NYMTC Regional Pedestrian Safety Study - New York Metropolitan ...

NYMTC Regional Pedestrian Safety Study - New York Metropolitan ... NYMTC Regional Pedestrian Safety Study - New York Metropolitan ...

07.11.2014 Views

cars. Another result is that delivery trucks, the police, and occasionally other people park on the sidewalks. Another issue specific to New York City is the elevated structure. Pedestrians sometimes walk underneath the structures rather than on the sidewalks or stand behind columns waiting for a gap in traffic; however the columns obstruct sight lines and the shadows make it difficult for drivers to see the pedestrians. (The New York City Departments of City Planning and of Transportation recently studied this issue; see Subway/Sidewalk Interface Study, discussed in Section 3.3.) NYCDOT has installed raised medians at subway stations under elevated structures to provide pedestrian refuges and to improve the safety of passengers transferring between subways and buses. Continuously accessible paths, particularly from subways to parks, are often lacking due to lack of curb cuts, inadequate provision of pedestrian crossing of high-volume and high-speed arterials, or obstructions. Low density areas The auto-dominated society discourages people from walking. In some areas, pedestrians are rare enough to be considered out of the ordinary or eccentric. Children are driven everywhere, with the result that they do not develop good pedestrian habits. Pedestrian facilities are seen as unnecessary and therefore omitted. There are many multi-lane arterials with high traffic volumes and speeds, and long distances between pedestrian cross walks. Often the cycle lengths of the signals are long (on Long Island, up to three minutes) making pedestrians and drivers impatient. The crossing distance is wide and seldom has refuges for the pedestrians. Often the arterials do not have sidewalks, causing the pedestrians to walk along the shoulder, with no separation between them and the traffic. If the shoulder is widened to provide additional space for pedestrians, the effect on traffic is to increase speed. When there are sidewalks, they are in the highway clear zone, again with little or no separation. An issue with differing opinions is the use of a barrier to separate motorized and non-motorized users of the highway on high-speed facilities; it was pointed out that the barrier may give the pedestrian a false sense of security and they can deflect when hit becoming a hazard to the pedestrian. Many communities do not have sidewalks or the sidewalks are poorly placed or not continuous. Many destinations that attract pedestrians, such as parks, do not have sidewalk access. When there are sidewalks, lack of access management has resulted in closely spaced driveways and curb cuts, making it inconvenient and less safe to use the sidewalks, particularly for pedestrians with disabilities. Lack of space to put sidewalks can be a problem in rural areas also, for example on old farm roads in areas with recent population growth. A related problem is where there is a sidewalk but the right of way is narrow or the road has been widened, with the result that the sidewalk is close to the moving traffic, making it less safe as well as unpleasant to use. NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Study 48

Some sidewalks are poorly designed or constructed. Sometimes utility poles or trees block the walks, forcing pedestrians into the street. This can be an even more severe problem for someone in a wheelchair or pushing a stroller. Often they are not wide enough, even when the space is available. The cross gradient may be too steep for comfort, particularly for the older or disabled pedestrian. The design of the roadway or its environment may unintentionally encourage drivers to speed up on certain sections, for example where a curve makes a higher speed more enjoyable or a wider right of way suggests there are no conflicts. These sections are not consistent with use by nonmotorized traffic. 4.5 Challenges to Improving Pedestrian Safety One of the questions asked during the interviews was about the barriers that the agencies have encountered in improving pedestrian safety. Most of their answers fit into one of four categories: resources; conflicts between jurisdictions; conflicts of opinions and/or habits within agencies; and lack of land use control. An issue that came up many times was people’s perception that pedestrian safety is not a major problem. Because of this perception they do not make the changes in behavior needed to improve it. Different people made this comment about the public in general, about either or both pedestrians and drivers, about traffic engineers or the people at the top of the agencies, or about the mayor, zoning boards, city councils, or the police. There is a perception among many people involved in pedestrian safety that police do not place priority on enforcing laws affecting pedestrians, whether the infraction is by the pedestrian or a driver (see Section 5.4, Enforcement). Resources Lack of funding was mentioned many times, but then not having enough funding is a problem for most activities. The vast extent of the existing transportation infrastructure in the region increases the resource cost of improving it or maintaining it in good repair. Another funding issue was getting funds for stand-alone sidewalk projects. Including sidewalks in a major reconstruction project is not a problem, but adding sidewalks to a roadway that does not otherwise need improvements can be difficult. Sometimes the issue is not lack of funding but not being aware of the appropriate grant programs. Smaller municipalities are not aware of the grant programs and don’t have the resources to look for them. Funding for safety projects is frequently targeted to locations with high incidences of fatal accidents as shown by crash data. Given that in most locations the majority of fatalities are vehicle occupants, not pedestrians, it can be difficult to get money for pedestrian safety improvements. This suggests that there is a need for funding targeted specifically to pedestrian (or non-motorized) safety. NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Study 49

cars. Another result is that delivery trucks, the police, and occasionally other people park on<br />

the sidewalks.<br />

Another issue specific to <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City is the elevated structure. <strong>Pedestrian</strong>s sometimes walk<br />

underneath the structures rather than on the sidewalks or stand behind columns waiting for a gap<br />

in traffic; however the columns obstruct sight lines and the shadows make it difficult for drivers<br />

to see the pedestrians. (The <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> City Departments of City Planning and of Transportation<br />

recently studied this issue; see Subway/Sidewalk Interface <strong>Study</strong>, discussed in Section 3.3.)<br />

NYCDOT has installed raised medians at subway stations under elevated structures to provide<br />

pedestrian refuges and to improve the safety of passengers transferring between subways and<br />

buses.<br />

Continuously accessible paths, particularly from subways to parks, are often lacking due to lack<br />

of curb cuts, inadequate provision of pedestrian crossing of high-volume and high-speed<br />

arterials, or obstructions.<br />

Low density areas<br />

The auto-dominated society discourages people from walking. In some areas, pedestrians are<br />

rare enough to be considered out of the ordinary or eccentric. Children are driven everywhere,<br />

with the result that they do not develop good pedestrian habits. <strong>Pedestrian</strong> facilities are seen as<br />

unnecessary and therefore omitted.<br />

There are many multi-lane arterials with high traffic volumes and speeds, and long distances<br />

between pedestrian cross walks. Often the cycle lengths of the signals are long (on Long Island,<br />

up to three minutes) making pedestrians and drivers impatient. The crossing distance is wide and<br />

seldom has refuges for the pedestrians. Often the arterials do not have sidewalks, causing the<br />

pedestrians to walk along the shoulder, with no separation between them and the traffic. If the<br />

shoulder is widened to provide additional space for pedestrians, the effect on traffic is to increase<br />

speed. When there are sidewalks, they are in the highway clear zone, again with little or no<br />

separation. An issue with differing opinions is the use of a barrier to separate motorized and<br />

non-motorized users of the highway on high-speed facilities; it was pointed out that the barrier<br />

may give the pedestrian a false sense of security and they can deflect when hit becoming a<br />

hazard to the pedestrian.<br />

Many communities do not have sidewalks or the sidewalks are poorly placed or not continuous.<br />

Many destinations that attract pedestrians, such as parks, do not have sidewalk access. When<br />

there are sidewalks, lack of access management has resulted in closely spaced driveways and<br />

curb cuts, making it inconvenient and less safe to use the sidewalks, particularly for pedestrians<br />

with disabilities.<br />

Lack of space to put sidewalks can be a problem in rural areas also, for example on old farm<br />

roads in areas with recent population growth. A related problem is where there is a sidewalk but<br />

the right of way is narrow or the road has been widened, with the result that the sidewalk is close<br />

to the moving traffic, making it less safe as well as unpleasant to use.<br />

<strong>NYMTC</strong> <strong>Pedestrian</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Study</strong> 48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!