NYMTC Regional Pedestrian Safety Study - New York Metropolitan ...

NYMTC Regional Pedestrian Safety Study - New York Metropolitan ... NYMTC Regional Pedestrian Safety Study - New York Metropolitan ...

07.11.2014 Views

Other challenges Some public advocacy groups are perceived to be obstructionists, demanding more or a different type of accommodation for bicycles and pedestrians with no room for compromise, and thus blocking a proposed improvement. The people who support projects seldom come to meetings. Also some segments of the public have misconceptions about pedestrian safety measures that cause them to try to block the implementation of the measures. Merchants in communities have blocked proposals to use traffic calming in the downtown areas, believing that it will reduce customers coming to their stores. Homeowners whose properties back up to a proposed trailway, objected to it, saying they did not want people walking behind their houses; after the trailway was built they were among the major users of it. Some communities do not want sidewalks. They think that sidewalks would detract from a rural or “exclusive” character of the area or would lower property values or attract “undesirables.” Some authority figures (for example, police or transportation agency employees), who should act as role models and set an example of safe pedestrian behavior, instead follow poor walking habits, jaywalking or ignoring pedestrian signals. This is a similar situation to parents and other adults who set a poor example of safe behavior for children. Evaluation of implemented safety measures is often left undone due to limited staff resources; as a result, we do not know how effective many of the measures are or in what situations they work best. It is also hard to measure long-term effectiveness. Another challenge is the new MS4 regulation (from implementation of the Federal Clean Water Act) concerning drainage and the impacts of adding impervious surfaces. Sidewalks are impervious surfaces that can require mitigation in the form of special drainage facilities. This issue has come up on pedestrian facilities within the New York City watershed in Putnam and Westchester Counties and will come up in other areas as MS4 implementation continues. 4.6 Other Issues This section reports the issues that were brought up that do not fit in the categories above. The design of large trucks is a problem for pedestrians for two reasons. Trucks have wider and off-track turning radii, which many pedestrians, particularly children, do not realize (or perhaps think about); a pedestrian may, through ignorance or inattention, stand in an area that is the path of a turning truck. The second problem is that the driver’s sight lines are frequently blocked directly in front of or near the sides and rear of the truck. Again, this problem is more severe for children, both from their lack of knowledge and their shorter height. Trucks may leave the designated truck routes, either because of street blockages causing them to seek a less congested route or due to getting lost. In these cases they end up on narrow residential streets where they are even more dangerous because of higher volumes of pedestrians or children on residential streets. NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Study 52

Crosswalks need to be more visible. This requires good striping and in some areas, highly visible patterns such as ladders. Striping is frequently lacking at ramps and jug handles. There also needs to be a clear delineation between parking and pedestrian space. Poor lighting was also mentioned as an issue. New York City is currently experimenting with different patterns to determine which are the most visible. Poor lighting was also mentioned as an issue. People waiting to cross the street are hard for drivers to see at night because the waiting areas are not sufficiently illuminated. Bicyclists need to realize the need for reflective markings and/or lights on their bicycles if they ride at night. No one would drive a car at night without lights yet we ride our bikes, a much smaller and less visible vehicle, only with reflectors on the pedals. Pedestrians also need to realize they are less visible at night even in built up areas amid the jumble of headlights, tail lights, illuminated signs, etc. The wearing of lighter colored clothing or something reflective makes people more visible. NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Study 53

Other challenges<br />

Some public advocacy groups are perceived to be obstructionists, demanding more or a different<br />

type of accommodation for bicycles and pedestrians with no room for compromise, and thus<br />

blocking a proposed improvement. The people who support projects seldom come to meetings.<br />

Also some segments of the public have misconceptions about pedestrian safety measures that<br />

cause them to try to block the implementation of the measures. Merchants in communities have<br />

blocked proposals to use traffic calming in the downtown areas, believing that it will reduce<br />

customers coming to their stores. Homeowners whose properties back up to a proposed trailway,<br />

objected to it, saying they did not want people walking behind their houses; after the trailway<br />

was built they were among the major users of it.<br />

Some communities do not want sidewalks. They think that sidewalks would detract from a rural<br />

or “exclusive” character of the area or would lower property values or attract “undesirables.”<br />

Some authority figures (for example, police or transportation agency employees), who should act<br />

as role models and set an example of safe pedestrian behavior, instead follow poor walking<br />

habits, jaywalking or ignoring pedestrian signals. This is a similar situation to parents and other<br />

adults who set a poor example of safe behavior for children.<br />

Evaluation of implemented safety measures is often left undone due to limited staff resources; as<br />

a result, we do not know how effective many of the measures are or in what situations they work<br />

best. It is also hard to measure long-term effectiveness.<br />

Another challenge is the new MS4 regulation (from implementation of the Federal Clean Water<br />

Act) concerning drainage and the impacts of adding impervious surfaces. Sidewalks are<br />

impervious surfaces that can require mitigation in the form of special drainage facilities. This<br />

issue has come up on pedestrian facilities within the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City watershed in Putnam and<br />

Westchester Counties and will come up in other areas as MS4 implementation continues.<br />

4.6 Other Issues<br />

This section reports the issues that were brought up that do not fit in the categories above.<br />

The design of large trucks is a problem for pedestrians for two reasons. Trucks have wider and<br />

off-track turning radii, which many pedestrians, particularly children, do not realize (or perhaps<br />

think about); a pedestrian may, through ignorance or inattention, stand in an area that is the path<br />

of a turning truck. The second problem is that the driver’s sight lines are frequently blocked<br />

directly in front of or near the sides and rear of the truck. Again, this problem is more severe for<br />

children, both from their lack of knowledge and their shorter height. Trucks may leave the<br />

designated truck routes, either because of street blockages causing them to seek a less congested<br />

route or due to getting lost. In these cases they end up on narrow residential streets where they<br />

are even more dangerous because of higher volumes of pedestrians or children on residential<br />

streets.<br />

<strong>NYMTC</strong> <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Study</strong> 52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!