07.11.2014 Views

NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us

NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us

NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINAL PROGRAMMATIC BIOLOGICAL OPINION ON U.S. NAVY ACTIVITIES IN THE HAWAII RANGE COMPLEX 2008-2013<br />

Integrati<strong>on</strong> and Synthesis of Effects<br />

In the Assessment Approach secti<strong>on</strong> of this <str<strong>on</strong>g>Opini<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, we stated that we measure risks to individuals of endangered or<br />

threatened species <strong>us</strong>ing changes in the individuals’ “fitness” or the individual’s growth, survival, annual<br />

reproductive success, and lifetime reproductive success. When we do not expect listed plants or animals exposed to<br />

an acti<strong>on</strong>’s effects to experience reducti<strong>on</strong>s in fitness, we would not expect the acti<strong>on</strong> to have adverse c<strong>on</strong>sequences<br />

<strong>on</strong> the viability of the populati<strong>on</strong>s those individuals represent or the species those populati<strong>on</strong>s comprise (Anders<strong>on</strong><br />

2000, Mills and Beatty 1979, Brand<strong>on</strong> 1978, Stearns 1977, 1992). As a result, if we c<strong>on</strong>clude that listed plants or<br />

animals are not likely to experience reducti<strong>on</strong>s in their fitness, we would c<strong>on</strong>clude our assessment.<br />

The following disc<strong>us</strong>si<strong>on</strong>s summarize the probable risks the <strong>training</strong> exercises and other activities the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong><br />

plans to c<strong>on</strong>duct in the Hawai'i Range Complex each year for the next five years pose to threatened and endangered<br />

species that are likely to be exposed to those transmissi<strong>on</strong>s. These summaries integrate the results of the exposure<br />

and resp<strong>on</strong>se analyes we presented previo<strong>us</strong>ly with background informati<strong>on</strong> from the Stat<strong>us</strong> of the Species secti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

this <str<strong>on</strong>g>Opini<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> to assess the potential risks the <strong>training</strong> is likely to pose to endangered and threatened individuals, the<br />

populati<strong>on</strong> or populati<strong>on</strong>s those individuals represent, and the “species” that have been listed pursuant to the<br />

Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended.<br />

BLUE WHALES. During future Rim of the Pacific Exercises, the first scenario (which assumed that animals would not<br />

move) identified 140 instances in which blue whales might be exposed to mid-frequency active s<strong>on</strong>ar at received<br />

levels between 140 and 195 dB and no instances in which blue whales might be exposed at received levels between<br />

195 and 215 dB. During the other anti-submarine exercises (USWEX, TRACKEX, and TORPEX) the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> plans to<br />

c<strong>on</strong>duct in the Hawai’i Range Complex each year, the first scenario identified another 351 instances in which blue<br />

whales might be exposed to mid-frequency active s<strong>on</strong>ar transmissi<strong>on</strong>s at received levels between 140 and 195 dB.<br />

No blue whales would be exposed to received levels greater than 195 dB associated with these other <strong>training</strong><br />

activities.<br />

Of the 489 instances in which <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g>’ exposure models identified blue whales that might be exposed to midfrequency<br />

active s<strong>on</strong>ar at received levels between 140 and 195 dB, about 286 of those instances would involve<br />

exposures at received levels between 140 and 150 dB. Another 136 of those instances would involve exposures at<br />

received levels between 150 and 160 dB. The balance of the exposures would occur at received levels greater than<br />

160 dB.<br />

As disc<strong>us</strong>sed in the introducti<strong>on</strong> to our Exposure Analyses, it is important to note that these estimates probably overestimate<br />

the actual number of blue whales that might be exposed to <strong>on</strong>e or more of the activities the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> plans<br />

239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!