healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education
healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education
healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
✯ Poster Abstracts ✯<br />
thursday – saturday | november 4-6<br />
39. Combined Use of Research-based Methods and<br />
Community Outreach Approaches to Improve Respiratory<br />
<strong>Health</strong> in Preschool Children<br />
Michael Shakarjian, PhD, New York Medical College; Deborah Viola,<br />
PhD, New York Medical College; Jean Hudson, MD, MPH, Orange County<br />
Commissioner of <strong>Health</strong>; Amy Ansehl, RN, BSN, FNPC, New York Medical<br />
College; Allen Dozer, MD, <strong>Health</strong> Center of the Hudson Valley, New York<br />
Medical College; Robert Amler, MD, New York Medical College,<br />
Peter Arno, PhD, Diane Heck, PhD<br />
There is a paucity of research examining the impact of ‘no idling’<br />
ordinances on ambient air quality near schools. Vehicle exhaust is the<br />
leading source of toxic air pollution <strong>for</strong> most communities in the Lower<br />
Hudson Valley (LHV) of New York State, and a single vehicle used<br />
to commute children to school contributes 3 pounds of air pollution<br />
monthly. Studies demonstrate that initial incidents of asthma develop<br />
be<strong>for</strong>e age 5, suggesting that preschool years mark the critical period <strong>for</strong><br />
development of the disease and that prevention be focused at this age<br />
group. We hypothesize that parents, educators and community leaders<br />
are not aware that automobile exhausts from delivering and retrieving<br />
children have a significant impact on the quality of outdoor and indoor<br />
ambient air at school facilities. We are analyzing the baseline levels of<br />
asthma triggering contaminants of automobile and bus exhaust (sulfur<br />
dioxides, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulates) at three preschool<br />
facilities in Orange County, NY, to develop a community-based ef<strong>for</strong>t to<br />
incorporate a ‘no idling’ policy as part of their environmental program.<br />
This research is motivated from SPARCS data demonstrating high asthma<br />
hospitalization rates <strong>for</strong> children in the LHV. For preschoolers, these<br />
rates are higher in some counties (ex. 40.1/10,000 <strong>for</strong> Orange County)<br />
than they are in NYC, and <strong>for</strong> the region are higher than <strong>Health</strong>y People<br />
<strong>2020</strong> goals (25/10,000). The objectives of this research are threefold:<br />
first, to document automobile and bus traffic and determine the levels of<br />
asthma-triggering contaminants of exhaust at three preschools. Second,<br />
we are raising awareness of the effects of car idling through advocacy. A<br />
steering committee of school representatives and community leaders are<br />
relying upon well-established local social networks to change behaviors<br />
by presenting results of the baseline exhaust assessment. The framework<br />
<strong>for</strong> action and change is based on theory developed by Everett M. Rogers<br />
that diffusion of innovations spreads via channels of communication<br />
developed by social members. Third, a no-idling resolution will be presented<br />
to the local town board <strong>for</strong> approval. A follow-up study measures<br />
changes in exhaust levels and community compliance as a result of the<br />
no-idling policies at these three sites. Our goal is to incorporate translational<br />
research components of moving population studies into the<br />
community research process in the longer term. This ef<strong>for</strong>t will not only<br />
contribute to the existing research, but will be available as a template <strong>for</strong><br />
other communities to apply towards reducing vehicle exhaust.<br />
40. The Effects of Projectpower Diabetes <strong>Education</strong><br />
Program on Adult African American’s Diabetes Knowledge,<br />
Empowerment, and Readiness to Change<br />
Sherry Grover, PhD, Ash<strong>for</strong>d University<br />
The primary purpose of this study was to assess whether a faith-based<br />
diabetes education program (ProjectPower) would significantly influence<br />
African American’s knowledge, readiness to change, and feelings<br />
of empowerment about diabetes care. The DHHS has outlined<br />
17 diabetes-related objectives aimed at improving diabetes diagnosis<br />
and care nationally. The first objective is to “increase the proportion<br />
of persons with diabetes who receive <strong>for</strong>mal diabetes education” from<br />
48% in 1998 to 60% in 2010. A secondary purpose of this study was to<br />
examine the ecological factors that would affect knowledge, readiness<br />
to change, and feelings of empowerment about diabetes care. For this<br />
presentation, only open-ended questions will be discussed. Open-ended<br />
questions, rooted in the Ecological Model, were used to assess barriers<br />
to diabetes care and behavior change. The Ecological Model proposes<br />
that <strong>people</strong> are affected by intrapersonal, interpersonal, community and<br />
policy influencers. Although the responses to the open-ended questions<br />
were very brief, the intrapersonal influencers mainly guided the use<br />
of the model and the thoughts of participants in this study. In order to<br />
conduct the study, a volunteer convenience sample of 48 church members,<br />
family and friends participated in the study. The inclusion criteria<br />
were: African American male and females ages 18 years and older that<br />
lived in Houston/Harris County, Texas and surrounding areas. Those<br />
with or without diabetes participated. The majority of the participants<br />
were female (79.2%), and 20.8% were males. Participants were, on average,<br />
60 years of age (M = 60.52, SD = 15.00) and ranged from 18 years<br />
to 82 years of age. The study used a pre-test/post-test survey design that<br />
included both open-ended and closed-ended questions. Participants<br />
were tested both be<strong>for</strong>e and after a three-module workshop. Participants<br />
were also invited to participate in a one-month follow-up survey.<br />
Data analyses included frequencies, ANOVA, and Pearson’s Product<br />
Moment correlations. Results indicated that the diabetes knowledge test<br />
scores were significantly higher at the time of post-test compared with<br />
results at the time of pre-test, while neither the readiness-to-change<br />
scores nor the diabetes empowerment change scores were significantly<br />
different between the pre-test and post-test. One response related to the<br />
interpersonal influencer and several positive comments regarding the<br />
program itself were made.<br />
41. Reliability and Validity of the Women’s <strong>Health</strong> Survey (WHS)<br />
– a Tool Assessing American Indian (AI) Women’s Motivation to<br />
Get a Screening Mammogram<br />
Eleni Tolma, PhD, <strong>Health</strong> Promotion Sciences, University of Oklahoma<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Science Center; Robert Hamm, PhD, University of Oklahoma<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Science Center; Chasity Battertom, MHA, University of Oklahoma<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Science Center, David Thompson, PhD, University of Oklahoma,<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Science Center<br />
background: Despite ef<strong>for</strong>ts to promote breast cancer screening, the<br />
number of Oklahoman women who died from breast cancer during<br />
the last two decades did not substantially change, and women of ethnic<br />
minorities were disproportionally under-screened. This study describes<br />
the development of an instrument designed to measure the motivation of<br />
American Indian (AI) women to get a regular screening mammogram.<br />
The study took place at a tribal clinic in Oklahoma.<br />
theoretical framework: This consists of an expanded theoretical<br />
framework of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) with constructs relevant<br />
to mammography screening (i.e. self-efficacy, perceived susceptibility<br />
to breast cancer, fatalism) and to the (AI) culture (i.e. cultural norms).<br />
hypothesis: No hypothesis is tested here. methods: The methodological<br />
design consisted of 8 major steps: a) review of the published<br />
literature to identify beliefs relevant to AI women’s mammography<br />
behavior and to the constructs of the TPB; b) per<strong>for</strong>mance of 9 key<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mant interviews with breast cancer survivors and clinic representatives;<br />
c) per<strong>for</strong>mance of elicitation interviews with 24 women of the<br />
priority population followed by 2 focus groups; d) trans<strong>for</strong>mation of the<br />
elicitation beliefs into complete item statements and development of the<br />
first draft of the Women’s <strong>Health</strong> Survey (WHS); e) review of the WHS<br />
by a panel of 5 experts; f) qualitative review of the survey with 2 focus<br />
group discussions (n=6); g) pilot-testing of the instrument with a repre-<br />
sophe conference ✯ november 4-6, 2010 55