08.11.2014 Views

sakaisettlersocr

sakaisettlersocr

sakaisettlersocr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

slavemasters was apparent to many. Fearing this disruption<br />

of the concentration camp culture of the plantations-and<br />

fearing even more the dangers of arming<br />

masses of Afrikans-many settlers preferred to lose to<br />

their British kith and kin rather than tamper with slavery.<br />

But that choice was no longer fully theirs to make, as the<br />

genie was part-way out of the bottle.<br />

On Dec. 31, 1775, Gen. Washington ordered the<br />

enlistment of Afrikans into the Continental Army, with<br />

the promise of freedom at the end of the war. Many settlers<br />

sent their slaves into the army to take their place. One<br />

Hessian mercenary officer with the British said: "The<br />

Negro can take the field instead of the master; and<br />

therefore, no regiment is to be seen in which there are not<br />

Negroes in abundance ..." Over 5,000 Afrikans served in<br />

the Patriot military, making up a large proportion of the<br />

most experienced troops (settlers usually served for only<br />

short enlistments-90 days duty being the most common<br />

term-while slaves served until the war's end or death).(24)<br />

For oppressed peoples the price of the war was<br />

paid in blood. ~fiikancasualties were heavy (one-half of<br />

the Afrikans who served with the British in Virginia died in<br />

an epidemic).(25) And the Indian nations allied to the<br />

Crown suffered greatly as the tide of battle turned against<br />

their side. The same was true of many Afrikans captured in<br />

British defeats. Some were sold to the West Indies and<br />

others were executed. A similar heavy fate fell on those<br />

recaptured while making their way to British lines. The settler<br />

mass community organizations, such as the infamous<br />

"Committees of Correspondence" in New York and<br />

Massachusetts, played the same role up North that the<br />

Slave Patrols played in the South, of checking and arresting<br />

rebellious Afrikans.(26)<br />

Even those who had allied with the victorious settlers<br />

did not necessarily find themselves winning anything.<br />

Many Afrikans were disarmed and put back into chains at<br />

the war's end, despite solemn settler promises. John Hancock,<br />

President of the Continental Congress, may have<br />

presented Afrikan U.S. troops with a banner - which<br />

praised them as "The Bucks of America" - but that<br />

didn't help Afrikans such as Captain Mark Starlin. He was<br />

the first Afrikan captain in the Amerikan naval forces, and<br />

had won many honors for his near-suicidal night raids on<br />

the British fleet (which is why the settlers let him and his<br />

all-Afrikan crew sail alone). But as soon as the war ended,<br />

his master simply reclaimed him. Starlin spent the rest of<br />

his life as a slave. He, ironically enough, is known to<br />

historians as an exceptionally dedicated "patriot", superloyal<br />

to the new settler nation.(27)<br />

What was primary for the Afrikan masses was a<br />

strategic relationship with the British Empire against settler<br />

Amerika. To use an Old European power against the<br />

Euro-Amerikan settlers-who were the nearest and most<br />

immediate enemy-was just common sense to many.<br />

65,000 Afrikans joined the British forces-over ten for<br />

every one enlisted in the Continental U.S. ranks.(28) As<br />

Lenin said in discussing the national question: "The<br />

masses vote with their feet". And in this case they voted<br />

against Amerika.<br />

Secondarily, on an individual level Afrikans served<br />

with various forces in return for release from slavery.<br />

There was no real "political unity" or larger allegiance involved,<br />

just a quid pro quo. On the European sides as well,<br />

obviously. If the British and Patriot sides could have pursued<br />

their conflict without freeing any slaves or disrupting<br />

the slave system, they each gladly would have done so. Just<br />

as the slave enlistments in Bacon's Rebellion demonstrated<br />

only the temporary and tactical nature of alliances between<br />

oppressed and oppressor forces, so the alignment of forces<br />

in the settler War of Independence only proved that the national<br />

patriotic struggle of Euro-Amerikans was opposite<br />

to the basic interests and political desires of the oppressed.<br />

Even in the ruins of British defeat, the soundness<br />

of this viewpoint was born out in practice. While the<br />

jubilant Patriots watched the defeated British army<br />

evacuate New York City in 1783, some 4,000 Afrikans<br />

swarmed aboard the departing ships to escape Amerika.<br />

Another 4,000 Afrikans escaped with the British from<br />

Savannah, 6,000 from Charleston, and 5,000 escaped<br />

aboard British ships prior to the surrender. (29) Did these<br />

brothers and sisters "lose" the war-compared to those<br />

still in chains on the plantations?<br />

Others chose neither to leave nor submit. All during<br />

the war Indian and Afrikan guerrillas struck at the settlers.<br />

In one case, three hundred Afrikan ex-slaves fought<br />

an extended guerrilla campaign against the planters in both<br />

Georgia and South Carolina. Originally allied to the<br />

British forces, they continued their independent campaign<br />

long after the British defeat. They were not overcome until<br />

1786, when their secret fort at Bear Creek was discovered<br />

and overwhelmed. This was but one front in the true<br />

democratic struggle against Amerika.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!