07.11.2014 Views

Copula-based Multivariate GARCH Model with ... - Economics

Copula-based Multivariate GARCH Model with ... - Economics

Copula-based Multivariate GARCH Model with ... - Economics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1. Bivariate C-M<strong>GARCH</strong> (FF-DM)<br />

Panel A. In-sample Results<br />

M<strong>GARCH</strong><br />

C-M<strong>GARCH</strong><br />

I G GS C CS F<br />

DCC θ 1.0507 1.0970 0.1199 0.0030 1.7024<br />

se(θ) 0.0048 0.0401 0.0019 0.0010 0.2045<br />

σ 0.0789 0.1429 0.0917 0.0024 0.2600<br />

logL -0.5893 -0.5081 -0.5013 -0.5038 -0.5093 -0.5074<br />

AIC 1.1945 1.0341 1.0206 1.0254 1.0366 1.0326<br />

SIC 1.2336 1.0781 1.0646 1.0694 1.0806 1.0766<br />

VC θ 1.0419 1.0887 0.1218 0.0021 0.8741<br />

se(θ) 0.0028 0.0030 0.0016 0.0151 0.0778<br />

σ 0.0659 0.1320 0.0930 0.0017 0.1373<br />

logL -0.6032 -0.5205 -0.5124 -0.5153 -0.5217 -0.5212<br />

AIC 1.2222 1.0590 1.0427 1.0484 1.0612 1.0602<br />

SIC 1.2614 1.1030 1.0867 1.0924 1.1052 1.1042<br />

SBEKK θ 1.0391 1.0788 0.1146 0.0021 0.7356<br />

se(θ) 0.0021 0.0020 0.0015 0.0031 0.0643<br />

σ 0.0617 0.1186 0.0879 0.0017 0.1159<br />

logL -0.5736 -0.5008 -0.4938 -0.4957 -0.5017 -0.5013<br />

AIC 1.1511 1.0076 0.9936 0.9975 1.0094 1.0086<br />

SIC 1.1609 1.0223 1.0083 1.0121 1.0241 1.0233<br />

Notes: Daily changes in log exchange rates for French Franc and Deutschemark from January 4, 1993 to December<br />

31, 1996 (R = 1005) are used. M<strong>GARCH</strong> is the C-M<strong>GARCH</strong> <strong>with</strong> the Independent copula (denoted as I). Estimated<br />

are five other C-M<strong>GARCH</strong> models <strong>with</strong> Gumbel copula (G), Gumbel Survival copula (GS), Clayton copula (C),<br />

Clayton Survival copula (CS), and Frank copula (F). For space, only copula shape parameter estimates and their<br />

robust standard errors are reported. The parameter estimates are from the one-step QMLE. The numbers in<br />

parentheses are the standard errors calculated from the robust QMLE covariance matrix of the parameters. θ is the<br />

copula shape parameter. Each copula function has only one shape parameter. σ is the off-diagonal element of Σ.<br />

logL, AIC, and SIC are as defined in Section 5. The largest in-sample average of the estimated log-likelihood (logL)<br />

and smallest AIC and SIC for each family are in bold font to indicate the best C-MARCH model of each family.<br />

Panel B. Out-of-sample Results<br />

I G GS C CS F<br />

DCC logL -0.1785 -0.1050 -0.1071 -0.1099 -0.1109 -0.1032 RC = 0.000<br />

std(logL) 0.9776 1.0810 1.0869 1.0945 1.0869 1.1216<br />

VC logL -0.2217 -0.1227 -0.1225 -0.1266 -0.1286 -0.1245 RC = 0.000<br />

std(logL) 0.9650 1.1816 1.1899 1.1962 1.1927 1.2044<br />

SBEKK logL -0.1299 -0.1020 -0.0995 -0.1032 -0.1061 -0.1039 RC = 0.001<br />

std(logL) 1.0159 1.0776 1.0899 1.0916 1.0853 1.0960<br />

Notes: The out-of-sample forecast period is daily from January 5, 1997 to December 31, 1997 (<strong>with</strong> P = 251 days).<br />

logL denotes the out-of-sample average of the predicted log-likelihood. std(logL) denotes the out-of-sample standard<br />

deviation of the predicted log-likelihood. The largest logL for each family is in bold font to indicate the best C-<br />

MARCH model of each family. The reality check p-values (denoted as RC) are reported to compare the five C-<br />

M<strong>GARCH</strong> models <strong>with</strong> the benchmark M<strong>GARCH</strong> model <strong>with</strong> I copula. We use 1000 bootstrap samples of the<br />

“stationary bootstrap” <strong>with</strong> the mean block size equal to 5 days (a week) (i.e., <strong>with</strong> the stationary bootstrap<br />

smoothing parameter (1/5)). The benchmark model in each family is M<strong>GARCH</strong> <strong>with</strong> Independent (I) copula. We<br />

also computed the modified reality check p-values of Hansen (2005) which all turn out to be exactly the same as<br />

those of White (2000) in all four tables in our paper.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!