08.11.2014 Views

Template - Case for Endorsement - National Skills Standards Council

Template - Case for Endorsement - National Skills Standards Council

Template - Case for Endorsement - National Skills Standards Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Template</strong> – <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> – pv2.0<br />

<strong>Template</strong> ‐ <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong><br />

REMEMBER …<br />

• The <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> is a comprehensive evidence‐based document that has a dual purpose of:<br />

(i) in<strong>for</strong>ming NQC’s decision in relation to endorsement of the Training Package; and (ii) telling the<br />

‘story’ to a broad audience, including all users of the Training Package, about what the changes to the<br />

Training Package are, why the changes were made, and what the changes mean to them.<br />

• Developed by the ISC <strong>for</strong> each submission, the <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> must evidence that the Training<br />

Package meets: (i) policy requirements as represented by both the Training Package Quality Principles<br />

(the Quality Principles) and the Training Package Development Handbook (the TPDH); (ii) the<br />

consultation and validation process has been rigorous and transparent; (iii) there is widespread<br />

support from industry <strong>for</strong> the changes; and (iv) the impact of changes has been considered.<br />

• The requirements in the TPDH and Quality Principles <strong>for</strong>m the basis of the Quality Report, which is<br />

attached as Appendix B to every <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong>. The ISC is required to: (i) respond to any areas<br />

in which the Quality Report has identified that the draft endorsed components have not met the<br />

Quality Principles; and (ii) respond to any other comments made in the Quality Report, indicate what<br />

actions have been taken and if none, the reasons.<br />

• Objective, factual and ‘to the point’, the <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> must be written as a compelling,<br />

coherent and plain English document. It must also demonstrate: (i) a direct link back to the ISC<br />

Continuous Improvement Plan; (ii) that industry’s needs have been met; and (iii) industry’s<br />

involvement in the consultation and validation process has been commensurate with the impact and<br />

need <strong>for</strong> the new units of competency, skill sets, qualifications or Training Package.<br />

• For the period of NQC/Ministerial consideration, the <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> must be posted on the<br />

ISC’s website. The full units of competency (all content), qualifications, skill sets or Training Package<br />

must also be posted on the website during this time. Following endorsement, appendices A and B are<br />

removed and the modified <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> made available to all stakeholders by: the ISC<br />

posting the modified document on its website; and STAs distributing the modified <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>Endorsement</strong> to registering bodies, course accrediting bodies, jurisdictional regulators and<br />

appropriate RTOs within their jurisdiction.<br />

• Only when industry and the ISC is satisfied that the draft units of competency, qualifications or<br />

Training Package is fit <strong>for</strong> purpose from both a content and quality perspective, is it <strong>for</strong>warded to the<br />

NQC Secretariat <strong>for</strong> distribution to the NQC. The ISC must advise the NQC Secretariat of the pending<br />

submission a minimum of 14 calendar days prior to <strong>for</strong>warding.<br />

• Further in<strong>for</strong>mation on the <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> and its role may be found in the policy document –<br />

<strong>National</strong> Quality <strong>Council</strong> Policy <strong>for</strong> the Training Package Development and <strong>Endorsement</strong> Process<br />

Principles, Processes & Key Documents.


<strong>Template</strong> – <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> – pv2.0<br />

<strong>Template</strong><br />

COVER<br />

INDEX<br />

OVERVIEW<br />

• Provide a short overview of the submission being put <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>for</strong> endorsement by the<br />

NQC. This should be no more than two pages and give NQC members and stakeholders a<br />

comprehensive picture of what is being put <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>for</strong> endorsement and its importance<br />

to industry. It should also identify any issues of importance regarding the submission.<br />

• The Overview section will <strong>for</strong>m part of the modified <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> document to<br />

be made publicly available to all stakeholders post‐endorsement. Some issues that could<br />

be raised in this section (e.g. reference to a ‘report by exception’, issues raised in the<br />

Quality Report) will be addressed as part of the endorsement process and may not be<br />

appropriate <strong>for</strong> inclusion in the post‐endorsement public document. ISCs should be<br />

mindful of the dual purpose nature of the <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> during drafting. In some<br />

instances, ISCs may need to revisit text in the body of the <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

finalising the post‐endorsement public version.<br />

Note on transition: The <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> requirements in this template apply to all new Training<br />

Package development work from 1 January 2010, and development work already in train that had not<br />

reached the stakeholder agreement stage at 1 January 2010. In all other cases ISCs may lodge a <strong>Case</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> using the <strong>for</strong>mer template until 31 March 2010 but are strongly encouraged to<br />

comply with the new requirements earlier where possible.<br />

SECTION 1‐– RESPONSIVENESS & RECOGNITION QUALITY PRINCIPLES<br />

• Provide evidence that the units of competency, skill sets 1 , qualifications or Training Package<br />

being put <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>for</strong> endorsement:<br />

- reflect contemporary work organisation and job profiles<br />

- are driven by industry’s needs<br />

- respond to government broad policy initiatives<br />

- recognise convergence and connectivity of skills<br />

- support movement of skills within and across organisations and sectors<br />

- promote national and international portability<br />

- reflect licensing and regulatory requirements.<br />

1 Skill sets using current endorsed units of competency are an ISC Upgrade and do not require NQC endorsement.<br />

Further in<strong>for</strong>mation on Categories of Change is in the Training Package Development and <strong>Endorsement</strong> Process<br />

document.


<strong>Template</strong> – <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> – pv2.0<br />

• Provide a ‘report by exception’ (only if required) on stakeholder consensus to flag where a<br />

stakeholder or individual holds a significantly differing viewpoint 2 from the majority. It<br />

should provide an objective view of the issue and steps taken by the ISC to resolve the<br />

matter or that reasonable measures have been taken to respond to stakeholder concerns.<br />

Note: Issues raised in a ‘report by exception’ will be addressed as part of the endorsement process. ISCs<br />

may wish to remove a ‘report by exception’ prior to finalising the post‐endorsement public version.<br />

SECTION 2 –– FLEXIBILITY & FUNCTIONALITY QUALITY PRINCIPLES<br />

• Provide evidence that the units of competency, skill sets 3 , qualifications or Training Package<br />

being put <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>for</strong> endorsement:<br />

- meet the diversity of individual and enterprise needs<br />

- support equitable access and progression of learners<br />

- support learner transition between education sectors<br />

- support implementation across a range of settings<br />

- support Sound Assessment Practice<br />

- do not impose structural barriers to implementation.<br />

• Attach a copy of the Quality Report completed by a holistic quality assurance member of<br />

the ISC Quality Assurance Panel (the Panel) at Appendix B.<br />

• If the Quality Report has identified areas where the draft endorsed components have not<br />

met the Training Package Quality Principles, the ISC must confirm that it has responded to<br />

the recommendations. Where the ISC has not adopted a recommendation, it must provide<br />

commentary and full justification, either in the body of the <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> or in a<br />

separate attachment to Appendix B. ISCs will be guided on the seriousness of the issues<br />

raised, keeping in mind that evidence the draft endorsed components meet the Training<br />

Package Quality Principles is a key element <strong>for</strong> NQC considerations.<br />

Note: Issues raised in a Quality Report, and the ISC’s response, will be addressed as part of the<br />

endorsement process. ISCs may wish to remove text regarding a Quality Report from the body of a <strong>Case</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> prior to finalising the post‐endorsement public version.<br />

SECTION 3 – IMPACT OF CHANGES<br />

• Set out the implications of the new or revised units of competency, skill sets, qualifications<br />

or Training Package in various delivery environments, and the extent of change required to<br />

enable successful implementation.<br />

2 ‘Significant’ is where the issue is of such an importance that it will impact on the product’s ability to be<br />

implemented. The ‘viewpoint’ relates directly to the content and/or structure of the draft endorsed components.<br />

3 Skill sets using current endorsed units of competency are an ISC Upgrade and do not require NQC endorsement.<br />

Further in<strong>for</strong>mation on Categories of Change is in the Training Package Development and <strong>Endorsement</strong> Process<br />

2008 document.


<strong>Template</strong> – <strong>Case</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Endorsement</strong> – pv2.0<br />

• Briefly state industry’s imperatives and timelines <strong>for</strong> implementation of the components.<br />

• Note any overarching expectations industry has of the delivery/assessment of the<br />

components.<br />

• Provide advice on the extent of change and key implications <strong>for</strong> the following<br />

environments/stakeholders as a result of the newly endorsed products:<br />

- Public/private training and assessment services (include delivery<br />

issues/resource implications)<br />

- Enterprises<br />

- Licensing and regulatory environments<br />

- Policy environment (this includes but is not necessarily limited to the VET<br />

environment. For example, the ISC should be aware of policy implications of<br />

broader government and industry policy).<br />

• Identify systemic issues that need to be addressed to ensure successful implementation.<br />

• While of interest to NQC members, the primary audience <strong>for</strong> Section 3 are those<br />

stakeholders critical to successful implementation, such as STAs and RTOs. ISCs will typically<br />

gather in<strong>for</strong>mation throughout the consultation and validation process including from<br />

enterprises, licensing and regulatory bodies, RTOs, employer and employee representatives,<br />

the Department and STAs.<br />

APPENDIX A: COMPONENTS FOR ENDORSEMENT<br />

Provide a copy of:<br />

• Qualification titles and packaging rules<br />

• Unit titles and codes (do not provide the content of the units of competency. This will<br />

already have been agreed by industry during the validation stage and considered by<br />

State/Territory Training Authorities (STAs).<br />

• Advice on occupational and licensing requirements or assessment specific to the units of<br />

competency and qualifications being submitted <strong>for</strong> endorsement<br />

• Mapping in<strong>for</strong>mation between old and replacement units of competency and<br />

qualifications<br />

• Training Package modification history.<br />

Note: When submitting the draft endorsed components, do not provide text which has been<br />

approved <strong>for</strong> insertion in all Training Packages, <strong>for</strong> example, Assessment Guidelines<br />

mandated text.<br />

Note: Appendix A is to be removed following NQC endorsement.<br />

APPENDIX B: QUALITY REPORT<br />

Note: Appendix B is to be removed following NQC endorsement.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!