healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education
healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education
healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
thursday – saturday | november 4-6<br />
✯ Poster Abstracts ✯<br />
is as part of the social and organizational environment. Through the<br />
lens of the Ecological Model, one can apply multilevel interventions by<br />
partnering with a WIB to address healthcare work<strong>for</strong>ce issues and there<strong>for</strong>e<br />
larger public health objectives. A WIB is an institutional convener<br />
(working with colleges, universities, and vocational training organizations,<br />
federal and state governments and governmental departments,<br />
non-profit human services organizations, and local employers) and a<br />
community convener (<strong>for</strong> youth, job seekers and local residents) that<br />
allows one to intervene an interpersonal level through direct client counseling<br />
or a community level through research and application, social<br />
networking facilitation, and policy advocacy. Yet, it is rare <strong>for</strong> healthcare<br />
and health services organizations to seek out WIBs <strong>for</strong> partnering to<br />
tackle tough health-centered objectives that can be addressed by a work<strong>for</strong>ce<br />
perspective. The following will use NOVA’s, the northern Santa<br />
Clara County-serving WIB, example of innovative healthcare work<strong>for</strong>ce<br />
research done in collaboration with union shops, private employers,<br />
and universities; participation in employer and college advisory groups,<br />
self-client driven education and programs, client training evaluation and<br />
innovation, and direct client services of how various organizations can<br />
partner strategically better deliver services in<br />
a struggling economy and more effectively address public health goals.<br />
37. “Sustainable Morehead”: Framing a Rural<br />
Community’s Environmental Sustainability Mission within the<br />
Community Coalition Action Theory to Improve <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />
Kristi King, PhD, University of Louisville; Brittany Trentham, BS, University<br />
of Louisville; Emily Whitney, PhD, CHES, Southern Illinois University<br />
at Carbondale<br />
background: Increasing public awareness, strengthening community<br />
capacity, and creating social and physical environments to improve public<br />
health are among several priorities of <strong>Health</strong>y People <strong>2020</strong>. Community<br />
coalitions with an environmental sustainability focus are excellent<br />
venues in which public health educators can partner to support physical<br />
activity, proper nutrition, and environmental education. “Sustainable<br />
Morehead” is a community coalition whose mission is “to further<br />
sustainable living in the Morehead and surrounding Appalachian region<br />
through education, demonstration projects, and activities that are based<br />
on the interrelationship of personal, social, and environmental health.”<br />
In order <strong>for</strong> public health educators to maximize their potential <strong>for</strong> collective<br />
coalition success, it is important to understand the development,<br />
maintenance, and potential <strong>for</strong> institutionalization of these grassroots<br />
organization ef<strong>for</strong>ts. There<strong>for</strong>e, the purpose of this study was to examine<br />
the <strong>for</strong>mation and maintenance of an environmental sustainabilityfocused<br />
community coalition in a rural community within the context of<br />
the Community Coalition Action Theory.<br />
theoretical framework: The Community Coalition Action Theory<br />
(CCAT), a type of interorganizational relations theory, served as the<br />
theoretical framework <strong>for</strong> this study. The CCAT constructs qualitatively<br />
examined were: stages of development, community context, convener<br />
group, coalition membership, operations and processes, leadership and<br />
staffing, structures, member and external resources, member engagement,<br />
assessment, intervention implementation, community change<br />
measures, community capacity, and health and social outcomes.<br />
hypothesis: Qualitative examination of “Sustainable Morehead’s”<br />
strengths and limitations will provide coalition members direction <strong>for</strong><br />
coalition institutionalization.<br />
methods: Data collection methods included structured and semi-structured<br />
interviews, coalition online social networking content analysis,<br />
meeting and event observation, and in<strong>for</strong>mal conversation. Subjects<br />
included coalition members, key stakeholders, community gatekeepers,<br />
and community members <strong>for</strong> which interventions were targeted.<br />
results: Important emergent coalition strengths identified were:<br />
1.) the importance of group consensus on issue selection, 2.) strong and<br />
frequent participation of coalition members, 3.) clear goals and objectives,<br />
and 4.) clear intervention strategies <strong>for</strong> member engagement.<br />
The need <strong>for</strong> 1.) identifying and securing external resources and 2.)<br />
increasing community participation <strong>for</strong> targeted interventions were<br />
areas <strong>for</strong> improvement.<br />
conclusion and implications <strong>for</strong> practice: Examination and<br />
application of the Community Coalition Action Theory constructs in<br />
“Sustainable Morehead” demonstrate how community groups can partner<br />
to achieve a common mission of improving environmental sustainability.<br />
Understanding a community coalition’s mission, dynamics, and potential<br />
<strong>for</strong> institutionalization can aid a public health educator’s mission of<br />
improving public health.<br />
38. Environmental <strong>Health</strong> Knowledge, Attitudes, and<br />
Behaviors of Pre-service Teachers<br />
Dhitinut Ratnapradipa, PhD, CHES, Department of <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> &<br />
Recreation, Southern Illinois University; Darson Rhodes, PhD, CHES,<br />
Department of <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> & Recreation, Southern Illinois University;<br />
Joyce Fetro, PhD, CHES, Department of <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> & Recreation,<br />
Southern Illinois University; Stephen Brown, PhD,<br />
Southern Illinois University<br />
Since progress in improving environmental health has been mixed<br />
(depending on the environmental issue), Developing <strong>Health</strong> People <strong>2020</strong><br />
proposes 21 objectives related to environmental health. Research has<br />
shown that personal health behaviors and actions established early in<br />
life often are carried through adulthood. Thus, working with children to<br />
increase environmental health literacy may improve the environmental<br />
health literacy of future adults, potentially improving the health of the<br />
Nation. Given the amount of time children spend in school, this setting<br />
could be an ideal place to address environmental health with children.<br />
According to social cognitive theory, learning takes place through<br />
observation. Consequently, the environmental behaviors and attitudes<br />
modeled by teachers would likely impact the environmental behaviors<br />
and attitudes learned by students. Based upon social cognitive theory, a<br />
research study including 101 pre-service teachers from a large Midwestern<br />
university was conducted to determine participants’ knowledge,<br />
attitudes, and behaviors regarding environmental health. Researchers<br />
hypothesized environmental health knowledge would be low (mean score<br />
less than 80%) and multiple unfavorable behaviors or attitudes would be<br />
reported. Results indicated major deficiencies in basic knowledge as well<br />
as many unfavorable environmental behaviors. On average, participants<br />
answered only 49.7% of knowledge items correctly. Fewer than half of<br />
the participants (48.5%) indicated they knew the EPA’s webpage provides<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation related to environmental health. Additionally, less than half<br />
(46.0%) recycle bottles or cans “often” or “almost always.” Given these results,<br />
pre-service teachers are likely ill-prepared to address environmental<br />
health literacy in their classrooms. Teacher education programs need to<br />
address this deficiency in pre-service teachers through the implementation<br />
of new courses focused on environmental health or the redesign of<br />
current courses to include environmental health content.<br />
54<br />
sophe conference ✯ november 4-6, 2010