08.11.2014 Views

RDR 3 Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County

RDR 3 Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County

RDR 3 Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. 47 th Avenue System<br />

The 47 th Avenue Channel and Basin were identified by the Review<br />

Committee as Priority 3 projects. These projects are noted to be <strong>of</strong> low<br />

importance by the City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix due to the industrial nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area and the lack <strong>of</strong> prior flooding reported in this area.<br />

5. Tres Rios System<br />

The Tres Rios Basins were identified by the Review Committee as<br />

Priority 2 projects. The Tres Rios Basins should be constructed<br />

concurrently with the proposed Tres Rios levee. The Tres Rios Basins<br />

would not be needed without the proposed Tres Rios levee in place.<br />

C. Project Funding<br />

The projects identified in this master plan are recommended within the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the existing development and environmental conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

the study area as <strong>of</strong> this writing. The Durango ADMP area is<br />

developing at a rapid pace. Basin sites and channel alignments have<br />

been proposed based on perceived availability <strong>of</strong> those sites based on<br />

recent aerial photographs, field reconnaissance, and development<br />

planning information provided by the Cities and <strong>County</strong> staff. For this<br />

plan to become a reality, steps must be taken by each <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

participants to begin acquisition <strong>of</strong> needed right-<strong>of</strong>-way and to develop<br />

implementation plans. This section presents funding options to assist<br />

with the timely implementation <strong>of</strong> the adopted plan.<br />

1. Estimated Costs<br />

The total estimated cost <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the projects identified in Section V<br />

is summarized in Table 2. The estimated costs are broken down<br />

according to the following:<br />

- Land acquisition cost<br />

- Landscape cost<br />

- Construction cost<br />

- Construction contingency at 15 percent <strong>of</strong> construction cost.<br />

- Design and construction management cost at 15 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

construction cost<br />

- Total estimated cost, and<br />

- Estimated annual maintenance cost.<br />

Major cost items included in the channel cost estimates are excavation,<br />

concrete, utility relocations, maintenance roads, land acquisition, and<br />

landscape. The current FCMDC policy allows landscape cost <strong>of</strong> up to<br />

$0.92 per square foot for which they will share the expense up to 50%.<br />

This allowed cost is approximately half <strong>of</strong> the $1.80 per square foot cost<br />

estimated in this study, resulting in the FCDMC paying 1/4 <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

landscape cost as estimated. Utility relocation costs are computed<br />

separately and included in the table as a lump sum per project. Land<br />

acquisition costs are included only for new facilities and are based on<br />

required right-<strong>of</strong>-way widths.<br />

Culvert costs are based on the length, number <strong>of</strong> barrels and size for<br />

each crossing and includes inlet and outlet headwalls.<br />

Detention basin costs include basin excavation, outlet headwall and<br />

drain pipe with manholes, inflow spillway, land acquisition, and<br />

landscape.<br />

A detailed breakdown <strong>of</strong> the estimated cost for each project is contained<br />

at the end <strong>of</strong> the report on the page facing the exhibits showing the<br />

project elements and I.D. descriptors.<br />

2. Funding Sources<br />

a. FCDMC CIP Process<br />

The FCDMC participates in the planning, design, and construction <strong>of</strong><br />

flood control projects throughout <strong>Maricopa</strong> <strong>County</strong>. The FCDMC<br />

follows an annual process <strong>of</strong> project prioritization to identify projects<br />

for their CIP program. The process <strong>of</strong> getting a project or projects<br />

funded by the FCDMC begins with a sponsoring agency, such as a City,<br />

submitting a project request to the FCDMC. The FCDMC includes<br />

projects requested by their constituent Cities in the prioritization<br />

process. Factors that are considered favorably in the prioritization are<br />

whether the project has been recommended in an adopted FCDMC<br />

Drainage Master Study, the level <strong>of</strong> cost participation <strong>of</strong>fered by the<br />

City, and who will provide ongoing maintenance <strong>of</strong> the facility. Projects<br />

are seldom selected for the CIP budget with no cost sharing. The<br />

FCDMC typically seeks a 50 percent level <strong>of</strong> cost participation.<br />

b. Project Participants<br />

The development <strong>of</strong> this master plan has been a cooperative effort<br />

between many agencies and local interests within the study area. The<br />

agencies have been involved throughout the project with an eye towards<br />

developing a plan that will be consistent with the ongoing development<br />

plans within the area and will be accepted by the local interests. The<br />

following agencies have an interest in the area and will benefit from<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the plan:<br />

- City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix<br />

- <strong>Maricopa</strong> <strong>County</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation (MCDOT)<br />

- City <strong>of</strong> Tolleson<br />

- City <strong>of</strong> Avondale<br />

- Salt River Project (SRP)<br />

- U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers (Tres Rios)<br />

- <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maricopa</strong> <strong>County</strong> (FCDMC)<br />

- Multiple Private Developers<br />

Projects where shared benefits may accrue to the above agencies are<br />

identified in Section V, Recommended Plan. It is anticipated that as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the information contained in this Recommended Design <strong>Report</strong>,<br />

a concept for shared project participation can be agreed upon between<br />

the agencies.<br />

City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix<br />

The City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix is expected to share a significant portion <strong>of</strong> the cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Durango Regional Conveyance System. The City has planned<br />

improvements for a storm drain system in 75 th Avenue which could be<br />

integrated into this overall ADMP. Additionally, the City would be<br />

responsible for partial construction costs based on an agreement to be<br />

developed with the FCDMC.<br />

DIBBLE & ASSOCIATES 46 DURANGO AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN<br />

August 2002<br />

RECOMMENDED DESIGN REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!