro has the more difficult part"<br />

since the Afrikan worker was becoming ' a professional<br />

strike-breaker. " And militant white workers knew what<br />

they were supposed to do to a "professional strikebreaker."<br />

Foster's lynch mob oratory was only restrained by<br />

the formality expected of a Euro-Amerikan "communist"<br />

leader. His white-supremacist message was identical to but<br />

more politely clothed than the crude rants of the Ku Klux<br />

Klan. He warned that the capitalists were grooming<br />

Afrikans as "as race of strike-breakers, with whom to hold<br />

the white workers in check; on much the same principle as<br />

the Czars used the Cossacks to keep in subjugation the<br />

balance of the Russian people. " It's easy to see how Foster<br />

became such a popular leader among the settler workers.<br />

During the 1919 race riots, a white mob chases a Negro into his homeand<br />

then stones him to death with bricks. He is dead by the time the<br />

police arrive.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!