07.11.2014 Views

NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us

NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us

NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINAL PROGRAMMATIC BIOLOGICAL OPINION ON U.S. NAVY ACTIVITIES IN THE HAWAII RANGE COMPLEX 2008-2013<br />

levels between 140 and 195 dB. No m<strong>on</strong>k seals would be exposed to received levels greater than 195 dB associated<br />

with these other <strong>training</strong> activities.<br />

Of the 171 instances in which <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ exposure models identified Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seals that might be exposed to<br />

mid-frequency active s<strong>on</strong>ar at received levels between 140 and 195 dB, about 100 of those instances would involve<br />

exposures at received levels between 140 and 150 dB and 49 other instances would involve exposures at received<br />

levels between 150 and 160 dB. The balance of the exposures would occur at received levels greater than 160 dB. In<br />

three instances, Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seals might be exposed at received levels sufficient to temporarily ca<strong>us</strong>e noiseinduced<br />

hearing loss.<br />

The informati<strong>on</strong> available does not allow <strong>us</strong> to assess the probable resp<strong>on</strong>ses of Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seals after they are<br />

exposed to mid-frequency active s<strong>on</strong>ar transmissi<strong>on</strong>s. In the past, we have assumed the Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seals do not<br />

seem likely to resp<strong>on</strong>d to those transmissi<strong>on</strong>s beca<strong>us</strong>e the s<strong>on</strong>ar that would be <strong>us</strong>ed during the anti-submarine<br />

warfare exercises transmits at frequencies below hearing thresholds for Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seals. However, the U.S.<br />

<strong>Navy</strong> has c<strong>on</strong>cluded that at least <strong>on</strong>e of these m<strong>on</strong>k seals might accumulate aco<strong>us</strong>tic energy sufficient to produce a<br />

temporary shift in its hearing sensitivity. Although this is an important c<strong>on</strong>cl<strong>us</strong>i<strong>on</strong>, it does not allow <strong>us</strong> to assess the<br />

potential fitness c<strong>on</strong>sequences of the noise-induced loss in hearing sensitivity beca<strong>us</strong>e we do not know the<br />

magnitude of the loss in hearing sensitivity (a 3 dB loss in sensitivity vers<strong>us</strong> a 10 dB loss in sensitivity), how l<strong>on</strong>g<br />

the animal might be impaired (for example, does the animal recover in minutes, hours, or days), or the frequency<br />

range affected by the loss (that is, what envir<strong>on</strong>mental cues might the animal fail to detect).<br />

At a minimum, we would assume that a Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seal that experienced a loss in hearing sensitivity would be<br />

aware of the impairment and would experience a stress resp<strong>on</strong>se as a result. We assume that, like the whales<br />

disc<strong>us</strong>sed previo<strong>us</strong>ly, m<strong>on</strong>k seals are likely to try to avoid being exposed to vessel traffic, active s<strong>on</strong>ar, and soundproducing<br />

exercises such as gunnery exercises or sink exercises. We do not have the informati<strong>on</strong> necessary to<br />

determine which of the many sounds associated with an exercise is likely to trigger avoidance behavior in Hawai’ian<br />

m<strong>on</strong>k seals (for example, engine noise, helicopter rotors, ordnance discharges, explosi<strong>on</strong>s, or some combinati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

these), but these relatively shy animals are likely to avoid the general area in which an exercise would occur by<br />

remaining close to a shoreline or <strong>on</strong> a beach. This avoidance will not prevent m<strong>on</strong>k seals from being exposed to<br />

received levels of active s<strong>on</strong>ar or explosi<strong>on</strong>s, but it would prevent m<strong>on</strong>k seals from being exposed at received levels<br />

that would injure a m<strong>on</strong>k seal, ca<strong>us</strong>e them physiological distress,or alter their reproductive success.<br />

As disc<strong>us</strong>sed in the Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Baseline secti<strong>on</strong> of this <str<strong>on</strong>g>Opini<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, Hawaiian m<strong>on</strong>k seals have been exposed to U.S.<br />

<strong>Navy</strong> <strong>training</strong> activities in the Hawai'i Range Complex, including vessel traffic, aircraft traffic, active s<strong>on</strong>ar, and<br />

underwater det<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s, for more than a generati<strong>on</strong>. Although we do not know if more m<strong>on</strong>k seals might have <strong>us</strong>ed<br />

the acti<strong>on</strong> area or the reproductive success of m<strong>on</strong>k seals in the Hawai'i Range Complex would be higher absent their<br />

exposure to these activities, the rate at which Hawaiian m<strong>on</strong>k seals occur in the Main Hawai'ian Islands suggests that<br />

m<strong>on</strong>k seals numbers in the acti<strong>on</strong> area c<strong>on</strong>tinue to increases despite exposure to earlier <strong>training</strong> regimes. Although<br />

the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> proposes to increase the frequency of some of these activities, we do not believe those increases are<br />

likely to affect the rate at which m<strong>on</strong>k seal counts in the Main Hawai'ian Islands are increasing.<br />

251

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!