A numerical study on the thermal expansion coefficients of fiber
A numerical study on the thermal expansion coefficients of fiber A numerical study on the thermal expansion coefficients of fiber
43 Square packing Figure 3.5 Idealized fiber packing arrangements. Hexagonal packing 3.4.1.7 Equation of Rosen and Hashin Rosen and Hashin (1970) derived expressions for the effective thermal expansion coefficients of multiphase composites and the summary of their approach for unidirectional fiber reinforced composites with transversely isotropic constituents is given as α α 1 2 = αˆ 1 = αˆ 2 + + + + + ( S11 − Ŝ11 ) ( α f1 − α m1) P11 + ( α f2 − α m2 ) 2P12 ( S − Ŝ ) ( α − α ) 2P + ( α − α ) 2( 12 12 [ ] [ P + P )] f1 m1 ( S12 − Ŝ12 ) ( α f1 − α m1) P11 + ( α f2 − α m2 ) ( S22 − Ŝ22 ) ( α f1 − α m1) P12 + ( α f2 − α m2 )( ( S − Ŝ ) ( α − α ) P + ( α − α )( 23 23 12 [ 2P12 ] [ P22 + P23 )] [ P + P )] f1 m1 12 f2 f2 m2 m2 23 22 33 23 (3.18) (3.19) where S S 11 12 1 = , S E = S 1 13 22 = S 1 33 1 = E −ν12 −ν = , S23 = E E 2 23 2 (3.20) and P ab (a,b=1,2,3) are
44 P P 11 33 2 A 22 − A = Det A A = P = 22 A12A 23 − A12A , P13 = P12 = Det A 2 2 A 22 − A12 A12 − A11A , P23 = Det A Det A 2 23 11 22 23 (3.21) where A ab is defined as (S fab - S mab ) and Det A is given by 2 2 ( A − A ) + 2A ( A A − A ) Det A = A (3.22) 11 22 23 12 12 23 12A 22 In above equations subscripts f and m refer to fiber and matrix and terms with and without a hat refer to volume average and effective composite properties respectively. S ab can be written for the effective property, the volume average property and the constituent properties. Composite volume average properties are obtained with the expression pˆ = p υ + p υ (3.23) f f m m and composite effective mechanical properties are given by Hashin (1979). It is very difficult to find the coefficients of thermal expansion of a composite using equations of Rosen and Hashin because, to determine composite effective mechanical properties the bulk modulus of the constituents and the composite should be determined. 3.4.1.8 Equation of Schneider Another consideration was made by Schneider (1971), who assumed a hexagonal arrangement of cylindrical fiber-matrix elements consisting of a fiber surrounded by a cylindrical matrix jacket. The equation for the longitudinal thermal expansion coefficient is identical to Schapery’s formula. For the transverse direction he derived the following equation
- Page 1 and 2: DOKUZ EYLÜL UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SC
- Page 3 and 4: M.Sc THESIS EXAMINATION RESULT FORM
- Page 5 and 6: A NUMERICAL STUDY ON THE THERMAL EX
- Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS Page THESIS EXAMINATION RE
- Page 9 and 10: 4.2.1 Geometry Creation............
- Page 11 and 12: 2 coefficients of thermal expansion
- Page 13 and 14: 4 coefficients coincide to give res
- Page 15 and 16: 6 concentration from pure metal to
- Page 17 and 18: 8 high strength-to-weight and stiff
- Page 19 and 20: 10 polymers. Thermosetting polymers
- Page 21 and 22: 12 Metals are strong and tough. The
- Page 23 and 24: 14 Table 2.1 Properties of reinforc
- Page 25 and 26: 16 2.2.2.2 Carbon Fibers Carbon is
- Page 27 and 28: 18 use is in aircraft industry foll
- Page 29 and 30: 20 strength and a reasonable Young
- Page 31 and 32: 22 1. Processing the conventional f
- Page 33 and 34: 24 (orthorhombic) of polyethylene h
- Page 35 and 36: 26 Whiskers are monocrystalline sho
- Page 37 and 38: 28 3.2 Factors Affecting the Coeffi
- Page 39 and 40: 30 3.2.4 Thermal Cycling The primar
- Page 41 and 42: 32 3.3.1 Mechanical Dilatometry Thi
- Page 43 and 44: 34 absolute accuracy of about ± 0.
- Page 45 and 46: 36 3.3.3 Strain Gauges This relativ
- Page 47 and 48: 38 • The composite is macroscopic
- Page 49 and 50: 40 3.4.1.3 Equation of Van Fo Fy In
- Page 51: 42 and the thermal expansion coeffi
- Page 55 and 56: 46 • A perfect bonding exists at
- Page 57 and 58: CHAPTER FOUR FINITE ELEMENT METHOD
- Page 59 and 60: 50 No matter how the geometry is cr
- Page 61 and 62: 52 displacements and/or rotations a
- Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER FIVE MICROMECHANICAL ANALYS
- Page 65 and 66: 56 5.2 Mesh Creation 10-node tetrah
- Page 67 and 68: 58 carbon fibers were assumed to ha
- Page 69 and 70: 60 Figure 5.6 The displacement fiel
- Page 71 and 72: 62 small differences between these
- Page 73 and 74: 64 Table 6.1 Comparison of the expe
- Page 75 and 76: 66 Longitudinal CTE (1/°C) 2.25E-0
- Page 77 and 78: 68 Longitudinal CTE (1/°C) 2.00E-0
- Page 79 and 80: 70 Longitudinal CTE (1/°C) 4.00E-0
- Page 81 and 82: 72 Longitudinal CTE (1/°C) 1.00E-0
- Page 83 and 84: 74 Ishikava, T., Koyama, K., & Koba
43<br />
Square packing<br />
Figure 3.5 Idealized <strong>fiber</strong> packing arrangements.<br />
Hexag<strong>on</strong>al packing<br />
3.4.1.7 Equati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Rosen and Hashin<br />
Rosen and Hashin (1970) derived expressi<strong>on</strong>s for <strong>the</strong> effective <strong>the</strong>rmal expansi<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>coefficients</strong> <strong>of</strong> multiphase composites and <strong>the</strong> summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir approach for<br />
unidirecti<strong>on</strong>al <strong>fiber</strong> reinforced composites with transversely isotropic c<strong>on</strong>stituents is<br />
given as<br />
α<br />
α<br />
1<br />
2<br />
= αˆ<br />
1<br />
= αˆ<br />
2<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
+<br />
( S11<br />
− Ŝ11<br />
) ( α<br />
f1<br />
− α<br />
m1) P11<br />
+ ( α<br />
f2<br />
− α<br />
m2<br />
) 2P12<br />
( S − Ŝ ) ( α − α ) 2P + ( α − α ) 2(<br />
12<br />
12<br />
[ ]<br />
[ P + P )]<br />
f1<br />
m1<br />
( S12<br />
− Ŝ12<br />
) ( α<br />
f1<br />
− α<br />
m1) P11<br />
+ ( α<br />
f2<br />
− α<br />
m2<br />
)<br />
( S22<br />
− Ŝ22<br />
) ( α<br />
f1<br />
− α<br />
m1) P12<br />
+ ( α<br />
f2<br />
− α<br />
m2<br />
)(<br />
( S − Ŝ ) ( α − α ) P + ( α − α )(<br />
23<br />
23<br />
12<br />
[ 2P12<br />
]<br />
[ P22<br />
+ P23<br />
)]<br />
[ P + P )]<br />
f1<br />
m1<br />
12<br />
f2<br />
f2<br />
m2<br />
m2<br />
23<br />
22<br />
33<br />
23<br />
(3.18)<br />
(3.19)<br />
where<br />
S<br />
S<br />
11<br />
12<br />
1<br />
= , S<br />
E<br />
= S<br />
1<br />
13<br />
22<br />
= S<br />
1<br />
33<br />
1<br />
=<br />
E<br />
−ν12<br />
−ν<br />
= , S23<br />
=<br />
E E<br />
2<br />
23<br />
2<br />
(3.20)<br />
and P ab (a,b=1,2,3) are