07.11.2014 Views

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

✯ Poster Abstracts ✯<br />

thursday – saturday | november 4-6<br />

27. Use of Cellular Telephones and Texting While Driving<br />

William Parker Hinson, BS, University of Florida, Gainesville; Karla Ruiz,<br />

BA, BS, University of Florida, Gainesville; Louis Carrillo, BS, University of<br />

Florida, Gainesville<br />

background: The effect of mobile phone use on driving per<strong>for</strong>mance has<br />

been widely studied; however, current gaps exist in research linking the relationship<br />

between texting and driving. Research suggests that using a mobile<br />

telephone while driving increases risk of being involved in a Motor Vehicle<br />

Accident (MVA). A study analyzing records in MVAs reported that using a<br />

cell phone while driving is associated with roughly a quadrupling of crash risk,<br />

and 1 in 7 drivers admit to text messaging while driving.<br />

objective: The primary aim of this exploratory study was to assess student<br />

behaviors and perceptions associated with use of cellular (mobile) telephones<br />

while driving. The secondary aim was to observe texting and driving behaviors<br />

by viewing incidence rates at intersections within a university campus.<br />

methods: Phase 1: Data were collected from a questionnaire given to<br />

students at the University of Florida. The questionnaire assessed students’<br />

behaviors, attitudes, and frequencies regarding the use of cellular telephones<br />

while driving. Phase 2: Collections of direct observational data were gathered<br />

at various intersections on the University of Florida campus. Frequencies were<br />

tabulated <strong>for</strong> the number of drivers with a cell phone in hand, and any additional<br />

distracting behaviors were also noted.<br />

results: Phase 1: Two-hundred and ninety (n=290) students participated in<br />

the questionnaire. Respondents were between the ages of 19-44 years (µ=22.2).<br />

Analysis showed that 69.8% send between 1-40 texts per day, and 86.6% send<br />

texts while driving. Students were also asked whether they engaged in other<br />

behaviors while driving including: texting while at a stop sign (45.7%), texting<br />

in parking lots (48.4%), pulling over to text (7.5%), and using a passenger to<br />

text (56.1%). Pearson’s correlation test showed that Age was negatively correlated<br />

to electronic communication device usage (p = 0.212), whereas Miles<br />

Driven had a significant, positive correlation (p < 0.001). Phase 2: Observation<br />

of vehicles (n=1,138) revealed that 12.9% (n=147) of drivers were engaged<br />

in distracted driving. Among all drivers, 3.4% (n=39) were texting and 6.4%<br />

(n=73) were speaking on the phone.<br />

conclusion: Results show that a large percentage of students send texts<br />

while driving, while lower percentages engage in behaviors that may help<br />

reduce associated risks. On the University of Florida campus, distracted driving<br />

occurs, indicating a need <strong>for</strong> an institution-based policy among students,<br />

faculty, visitors, and employees. Future research should expand beyond the<br />

university population so results are more generalized.<br />

28. Adolescent Physical Activity: Does Perception of School and<br />

Neighborhood Safety Matter?<br />

Clare Lenhart, MPH, CHES, Temple University; Brian Daly, PhD,<br />

Temple University<br />

background: As the public health community looks to the implementation<br />

of <strong>Health</strong>y People <strong>2020</strong> objectives, concerns persist regarding the<br />

prevalence of adolescents failing to meet recommended levels of physical<br />

activity. Despite physical activity-based initiatives aimed at the individual,<br />

school, and community level, the majority of adolescents remain unacceptably<br />

inactive. Research in adult populations suggests low levels of<br />

physical activity are more common among respondents reporting concerns<br />

<strong>for</strong> safety in their immediate neighborhood. What is less clear is the<br />

association between perceptions of neighborhood and school safety and<br />

physical activity levels among ethnically diverse urban adolescents.<br />

purpose: This study evaluated the prevalence of self-reported neighborhood<br />

and school safety and physical activity levels, and the relationship<br />

between perceived safety and physical activity level among adolescents in<br />

a large urban city.<br />

methodology: 2009 Philadelphia Youth Risk Behavior Survey data<br />

were analyzed. The weighted sample of 43,867 students included those<br />

from 9th grade (30.9%), 10th grade (27.1%), 11th grade (21.5%), and 12th<br />

grade (20.4%) attending Philadelphia public high schools. The sample<br />

was 51.5% male and 48.5% female. Race/Ethnicity of the participants was<br />

64.8% African American, 14.2% Hispanic/ Latino, 12.7% White and 2.8%<br />

all other races. Separate research questions examined perceived neighborhood<br />

safety and impressions of safety at school. Frequency of self-reported<br />

moderate-to-vigorous physical activity lasting 60 minutes or more was<br />

also collected.<br />

results: 32% of adolescents meet current physical activity recommendations.<br />

Males (41.3%) are more likely than females (23.9%) to report<br />

adequate physical activity. Forty-seven percent of all respondents report<br />

feeling unsafe both at school and in their neighborhood. Adolescents who<br />

feel safe are 1.183 times more likely (CI: 1.137-1.232, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!