healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education
healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education
healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
✯ Poster Abstracts ✯<br />
thursday – saturday | november 4-6<br />
27. Use of Cellular Telephones and Texting While Driving<br />
William Parker Hinson, BS, University of Florida, Gainesville; Karla Ruiz,<br />
BA, BS, University of Florida, Gainesville; Louis Carrillo, BS, University of<br />
Florida, Gainesville<br />
background: The effect of mobile phone use on driving per<strong>for</strong>mance has<br />
been widely studied; however, current gaps exist in research linking the relationship<br />
between texting and driving. Research suggests that using a mobile<br />
telephone while driving increases risk of being involved in a Motor Vehicle<br />
Accident (MVA). A study analyzing records in MVAs reported that using a<br />
cell phone while driving is associated with roughly a quadrupling of crash risk,<br />
and 1 in 7 drivers admit to text messaging while driving.<br />
objective: The primary aim of this exploratory study was to assess student<br />
behaviors and perceptions associated with use of cellular (mobile) telephones<br />
while driving. The secondary aim was to observe texting and driving behaviors<br />
by viewing incidence rates at intersections within a university campus.<br />
methods: Phase 1: Data were collected from a questionnaire given to<br />
students at the University of Florida. The questionnaire assessed students’<br />
behaviors, attitudes, and frequencies regarding the use of cellular telephones<br />
while driving. Phase 2: Collections of direct observational data were gathered<br />
at various intersections on the University of Florida campus. Frequencies were<br />
tabulated <strong>for</strong> the number of drivers with a cell phone in hand, and any additional<br />
distracting behaviors were also noted.<br />
results: Phase 1: Two-hundred and ninety (n=290) students participated in<br />
the questionnaire. Respondents were between the ages of 19-44 years (µ=22.2).<br />
Analysis showed that 69.8% send between 1-40 texts per day, and 86.6% send<br />
texts while driving. Students were also asked whether they engaged in other<br />
behaviors while driving including: texting while at a stop sign (45.7%), texting<br />
in parking lots (48.4%), pulling over to text (7.5%), and using a passenger to<br />
text (56.1%). Pearson’s correlation test showed that Age was negatively correlated<br />
to electronic communication device usage (p = 0.212), whereas Miles<br />
Driven had a significant, positive correlation (p < 0.001). Phase 2: Observation<br />
of vehicles (n=1,138) revealed that 12.9% (n=147) of drivers were engaged<br />
in distracted driving. Among all drivers, 3.4% (n=39) were texting and 6.4%<br />
(n=73) were speaking on the phone.<br />
conclusion: Results show that a large percentage of students send texts<br />
while driving, while lower percentages engage in behaviors that may help<br />
reduce associated risks. On the University of Florida campus, distracted driving<br />
occurs, indicating a need <strong>for</strong> an institution-based policy among students,<br />
faculty, visitors, and employees. Future research should expand beyond the<br />
university population so results are more generalized.<br />
28. Adolescent Physical Activity: Does Perception of School and<br />
Neighborhood Safety Matter?<br />
Clare Lenhart, MPH, CHES, Temple University; Brian Daly, PhD,<br />
Temple University<br />
background: As the public health community looks to the implementation<br />
of <strong>Health</strong>y People <strong>2020</strong> objectives, concerns persist regarding the<br />
prevalence of adolescents failing to meet recommended levels of physical<br />
activity. Despite physical activity-based initiatives aimed at the individual,<br />
school, and community level, the majority of adolescents remain unacceptably<br />
inactive. Research in adult populations suggests low levels of<br />
physical activity are more common among respondents reporting concerns<br />
<strong>for</strong> safety in their immediate neighborhood. What is less clear is the<br />
association between perceptions of neighborhood and school safety and<br />
physical activity levels among ethnically diverse urban adolescents.<br />
purpose: This study evaluated the prevalence of self-reported neighborhood<br />
and school safety and physical activity levels, and the relationship<br />
between perceived safety and physical activity level among adolescents in<br />
a large urban city.<br />
methodology: 2009 Philadelphia Youth Risk Behavior Survey data<br />
were analyzed. The weighted sample of 43,867 students included those<br />
from 9th grade (30.9%), 10th grade (27.1%), 11th grade (21.5%), and 12th<br />
grade (20.4%) attending Philadelphia public high schools. The sample<br />
was 51.5% male and 48.5% female. Race/Ethnicity of the participants was<br />
64.8% African American, 14.2% Hispanic/ Latino, 12.7% White and 2.8%<br />
all other races. Separate research questions examined perceived neighborhood<br />
safety and impressions of safety at school. Frequency of self-reported<br />
moderate-to-vigorous physical activity lasting 60 minutes or more was<br />
also collected.<br />
results: 32% of adolescents meet current physical activity recommendations.<br />
Males (41.3%) are more likely than females (23.9%) to report<br />
adequate physical activity. Forty-seven percent of all respondents report<br />
feeling unsafe both at school and in their neighborhood. Adolescents who<br />
feel safe are 1.183 times more likely (CI: 1.137-1.232, p