07.11.2014 Views

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

✯ Poster Abstracts ✯<br />

thursday – saturday | november 4-6<br />

39. Combined Use of Research-based Methods and<br />

Community Outreach Approaches to Improve Respiratory<br />

<strong>Health</strong> in Preschool Children<br />

Michael Shakarjian, PhD, New York Medical College; Deborah Viola,<br />

PhD, New York Medical College; Jean Hudson, MD, MPH, Orange County<br />

Commissioner of <strong>Health</strong>; Amy Ansehl, RN, BSN, FNPC, New York Medical<br />

College; Allen Dozer, MD, <strong>Health</strong> Center of the Hudson Valley, New York<br />

Medical College; Robert Amler, MD, New York Medical College,<br />

Peter Arno, PhD, Diane Heck, PhD<br />

There is a paucity of research examining the impact of ‘no idling’<br />

ordinances on ambient air quality near schools. Vehicle exhaust is the<br />

leading source of toxic air pollution <strong>for</strong> most communities in the Lower<br />

Hudson Valley (LHV) of New York State, and a single vehicle used<br />

to commute children to school contributes 3 pounds of air pollution<br />

monthly. Studies demonstrate that initial incidents of asthma develop<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e age 5, suggesting that preschool years mark the critical period <strong>for</strong><br />

development of the disease and that prevention be focused at this age<br />

group. We hypothesize that parents, educators and community leaders<br />

are not aware that automobile exhausts from delivering and retrieving<br />

children have a significant impact on the quality of outdoor and indoor<br />

ambient air at school facilities. We are analyzing the baseline levels of<br />

asthma triggering contaminants of automobile and bus exhaust (sulfur<br />

dioxides, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulates) at three preschool<br />

facilities in Orange County, NY, to develop a community-based ef<strong>for</strong>t to<br />

incorporate a ‘no idling’ policy as part of their environmental program.<br />

This research is motivated from SPARCS data demonstrating high asthma<br />

hospitalization rates <strong>for</strong> children in the LHV. For preschoolers, these<br />

rates are higher in some counties (ex. 40.1/10,000 <strong>for</strong> Orange County)<br />

than they are in NYC, and <strong>for</strong> the region are higher than <strong>Health</strong>y People<br />

<strong>2020</strong> goals (25/10,000). The objectives of this research are threefold:<br />

first, to document automobile and bus traffic and determine the levels of<br />

asthma-triggering contaminants of exhaust at three preschools. Second,<br />

we are raising awareness of the effects of car idling through advocacy. A<br />

steering committee of school representatives and community leaders are<br />

relying upon well-established local social networks to change behaviors<br />

by presenting results of the baseline exhaust assessment. The framework<br />

<strong>for</strong> action and change is based on theory developed by Everett M. Rogers<br />

that diffusion of innovations spreads via channels of communication<br />

developed by social members. Third, a no-idling resolution will be presented<br />

to the local town board <strong>for</strong> approval. A follow-up study measures<br />

changes in exhaust levels and community compliance as a result of the<br />

no-idling policies at these three sites. Our goal is to incorporate translational<br />

research components of moving population studies into the<br />

community research process in the longer term. This ef<strong>for</strong>t will not only<br />

contribute to the existing research, but will be available as a template <strong>for</strong><br />

other communities to apply towards reducing vehicle exhaust.<br />

40. The Effects of Projectpower Diabetes <strong>Education</strong><br />

Program on Adult African American’s Diabetes Knowledge,<br />

Empowerment, and Readiness to Change<br />

Sherry Grover, PhD, Ash<strong>for</strong>d University<br />

The primary purpose of this study was to assess whether a faith-based<br />

diabetes education program (ProjectPower) would significantly influence<br />

African American’s knowledge, readiness to change, and feelings<br />

of empowerment about diabetes care. The DHHS has outlined<br />

17 diabetes-related objectives aimed at improving diabetes diagnosis<br />

and care nationally. The first objective is to “increase the proportion<br />

of persons with diabetes who receive <strong>for</strong>mal diabetes education” from<br />

48% in 1998 to 60% in 2010. A secondary purpose of this study was to<br />

examine the ecological factors that would affect knowledge, readiness<br />

to change, and feelings of empowerment about diabetes care. For this<br />

presentation, only open-ended questions will be discussed. Open-ended<br />

questions, rooted in the Ecological Model, were used to assess barriers<br />

to diabetes care and behavior change. The Ecological Model proposes<br />

that <strong>people</strong> are affected by intrapersonal, interpersonal, community and<br />

policy influencers. Although the responses to the open-ended questions<br />

were very brief, the intrapersonal influencers mainly guided the use<br />

of the model and the thoughts of participants in this study. In order to<br />

conduct the study, a volunteer convenience sample of 48 church members,<br />

family and friends participated in the study. The inclusion criteria<br />

were: African American male and females ages 18 years and older that<br />

lived in Houston/Harris County, Texas and surrounding areas. Those<br />

with or without diabetes participated. The majority of the participants<br />

were female (79.2%), and 20.8% were males. Participants were, on average,<br />

60 years of age (M = 60.52, SD = 15.00) and ranged from 18 years<br />

to 82 years of age. The study used a pre-test/post-test survey design that<br />

included both open-ended and closed-ended questions. Participants<br />

were tested both be<strong>for</strong>e and after a three-module workshop. Participants<br />

were also invited to participate in a one-month follow-up survey.<br />

Data analyses included frequencies, ANOVA, and Pearson’s Product<br />

Moment correlations. Results indicated that the diabetes knowledge test<br />

scores were significantly higher at the time of post-test compared with<br />

results at the time of pre-test, while neither the readiness-to-change<br />

scores nor the diabetes empowerment change scores were significantly<br />

different between the pre-test and post-test. One response related to the<br />

interpersonal influencer and several positive comments regarding the<br />

program itself were made.<br />

41. Reliability and Validity of the Women’s <strong>Health</strong> Survey (WHS)<br />

– a Tool Assessing American Indian (AI) Women’s Motivation to<br />

Get a Screening Mammogram<br />

Eleni Tolma, PhD, <strong>Health</strong> Promotion Sciences, University of Oklahoma<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Science Center; Robert Hamm, PhD, University of Oklahoma<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Science Center; Chasity Battertom, MHA, University of Oklahoma<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Science Center, David Thompson, PhD, University of Oklahoma,<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Science Center<br />

background: Despite ef<strong>for</strong>ts to promote breast cancer screening, the<br />

number of Oklahoman women who died from breast cancer during<br />

the last two decades did not substantially change, and women of ethnic<br />

minorities were disproportionally under-screened. This study describes<br />

the development of an instrument designed to measure the motivation of<br />

American Indian (AI) women to get a regular screening mammogram.<br />

The study took place at a tribal clinic in Oklahoma.<br />

theoretical framework: This consists of an expanded theoretical<br />

framework of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) with constructs relevant<br />

to mammography screening (i.e. self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility<br />

to breast cancer, fatalism) and to the (AI) culture (i.e. cultural norms).<br />

hypothesis: No hypothesis is tested here. methods: The methodological<br />

design consisted of 8 major steps: a) review of the published<br />

literature to identify beliefs relevant to AI women’s mammography<br />

behavior and to the constructs of the TPB; b) per<strong>for</strong>mance of 9 key<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mant interviews with breast cancer survivors and clinic representatives;<br />

c) per<strong>for</strong>mance of elicitation interviews with 24 women of the<br />

priority population followed by 2 focus groups; d) trans<strong>for</strong>mation of the<br />

elicitation beliefs into complete item statements and development of the<br />

first draft of the Women’s <strong>Health</strong> Survey (WHS); e) review of the WHS<br />

by a panel of 5 experts; f) qualitative review of the survey with 2 focus<br />

group discussions (n=6); g) pilot-testing of the instrument with a repre-<br />

sophe conference ✯ november 4-6, 2010 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!