07.11.2014 Views

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

healthy people 2020 - Society for Public Health Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

✯ Conference Abstracts ✯<br />

friday | | november 6 5<br />

current sessions b5<br />

Room: Denver 5-6<br />

<strong>healthy</strong> faculty <strong>2020</strong> and beyond:<br />

commitment to health <strong>for</strong> all<br />

Consideration of Some Great Contributors to Philosophy of<br />

<strong>Education</strong> as Foundation <strong>for</strong> Developing a Personal Practice<br />

Theory and Philosophy of <strong>Education</strong>.<br />

Stephen F. Gambescia, PhD, MEd, MBA, MHum, CHES, Drexel University<br />

This presentation explains a process educators at all levels can use to<br />

create or update their philosophy of education statement. The presenter<br />

gives a first-hand account of a process that involves a systematic, disciplined,<br />

intellectually liberating, and reflective approach to articulating<br />

one’s philosophy of education statement by considering the writings<br />

of select intellectual giants who have acted upon human experience,<br />

thought, and practice in education. The project should not be approached<br />

as a standard “research paper” but an attempt to consider both<br />

the corpus of reading and research over one’s life time, coupled with<br />

one’s knowledge and experience gained to date in the area of teaching<br />

and learning. The resultant updated statement should serve to sharpen<br />

a faculty member’s future role as an educator and educational leader, as<br />

well as contribute to his/her journey in life-long learning. Examples of<br />

how to approach the self study will be given and the presenter shares his<br />

updated philosophy of education statement.<br />

On Becoming a Teacher…How to Shift to a Student<br />

Centered Classroom.<br />

Bojana Beric, MD, PhD, CHES, Monmouth University<br />

Who is in charge of knowledge and learning in the classroom: the teacher<br />

or a student? Who should be in charge of knowledge and learning in the<br />

classroom: the teacher or a student? Many questions are raised daily in<br />

minds of caring teachers and curious students about the teaching/learning<br />

process in schools. The famous students’ questions are asked daily:<br />

Why do I need this in<strong>for</strong>mation? When am I going to use this knowledge?<br />

Everyone who went to school raised this question at least once in some<br />

courses. In<strong>for</strong>mation is power, especially in health. Then, who decides<br />

what in<strong>for</strong>mation is needed? The teacher may be given initial power, by<br />

default and tradition, and then it is her duty to let go of that power and<br />

carefully and parentally guide acquisition of that power by her students.<br />

The <strong>Health</strong> <strong>for</strong> All movement calls <strong>for</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>for</strong> All, without an exception;<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e, a health education classroom structure needs to allow <strong>for</strong><br />

redistribution of power in classes that teach about health, the basic human<br />

right of all. Subsequently, a health education teacher is the one who should<br />

design the classroom structure, both physical and social to stimulate<br />

learning and allow <strong>for</strong> all minds in that classroom to become powerful<br />

teachers and inquiring students, alternating roles com<strong>for</strong>tably, and as<br />

needed. The presentation provides one teacher’s journey to a democratic<br />

teaching/learning style destination and the circumstances, experiences and<br />

conscious “awakening” on that road will be shared.<br />

Staying Motivated During the Ups and Downs of<br />

a Research Career.<br />

Marc A. Zimmerman, PhD, University of Michigan<br />

Faculty in any institution of higher education at some level are measured<br />

against their ability to excel in the areas of teaching, scholarly work,<br />

research and service. Of these, the ability to provide original research that<br />

makes a “significant contribution” [to the discipline] seems to be the most<br />

elusive. Faculty researchers in health education are introduced quickly to<br />

the many master’s that they need to serve, balancing their own interests<br />

26<br />

sophe conference ✯ november 4-6, 2010<br />

with the proclivities of their department members [and subsequently<br />

tenure committees], current trends of granting agencies, temperaments of<br />

journal editors and peer reviewers, and the real needs of the <strong>people</strong> in the<br />

communities that they serve. This presentation gives a personal account<br />

and sage advice <strong>for</strong> staying motivated during the ups and downs of a<br />

research career. In a liberating style the presenter distinguishes the difference<br />

between being “right” and being “effective” in an academic environment<br />

and the various strategies that can be used to chart a successful and<br />

rewarding course in conducting research in the academy.<br />

concurrent sessions c<br />

fri / nov 5 / 3:00 pm – 4:15 pm<br />

current sessions c1<br />

Room: Colorado I-J<br />

quality assurance: a recipe <strong>for</strong> excellence<br />

Strengthening Quality Assurance: A Decade of Progress.<br />

David Birch, PhD, CHES, Department of <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> and Promotion,<br />

East Carolina University; Randall R. Cottrell, D.Ed, CHES, <strong>Health</strong> Promotion<br />

& <strong>Education</strong> Program, University of Cincinnati<br />

Over several decades, a multicomponent system has evolved to support<br />

quality assurance in professional preparation and individual professional<br />

practice. Components of this system include the National Commission<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Credentialing (NCHEC), which certifies individual<br />

health education specialists; the Council <strong>for</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />

(CEPH), which accredits graduate study in public health including a<br />

concentration in community health education; the American Association<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> (AAHE)/<strong>Society</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong> (SOPHE)<br />

Baccalaureate Program Approval Committee (SABPAC), which provides<br />

an approval process <strong>for</strong> undergraduate programs in community health<br />

education; and the National Council <strong>for</strong> Accreditation of Teacher<br />

<strong>Education</strong> (NCATE), which collaborates with AAHE in the accreditation<br />

of undergraduate school health education programs. Even with<br />

these processes in place, concerns existed relative to their coordination<br />

and perceived value. Beginning in 2001, three national task <strong>for</strong>ces were<br />

sequentially appointed to develop and implement a detailed plan <strong>for</strong> a<br />

coordinated, quality assurance system <strong>for</strong> undergraduate and graduate<br />

programs in health education. The purpose of this session is to summarize<br />

the accomplishments of the decade-long movement, identify<br />

challenges, and present future strategies designed to move the profession<br />

toward a coordinated, quality assurance system valued by higher<br />

education faculty and institutions, practitioners, and employers of health<br />

educators.<br />

Master Certified <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Specialist (MCHES):<br />

New Heights in Credentialing in <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong>.<br />

Linda Lysoby, MS, CHES, CAE, National Commission <strong>for</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Credentialing, Inc.; Dixie Dennis, PhD, CHES, Austin Peay State University;<br />

Melissa Rehrig, MPH, CHES, National Commission <strong>for</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong><br />

Credentialing, Inc.<br />

Achieving the <strong>Health</strong>y People Goals require a trained and competent<br />

health education work<strong>for</strong>ce. The nationally recognized Certified <strong>Health</strong><br />

<strong>Education</strong> Specialist (CHES) credential, in existence <strong>for</strong> 20 years and<br />

held by over 8,500 current active individuals, is one measure of professional<br />

competence of the health education work<strong>for</strong>ce. For the first time<br />

in 2011, the National Commission <strong>for</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Education</strong> Credentialing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!