NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us
NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us
NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINAL PROGRAMMATIC BIOLOGICAL OPINION ON U.S. NAVY ACTIVITIES IN THE HAWAII RANGE COMPLEX 2008-2013<br />
spp., mel<strong>on</strong>-headed whale, pantropical spotted dolphin, pygmy killer whale, short-finned pilot whale, striped<br />
dolphin, and Cuvier’s, L<strong>on</strong>gman’s, and Blainville’s beaked whales).<br />
In July 2007, the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> published a Draft Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Statement and Overseas Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact<br />
Statement <strong>on</strong> activities the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> planned to c<strong>on</strong>duct in the Hawai'i Range Complex. The DEIS evaluated the<br />
potential effects of alternatives to the <strong>Navy</strong>’s <strong>us</strong>e of the range, including current and additi<strong>on</strong>al <strong>training</strong> activities and<br />
Research, Development, Test and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> activities in the range.<br />
Between October 2007 and December 2007, pers<strong>on</strong>nel from the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g> met numero<strong>us</strong> times to disc<strong>us</strong>s<br />
(1) different approaches and methods that could be <strong>us</strong>ed to estimate the number of marine mammals that might be<br />
exposed to mid-frequency active s<strong>on</strong>ar during exercises; (2) different methods that could be <strong>us</strong>ed to estimate the<br />
proporti<strong>on</strong> of a “populati<strong>on</strong>” of marine mammals that might experience behavioral “harassment” (as that term is<br />
defined by the ESA and Marine Mammal Protecti<strong>on</strong> Act of 1972, as amended) given their exposure to mid-frequency<br />
active s<strong>on</strong>ar; and (3) different approaches and methods to m<strong>on</strong>itor and mitigate the potential effects of midfrequency<br />
active s<strong>on</strong>ar <strong>on</strong> marine animals (marine mammals, sea turtles, and fish).<br />
In February 2008, the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> prepared a Supplement to its July 2007 Draft Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Statement and<br />
Overseas Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Statement <strong>on</strong> activities the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> planned to c<strong>on</strong>duct in the Hawai'i Range<br />
Complex. In this supplement to the DEIS, the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> developed and selected a new preferred alternative. On 9<br />
May 2008, the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> published its Final Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact Statement and Overseas Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Impact<br />
Statement <strong>on</strong> activities the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> planned to c<strong>on</strong>duct in the Hawai'i Range Complex.<br />
On 6 June 2008, <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g> provided the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> with an electr<strong>on</strong>ic copy of its draft preliminary biological opini<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong><br />
the activities the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> planned to c<strong>on</strong>duct in the Hawai’i Range Complex from January 2009 through January<br />
2014. On 15 June 2008, the <strong>Navy</strong> provided its comments <strong>on</strong> that draft document. On 21 June 2008, <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g> issued a<br />
final biological opini<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong>’s proposal to c<strong>on</strong>duct Rim of the Pacific Exercises in the Hawai’i Range<br />
Complex in July 2008 and other <strong>training</strong> activities in the Hawai’i Range Complex from July 2008 through the third<br />
week of January 2009.<br />
On 23 June 2008, <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g> published a proposed rule in the Federal Register <strong>on</strong> the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong>’s request for a letter of<br />
authorizati<strong>on</strong> to “take” marine mammals incidental to <strong>training</strong> activities the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> planned to c<strong>on</strong>duct in the<br />
Hawai’i Range Complex.<br />
On 26 June 2008, <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g> provided copies of its preliminary biological opini<strong>on</strong> to the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> and the Permits<br />
Divisi<strong>on</strong>. After <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g> issued that preliminary biological opini<strong>on</strong>, the timing and scope of the acti<strong>on</strong> changed from the<br />
timing and scope that had been c<strong>on</strong>sidered in <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ preliminary biological opini<strong>on</strong>. Specifically, the durati<strong>on</strong> of the<br />
proposed permit changed from January 2009 – January 2014 to December 2008 – December 2013 and the proposed<br />
acti<strong>on</strong> expanded to include a series of multi-strike exercises that had not been included in the preliminary biological<br />
opini<strong>on</strong>. Those changes were sufficient to require <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g> to prepare a new, final biological opini<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the proposed<br />
acti<strong>on</strong> rather than affirm its preliminary biological opini<strong>on</strong> as final.<br />
3