07.11.2014 Views

NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us

NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us

NMFS Biological Opinion on U.S. Navy training ... - Govsupport.us

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FINAL PROGRAMMATIC BIOLOGICAL OPINION ON U.S. NAVY ACTIVITIES IN THE HAWAII RANGE COMPLEX 2008-2013<br />

numbers of seals (Bailey 1952). A survey in 1958 suggested that the populati<strong>on</strong> had partially recovered from its<br />

initial collapse.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sistent declines in the m<strong>on</strong>k seal populati<strong>on</strong> trends have been recorded since range-wide surveys began in the<br />

late 1950s (survey results that were reported by Keny<strong>on</strong> and Rice 1959 and Rice 1960). Rice (1960) c<strong>on</strong>ducted<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>al counts at Midway Islands in 1956-1958 and Wirtz (1968) c<strong>on</strong>ducted counts at Kure Atoll in 1963-1965.<br />

Between the late 1950s and 1980s, counts at the atolls, islands, and reefs in the Northwest Hawai’ian Islands<br />

suggested a 50 percent decline in this populati<strong>on</strong> (Keny<strong>on</strong> 1973, Johns<strong>on</strong> et al. 1982). The total populati<strong>on</strong> for the<br />

five major breeding locati<strong>on</strong>s pl<strong>us</strong> Necker Island for 1987 was estimated to be 1,718 seals including 202 pups of the<br />

year (Gilmartin 1988). This compares with 1,488 animals estimated for 1983 (Gerrodette 1985). In 1992 the<br />

Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seal populati<strong>on</strong> was estimated to be 1580 (standard error = 147) (Ragen 1993). The best estimate of<br />

total abundance for 1993 was 1,406 (standard error = 131, assuming a c<strong>on</strong>stant coefficient of variati<strong>on</strong>).<br />

Beach counts of juveniles, sub-adults, and adults declined by about 5 percent per year from 1985 – 1993, and then<br />

became relatively stable until the current decline began in 2001 (<str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2007). Between 1958 and 1993, mean beach<br />

counts declined by 60 percent and included declines in the number of m<strong>on</strong>k seals at French Frigate Shoals, which<br />

<strong>on</strong>ce accounted for more than 50 percent of the total n<strong>on</strong>-pup beach counts am<strong>on</strong>g the six primary Northwest<br />

Hawai’ian Island sub-populati<strong>on</strong>s. Between the years 1958 and 2006, beach counts of juveniles, sub-adults and<br />

adults declined by 66 percent; the total abundance of m<strong>on</strong>k seals at the six primary subpopulati<strong>on</strong>s in the Northwest<br />

Hawai’ian Islands is declining at annual rate of 3.9% (95% CI = -4.8% to - 3.0%; <str<strong>on</strong>g>NMFS</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2007). In 2006, the m<strong>on</strong>k<br />

seal populati<strong>on</strong> was estimated to number about 1,200 animals.<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> the evidence available, Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seals exist as a populati<strong>on</strong> that is subject to the dynamics of<br />

“small” populati<strong>on</strong>s. That is, they experience phenomena such as demographic stochasticity, inbreeding depressi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

Allee effects, am<strong>on</strong>g others, that ca<strong>us</strong>e their populati<strong>on</strong> size to become a threat in and of itself. For example,<br />

Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seals have very low survival of juveniles and sub-adults due to starvati<strong>on</strong> (which is believed to be<br />

ca<strong>us</strong>ed by limitati<strong>on</strong>s in the food base), low juvenile survival has lead to low juvenile recruitment into the adult<br />

populati<strong>on</strong>, and the adult populati<strong>on</strong> increasingly c<strong>on</strong>sists of ageing females who reproductive success is expected to<br />

decline (if it has not already declined) in the foreseeable future. A positive feedback loop between reduced<br />

reproductive success of adult females and reduced recruitment into the adult populati<strong>on</strong> (which reduces the number<br />

of adult females) is the kind of demographic pattern that is likely to increase the m<strong>on</strong>k seal’s decline toward<br />

extincti<strong>on</strong>. As a result, we assume that Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seals have elevated extincti<strong>on</strong> probabilities beca<strong>us</strong>e of<br />

exogeno<strong>us</strong> threats ca<strong>us</strong>ed by anthropogenic activities (primarily whaling, entanglement, and ship strikes), natural<br />

phenomena (such as disease, predati<strong>on</strong>, or changes in the distributi<strong>on</strong> and abundance of their prey in resp<strong>on</strong>se to<br />

changing climate), and endogeno<strong>us</strong> threats ca<strong>us</strong>ed by the small size of their populati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Diving and Social Behavior<br />

Several recent studies of the foraging patterns of Hawai’ian m<strong>on</strong>k seals near rookeries in the northwestern Hawai’ian<br />

Islands provide insight into their diving behavior. Dive depths appear to differ slightly between rookeries as well as<br />

between age classes and genders. At Pearl and Hermes Reef, most dives were from 8-40 m with a sec<strong>on</strong>d much<br />

smaller node at 100- 120 m (Stewart, 2004). At Kure Atoll, most dives were shallower than 40 m, with males<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!