07.11.2014 Views

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

thursday – saturday | november 4-6<br />

✯ Poster Abstracts ✯<br />

is as part of the social and organizational environment. Through the<br />

lens of the Ecological Model, one can apply multilevel interventions by<br />

partnering with a WIB to address healthcare work<strong>for</strong>ce issues and there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

larger public health objectives. A WIB is an institutional convener<br />

(working with colleges, universities, and vocational training organizations,<br />

federal and state governments and governmental departments,<br />

non-profit human services organizations, and local employers) and a<br />

community convener (<strong>for</strong> youth, job seekers and local residents) that<br />

allows one to intervene an interpersonal level through direct client counseling<br />

or a community level through research and application, social<br />

networking facilitation, and policy advocacy. Yet, it is rare <strong>for</strong> healthcare<br />

and health services organizations to seek out WIBs <strong>for</strong> partnering to<br />

tackle tough health-centered objectives that can be addressed by a work<strong>for</strong>ce<br />

perspective. The following will use NOVA’s, the northern Santa<br />

Clara County-serving WIB, example of innovative healthcare work<strong>for</strong>ce<br />

research done in collaboration with union shops, private employers,<br />

and universities; participation in employer and college advisory groups,<br />

self-client driven education and programs, client training evaluation and<br />

innovation, and direct client services of how various organizations can<br />

partner strategically better deliver services in<br />

a struggling economy and more effectively address public health goals.<br />

37. “Sustainable Morehead”: Framing a Rural<br />

Community’s Environmental Sustainability Mission within the<br />

Community Coalition Action Theory to Improve <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />

Kristi King, PhD, University of Louisville; Brittany Trentham, BS, University<br />

of Louisville; Emily Whitney, PhD, CHES, Southern Illinois University<br />

at Carbondale<br />

background: Increasing public awareness, strengthening community<br />

capacity, and creating social and physical environments to improve public<br />

health are among several priorities of <strong>Health</strong>y People <strong>2020</strong>. Community<br />

coalitions with an environmental sustainability focus are excellent<br />

venues in which public health educators can partner to support physical<br />

activity, proper nutrition, and environmental education. “Sustainable<br />

Morehead” is a community coalition whose mission is “to further<br />

sustainable living in the Morehead and surrounding Appalachian region<br />

through education, demonstration projects, and activities that are based<br />

on the interrelationship of personal, social, and environmental health.”<br />

In order <strong>for</strong> public health educators to maximize their potential <strong>for</strong> collective<br />

coalition success, it is important to understand the development,<br />

maintenance, and potential <strong>for</strong> institutionalization of these grassroots<br />

organization ef<strong>for</strong>ts. There<strong>for</strong>e, the purpose of this study was to examine<br />

the <strong>for</strong>mation and maintenance of an environmental sustainabilityfocused<br />

community coalition in a rural community within the context of<br />

the Community Coalition Action Theory.<br />

theoretical framework: The Community Coalition Action Theory<br />

(CCAT), a type of interorganizational relations theory, served as the<br />

theoretical framework <strong>for</strong> this study. The CCAT constructs qualitatively<br />

examined were: stages of development, community context, convener<br />

group, coalition membership, operations and processes, leadership and<br />

staffing, structures, member and external resources, member engagement,<br />

assessment, intervention implementation, community change<br />

measures, community capacity, and health and social outcomes.<br />

hypothesis: Qualitative examination of “Sustainable Morehead’s”<br />

strengths and limitations will provide coalition members direction <strong>for</strong><br />

coalition institutionalization.<br />

methods: Data collection methods included structured and semi-structured<br />

interviews, coalition online social networking content analysis,<br />

meeting and event observation, and in<strong>for</strong>mal conversation. Subjects<br />

included coalition members, key stakeholders, community gatekeepers,<br />

and community members <strong>for</strong> which interventions were targeted.<br />

results: Important emergent coalition strengths identified were:<br />

1.) the importance of group consensus on issue selection, 2.) strong and<br />

frequent participation of coalition members, 3.) clear goals and objectives,<br />

and 4.) clear intervention strategies <strong>for</strong> member engagement.<br />

The need <strong>for</strong> 1.) identifying and securing external resources and 2.)<br />

increasing community participation <strong>for</strong> targeted interventions were<br />

areas <strong>for</strong> improvement.<br />

conclusion and implications <strong>for</strong> practice: Examination and<br />

application of the Community Coalition Action Theory constructs in<br />

“Sustainable Morehead” demonstrate how community groups can partner<br />

to achieve a common mission of improving environmental sustainability.<br />

Understanding a community coalition’s mission, dynamics, and potential<br />

<strong>for</strong> institutionalization can aid a public health educator’s mission of<br />

improving public health.<br />

38. Environmental <strong>Health</strong> Knowledge, Attitudes, and<br />

Behaviors of Pre-service Teachers<br />

Dhitinut Ratnapradipa, PhD, CHES, Department of <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> &<br />

Recreation, Southern Illinois University; Darson Rhodes, PhD, CHES,<br />

Department of <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> & Recreation, Southern Illinois University;<br />

Joyce Fetro, PhD, CHES, Department of <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> & Recreation,<br />

Southern Illinois University; Stephen Brown, PhD,<br />

Southern Illinois University<br />

Since progress in improving environmental health has been mixed<br />

(depending on the environmental issue), Developing <strong>Health</strong> People <strong>2020</strong><br />

proposes 21 objectives related to environmental health. Research has<br />

shown that personal health behaviors and actions established early in<br />

life often are carried through adulthood. Thus, working with children to<br />

increase environmental health literacy may improve the environmental<br />

health literacy of future adults, potentially improving the health of the<br />

Nation. Given the amount of time children spend in school, this setting<br />

could be an ideal place to address environmental health with children.<br />

According to social cognitive theory, learning takes place through<br />

observation. Consequently, the environmental behaviors and attitudes<br />

modeled by teachers would likely impact the environmental behaviors<br />

and attitudes learned by students. Based upon social cognitive theory, a<br />

research study including 101 pre-service teachers from a large Midwestern<br />

university was conducted to determine participants’ knowledge,<br />

attitudes, and behaviors regarding environmental health. Researchers<br />

hypothesized environmental health knowledge would be low (mean score<br />

less than 80%) and multiple unfavorable behaviors or attitudes would be<br />

reported. Results indicated major deficiencies in basic knowledge as well<br />

as many unfavorable environmental behaviors. On average, participants<br />

answered only 49.7% of knowledge items correctly. Fewer than half of<br />

the participants (48.5%) indicated they knew the EPA’s webpage provides<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation related to environmental health. Additionally, less than half<br />

(46.0%) recycle bottles or cans “often” or “almost always.” Given these results,<br />

pre-service teachers are likely ill-prepared to address environmental<br />

health literacy in their classrooms. Teacher education programs need to<br />

address this deficiency in pre-service teachers through the implementation<br />

of new courses focused on environmental health or the redesign of<br />

current courses to include environmental health content.<br />

54<br />

sophe conference ✯ november 4-6, 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!