RDR 3 Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County
RDR 3 Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County
RDR 3 Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4. 47 th Avenue System<br />
The 47 th Avenue Channel and Basin were identified by the Review<br />
Committee as Priority 3 projects. These projects are noted to be <strong>of</strong> low<br />
importance by the City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix due to the industrial nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
area and the lack <strong>of</strong> prior flooding reported in this area.<br />
5. Tres Rios System<br />
The Tres Rios Basins were identified by the Review Committee as<br />
Priority 2 projects. The Tres Rios Basins should be constructed<br />
concurrently with the proposed Tres Rios levee. The Tres Rios Basins<br />
would not be needed without the proposed Tres Rios levee in place.<br />
C. Project Funding<br />
The projects identified in this master plan are recommended within the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> the existing development and environmental conditions <strong>of</strong><br />
the study area as <strong>of</strong> this writing. The Durango ADMP area is<br />
developing at a rapid pace. Basin sites and channel alignments have<br />
been proposed based on perceived availability <strong>of</strong> those sites based on<br />
recent aerial photographs, field reconnaissance, and development<br />
planning information provided by the Cities and <strong>County</strong> staff. For this<br />
plan to become a reality, steps must be taken by each <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
participants to begin acquisition <strong>of</strong> needed right-<strong>of</strong>-way and to develop<br />
implementation plans. This section presents funding options to assist<br />
with the timely implementation <strong>of</strong> the adopted plan.<br />
1. Estimated Costs<br />
The total estimated cost <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the projects identified in Section V<br />
is summarized in Table 2. The estimated costs are broken down<br />
according to the following:<br />
- Land acquisition cost<br />
- Landscape cost<br />
- Construction cost<br />
- Construction contingency at 15 percent <strong>of</strong> construction cost.<br />
- Design and construction management cost at 15 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
construction cost<br />
- Total estimated cost, and<br />
- Estimated annual maintenance cost.<br />
Major cost items included in the channel cost estimates are excavation,<br />
concrete, utility relocations, maintenance roads, land acquisition, and<br />
landscape. The current FCMDC policy allows landscape cost <strong>of</strong> up to<br />
$0.92 per square foot for which they will share the expense up to 50%.<br />
This allowed cost is approximately half <strong>of</strong> the $1.80 per square foot cost<br />
estimated in this study, resulting in the FCDMC paying 1/4 <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
landscape cost as estimated. Utility relocation costs are computed<br />
separately and included in the table as a lump sum per project. Land<br />
acquisition costs are included only for new facilities and are based on<br />
required right-<strong>of</strong>-way widths.<br />
Culvert costs are based on the length, number <strong>of</strong> barrels and size for<br />
each crossing and includes inlet and outlet headwalls.<br />
Detention basin costs include basin excavation, outlet headwall and<br />
drain pipe with manholes, inflow spillway, land acquisition, and<br />
landscape.<br />
A detailed breakdown <strong>of</strong> the estimated cost for each project is contained<br />
at the end <strong>of</strong> the report on the page facing the exhibits showing the<br />
project elements and I.D. descriptors.<br />
2. Funding Sources<br />
a. FCDMC CIP Process<br />
The FCDMC participates in the planning, design, and construction <strong>of</strong><br />
flood control projects throughout <strong>Maricopa</strong> <strong>County</strong>. The FCDMC<br />
follows an annual process <strong>of</strong> project prioritization to identify projects<br />
for their CIP program. The process <strong>of</strong> getting a project or projects<br />
funded by the FCDMC begins with a sponsoring agency, such as a City,<br />
submitting a project request to the FCDMC. The FCDMC includes<br />
projects requested by their constituent Cities in the prioritization<br />
process. Factors that are considered favorably in the prioritization are<br />
whether the project has been recommended in an adopted FCDMC<br />
Drainage Master Study, the level <strong>of</strong> cost participation <strong>of</strong>fered by the<br />
City, and who will provide ongoing maintenance <strong>of</strong> the facility. Projects<br />
are seldom selected for the CIP budget with no cost sharing. The<br />
FCDMC typically seeks a 50 percent level <strong>of</strong> cost participation.<br />
b. Project Participants<br />
The development <strong>of</strong> this master plan has been a cooperative effort<br />
between many agencies and local interests within the study area. The<br />
agencies have been involved throughout the project with an eye towards<br />
developing a plan that will be consistent with the ongoing development<br />
plans within the area and will be accepted by the local interests. The<br />
following agencies have an interest in the area and will benefit from<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the plan:<br />
- City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix<br />
- <strong>Maricopa</strong> <strong>County</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Transportation (MCDOT)<br />
- City <strong>of</strong> Tolleson<br />
- City <strong>of</strong> Avondale<br />
- Salt River Project (SRP)<br />
- U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers (Tres Rios)<br />
- <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maricopa</strong> <strong>County</strong> (FCDMC)<br />
- Multiple Private Developers<br />
Projects where shared benefits may accrue to the above agencies are<br />
identified in Section V, Recommended Plan. It is anticipated that as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> the information contained in this Recommended Design <strong>Report</strong>,<br />
a concept for shared project participation can be agreed upon between<br />
the agencies.<br />
City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix<br />
The City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix is expected to share a significant portion <strong>of</strong> the cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Durango Regional Conveyance System. The City has planned<br />
improvements for a storm drain system in 75 th Avenue which could be<br />
integrated into this overall ADMP. Additionally, the City would be<br />
responsible for partial construction costs based on an agreement to be<br />
developed with the FCDMC.<br />
DIBBLE & ASSOCIATES 46 DURANGO AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN<br />
August 2002<br />
RECOMMENDED DESIGN REPORT