NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us
NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us
NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FINAL PROGRAMMATIC BIOLOGICAL OPINION ON U.S. NAVY ACTIVITIES IN THE HAWAII RANGE COMPLEX 2008-2013<br />
proposes to c<strong>on</strong>duct in the Hawai'i Range Complex transmits at frequencies that are substantially higher than the<br />
hearing thresholds of sea turtles. As a result, sea turtles are not likely to resp<strong>on</strong>d up<strong>on</strong> being exposed to midfrequency<br />
active s<strong>on</strong>ar.<br />
5.3.5 Probable Resp<strong>on</strong>ses of Listed Species to Explosi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
The U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> proposes to employ a suite of measures to protect endangered and threatened marine mammals and<br />
sea turtles from being exposed to underwater det<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s and mining operati<strong>on</strong>s during the activities they plan to<br />
c<strong>on</strong>duct in the Hawai'i Range Complex (including sinking exercises). These measures involve site-selecti<strong>on</strong><br />
procedures, excl<strong>us</strong>i<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>es, and m<strong>on</strong>itoring protocols that comply with Marine Protecti<strong>on</strong>, Research, and<br />
Sanctuaries Act permits as well as procedures developed and tested during the ship shock trial <strong>on</strong> the USS WINSTON S<br />
CHURCHILL. These m<strong>on</strong>itoring protocols were studied extensively (Clarke and Norman 2005) and those studies<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cluded that the m<strong>on</strong>itoring protocols effectively insured that marine mammals or sea turtles did not occur within<br />
3.7 kilometers of the underwater det<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Despite these protective measures, the U.S. <strong>Navy</strong> identified five instances in which humpback whales might be<br />
exposed to pressure waves or sound fields associated with underwater det<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s at received levels that would<br />
ca<strong>us</strong>e behaviors that would be c<strong>on</strong>sidered behavioral harassment (as that term is defined by the MMPA) and in<br />
another four instances in which humpback whales might be exposed at received levels that might temporarily ca<strong>us</strong>e<br />
noise-induced hearing losses. that five humpback whales might be exposed to pressure waves or sound fields<br />
associated with underwater det<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s and another four humpback whales might be exposed at received levels that<br />
might temporarily ca<strong>us</strong>e noise-induced hearing losses. In additi<strong>on</strong>, in nine instances in which sperm whales might be<br />
exposed to pressure waves or sound fields associated with underwater det<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s at received levels that would<br />
ca<strong>us</strong>e behaviors that would be c<strong>on</strong>sidered behavioral harassment (as that term is defined by the MMPA) and in<br />
another four instances in which sperm whales might be exposed at received levels that might temporarily ca<strong>us</strong>e<br />
noise-induced hearing losses. that five humpback whales might be exposed to pressure waves or sound fields<br />
associated with underwater det<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s and another four humpback whales might be exposed at received levels that<br />
might temporarily ca<strong>us</strong>e noise-induced hearing losses. In three instances, Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seals might be exposed at<br />
received levels sufficient to temporarily ca<strong>us</strong>e noise-induced hearing loss. The <strong>Navy</strong>’s analyses and our analyses did<br />
not estimate the number of instances in which <strong>on</strong>e or more species of sea turtle might be exposed to pressure waves<br />
or sound field associated with underwater det<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Humpback whales were not reported to change the short-term behavior or distributi<strong>on</strong> in feeding areas in resp<strong>on</strong>se to<br />
explosi<strong>on</strong>s with received levels of about 150dB re 1 μPa/Hz at 350Hz (Lien et al. 1993, Todd et al. 1996). However,<br />
at least two individuals were probably killed by the high-intensity, impulsed blasts and had extensive mechanical<br />
injuries in their ears (Ketten et al. 1993, Todd et al. 1996). The explosi<strong>on</strong>s may also have increased the number of<br />
humpback whales entangled in fishing nets as they avoided the area in which the det<strong>on</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s occurred (Todd et al.<br />
1996).<br />
Klima et. al. (1988) c<strong>on</strong>ducted an experiment in which Kemp’s ridley and loggerhead turtles were placed in cages at<br />
four distances from a oil platform to be removed with explosives. The cages were submerged to a depth of 15 ft over<br />
the 30 ft sea bottom j<strong>us</strong>t prior to the simultaneo<strong>us</strong> explosi<strong>on</strong> of four 50.75 lb charges of nitromethane placed inside<br />
233