RDR 3 Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County

RDR 3 Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County RDR 3 Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County

fcd.maricopa.gov
from fcd.maricopa.gov More from this publisher
08.11.2014 Views

prior to construction and there are any contaminated sites that conflict with the proposed route such as contaminated soils sites due to leaking storage tanks, for example, these sites should be documented and avoided if possible. F. Social and Economic Issues Social and economic issues were considered in this project. As evidenced by the data presented in the Data Collection Report, there are no specific groups unfairly targeted by the project’s location. The specific type of groups researched for this study include: income range, age, and ethnic background. DIBBLE & ASSOCIATES 44 DURANGO AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN August 2002 RECOMMENDED DESIGN REPORT

VIII. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN A. Introduction This Section contains recommendations for funding, cost sharing, budgetary and construction phasing for the recommended projects identified in Section V. B. Construction Phasing For budgeting purposes, capital improvements must be prioritized and constructed in phases as funding permits. To identify phasing of capital improvements, three priority categories are used. Priority 1 projects are current needs that should be constructed as soon as possible to correct existing system deficiencies. Priority 2 projects are projects that should be budgeted now for construction over the next five years and are needed to accommodate the anticipated development over the next five years. Priority 3 projects are improvements that are not needed within the next five years but will be needed as development occurs. Construction scheduling of priority 3 projects will be dictated by development timing and patterns. Priorities were assigned for each project by the Review Committee at the Review Committee Meeting held on January 23, 2001. The assigned priorities will act as a guide to the relative urgency of the storm drainage improvements and will form the basis for developing project funding and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budgets. It is recognized that the priorities will be subject to revision for various reasons during project implementation. For instance, in the next few years changes in development patterns may occur within the study area. The current financial obligations of government agencies or that of land developers may also vary. Further, as scheduling of roadway construction in the area becomes clearer, significant savings may be achieved by coordinating box culvert and channel construction with that of the roads or highways. Figure VIII-1 illustrates Priority No. 1, 2, and 3 projects. Table 2 summarizes each of the master plan projects and their construction costs. 1. Durango Regional Conveyance System The Durango Regional Conveyance Channel and Basins were identified by the Review Committee as Priority 1 projects. Advanced land acquisition for all basins is also identified as Priority 1. If basin sites are not acquired quickly, the opportunity to implement the plan may be lost, or modifications to the plan may need to be made. Due to the length of the Durango Regional Conveyance Channel and the need to construct the channel segments from downstream to upstream, it is important to quickly obtain cooperation between the multiple land owners, developers, and jurisdictions. Additionally construction phasing will be required based on available funding and other projects which are proceeding immediately. The first phase of the project is expected to be Reach 1, the portion between the outfall at the Agua Fria River and 107 th Avenue, which is within the City of Avondale. The second phase of the project is expected to be Reach 2, the portion between 107 th Avenue and 75 th Avenue, which is within the City of Phoenix. The third and last phase of the system is expected to be Reach 3, the portion between 75 th Avenue, and 63 rd Avenue, which is within the City of Phoenix. A potential modification to this phasing is described below with the 75 th Avenue Preliminary Storm Drain Study. A portion of Reach 1 may be constructed in conjunction with new developments within the Lakin Cattle Company property currently being master planned for residential and commercial development. A portion of Reach 2 may be constructed in conjunction with the Tuscano development at 75 th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road as well as improvements to the Country Place development at 99 th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road. A portion of Reach 3 may be constructed in conjunction with a City of Phoenix Storm Drain project along 75 th Avenue as described below. 75 th Avenue Preliminary Storm Drain Study The concept of incorporating the 75 th Avenue City of Phoenix Storm Drain project into a portion of the ADMP was developed to determine the feasibility of an interim drainage concept that beneficially utilizes the proposed City of Phoenix storm drain to allow implementation of certain features of the Durango ADMP prior to completion of the ultimate system outfall at the Agua Fria River. This analysis concludes that DRC basin #4 could be up sized and the flow-by channel along the basin could be redirected to a lateral storm drain that connects to the proposed City of Phoenix storm drain system, thus assisting in implementing a portion of the ADMP and still alleviating local flooding problems. A copy of the 75 th Avenue Preliminary Storm Drain Study can be found in Appendix H. 2. Durango Regional Outfall System The Durango Regional Outfall Channel, Basins and Laterals were identified by the Review Committee as Priority 1 projects. Advanced land acquisition for all basins is also identified as Priority 1. If basin sites are not acquired quickly, the opportunity to implement the plan may be lost, or modifications to the plan may need to be made. 3. Sunland Avenue System The Sunland Avenue Channel was identified as a replacement to the previously identified “91 st Avenue Channel” because it better accomplished the task of alleviating the floodplain. The 91 st Avenue Channel was previously identified as a Priority 2 project by the Review Committee and as such the Sunland Avenue System is designated a Priority 2 project. DIBBLE & ASSOCIATES 45 DURANGO AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN August 2002 RECOMMENDED DESIGN REPORT

VIII. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN<br />

A. Introduction<br />

This Section contains recommendations for funding, cost sharing,<br />

budgetary and construction phasing for the recommended projects<br />

identified in Section V.<br />

B. Construction Phasing<br />

For budgeting purposes, capital improvements must be prioritized and<br />

constructed in phases as funding permits. To identify phasing <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

improvements, three priority categories are used. Priority 1 projects are<br />

current needs that should be constructed as soon as possible to correct<br />

existing system deficiencies. Priority 2 projects are projects that should<br />

be budgeted now for construction over the next five years and are<br />

needed to accommodate the anticipated development over the next five<br />

years. Priority 3 projects are improvements that are not needed within<br />

the next five years but will be needed as development occurs.<br />

Construction scheduling <strong>of</strong> priority 3 projects will be dictated by<br />

development timing and patterns.<br />

Priorities were assigned for each project by the Review Committee at<br />

the Review Committee Meeting held on January 23, 2001. The<br />

assigned priorities will act as a guide to the relative urgency <strong>of</strong> the<br />

storm drainage improvements and will form the basis for developing<br />

project funding and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budgets. It is<br />

recognized that the priorities will be subject to revision for various<br />

reasons during project implementation. For instance, in the next few<br />

years changes in development patterns may occur within the study area.<br />

The current financial obligations <strong>of</strong> government agencies or that <strong>of</strong> land<br />

developers may also vary. Further, as scheduling <strong>of</strong> roadway<br />

construction in the area becomes clearer, significant savings may be<br />

achieved by coordinating box culvert and channel construction with<br />

that <strong>of</strong> the roads or highways.<br />

Figure VIII-1 illustrates Priority No. 1, 2, and 3 projects. Table 2<br />

summarizes each <strong>of</strong> the master plan projects and their construction costs.<br />

1. Durango Regional Conveyance System<br />

The Durango Regional Conveyance Channel and Basins were identified<br />

by the Review Committee as Priority 1 projects. Advanced land<br />

acquisition for all basins is also identified as Priority 1. If basin sites are<br />

not acquired quickly, the opportunity to implement the plan may be lost,<br />

or modifications to the plan may need to be made.<br />

Due to the length <strong>of</strong> the Durango Regional Conveyance Channel and the<br />

need to construct the channel segments from downstream to upstream,<br />

it is important to quickly obtain cooperation between the multiple land<br />

owners, developers, and jurisdictions. Additionally construction phasing<br />

will be required based on available funding and other projects which are<br />

proceeding immediately. The first phase <strong>of</strong> the project is expected to be<br />

Reach 1, the portion between the outfall at the Agua Fria River and 107 th<br />

Avenue, which is within the City <strong>of</strong> Avondale. The second phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project is expected to be Reach 2, the portion between 107 th Avenue and<br />

75 th Avenue, which is within the City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix. The third and last<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> the system is expected to be Reach 3, the portion between 75 th<br />

Avenue, and 63 rd Avenue, which is within the City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix. A<br />

potential modification to this phasing is described below with the 75 th<br />

Avenue Preliminary Storm Drain Study.<br />

A portion <strong>of</strong> Reach 1 may be constructed in conjunction with new<br />

developments within the Lakin Cattle Company property currently being<br />

master planned for residential and commercial development. A portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> Reach 2 may be constructed in conjunction with the Tuscano<br />

development at 75 th Avenue and Lower Buckeye Road as well as<br />

improvements to the Country Place development at 99 th Avenue and<br />

Lower Buckeye Road. A portion <strong>of</strong> Reach 3 may be constructed in<br />

conjunction with a City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix Storm Drain project along 75 th<br />

Avenue as described below.<br />

75 th Avenue Preliminary Storm Drain Study<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> incorporating the 75 th Avenue City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix Storm<br />

Drain project into a portion <strong>of</strong> the ADMP was developed to determine<br />

the feasibility <strong>of</strong> an interim drainage concept that beneficially utilizes<br />

the proposed City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix storm drain to allow implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

certain features <strong>of</strong> the Durango ADMP prior to completion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ultimate system outfall at the Agua Fria River. This analysis concludes<br />

that DRC basin #4 could be up sized and the flow-by channel along the<br />

basin could be redirected to a lateral storm drain that connects to the<br />

proposed City <strong>of</strong> Phoenix storm drain system, thus assisting in<br />

implementing a portion <strong>of</strong> the ADMP and still alleviating local flooding<br />

problems. A copy <strong>of</strong> the 75 th Avenue Preliminary Storm Drain Study<br />

can be found in Appendix H.<br />

2. Durango Regional Outfall System<br />

The Durango Regional Outfall Channel, Basins and Laterals were<br />

identified by the Review Committee as Priority 1 projects. Advanced<br />

land acquisition for all basins is also identified as Priority 1. If basin<br />

sites are not acquired quickly, the opportunity to implement the plan<br />

may be lost, or modifications to the plan may need to be made.<br />

3. Sunland Avenue System<br />

The Sunland Avenue Channel was identified as a replacement to the<br />

previously identified “91 st Avenue Channel” because it better<br />

accomplished the task <strong>of</strong> alleviating the floodplain. The 91 st Avenue<br />

Channel was previously identified as a Priority 2 project by the Review<br />

Committee and as such the Sunland Avenue System is designated a<br />

Priority 2 project.<br />

DIBBLE & ASSOCIATES 45 DURANGO AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN<br />

August 2002<br />

RECOMMENDED DESIGN REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!