08.11.2014 Views

ad - BrainJuicer

ad - BrainJuicer

ad - BrainJuicer

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1<br />

Understanding System 1<br />

vs. 2 thinking… for More<br />

Effective Communication!<br />

2007<br />

2007<br />

Award<br />

Winner<br />

2007<br />

2007 2007<br />

Award<br />

Winner Award<br />

Winner<br />

London Rotterdam Lausanne Hamburg New York Chicago LA Toronto Melbourne Shanghai Sao Paulo<br />

A Le<strong>ad</strong>ing International Online research agency<br />

1


Always start by calling your audience liars!<br />

2


Social animals…<br />

3


Which means we copy other people all the time<br />

4


We think much less than we like to think we think……..<br />

5


System 1 vs. System 2 Thinking…<br />

6


Can you tell what it is in the picture?<br />

7


Intuitive Judgement<br />

“A bat and a ball cost $1.10 in total.<br />

The bat costs $1 more than the ball.<br />

How much does the ball cost?”<br />

“People are not accustomed to thinking hard, and are often content to<br />

trust a plausible judgement that quickly comes to mind.”<br />

Daniel Kahnemann, Nobel Prize Winner<br />

8


Human behaviour driven by two independent brain systems, 1 & 2 …<br />

System 2<br />

System 1<br />

Explicit<br />

Slow<br />

Analytical<br />

Learned<br />

Propositional<br />

Conscious<br />

Implicit<br />

Fast<br />

Intuitive<br />

Instinctive<br />

Metaphoric<br />

Unconscious<br />

9


Implicit has greater processing power (and is less effortful)<br />

System 1<br />

System 2<br />

50 bit/sec<br />

“We are not<br />

thinking<br />

machines that<br />

feel; we are<br />

feeling machines<br />

that think”<br />

Antonio Damasio<br />

11,000,000 bit/sec<br />

Zimmerman, M. (1989) "The Nervous System in the<br />

Context of Information Theory".<br />

10


Current view is that emotion simply helps message cut through…<br />

11


Current view is that emotion simply helps message cut through…<br />

12


But new evidence reveals that the most effective <strong>ad</strong>vertising draws<br />

people closer to the brand…<br />

13


Paul Ekman<br />

14


As seen in ‘Lie To Me’ Hit TV Series based on Paul Ekman’s work<br />

15


FaceTrace ® - Measuring Emotional Appeal<br />

“Which of these faces best expresses<br />

how you feel about this <strong>ad</strong>?”<br />

S<strong>ad</strong>ness<br />

Contempt<br />

Surprise<br />

“To what degree did this<br />

<strong>ad</strong> make you feel<br />

[selected emotion]?”<br />

Happiness<br />

Neutral<br />

Anger<br />

“And what was it about this<br />

idea that m<strong>ad</strong>e you feel this way?”<br />

Captures ‘Reasons for Emotion’<br />

Fear<br />

<strong>BrainJuicer</strong> ® 2006<br />

Disgust<br />

2007<br />

2007<br />

Award<br />

Winner<br />

2007<br />

2007 2007<br />

Award<br />

Winner Award<br />

Winner<br />

1<br />

16


Emotional campaigns outperform rational, info-based campaigns…<br />

“Emotional <strong>ad</strong>vertising campaigns are more effective & more<br />

profitable than rational campaigns - even in 'rational' categories…”<br />

35%<br />

V large profit gains (% reporting)<br />

30%<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

31%<br />

26%<br />

16%<br />

Emotional Ad Strategy Combined Rational Ad Strategy<br />

Les Binet & Peter Field<br />

Marketing in the Era of<br />

Accountability, 2007<br />

(IPA dataMINE analysis<br />

study on 880 case studies).<br />

Campaign strategy<br />

“…The most effective <strong>ad</strong>vertisements of all are<br />

those with little or no rational content”<br />

17


C<strong>ad</strong>bury Dairy Milk Gorilla<br />

18


C<strong>ad</strong>bury’s Gorilla WOULD NOT have been progressed on usual measures<br />

CDM Gorilla<br />

UK TV <strong>ad</strong> test norm<br />

2<br />

Very Positive<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1 Very Negative<br />

How easy it is to<br />

understand<br />

How relevant it is<br />

to you<br />

How persuasive<br />

you found it<br />

How much it told<br />

you about the<br />

brand<br />

19


Measuring the C<strong>ad</strong>bury Gorilla Emotionally with FaceTrace ®<br />

Which of these faces best expresses<br />

how you feel about this <strong>ad</strong>vert?<br />

Contempt<br />

S<strong>ad</strong>ness<br />

Surprise<br />

To what degree did this<br />

<strong>ad</strong>vert make you feel<br />

[selected emotion]?<br />

Happiness<br />

Neutral<br />

Anger<br />

What was it about this <strong>ad</strong>vert<br />

that m<strong>ad</strong>e you feel this way?<br />

[Use patented MindRe<strong>ad</strong>er ®<br />

to capture reasons]<br />

Fear<br />

Disgust<br />

2007<br />

<strong>BrainJuicer</strong> © 2006<br />

2007<br />

Award<br />

Winner<br />

20


C<strong>ad</strong>bury Gorilla Ad<br />

Intensity Score<br />

measured on a<br />

scale from 0 to +3<br />

Contempt<br />

Disgust<br />

Anger<br />

100%<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

2.17<br />

5<br />

1<br />

16<br />

Cannot see what the connection was between<br />

Phil Collins, Gorilla & Chocolate<br />

Don't understand the connection between a<br />

gorilla and chocolate<br />

Good filming, but what has it to do with<br />

chocolate?<br />

Excellent <strong>ad</strong>, not quite sure what gorilla<br />

represents, but who cares. Fantastic<br />

Fear<br />

S<strong>ad</strong>ness<br />

Neutral<br />

Happy<br />

% of respondents<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

65<br />

Ad is brilliant and gorilla makes me laugh, its<br />

very clever and easy to remember<br />

The best <strong>ad</strong> around! I just love it!!!! it is different<br />

and memorable<br />

Great <strong>ad</strong>, gets people talking about it,<br />

memorable<br />

First time I saw it I was really surprised it was for<br />

Surprise<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

12<br />

What does a gorilla playing the drums have to do<br />

with chocolate?<br />

Not what I was expecting. Trying to work out<br />

whether the gorilla was real...<br />

Bizarre and unique. Makes you watch<br />

the whole <strong>ad</strong> to find the tagline.<br />

21


C<strong>ad</strong>bury’s most effective <strong>ad</strong> ever…<br />

WOULD have been progressed on<br />

emotional engagement measures<br />

Would NOT have been progressed<br />

on usual information measures<br />

Emotional<br />

Intensity<br />

(0 to +3)<br />

100%<br />

2.17 1.33<br />

5 5<br />

2 Very Positive<br />

CDM Gorilla<br />

UK TV <strong>ad</strong> test norm<br />

Masterbrand payback 171% vs<br />

previous campaigns<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

16<br />

43<br />

Contempt<br />

Disgust<br />

Anger<br />

1<br />

Revenue ROI of £4.88 for every £1<br />

spent (vs £3.16 for previous<br />

persuasion campaign)<br />

Hardened price elasticity by 27%<br />

60%<br />

Fear<br />

S<strong>ad</strong>ness<br />

50%<br />

Neutral<br />

40%<br />

65<br />

Happy<br />

Surprise<br />

0<br />

30%<br />

43<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

12<br />

CDM (Gorilla)<br />

6<br />

Commercial <strong>ad</strong>s norm<br />

-1 Very Negative<br />

How easy it<br />

is to<br />

understand<br />

How relevant<br />

it is to you<br />

How<br />

persuasive<br />

you found it<br />

How much it<br />

told you<br />

about the<br />

brand<br />

22


Emotional Journey: C<strong>ad</strong>bury Dairy Milk Gorilla<br />

100%<br />

Contempt<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

Disgust<br />

70%<br />

Anger<br />

60%<br />

“Unsure”<br />

“Music…”<br />

“Feel good<br />

<strong>ad</strong>vert”<br />

50%<br />

Fear<br />

“Funny to see the gorilla”<br />

“Not sure what I expected”<br />

“Don't understand<br />

what the <strong>ad</strong>vert is for”<br />

“Don't like a close<br />

up of the gorillas<br />

“Love it” nostrils!!”<br />

“An ape playing the<br />

drums!” “It’s funny”<br />

“It all comes together<br />

“But still, what’s and it got is amusing” to<br />

do with chocolate?”<br />

“Good music, good chocolate!”<br />

“Love C<strong>ad</strong>bury's Chocolate!”<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Start<br />

2<br />

4<br />

6<br />

8<br />

10<br />

12<br />

14<br />

16<br />

18<br />

20<br />

22<br />

24<br />

26<br />

28<br />

30<br />

32<br />

34<br />

36<br />

38<br />

40<br />

42<br />

44<br />

46<br />

seconds<br />

48<br />

50<br />

52<br />

54<br />

56<br />

58<br />

60<br />

62<br />

64<br />

66<br />

68<br />

70<br />

72<br />

74<br />

76<br />

78<br />

80<br />

82<br />

84<br />

86<br />

88<br />

90<br />

S<strong>ad</strong>ness<br />

Neutral<br />

Happy<br />

Surprise<br />

23


FaceTracing Output: Phil Collins<br />

100%<br />

Contempt<br />

Disgust<br />

90%<br />

Anger<br />

Fear<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

24<br />

Start<br />

2 sec<br />

4 sec<br />

6 sec<br />

8 sec<br />

10 sec<br />

12 sec<br />

14 sec<br />

16 sec<br />

18 sec<br />

20 sec<br />

22 sec<br />

24 sec<br />

26 sec<br />

28 sec<br />

30 sec<br />

32 sec<br />

34 sec<br />

36 sec<br />

38 sec<br />

40 sec<br />

42 sec<br />

44 sec<br />

46 sec<br />

48 sec<br />

50 sec<br />

52 sec<br />

54 sec<br />

56 sec<br />

58 sec<br />

60 sec<br />

62 sec<br />

64 sec<br />

66 sec<br />

68 sec<br />

70 sec<br />

72 sec<br />

74 sec<br />

76 sec<br />

78 sec<br />

80 sec<br />

82 sec<br />

84 sec<br />

86 sec<br />

88 sec<br />

90 sec<br />

S<strong>ad</strong>ness<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Neutral<br />

Happy<br />

Surprise


Heineken Walk-In Fridge<br />

25


Heineken Fridge WOULD NOT have been progressed on usual measures<br />

Finished TV-<strong>ad</strong><br />

Norm<br />

Very Positive<br />

UK TV <strong>ad</strong> test norm<br />

1<br />

0<br />

- 1<br />

Relevant Persuasive M<strong>ad</strong>e you<br />

w ant buy the<br />

Very Negative<br />

product<br />

How much it<br />

told about<br />

brand<br />

26


Heineken Walk in Fridge<br />

Which of these faces best expresses how you feel about the <strong>ad</strong>vert/idea for an <strong>ad</strong>vert you saw?<br />

Intensity<br />

Score<br />

Contempt<br />

Disgust<br />

Anger<br />

Fear<br />

S<strong>ad</strong>ness<br />

Neutral<br />

Happiness<br />

% of respondents<br />

2.10<br />

3<br />

1<br />

21<br />

63<br />

Childish playing to stereotypes<br />

Didn't mean anything to me<br />

Its just a fridge<br />

It was right up my street and m<strong>ad</strong>e me laugh<br />

It was stereotypical and because of that it was amusing<br />

Typical Heineken <strong>ad</strong>vert. It was funny<br />

Surprise<br />

It m<strong>ad</strong>e me giggle<br />

12<br />

Walk-In<br />

Fridge<br />

As a woman I was amused by the shoes<br />

- but the fridge was funny and unexpected<br />

For women not surprised but then when it came to men surprised and funny<br />

27


Heineken Walk-in Fridge…<br />

…would not have been progressed on cognitive KPIs<br />

- Heineken ‘Walk-In fridge’ <strong>ad</strong> -<br />

- Click -<br />

to watch <strong>ad</strong>vertisement<br />

Emotional measurement shows<br />

how brilliant the <strong>ad</strong> really is<br />

Would not have been progressed on<br />

cognitive KPIs<br />

Finished<br />

TV-<strong>ad</strong> Norm<br />

Finished<br />

TV-<strong>ad</strong> Norm<br />

Intensity Score<br />

Contempt<br />

Disgust<br />

1.33 2.10<br />

3 3<br />

1 1<br />

02<br />

4<br />

21<br />

Very Positive<br />

1<br />

UK TV <strong>ad</strong> test norm<br />

Anger<br />

40<br />

Fear<br />

0<br />

S<strong>ad</strong>ness<br />

Neutral<br />

63<br />

Happiness<br />

43<br />

- 1<br />

Surprise<br />

7<br />

12<br />

Relevant Persuasive M<strong>ad</strong>e you<br />

w ant buy the<br />

Very Negative<br />

product<br />

How much it<br />

told about<br />

brand<br />

28


Both strongly outperform UK benchmark on Emotion-into-Action TM<br />

% of Cases<br />

(UK finished film norm)<br />

50%<br />

= Great <strong>ad</strong>s<br />

40%<br />

= Good <strong>ad</strong>s<br />

= Mediocre <strong>ad</strong>s<br />

30%<br />

28%<br />

31%<br />

84<br />

22%<br />

85<br />

20%<br />

16%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

1%<br />

1%<br />

86<br />

Emotion-into-Action Score<br />

29


…Enjoyed by millions of people on the web<br />

100,000,000<br />

More Emotional Appeal = Exponential Growth in Fame<br />

10,000,000<br />

YouTube Hits<br />

1,000,000<br />

100,000<br />

R 2 = 0.79<br />

10,000<br />

1,000<br />

1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5<br />

Emotional Intensity Score<br />

30


Tr<strong>ad</strong>itional pre-testing actually REDUCES <strong>ad</strong> effectiveness<br />

60<br />

“Cases with favourable pre-testing results<br />

did significantly worse in market<br />

than those that were not tested”<br />

Effectiveness Success Rate %<br />

80<br />

71<br />

70<br />

- Binet & Field, Marketing in the Era of Accountability, 2008<br />

50<br />

40<br />

44<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Not Pre-tested<br />

Pre-tested<br />

Source: Marketing in the Era of Accountability, Binet & Field, 2008.<br />

Analysis from the IPA DataMine effectiveness database.<br />

31


The Dirty Little Secret of Tr<strong>ad</strong>itional Ad Pretesting<br />

“The dirty little secret of tr<strong>ad</strong>itional, information-based <strong>ad</strong><br />

pretesting is that it’s actually making things worse, by<br />

actively discriminating against the best creative & most<br />

effective work and suggesting ‘improvements’ to fit it’s<br />

rational, information-based agenda.”<br />

80<br />

70<br />

71<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

44<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Not Pre-tested<br />

Pre-tested<br />

32


So are all categories driven by emotion?<br />

33


World Exclusive: IPA experiment correlating big business effects<br />

XL Business<br />

Effects<br />

18 Ad campaigns – all submitted for IPA ‘most effective campaign’ award<br />

Key criterion: # of very large business effects achieved, for example:<br />

market share gain<br />

reduction of price sensitivity<br />

increased penetration<br />

profit gain<br />

loyalty gain<br />

Experiment: which KPI can best select most effective 9 out of these 18 <strong>ad</strong>s?<br />

34


Emotion-into-Action score is the best predictor of Ad Effectiveness<br />

Tr<strong>ad</strong>itional KPIs actually discriminate against most effective <strong>ad</strong>s…<br />

Average number of very large business effects achieved<br />

for top and bottom 9 <strong>ad</strong>s when ordered on each measure<br />

3<br />

2.67<br />

2.56<br />

2.56<br />

2.33<br />

2.33<br />

2<br />

1.67<br />

2.00<br />

1.78<br />

2.00<br />

1.78<br />

1<br />

Best 9<br />

Ads<br />

Bottom 9<br />

Ads<br />

Best 9<br />

Ads<br />

Bottom 9<br />

Ads<br />

Best 9<br />

Ads<br />

Bottom 9<br />

Ads<br />

Best 9<br />

Ads<br />

Bottom 9<br />

Ads<br />

Best 9<br />

Ads<br />

Bottom 9<br />

Ads<br />

Emotion-into-<br />

Action<br />

Persuasion<br />

Established Industry<br />

Cut-through<br />

Measure Equivalent<br />

Brand Linkage<br />

Specific<br />

Key Message<br />

= on Message<br />

35<br />

Base: 18 <strong>ad</strong>s for which business effectiveness data is available from the IPA


Emotion-into-Action has a strong, positive correlation with efficiency;<br />

Tr<strong>ad</strong>itional cognitive KPIs actually show a negative correlation<br />

Extent to which variation in each measure explains variation in efficiency<br />

(R-squared values) – with positive or negative correlations marked (+/-)<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

+ - - - -<br />

0.37<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

-0.1<br />

-0.05<br />

-0.2<br />

-0.16<br />

-0.3<br />

-0.4<br />

-0.27<br />

-0.30<br />

-0.5<br />

Emotion-into-<br />

Action<br />

Persuasion<br />

Established Industry<br />

Cut-through<br />

Measure Equivalent<br />

Brand Linkage<br />

Specific<br />

Key Message<br />

= on Message<br />

36<br />

Base: 10 <strong>ad</strong>s for which SOM and ESOV data is available from the IPA


Guide to Likely Business Effects<br />

Blockbuster<br />

Must See<br />

Profit gain extremely likely<br />

Share gain very likely<br />

Reduction in price sensitivity likely<br />

Viral potential in some cases<br />

Profit gain quite likely<br />

Share gain likely<br />

Solid Performance<br />

Pedestrian<br />

Profit gain possible<br />

Share gain potential limited<br />

Negative return on marketing investment quite likely<br />

Straight to Video<br />

Negative return on marketing investment likely<br />

37 37


Indication of Efficiency using Emotion-into-Action Score<br />

Efficiency = share gain/extra share of voice<br />

CDM Gorilla<br />

ROI £1.85*<br />

IPA Silver<br />

Efficiency<br />

60 65 70 75 80 85 90<br />

* Calculated using a reported<br />

revenue ROI of £4.88 and a reported<br />

‘conservative industry estimate for<br />

gross margin’ of 38%. Source:<br />

Advertising Works 19, WARC, 2010<br />

Emotion-into-Action Score<br />

38<br />

Note: colour = confidence band (based on average size of 95% confidence interval for efficiency values)


This is not just a UK phenomenon:<br />

CASSIES Experiment Can<strong>ad</strong>a 2010<br />

McCain Sweet Potato Superfries.<br />

Packaged Goods Foods & Best Launch<br />

Bronze Winner, 2010. Year 1 sales of<br />

$8.4m vs $3.9m objective. Now le<strong>ad</strong>ing<br />

sweet potato brand in frozen category.<br />

+<br />

Competitor<br />

Ad A<br />

Rickards Pint of Delicious. Off To A<br />

Good Start – Silver Winner, 2010. Sales<br />

Volume Growth of 12% YOY. Reversed<br />

fortunes of Rickards Red.<br />

+<br />

Competitor<br />

Ad B<br />

McDonalds Mornings. Off To A Good<br />

Start – Silver Winner, 2009. Increased<br />

breakfast sales by +9%, breakfast guest<br />

counts by +13.2%, morning guest<br />

counts by +18.2%, coffee unit growth<br />

+28.6%.<br />

+<br />

Competitor<br />

Ad C<br />

Pillsbury Cookies. Off To A Good Start<br />

– Bronze Winner, 2008. Baseline<br />

tonnage growth of +24% (vs prior<br />

average 3 year growth rate of 1%).<br />

+<br />

Competitor<br />

Ad D<br />

39


We have even brought this approach to China – and one learning in China<br />

is that using celebrities is still a near-guarantee for a successful <strong>ad</strong><br />

Ad tested EiA score Percentile<br />

President Ice Tea Seren<strong>ad</strong>e 87.4<br />

Kraft Oreo Sippy Cup 86.3<br />

Minute Maid Pulp 85.2<br />

Lay's Distance 84.9<br />

Top 20%<br />

Lay's Cheers 84.7<br />

Maybelline Writer 84.5<br />

Neutrogena Umbrella 84.2<br />

Daphne Singer 84.0<br />

Taoti Hotspring 83.3<br />

Sprite Inspiration 83.2 20 - 40%<br />

Heineken Walk in Fridge 83.1<br />

MaybellineModel 82.9<br />

VW Tiguan 82.7<br />

Quaker D<strong>ad</strong> 81.9<br />

Neutrogena Water 81.8<br />

VW Lavida 81.5 40 - 60%<br />

MaybellineMagnum 80.8<br />

Evian Roller Babies 80.7<br />

Acer Pilot 79.7<br />

Budweiser Surf 79.6<br />

Vanish 79.2<br />

Maybelline Blogger 78.9<br />

New Balance Love vs Hate 78.8<br />

60 - 80%<br />

Danone Ballon 78.4<br />

Airwick Cartoon 78.2<br />

Danone Trashbag 77.9<br />

Danone CNY 77.7<br />

Chivas Alaska 77.6<br />

Chivas Waterfall 74.5<br />

Li Ning Basketball 74.4<br />

Bottom 20%<br />

Maybelline Rocker 73.3<br />

C<strong>ad</strong>bury Gorilla 70.0<br />

Emotion-into-Action Performance<br />

vs China Tier 1 Norm<br />

test score & relative performance<br />

Bottom<br />

20%<br />

70 75 80 85 90<br />

Emotion-into-Action score<br />

Top<br />

20%<br />

40


Example: Karena Lam – a beautiful model with a good image<br />

“Karena Lam, the spokesperson has a good image”<br />

“Beautiful female model”<br />

41


Some celebrities can be quite polarising though…<br />

“Choosing Zeng Yi Ke is a good<br />

decision, because it would leave<br />

people with a deep impression,<br />

whether you like or dislike her”<br />

“Maybelline actually hires<br />

Brother Zeng to be its<br />

spokesperson, how fun”<br />

“I simply loathe Zeng Yi Ke,<br />

having him endorse<br />

Maybelline simply alienates<br />

me from the brand”<br />

“I do not like the actress in the <strong>ad</strong>, feel<br />

that she does not have taste, and I<br />

think that the slogan of 'dare to bare'<br />

is not good for this brand”<br />

“Absolutely hate her, she<br />

tarnishes the word 'music‘.”<br />

“[The <strong>ad</strong> has] rapidly downgr<strong>ad</strong>ed<br />

[Maybelline] from an international<br />

brand to a low-end brand that<br />

street girls use” 42


Tell an engaging story that celebrates and reflects on an aspect of life<br />

Ad tested EiA score Percentile<br />

President Ice Tea Seren<strong>ad</strong>e 87.4<br />

Kraft Oreo Sippy Cup 86.3<br />

Minute Maid Pulp 85.2<br />

Lay's Distance 84.9<br />

Top 20%<br />

Lay's Cheers 84.7<br />

Maybelline Writer 84.5<br />

Neutrogena Umbrella 84.2<br />

Daphne Singer 84.0<br />

Taoti Hotspring 83.3<br />

Sprite Inspiration 83.2 20 - 40%<br />

Heineken Walk in Fridge 83.1<br />

MaybellineModel 82.9<br />

VW Tiguan 82.7<br />

Quaker D<strong>ad</strong> 81.9<br />

Neutrogena Water 81.8<br />

VW Lavida 81.5 40 - 60%<br />

MaybellineMagnum 80.8<br />

Evian Roller Babies 80.7<br />

Acer Pilot 79.7<br />

Budweiser Surf 79.6<br />

Vanish 79.2<br />

Maybelline Blogger 78.9<br />

New Balance Love vs Hate 78.8<br />

60 - 80%<br />

Danone Ballon 78.4<br />

Airwick Cartoon 78.2<br />

Danone Trashbag 77.9<br />

Danone CNY 77.7<br />

Chivas Alaska 77.6<br />

Chivas Waterfall 74.5<br />

Li Ning Basketball 74.4<br />

Bottom 20%<br />

Maybelline Rocker 73.3<br />

C<strong>ad</strong>bury Gorilla 70.0<br />

Emotion-into-Action Performance<br />

vs China Tier 1 Norm<br />

test score & relative performance<br />

Bottom<br />

20%<br />

70 75 80 85 90<br />

Emotion-into-Action score<br />

Top<br />

20%<br />

43


President Ice Tea Seren<strong>ad</strong>e<br />

44


President Ice Tea Seren<strong>ad</strong>e scored 87.4 on Emotion-into-Action, which<br />

puts it at a 94% performance vs the Chinese Tier 1 benchmark<br />

87.4<br />

94%<br />

Bottom<br />

20%<br />

Top<br />

20%<br />

70 75 80 85 90<br />

Emotion-into-Action score<br />

45


President ‘Seren<strong>ad</strong>e’ celebrates the passion of youth<br />

“The young chap's<br />

persistence and his passion<br />

for music makes us proud,<br />

earns our <strong>ad</strong>miration and<br />

respect”<br />

“To youngsters, the sky is the<br />

limit”<br />

“Being young is to<br />

never give up”<br />

“It's okay to fail, because you have<br />

the greatest asset called youth”<br />

“Drinking President ice tea<br />

doesn't only please your palate,<br />

it brings back good memories<br />

from your youth!”<br />

46


C<strong>ad</strong>bury Gorilla – Certainly not average…<br />

Extremely Weak Ad<br />

Highly Effective Ad<br />

47


C<strong>ad</strong>bury Gorilla scored 70.0 on Emotion-into-Action, which means it’s<br />

the lowest scoring <strong>ad</strong> we’ve tested in Chinese Tier 1…<br />

70.0<br />

Bottom<br />

20%<br />

Top<br />

20%<br />

70 75 80 85 90<br />

Emotion-into-Action score<br />

48


C<strong>ad</strong>bury Gorilla – China vs UK<br />

Obviously very fake because a<br />

gorilla cannot play music on its<br />

own!<br />

That gorilla is rather disgusting,<br />

don't know what the <strong>ad</strong> is trying<br />

to convey, very silly<br />

This is a chocolate <strong>ad</strong>, but I don't<br />

think any chocolate appeared.<br />

And the gorilla doesn't seem to<br />

be compatible with the image of<br />

chocolate<br />

The performance is very<br />

interesting, leaves a deep<br />

impression<br />

1.77<br />

4<br />

8<br />

2<br />

0<br />

2<br />

24<br />

29<br />

Intensity Score<br />

measured on a<br />

scale from 0 to +3<br />

Contempt<br />

Disgust<br />

Anger<br />

Fear<br />

S<strong>ad</strong>ness<br />

Neutral<br />

% of respondents<br />

2.17<br />

5<br />

1<br />

16<br />

65<br />

Cannot see what the connection was<br />

between Phil Collins, Gorilla &<br />

Chocolate<br />

Don't understand the connection<br />

between a gorilla and chocolate<br />

Excellent <strong>ad</strong>, not quite sure what<br />

gorilla represents, but who cares.<br />

Fantastic<br />

Ad is brilliant and gorilla makes me<br />

laugh, its very clever and easy to<br />

remember<br />

The gorilla is very ‘high’<br />

The gorilla is so different<br />

compared to before, can a piece<br />

of chocolate make such a<br />

difference?<br />

31<br />

Happiness<br />

Surprise<br />

The best <strong>ad</strong> around! I just love it!!!! it<br />

is different and memorable<br />

Why use a gorilla as the le<strong>ad</strong><br />

character?!<br />

12<br />

Bizarre and unique. Makes you watch<br />

the whole <strong>ad</strong> to find the tagline. 49<br />

CHINA<br />

UK


So what have we learned?<br />

Emotion drives behaviour – emotional response is a better predictor of ROI<br />

FaceTrace is a good tool for measuring emotion<br />

CommScan correctly identifies <strong>ad</strong>s that have the potential to be “famous” and that drive the<br />

largest business effects<br />

MindRe<strong>ad</strong>er provides useful diagnostics on what is really happening (open ended and selfcoded)<br />

CommScan can identify executional elements at all stages of the creative process that<br />

improve the results of communications<br />

There is lots more to do!<br />

50


Thank You<br />

Alex Batchelor<br />

Chief Operating Officer<br />

+44 7710 943 140<br />

alex.batchelor@brainjuicer.com<br />

Orlando Wood<br />

MD of <strong>BrainJuicer</strong> Labs<br />

+44 7980 671768<br />

orlando.wood@brainjuicer.com<br />

London Brighton Rotterdam Lausanne Hamburg New York Chicago Los Angeles Toronto Melbourne<br />

A Le<strong>ad</strong>ing International Online research agency<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!