NYMTC Regional Pedestrian Safety Study - New York Metropolitan ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Model ice cream truck ordinance: Suggested provisions are restricting the types of locations were the trucks are allowed and requiring other vehicles to stop before passing them. • Model bus stop ordinance: Requiring bus stops to be far-side, where possible (see Section 5.2.6 for some exceptions), would reduce the danger of pedestrians crossing in front of the bus after disembarking. • Multiple vehicle overtaking ordinance: This would require vehicles to stop if another vehicle is stopped at a cross walk, reducing crashes caused by vehicles that have stopped for pedestrians and thereby block the view of overtaking vehicles. (The purpose is similar to that of the bus stop ordinance.) • Parking near intersections or crosswalk ordinance: The ordinance would prohibit parking within 15 to 18 meters of a crosswalk, again with the objective of increasing visibility. NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Study 94
VI. FUNDING Funding for pedestrian safety projects came up frequently during the interviews. This section provides a brief summary of funding strategies and sources. 6.1 Funding Strategies The new manual, How to Develop a Pedestrian Safety Action Plan (Zegeer et al., 2006; available at http://www.walkinginfo.org/pp/howtoguide2006.pdf), suggests four strategies for funding pedestrian safety improvements: ♦ Routine accommodation in new projects ♦ Partnerships ♦ Dedicated funds and set asides ♦ Annual maintenance budget Routine accommodation in new projects: Several agencies in the NYMTC region are already doing this as a routine planning measure, and in fact, all roadway and transit projects should be analyzed for associated pedestrian improvements. Project selection criteria for inclusion in the TIP could be modified to promote projects that have pedestrian safety components. NYSDOT has a “Pedestrian Generator Checklist” in Chapter 18 the NYSDOT Design Manual for determining if pedestrian improvements should be made as part of a project. [Available at: http://www.dot.state.ny.us/cmb/consult/hdmfiles/chapt_18.pdf] Partnerships: The partnership might be with another public agency or with a private developer. Possible examples of projects to partner with are utility work along a roadway could or the construction of a new school. An important partnership that should be considered for many projects is using NHTSA funds (through the local Traffic Safety Board and GTSC) to add enforcement and education components to engineering projects. Another suggestion is grouping several small pedestrian improvement projects and including them with a nearby larger project. Dedicated funds and set asides: NYSDOT, NYMTC, or a local government can set up a dedicated fund or set aside a percentage of a larger fund to be used specifically for pedestrian safety improvements. NYSDOT Regions typically block out funds for future pedestrian projects in their 12 year capital programs. A similar possibility is to establish a sidewalk fund with fees paid by developers in lieu of building sidewalks in their projects. The funds could then be used for pedestrian facilities where they are most needed. The manual cautions that the dedicated fund should not be used for routine accommodation in projects. Annual maintenance budget: Small improvements, such as widening a sidewalk or providing high visibility crosswalks, can be included during maintenance. An important strategy for obtaining funding is to develop a sidewalk plan (or sidewalk and bicycle plan) to identify and prioritize pedestrian infrastructure needs. The plan would provide NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Study 95
Page 1 and 2:
New York Metropolitan Transportatio
Page 3 and 4:
1. Report No. 2. Government Accessi
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Figures 2.1 Ten Year Trend
Page 9 and 10:
I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Study Origin an
Page 11 and 12:
in the United States; the 2004 data
Page 13 and 14:
Table 1.1 Organizations That Were I
Page 15 and 16:
II. BACKGROUND ON PEDESTRIAN SAFETY
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 2.1 Ten Year Trend in Pedest
Page 19 and 20:
Figure 2.3 Historic Trend in Annual
Page 21 and 22:
than fatality rates.) The most noti
Page 23 and 24:
III. ORGANIZATIONS FOR PEDESTRIAN S
Page 25 and 26:
• Updating and creating new stand
Page 27 and 28:
The New York State Metropolitan Pla
Page 29 and 30:
getting input from people who have
Page 31 and 32:
i. 20% of priority crash locations
Page 33 and 34:
located by reference marker (the sm
Page 35 and 36:
that the proper signage and other t
Page 37 and 38:
and funding has been secured to adv
Page 39 and 40:
Westchester County and NYSDOT have
Page 41 and 42:
programs in each borough. The NYCDO
Page 43 and 44:
IV. PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ISSUES IN THE
Page 45 and 46:
Drivers: Typical statements about d
Page 47 and 48:
• Ability to lift foot high decre
Page 49 and 50:
The national data indicates that th
Page 51 and 52: Vendors Vendors set up their carts
Page 53 and 54: Table 4.1 Continued Staten Island H
Page 55 and 56: 4.4 Existing Infrastructure and Lan
Page 57 and 58: Some sidewalks are poorly designed
Page 59 and 60: pedestrian design. At least one per
Page 61 and 62: Crosswalks need to be more visible.
Page 63 and 64: V COUNTERMEASURES AND STRATEGIES Th
Page 65 and 66: timing and street lighting. New Jer
Page 67 and 68: Providing Sidewalks: Walking-along-
Page 69 and 70: the pedestrian crash rate was signi
Page 71 and 72: Speed management through engineerin
Page 73 and 74: nearby streets. Whereas Bus-pedestr
Page 75 and 76: and have geometric curvature that e
Page 77 and 78: Roadway narrowings are used to prov
Page 79 and 80: have experienced a maintenance prob
Page 81 and 82: measures with specific geographic a
Page 83 and 84: and 3.0 feet per second more approp
Page 85 and 86: Figure 5.17 Split Phase Cycle Sourc
Page 87 and 88: Combined Automatic and Actuated Sig
Page 89 and 90: 5.2.5 Visibility To insure safety,
Page 91 and 92: Pedestrian Crosswalk Signs: There a
Page 93 and 94: also be placed next to the stop lin
Page 95 and 96: Table 5.5 Crash Reduction Factors f
Page 97 and 98: ask them to act as role models for
Page 99 and 100: 5.3.3 Educating Local Officials and
Page 101: • Good planning and organization.
Page 105 and 106: York, Projects are chosen by the NY
Page 107 and 108: NHTSA distributes the Section 402 f
Page 109 and 110: VII. RECOMMENDATIONS As noted in Ch
Page 111 and 112: o Safe Routes to School • NYMTC s
Page 113 and 114: easy to use is residential populati
Page 115 and 116: REFERENCES American Council of the
Page 117 and 118: ITE (1998) Design and Safety of Ped
Page 119 and 120: Parsons Brincherhoff Quade & Dougla
Page 121 and 122: Intentionally left blank. NYMTC Ped
Page 123 and 124: Intentionally left blank. NYMTC Ped
Page 125 and 126: NYMTC Pedestrian Safety Interview f
Page 127 and 128: 12. Do you have any strategies or t
Page 129 and 130: Appendix B: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY CONTA
Page 131 and 132: New York City Department of Transpo
Page 133 and 134: Suffolk County Department of Public
Page 135 and 136: Appendix C: TRAFFIC SAFETY BOARD CO
Page 137 and 138: Appendix D: ON LINE PEDESTRIAN SAFE
Page 139 and 140: FARS Query System is an interactive
Page 141 and 142: Education and Enforcement Counterme
Page 143 and 144: Appendix E: NEW YORK CITY FATATLIES
Page 145 and 146: Appendix F: Prompt Lists for Pedest
Page 147 and 148: Pedestrian Safety Prompt List Gener
Page 149 and 150: pathway provide direct access to wa
Page 151 and 152: If so, is there a sign that explain
show all

NYMTC Regional Pedestrian Safety Study - New York Metropolitan ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?