A numerical study on the thermal expansion coefficients of fiber
A numerical study on the thermal expansion coefficients of fiber A numerical study on the thermal expansion coefficients of fiber
45 ⎡ Ef ⎤ ⎢ ν 2 m 2 ( ) ( 1+ ν )( ) ⎥ m ν m −1 C E m α = − − ⎢ − ⎥ 2 α m α m αf (3.24) ⎢1+ 1.1υf 2 1 E f − ν + + ⎥ ⎢ m 2ν mC ⎣1.1υ − ⎥ f 1 C E m ⎦ in which C 1.1υ 1 −1.1υ f = (3.25) f 3.4.1.9 Equation of Chamis Chamis (1984) has used a simple force balance, or strength of materials, approach to derive expression for both mechanical and thermal properties of unidirectional composites with transversely isotropic fibers. The derived expression for the longitudinal thermal expansion coefficient is again identical to Schapery’s formula. The expression for the transverse thermal expansion coefficient is α ⎛ E f1 ⎞ ( 1 − υf ) ⎜1 + υf ν m m = α υ ⎟ (3.26) ⎝ ⎠ 2 f2 f + ⎜ α E1 3.4.1.10 Equation of Sideridis Sideridis (1994) has calculated the expansion coefficients of the composite using a model which introduces the concept of the boundary interphase. This concept determines the influence of the interphase which depends on the quality of adhesion between fiber and matrix. It has been assumed that the composite has well defined material properties for the fiber and matrix, whereas the interphase material has inhomogeneous properties (thermal expansion coefficient, the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio) varying from the fiber surface to the matrix. He also made the following assumptions:
46 • A perfect bonding exists at all surfaces. • The fiber and the matrix materials carry only tensile stresses. • The interphase material can only carry shear stresses. The equation for the longitudinal thermal expansion coefficient is ∫ () r E () r i α ′ f Ef υf + αmEmυm + αi i r dr rf α 1 = (3.27) 2 ri E + ′ f υf Emυm + ∫ Ei () r r dr 2 r rf m r and for the transverse thermal expansion coefficient is α 2 = ri ( 1+ ν ) α υ + ( 1+ ν ) α υ′ + ( 1+ ν () r ) α ( r) f f f − α ν 1 f m υ f m + ν m m υ′ m 2 r 2 m ∫ rf 2 + 2 r m ∫ ri rf ν i i () r r dr i dr (3.28) where r f , r i , r m are the outer radii of the fiber, the interphase and the matrix circular sections respectively, then the fractions of the respective phases are υ f 2 2 2 2 r ri − rf rm − rf = , υi = , υ′ m = (3.29) r r r 2 f 2 m 2 m 2 m with υ′ = 1− υ − υ (3.30) m f i The influence of the mode of variation of the interphase material properties (linear, hyperbolic and parabolic) on the thermal expansion coefficient was studied by Sideridis. However, it is inconvenient to determine the thermal expansion coefficient of a composite using equation of Sideridis, because determination of the
- Page 3 and 4: M.Sc THESIS EXAMINATION RESULT FORM
- Page 5 and 6: A NUMERICAL STUDY ON THE THERMAL EX
- Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS Page THESIS EXAMINATION RE
- Page 9 and 10: 4.2.1 Geometry Creation............
- Page 11 and 12: 2 coefficients of thermal expansion
- Page 13 and 14: 4 coefficients coincide to give res
- Page 15 and 16: 6 concentration from pure metal to
- Page 17 and 18: 8 high strength-to-weight and stiff
- Page 19 and 20: 10 polymers. Thermosetting polymers
- Page 21 and 22: 12 Metals are strong and tough. The
- Page 23 and 24: 14 Table 2.1 Properties of reinforc
- Page 25 and 26: 16 2.2.2.2 Carbon Fibers Carbon is
- Page 27 and 28: 18 use is in aircraft industry foll
- Page 29 and 30: 20 strength and a reasonable Young
- Page 31 and 32: 22 1. Processing the conventional f
- Page 33 and 34: 24 (orthorhombic) of polyethylene h
- Page 35 and 36: 26 Whiskers are monocrystalline sho
- Page 37 and 38: 28 3.2 Factors Affecting the Coeffi
- Page 39 and 40: 30 3.2.4 Thermal Cycling The primar
- Page 41 and 42: 32 3.3.1 Mechanical Dilatometry Thi
- Page 43 and 44: 34 absolute accuracy of about ± 0.
- Page 45 and 46: 36 3.3.3 Strain Gauges This relativ
- Page 47 and 48: 38 • The composite is macroscopic
- Page 49 and 50: 40 3.4.1.3 Equation of Van Fo Fy In
- Page 51 and 52: 42 and the thermal expansion coeffi
- Page 53: 44 P P 11 33 2 A 22 − A = Det A A
- Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER FOUR FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
- Page 59 and 60: 50 No matter how the geometry is cr
- Page 61 and 62: 52 displacements and/or rotations a
- Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER FIVE MICROMECHANICAL ANALYS
- Page 65 and 66: 56 5.2 Mesh Creation 10-node tetrah
- Page 67 and 68: 58 carbon fibers were assumed to ha
- Page 69 and 70: 60 Figure 5.6 The displacement fiel
- Page 71 and 72: 62 small differences between these
- Page 73 and 74: 64 Table 6.1 Comparison of the expe
- Page 75 and 76: 66 Longitudinal CTE (1/°C) 2.25E-0
- Page 77 and 78: 68 Longitudinal CTE (1/°C) 2.00E-0
- Page 79 and 80: 70 Longitudinal CTE (1/°C) 4.00E-0
- Page 81 and 82: 72 Longitudinal CTE (1/°C) 1.00E-0
- Page 83 and 84: 74 Ishikava, T., Koyama, K., & Koba
45<br />
⎡<br />
Ef<br />
⎤<br />
⎢<br />
ν<br />
2<br />
m<br />
2<br />
( )<br />
( 1+<br />
ν )( )<br />
⎥<br />
m<br />
ν<br />
m<br />
−1 C E<br />
m<br />
α = − − ⎢<br />
− ⎥<br />
2<br />
α<br />
m<br />
α<br />
m<br />
αf<br />
(3.24)<br />
⎢1+<br />
1.1υf<br />
2 1 E<br />
f<br />
− ν + +<br />
⎥<br />
⎢<br />
m<br />
2ν<br />
mC<br />
⎣1.1υ<br />
−<br />
⎥<br />
f<br />
1<br />
C E<br />
m ⎦<br />
in which<br />
C<br />
1.1υ<br />
1 −1.1υ<br />
f<br />
= (3.25)<br />
f<br />
3.4.1.9 Equati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chamis<br />
Chamis (1984) has used a simple force balance, or strength <strong>of</strong> materials, approach<br />
to derive expressi<strong>on</strong> for both mechanical and <strong>the</strong>rmal properties <strong>of</strong> unidirecti<strong>on</strong>al<br />
composites with transversely isotropic <strong>fiber</strong>s. The derived expressi<strong>on</strong> for <strong>the</strong><br />
l<strong>on</strong>gitudinal <strong>the</strong>rmal expansi<strong>on</strong> coefficient is again identical to Schapery’s formula.<br />
The expressi<strong>on</strong> for <strong>the</strong> transverse <strong>the</strong>rmal expansi<strong>on</strong> coefficient is<br />
α<br />
⎛ E<br />
f1<br />
⎞<br />
( 1 − υf<br />
) ⎜1<br />
+ υf<br />
ν<br />
m m<br />
= α υ<br />
⎟ (3.26)<br />
⎝<br />
⎠<br />
2 f2 f + ⎜<br />
α<br />
E1<br />
3.4.1.10 Equati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Sideridis<br />
Sideridis (1994) has calculated <strong>the</strong> expansi<strong>on</strong> <strong>coefficients</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> composite using<br />
a model which introduces <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cept <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> boundary interphase. This c<strong>on</strong>cept<br />
determines <strong>the</strong> influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interphase which depends <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> adhesi<strong>on</strong><br />
between <strong>fiber</strong> and matrix. It has been assumed that <strong>the</strong> composite has well defined<br />
material properties for <strong>the</strong> <strong>fiber</strong> and matrix, whereas <strong>the</strong> interphase material has<br />
inhomogeneous properties (<strong>the</strong>rmal expansi<strong>on</strong> coefficient, <strong>the</strong> elastic modulus and<br />
Poiss<strong>on</strong>’s ratio) varying from <strong>the</strong> <strong>fiber</strong> surface to <strong>the</strong> matrix. He also made <strong>the</strong><br />
following assumpti<strong>on</strong>s: