NYMTC Regional Pedestrian Safety Study - New York Metropolitan ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ewing, Reid, (1999) Traffic Calming: The State of the Practice, Washington, D.C: Institute of Transportation Engineers. [Available at http://www.ite.org/traffic/tcstate.htm#cgntc ] Fitzpatrick, Day, et al. (2006) “Another Look at Pedestrian Walking Speed,” presented at 85 th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 22-26. Fitzpatrick, Kay, Shawn Turner, et al. (2006) Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Intersections, TCRP112/NCHRP562. Available at: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_562.pdf ] GTSC (2006A) Traffic Safety Data Reports for 2004 by County, Governor’s Traffic Safety Committee. Available at: http://www.safeny.com/hsdata.htm GTSC (2006B) Highway Safety Strategic Plan 2006, Governor’s Traffic Safety Committee. Hagen, Lawrence (2006) “Selecting the Most Effective ITS Application for Pedestrian Safety in Florida,” Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, Report No. BC353-50. Harkey, David, and Charles Zegeer (2004) PedSafe: Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System, September 2004, for FHWA. Available at: http://www.walkinginfo.org/pedsafe/pedsafe_downloads.cfm Hilton, Judith, (2006), “Race and Ethnicity Factors in Fatal Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes 1999- 2004,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, May. [Available at: http://wwwnrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/Rpts/2006/809956.pdf] Huang, Herman F., and Michael J. Cynecki, “The Effects of Traffic Calming Measures on Pedestrian and Motorist Behavior, FHWA-RD-00-104, August 2001. Huang, Herman F., and Charles Zegeer (2000) The Effect of Pedestrian Countdown Signals in Lake Buena Vista, prepared by Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, for Florida Department of Transportation, November, 2000. [Available at: http://www.dot.state.fl.us/Safety/ped_bike/handbooks_and_research/research/CNT- REPT.pdf#search=%22herman%20huang%20charles%20zegeer%22 .] Huang, Herman, C. Zegeer, R. Nassi, and B. Fairfax (2000) The Effects of Innovative Pedestrian Signs at Unsignalized Locations: A Tale of Three Treatments, prepared by Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, for FHWA, August, 2000. [Available at: http://www.tfhrc.gov/safety/pedbike/pubs/00-098.pdf ] IIHS (2005) “Q & A: Pedestrian: as of December 2005,” Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. [Available at: http://www.iihs.org/research/qanda/peds.html] IIHS (2006), “Fatality Facts 2004: PEDESTRIANS,” Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. [Available at: http://www.iihs.org/research/fatality_facts/pedestrians.html#sec1] NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Study 108
ITE (1998) Design and Safety of Pedestrian Facilities, Institute of Transportation Engineers. [Available at: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/docs/designsafety.pdf ] Karkee, Ganesh, et al. (2006) “An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an In-pavement Flashing Light System,” presented at 85 th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, January 2006. King, Michael R. (1999) “Calming New York City Intersections,” presented at Urban Street Symposium, Dallas, Texas, June 1999. [Available at: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec019/Ec019_i3.pdf .] Knoblauch, R.L., et al. (2004), “The Pedestrian and Bicyclist Highway Safety Problem As It Relates to the Hispanic Population in the United States.” Available at: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/docs/03p00324/index.htm#toc Leaf, W.A., and D.F. Preusser (1999) Literature Review on Vehicle Travel Speeds and Pedestrian Injuries, Preusser Research Group, for National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, October 1999. [Available at: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/research/pub/HS809012.html ] Markowitz, Frank, S. Sciortino, J. L. Fleck, and B.M. Yee (2006) “Pedestrian Countdown Signals: Experience with an Extensive Pilot Installation,” in ITE Journal, pp. 43-48, January. McMahon, Patrick J., et al. (2002) An Analysis of Factors Contributing to “Walking Along Roadway” Crashes, University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, prepared for FHWA, February 2002. [Available at: http://www.walkinginfo.org/pdf/rd/SidewalkReport.pdf ] NCSA (2006). “Traffic Safety Facts, 2004 Data: Pedestrians,” National Center for Statistics and Analysis. [Available at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSF2004/809913.pdf ] NCSA (2006B). Traffic Safety Facts 2004: A Compilation of Motor Vehicle Crash Data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and the General Estimates System, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, NHTSA, U.S. DOT. [Available at: http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/nrd-30/NCSA/TSFAnn/TSF2004.pdf ] NHTSA (2000) Strengthening The Citizen and Law Enforcement Partnership at The Traffic Stop: Professionalism is a Two-Way Street. [Available at: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/injury/enforce/professionalism/index.html ] NHTSA (2004) “Date Collection Study: Deaths and Injuries Resulting from Certain Non-Traffic and Non-Crash Events,” U.S. Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, May. [Available at: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/problems/studies/NonTraffic-NonCrash/] NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Study 109
Page 1 and 2:
New York Metropolitan Transportatio
Page 3 and 4:
1. Report No. 2. Government Accessi
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Figures 2.1 Ten Year Trend
Page 9 and 10:
I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Study Origin an
Page 11 and 12:
in the United States; the 2004 data
Page 13 and 14:
Table 1.1 Organizations That Were I
Page 15 and 16:
II. BACKGROUND ON PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 2.1 Ten Year Trend in Pedest
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 2.3 Historic Trend in Annual
Page 21 and 22:
than fatality rates.) The most noti
Page 23 and 24:
III. ORGANIZATIONS FOR PEDESTRIAN S
Page 25 and 26:
• Updating and creating new stand
Page 27 and 28:
The New York State Metropolitan Pla
Page 29 and 30:
getting input from people who have
Page 31 and 32:
i. 20% of priority crash locations
Page 33 and 34:
located by reference marker (the sm
Page 35 and 36:
that the proper signage and other t
Page 37 and 38:
and funding has been secured to adv
Page 39 and 40:
Westchester County and NYSDOT have
Page 41 and 42:
programs in each borough. The NYCDO
Page 43 and 44:
IV. PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ISSUES IN THE
Page 45 and 46:
Drivers: Typical statements about d
Page 47 and 48:
• Ability to lift foot high decre
Page 49 and 50:
The national data indicates that th
Page 51 and 52:
Vendors Vendors set up their carts
Page 53 and 54:
Table 4.1 Continued Staten Island H
Page 55 and 56:
4.4 Existing Infrastructure and Lan
Page 57 and 58:
Some sidewalks are poorly designed
Page 59 and 60:
pedestrian design. At least one per
Page 61 and 62:
Crosswalks need to be more visible.
Page 63 and 64:
V COUNTERMEASURES AND STRATEGIES Th
Page 65 and 66: timing and street lighting. New Jer
Page 67 and 68: Providing Sidewalks: Walking-along-
Page 69 and 70: the pedestrian crash rate was signi
Page 71 and 72: Speed management through engineerin
Page 73 and 74: nearby streets. Whereas Bus-pedestr
Page 75 and 76: and have geometric curvature that e
Page 77 and 78: Roadway narrowings are used to prov
Page 79 and 80: have experienced a maintenance prob
Page 81 and 82: measures with specific geographic a
Page 83 and 84: and 3.0 feet per second more approp
Page 85 and 86: Figure 5.17 Split Phase Cycle Sourc
Page 87 and 88: Combined Automatic and Actuated Sig
Page 89 and 90: 5.2.5 Visibility To insure safety,
Page 91 and 92: Pedestrian Crosswalk Signs: There a
Page 93 and 94: also be placed next to the stop lin
Page 95 and 96: Table 5.5 Crash Reduction Factors f
Page 97 and 98: ask them to act as role models for
Page 99 and 100: 5.3.3 Educating Local Officials and
Page 101 and 102: • Good planning and organization.
Page 103 and 104: VI. FUNDING Funding for pedestrian
Page 105 and 106: York, Projects are chosen by the NY
Page 107 and 108: NHTSA distributes the Section 402 f
Page 109 and 110: VII. RECOMMENDATIONS As noted in Ch
Page 111 and 112: o Safe Routes to School • NYMTC s
Page 113 and 114: easy to use is residential populati
Page 115: REFERENCES American Council of the
Page 119 and 120: Parsons Brincherhoff Quade & Dougla
Page 121 and 122: Intentionally left blank. NYMTC Ped
Page 123 and 124: Intentionally left blank. NYMTC Ped
Page 125 and 126: NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Interview f
Page 127 and 128: 12. Do you have any strategies or t
Page 129 and 130: Appendix B: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY CONTA
Page 131 and 132: New York City Department of Transpo
Page 133 and 134: Suffolk County Department of Public
Page 135 and 136: Appendix C: TRAFFIC SAFETY BOARD CO
Page 137 and 138: Appendix D: ON LINE PEDESTRIAN SAFE
Page 139 and 140: FARS Query System is an interactive
Page 141 and 142: Education and Enforcement Counterme
Page 143 and 144: Appendix E: NEW YORK CITY FATATLIES
Page 145 and 146: Appendix F: Prompt Lists for Pedest
Page 147 and 148: Pedestrian Safety Prompt List Gener
Page 149 and 150: pathway provide direct access to wa
Page 151 and 152: If so, is there a sign that explain
show all

NYMTC Regional Pedestrian Safety Study - New York Metropolitan ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?